生境破碎化对生物多样性的影响研究综述

生境破碎化与生物多样性的关系是理论生态学的研究热点。本文在综述国内外相关研究内容的基础上,阐述了生境破碎化的概念内涵与度量,介绍了生境破碎化研究的主要理论基础、研究内容与研究进展;总结了目前生境破碎化研究存在度量破碎景观格局的方法尚未统一、研究方法有待精确以及生境破碎化与生物多样性的阈值效应尚未发现等问题。今后,半干旱地区生境破碎化对生物多样性影响的研究需要加强,空间分析理论和方法将会在生境破碎化对生物多样性影响的研究中得到更多应用。     

生境破碎化对生物多样性的影响

生境破碎化对生物多样性和生态系统功能的影响是当前国内外生态学家研究的热点问题之一。生境破碎化导致原生境的总面积减小,产生隔离的异质种群,从而影响个体行为特性、种群间基因交换、物种间相互作用及生态过程。生境破碎化的过程引起栖息地内部食物、繁殖场所、局部小气候、边缘效应等生物和非生物条件的变化,从而影响植物种群的大小和灭绝速率、扩散和迁入、遗传和变异以及存活力等,影响动物种群的异质种群动态、适宜生境比例、灭绝阈值、种间关系等。随着景观生态学与农业科学的融合,探索利用景观布局控制害虫发生将是人类利用生境破碎化为人类服务的一条新途径。     

扩散对破碎化景观上宿主-寄生种群动态的影响

景观破碎化和扩散是空间种群模型的重要因素,对生物入侵存在着深远的影响。本章将基于偶对近似模型,探讨由局部和全局宿主-寄生相互作用共同决定的扩散模式对破坏性景观上疾病入侵与传播的影响。其中,生境破坏由生境丧失量与生境破碎化程度来描述。模拟结果显示,宿主和病毒的全局扩散对疾病的入侵与种群密度产生不对称效应：病毒的全局扩散对系统产生的影响较宿主的全局扩散更为显著。不同扩散模式下,生境丧失越高或破碎化程度越低,均将越有害于寄生病毒的入侵;同时,生境的破坏程度也显著地影响了入侵阈值对扩散模式的响应机制。本文研究结果暗示,景观破碎化的空间分布格局以及病毒扩散的限制均可作为物种保护与管理中有效的疾病控制策略。该研究结果在一定意义上丰富和发展了寄生感染理论,为物种保护提供了生态学理论依据。     

京杭运河邵伯高邮段栖息地破碎化对狗獾种群数量分布的影响

栖息地破碎是生物多样性下降的主要原因之一。栖息地破碎引起的面积效应、隔离效应和边缘效应能影响动物种群的绝灭阈值、分布、多度、种间关系以及生态系统过程, 最终影响动物种群的数量分布。2006年10-11月和2007年10-11月, 利用全球定位系统(GPS)、地理信息系统(GIS)和样方法定量分析京杭运河邵伯至高邮段狗獾栖息地破碎化程度, 确定不同斑块的面积、斑块距离、斑块隔离度以及栖息地质量对斑块中狗獾数量分布的影响。结果表明, 各个斑块内狗獾的洞口数、粪堆数与该斑块的面积显著的正相关(r=0.961, P=0.039; r=0.999, P=0.023), 但与斑块距离、斑块隔离度无显著的相关性(P>0.05)。栖息地的质量也会影响狗獾的数量分布, 多元线性逐步回归分析表明, 人类干扰和与栖息地的郁闭性显著的影响狗獾的数量分布。以上结果说明, 京杭运河邵伯高邮段栖息地的破碎化程度对狗獾的数量分布还没有造成显著的直接影响, 但会间接降低栖息地的质量, 进而影响狗獾的生存。     

苜蓿草地生境丧失与破碎化对昆虫物种丧失与群落重建的影响

生境破碎化包括生境丧失与破碎化两个相对独立的过程,为探讨这两个过程各自对生物多样性的影响,本文利用苜蓿草地实验模型系统(EMS)构建了36个小区研究不同生境丧失与破碎化对昆虫群落及不同类群的影响,包括18个破碎化小区与18个连续小区,破碎化小区全部采用1 m×1 m(H=1)破碎,连续小区苜蓿连片(H=0),生境丧失采...     

生境破碎化过程对流域生境质量的影响

近几十年来,随着工业化、城市化的加速推进,人类活动对自然生境的干扰越来越频繁,导致生境破碎化与生境质量下降。在流域尺度上科学模拟生境破碎化过程及其对生境质量的影响,对于提升生物多样性和生态系统功能具有重要意义。以鄱阳湖流域为研究区域,基于InVEST模型分析区域生境质量的演变特征;从生境面积、生境边缘和生境隔离三个特征维度模拟生境破碎化过程;采用广义加性模型和地理探测器探究不同生境破碎化过程对生境质量变化的影响与交互作用。研究结果表明:(1)鄱阳湖流域生境质量呈下降趋势,从2000年的0.7862下降到2010年的0.7807,再下降到2020年的0.7715,但总体生境质量较好。生境质量较优的区域主要分布在流域南部、东北部以及西部地区,生境质量较差的区域主要分布在各个子流域的交界处。(2)2000-2010年,鄱阳湖流域生境面积占比下降、生境边缘增加和生境隔离增加三个生境破碎化过程分别占总研究区网格数的34.70%、30.15%和4.50%;2010-2020年分别占总研究区网格数的34.80%、30.69%和4.40%;2000-2020年分别占总研究区网格数的40.82%、37.50%和5.46%。生境面积减少的网格主要集中在鄱阳湖流域的中北部地区;生境边缘增加的网格分布和生境面积减少的网格分布相似;相比之下,生境隔离增加的网格较少,主要分布在各城市的中心城区范围。(3)生境破碎化过程对生境质量具有显著影响,两者呈非线性负相关关系;三个生境破碎化过程两两之间交互作用对生境质量的影响呈现双因子增强趋势。研究结果可为鄱阳湖流域生态格局优化与生境质量提升提供科学参考。     

棉花生境面积及其破碎化对烟粉虱种群的影响

【目的】阐明棉花生境面积变化及其破碎化对烟粉虱Bemisiatabaci种群的作用规律,为合理利用作物布局进行害虫生态调控提供理论支撑。【方法】采用国际流行的微景观试验模型系统(Experimental model landscape system,EMLS)进行试验设计,田间条件下连续两年研究了棉花生境面积变化(20%、40%、60%、80%和100%;其他为玉米生境面积)及2种极端破碎化(完全连通C clumped:H=1.0;完全破碎F fragmented:H=0.0)下烟粉虱种群数量变化,采用广义线性模型(GLM)分析各因素对烟粉虱种群数量的影响。【结果】棉花生境面积及其破碎化单独作用时均对烟粉虱种群数量无显著影响,而取样时间则有显著影响。烟粉虱种群数量也没有受到取样时间与棉花生境面积、取样时间与破碎化以及三者交互作用的显著影响。但是,棉花生境面积与破碎化的互作效应则存在年度变化,2014年无显著作用,2015年显著影响烟粉虱种群。当棉花生境面积较小(20%)或较大(80%)时,破碎化程度高,烟粉虱种群数量少;棉花生境面积中等(40%和60%)时,破碎化程度低,烟粉虱种群数量少。【结论】烟粉虱种群对棉花生境面积变化有较强的适应性,而生境破碎化只能在一定程度上产生影响。     

生境破碎化对黑白仰鼻猴种群数量的影响

从1999年4月至2002年6月间,对黑白仰鼻猴种群的分布和生境状况进行了调查。与十年前的调查结果相比,本次调查新发现了4个猴群,但有5个以前存在的猴群已经消失,现存种群数量为13个猴群,总体数量约为1200─1700只。从西藏的芒康到云龙的龙马山,随着海拔的降低,猴群可利用的植被类型也随之多样化。但由于砍伐、放牧、开矿等因素的影响,猴群的适宜生境破碎化程度较高,连接猴群的生境走廊状况通常较差,多数猴群孤立分布,并且存在小种群问题,生境走廊的维护和恢复已成为该物种保护成功与否的关键。种群的总体数量下降了32%,其中4个猴群数量下降,4个猴群持平,1个猴群有所增长,5个猴群消失,这不容乐观的状况给我们的保护工作敲响了警钟。     

生境破碎化对丹顶鹤巢位选择的影响

1985、1995年和1998年4－5月,采用查阅保护区历史资料及实地调查方法,对辽宁双台河口国家级自然保护区内丹顶鹤（Grus japonensis)的主要营巢地－东郭苇场和赵圈河苇场的生境破碎化及丹顶鹤在2片苇场中的营巢状况和繁殖种群数量变动情况作了系统的考察和研究,发现丹顶鹤的营巢生境破碎严重,已由成片的芦苇湿地变成91个斑块,其中最小营巢斑块面积为0．37km^2,最小巢间距为304m,比过去资料记载的最小巢区面积缩小了0．72km^2,但繁殖种群数量变动不大,多年来一直维持在30对左右,丹顶鹤为了适应变化了的环境,已采取了缩小巢区面积的生态适应对策。     

生境破碎化对食果动物及种子传播的影响

食果动物与依赖其传播种子的植物间在进化过程中形成互惠关系,生境破碎化往往干扰种子传播过程,继而破坏这种关系.生境破碎化通常降低食果动物的多样性,但亦有相反的情况出现.食果动物对生境破碎化的适应能力不同,泛性森林动物和广食性动物具有较强的适应性.生境破碎化对依赖动物传播的植物影响有差异,多数植物受到负面影响,但也有一些植物不受影响,甚至受益.动物在破碎生境中对种子传播的有效性是种子搬运量、传播距离、种子萌发及种群建立等环节的综合效果.破碎化生境中种子的搬运量与动物的觅食行为和食物选择有关;种子传播距离受食物资源可获得性的改变和生境斑块异质性的影响;种子萌发和更新种群建立成功与否决定于是否存在有效的种子传播者.生境破碎化如何影响种子传播以及动植物相互关系,尤其是异质斑块的空间分布如何影响食果动物的传播有效性、破碎化生境下动植物互惠共生关系如何建立,生境破碎化导致的植物入侵对本地植物种子传播的影响是未来需要深入研究的问题.     

The geometry of habitat fragmentation: Effects of species distribution patterns on extinction risk due to habitat conversion

Land‐use changes, which cause loss, degradation, and fragmentation of natural habitats, are important anthropogenic drivers of biodiversity change. However, there is an ongoing debate about how fragmentation per se affects biodiversity in a given amount of habitat. Here, we illustrate why it is important to distinguish two different aspects of fragmentation to resolve this debate: (a) geometric fragmentation effects, which exclusively arise from the spatial distributions of species and habitat fragments, and (b) demographic fragmentation effects due to reduced fragment sizes, and/or changes in fragment isolation, edge effects, or species interactions. While most empirical studies are primarily interested in quantifying demographic fragmentation effects, geometric effects are typically invoked as post hoc explanations of biodiversity responses to fragmentation per se. Here, we present an approach to quantify geometric fragmentation effects on species survival and extinction probabilities. We illustrate this approach using spatial simulations where we systematically varied the initial abundances and distribution patterns (i.e., random, aggregated, or regular) of species as well as habitat amount and fragmentation per se. As expected, we found no geometric fragmentation effects when species were randomly distributed. However, when species were aggregated, we found positive effects of fragmentation per se on survival probability for a large range of scenarios. For regular species distributions, we found weakly negative geometric effects. These findings are independent of the ecological mechanisms which generate nonrandom species distributions. Our study helps to reconcile seemingly contradictory results of previous fragmentation studies. Since intraspecific aggregation is a ubiquitous pattern in nature, our findings imply widespread positive geometric fragmentation effects. This expectation is supported by many studies that find positive effects of fragmentation per se on species occurrences and diversity after controlling for habitat amount. We outline how to disentangle geometric and demographic fragmentation effects, which is critical for predicting the response of biodiversity to landscape change.     

Characterising extinction debt following habitat fragmentation using neutral theory

Habitat loss leads to species extinctions, both immediately and over the long term as ‘extinction debt’ is repaid. The same quantity of habitat can be lost in different spatial patterns with varying habitat fragmentation. How this translates to species loss remains an open problem requiring an understanding of the interplay between community dynamics and habitat structure across temporal and spatial scales. Here we develop formulas that characterise extinction debt in a spatial neutral model after habitat loss and fragmentation. Central to our formulas are two new metrics, which depend on properties of the taxa and landscape: ‘effective area’, measuring the remaining number of individuals and ‘effective connectivity’, measuring individuals’ ability to disperse through fragmented habitat. This formalises the conventional wisdom that habitat area and habitat connectivity are the two critical requirements for long‐term preservation of biodiversity. Our approach suggests that mechanistic fragmentation metrics help resolve debates about fragmentation and species loss.     

Experimental simulations about the effects of overexploitation and habitat fragmentation on populations facing environmental warming

Populations of many species are dramatically declining worldwide, but the causal mechanism remains debated among different human-related threats. Coping with this uncertainty is critical to several issues about the conservation and future of biodiversity, but remains challenging due to difficulties associated with the experimental manipulation and/or isolation of the effects of such threats under field conditions. Using controlled microcosm populations, we quantified the individual and combined effects of environmental warming, overexploitation and habitat fragmentation on population persistence. Individually, each of these threats produced similar and significant population declines, which were accelerated to different degrees depending upon particular interactions. The interaction between habitat fragmentation and harvesting generated an additive decline in population size. However, both of these threats reduced population resistance causing synergistic declines in populations also facing environmental warming. Declines in population size were up to 50 times faster when all threats acted together. These results indicate that species may be facing risks of extinction higher than those anticipated from single threat analyses and suggest that all threats should be mitigated simultaneously, if current biodiversity declines are to be reversed.     

生境破碎化对苦豆子种子害虫种群数量及危害率的影响

苦豆子是一种典型的防风固沙先锋植物, 其生长分布呈典型的斑块化格局。于2017年6月至9月在宁夏灵武市宁东镇刘家寨地区选取了LJZ2017A(01—08斑块)和LJZ2017B(01—06斑块)两个样地共14个苦豆子植物斑块, 调查了各斑块内苦豆子种子害虫(豆荚螟)的种群数量及其危害率。结果表明: 在LJZ2017A样地斑块面积平均为1457.79 m2, 种子害虫数量平均为0.69只每荚, 密度为0.65只•m-2; 在LJZ2017B样地斑块面积平均为949.87 m2, 种子害虫数量平均1.46只每荚, 密度为1.30只•m-2。种子害虫对豆粒的危害率在LJZ2017B样地为49.91%, 明显高于LJZ2017A样地的24.50%。种子害虫密度与斑块面积的逐步回归分析显示随着斑块面积的增大而呈显著下降趋势(F =16.58, P = 0.0015, R=0.7617), 对豆粒的危害率随着生境破碎化程度增加呈增加趋势(F =7.45, P =0.0183, R=0.6189)。     

栖息地片断化对动物种群间基因流的影响及其测定方法

栖息地片断化指在人为活动和自然干扰下,大面积连续分布的自然栖息地被其它非适宜栖息地分隔成许多面积较小的斑块(岛屿)的过程。栖息地片断化是导致生物多样性丧失和物种绝灭的主要因素,也是威胁自然界生物生存的重要因素之一。栖息地片断化将影响基因在种群间和种群内的运动(基因流),开展栖息地片断化研究对保持物种间遗传多样性具有重要意义。本文介绍了片断化程度和基因流的测定方法。回顾了国内外的研究现状,并探讨了片断化对种群间基因流的影响和对濒危物种保护的意义。     

Habitat fragmentation and species richness

In a recent article in this journal, Fahrig (2013, Journal of Biogeography, 40 , 1649–1663) concludes that variation in species richness among sampling sites can be explained by the amount of habitat in the ‘local landscape’ around the sites, while the spatial configuration of habitat within the landscape makes little difference. This conclusion may be valid for small spatial scales and when the total amount of habitat is large, but modelling and empirical studies demonstrate adverse demographic consequences of fragmentation when there is little habitat across large areas. Fragmentation effects are best tested with studies on individual species rather than on communities, as the latter typically consist of species with dissimilar habitat requirements. The total amount of habitat and the degree of fragmentation tend to be correlated, which poses another challenge for empirical studies. I conclude that fragmentation poses an extra threat to biodiversity, in addition to the threat posed by loss of habitat area.     

Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes

Habitat fragmentation is a potentially critical factor in determining population persistence. In this paper, we explore the effect of fragmentation when the fragmentation follows a fractal pattern. The habitat is divided into patches, each of which is suitable or unsuitable. Suitable patches are either occupied or unoccupied, and change state depending on rates of colonization and local extinction. We compare the behaviour of two models: a spatially implicit patch-occupancy (PO) model and a spatially explicit cellular automaton (CA) model. The PO model has two fixed points: extinction, and a stable equilibrium with a fixed proportion of occupied patches. Global extinction results when habitat destruction reduces the proportion of suitable patches below a critical threshold. The PO model successfully recreates the extinction patterns found in other models. We translated the PO model into a stochastic cellular automaton. Fractal arrangements of suitable and unsuitable patches were used to simulate habitat fragmentation. We found that: (i) a population on a fractal landscape can tolerate more habitat destruction than predicted by the patch-occupancy model, and (ii) the extinction threshold decreases as the fractal dimension of the landscape decreases. These effects cannot be seen in spatially implicit models. Landscape struc-ture plays a vital role in mediating the effects of habitat fragmentation on persistence.