Delineating the requirements for spontaneous DNA damage resistance pathways in genome maintenance and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cellular metabolic processes constantly generate reactive species that damage DNA. To counteract this relentless assault, cells have developed multiple pathways to resist damage. The base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways remove damage whereas the recombination (REC) and postreplication repair (PRR) pathways bypass the damage, allowing deferred removal. Genetic studies in yeast indicate that these pathways can process a common spontaneous lesion(s), with mutational inactivation of any pathway increasing the burden on the remaining pathways. In this study, we examine the consequences of simultaneously compromising three or more of these pathways. Although the presence of a functional BER pathway alone is able to support haploid growth, retention of the NER, REC, or PRR pathway alone is not, indicating that BER is the key damage resistance pathway in yeast and may be responsible for the removal of the majority of either spontaneous DNA damage or specifically those lesions that are potentially lethal. In the diploid state, functional BER, NER, or REC alone can support growth, while PRR alone is insufficient for growth. In diploids, the presence of PRR alone may confer a lethal mutation load or, alternatively, PRR alone may be insufficient to deal with potentially lethal, replication-blocking lesions.     

DNA repair defects channel interstrand DNA cross-links into alternate recombinational and error-prone repair pathways

The repair of psoralen interstrand cross-links in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the DNA repair groups nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR), and post-replication repair (PRR). In repair-proficient yeast cells cross-links induce double-strand breaks, in an NER-dependent process; the double-strand breaks are then repaired by HR. An alternate error-prone repair pathway generates mutations at cross-link sites. We have characterized the repair of plasmid molecules carrying a single psoralen cross-link, psoralen monoadduct, or double-strand break in yeast cells with deficiencies in NER, HR, or PRR genes, measuring the repair efficiencies and the levels of gene conversions, crossing over, and mutations. Strains with deficiencies in the NER genes RAD1, RAD3, RAD4, and RAD10 had low levels of cross-link-induced recombination but higher mutation frequencies than repair-proficient cells. Deletion of the HR genes RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, RAD55, and RAD57 also decreased induced recombination and increased mutation frequencies above those of NER-deficient yeast. Strains lacking the PRR genes RAD5, RAD6, and RAD18 did not have any cross-link-induced mutations but showed increased levels of recombination; rad5 and rad6 cells also had altered patterns of cross-link-induced gene conversion in comparison with repair-proficient yeast. Our observations suggest that psoralen cross-links can be repaired by three pathways: an error-free recombinational pathway requiring NER and HR and two PRR-dependent error-prone pathways, one NER-dependent and one NER-independent.     

Role of the error-free damage bypass postreplication repair pathway in the maintenance of genomic stability

The postreplication repair pathway (PRR) is composed of error-free and error-prone sub-pathways that allow bypass of DNA damage-induced replication-blocking lesions. The error-free sub-pathway is also used for bypass of spontaneous DNA damage and functions in cooperation with recombination pathways. In diploid yeast cells, error-free PRR is needed to prevent genomic instability, which is manifest as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events of increased chromosome loss and recombination. Homologous recombination acts synergistically with the error-free damage avoidance branch of PRR to prevent chromosome loss. The DNA damage checkpoint gene MEC1 acts synergistically with the PRR pathway in maintaining genomic stability. Integration of the PRR pathway with other cellular pathways for preventing genomic instability is discussed. In diploid strains, the most dramatic increase is in the abnormality of chromosome loss when a repair or damage detection pathway is defective.     

A homologue of the Rad18 postreplication repair gene is required for DNA damage responses throughout the fission yeast cell cycle

Cells activate DNA repair pathways and cell cycle checkpoints when they suffer damage to their genome. They also activate tolerance pathways that facilitate survival. In Escherichia coli, a mechanism known as postreplication repair (PRR) is used to bypass lesions that would otherwise present a physical block to DNA polymerase. PRR has also been proposed to occur in eukaryotic cells, although the partitioning of DNA synthesis to a discrete S-phase would suggest that it is only operative within a defined period of the cell cycle. Eukaryotic PRR has been most extensively studied in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Two important genes for components of this repair pathway are RAD6, which encodes an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and RAD18, which encodes a RING-finger protein and forms a heterodimer with Rad6p. Rad18p can also bind to DNA. We report here the identification of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of RAD18, which we have denoted rhp18. rhp18 mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, but show this hypersensitivity throughout the cell cycle. rhp18 mutants are characterised by a longer than usual DNA damage checkpoint arrest that is required for their residual viability following irradiation. Genetic analyses show that rhp18 controls a unique DNA damage repair/tolerance pathway that extends beyond the requirement to tolerate damage during S-phase, suggesting a broader definition of the function of this eukaryotic PRR protein.     

Requirement for the SRS2 DNA helicase gene in non-homologous end joining in yeast

Mitotic cells experience double-strand breaks (DSBs) from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Since unrepaired DSBs can result in genome rearrangements or cell death, cells mobilize multiple pathways to repair the DNA damage. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitotic cells preferentially use a homologous recombination repair pathway. However, when no significant homology to the DSB ends is available, cells utilize a repair process called non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which can join ends with no homology through resection to uncover microhomologies of a few nucleotides. Although components of the homologous recombination repair system are also involved in NHEJ, the rejoining does not involve all of the homologous recombination repair genes. The SRS2 DNA helicase has been shown to be required for DSB repair when the homologous single-stranded regions are short. Here it is shown that SRS2 is also required for NHEJ, regardless of the cell mating type. Efficient NHEJ of sticky ends requires the Ku70 and Ku80 proteins and the silencing genes SIR2, SIR3 and SIR4. However, NHEJ of blunt ends, while very inefficient, is not further reduced by mutations in YKU70, SIR2, SIR3, SIR4 or SRS2, suggesting that this rejoining process occurs by a different mechanism.     

RAD18 gene product of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls mutagenesis induced by hydrogen peroxide

Within eukaryotes, tolerance to DNA damage is determined primarily by the repair pathway controlled by the members of the RAD6 epistasis group. Genetic studies on a yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae model showed that the initial stage of postreplication repair (PRR), i.e., initiation of replication through DNA damage, is controlled by Rad6-Rad18 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex. Mutants of these genes are highly sensitive to various genotoxic agents and reduce the level of induced mutagenesis. In this case, the efficiency of mutagenesis suppression depends on the type of damage. In this study we showed that DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide at the same mutagen doses causes significantly more mutations and lethal events in the rad18 mutant cells compared to control wild-type cells.     

Brc1-mediated rescue of Smc5/6 deficiency: requirement for multiple nucleases and a novel Rad18 function

Smc5/6 is a structural maintenance of chromosomes complex, related to the cohesin and condensin complexes. Recent studies implicate Smc5/6 as being essential for homologous recombination. Each gene is essential, but hypomorphic alleles are defective in the repair of a diverse array of lesions. A particular allele of smc6 (smc6-74) is suppressed by overexpression of Brc1, a six-BRCT domain protein that is required for DNA repair during S-phase. This suppression requires the postreplication repair (PRR) protein Rhp18 and the structure-specific endonucleases Slx1/4 and Mus81/Eme1. However, we show here that the contribution of Rhp18 is via a novel pathway that is independent of PCNA ubiquitination and PRR. Moreover, we identify Exo1 as an additional nuclease required for Brc1-mediated suppression of smc6-74, independent of mismatch repair. Further, the Apn2 endonuclease is required for the viability of smc6 mutants without extrinsic DNA damage, although this is not due to a defect in base excision repair. Several nucleotide excision repair genes are similarly shown to ensure viability of smc6 mutants. The requirement for excision factors for the viability of smc6 mutants is consistent with an inability to respond to spontaneous lesions by Smc5/6-dependent recombination.     

The yeast Shu complex couples error-free post-replication repair to homologous recombination

DNA post-replication repair (PRR) functions to bypass replication-blocking lesions and prevent damage-induced cell death. PRR employs two different mechanisms to bypass damaged DNA. While translesion synthesis has been well characterized, little is known about the molecular events involved in error-free bypass, although it has been assumed that homologous recombination (HR) is required for such a mode of lesion bypass. We undertook a genome-wide synthetic genetic array screen for novel genes involved in error-free PRR and observed evidence of genetic interactions between error-free PRR and HR. Furthermore, this screen identified and assigned four genes, CSM2 , PSY3 , SHU1 and SHU2 , whose products form a stable Shu complex, to the error-free PRR pathway. Previous studies have indicated that the Shu complex is required for efficient HR and that inactivation of any of these genes is able to suppress the severe phenotypes of top3 and sgs1 . We confirmed and further extended some of the reported observations and demonstrated that error-free PRR mutations are also epistatic to sgs1 . Based on the above analyses, we propose a model in which error-free PRR utilizes the Shu complex to recruit HR to facilitate template switching, followed by double-Holliday junction resolution by Sgs1-Top3. This mechanism appears to be conserved throughout eukaryotes.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">RAD18</Emphasis> gene product of yeast <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis> controls mutagenesis induced by hydrogen peroxide

Within eukaryotes, tolerance to DNA damage is determined primarily by the repair pathway controlled by the members of the RAD6 epistasis group. Genetic studies on a yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae model showed that the initial stage of postreplication repair (PRR), i.e., initiation of replication through DNA damage, is controlled by Rad6–Rad18 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex. Mutants of these genes are highly sensitive to various genotoxic agents and reduce the level of induced mutagenesis. In this case, the efficiency of mutagenesis suppression depends on the type of damage. In this study we showed that DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide at the same mutagen doses causes significantly more mutations and lethal events in the rad18 mutant cells compared to control wild-type cells.     

DNA damage response and cancer therapeutics through the lens of the Fanconi Anemia DNA repair pathway

Fanconi Anemia (FA) is a rare, inherited genomic instability disorder, caused by mutations in genes involved in the repair of interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). The FA signaling network contains a unique nuclear protein complex that mediates the monoubiquitylation of the FANCD2 and FANCI heterodimer, and coordinates activities of the downstream DNA repair pathway including nucleotide excision repair, translesion synthesis, and homologous recombination. FA proteins act at different steps of ICL repair in sensing, recognition and processing of DNA lesions. The multi-protein network is tightly regulated by complex mechanisms, such as ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and degradation signals that are critical for the maintenance of genome integrity and suppressing tumorigenesis. Here, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how the FA proteins participate in ICL repair and regulation of the FA signaling network that assures the safeguard of the genome. We further discuss the potential application of designing small molecule inhibitors that inhibit the FA pathway and are synthetic lethal with DNA repair enzymes that can be used for cancer therapeutics.     

RAD29 and RAD31--new genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts, participating in control of DNA repair. II. Clarification of possible functions of these genes

Possible functions of previously described genes RAD29 and RAD31 involved in DNA repair were determined by analyzing the interaction between these genes and mutations in the genes of the three basic epistatic groups: RAD3 (nucleotide excision repair), RAD6 (error-prone mutagenic repair system), RAD52 (recombination repair pathway), and also the apn1 mutation that blocks the synthesis of major AP endonuclease (base excision repair). The results obtained in these studies and the estimation of the capability for excision repair of lesions induced by 8-metoxipsoralen and subsequent exposure to long-wavelength UV light in mutants for these genes led to the assumption that the RAD29 and RAD31 genes are involved in yeast DNA repair control.     

RAS Transformation Requires CUX1-Dependent Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage

The Cut homeobox 1 (CUX1) gene is a target of loss-of-heterozygosity in many cancers, yet elevated CUX1 expression is frequently observed and is associated with shorter disease-free survival. The dual role of CUX1 in cancer is illustrated by the fact that most cell lines with CUX1 LOH display amplification of the remaining allele, suggesting that decreased CUX1 expression facilitates tumor development while increased CUX1 expression is needed in tumorigenic cells. Indeed, CUX1 was found in a genome-wide RNAi screen to identify synthetic lethal interactions with oncogenic RAS. Here we show that CUX1 functions in base excision repair as an ancillary factor for the 8-oxoG-DNA glycosylase, OGG1. Single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) reveals that Cux1^+/− MEFs are haploinsufficient for the repair of oxidative DNA damage, whereas elevated CUX1 levels accelerate DNA repair. In vitro base excision repair assays with purified components demonstrate that CUX1 directly stimulates OGG1''s enzymatic activity. Elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in cells with sustained RAS pathway activation can cause cellular senescence. We show that elevated expression of either CUX1 or OGG1 prevents RAS-induced senescence in primary cells, and that CUX1 knockdown is synthetic lethal with oncogenic RAS in human cancer cells. Elevated CUX1 expression in a transgenic mouse model enables the emergence of mammary tumors with spontaneous activating Kras mutations. We confirmed cooperation between Kras^G12V and CUX1 in a lung tumor model. Cancer cells can overcome the antiproliferative effects of excessive DNA damage by inactivating a DNA damage response pathway such as ATM or p53 signaling. Our findings reveal an alternate mechanism to allow sustained proliferation in RAS-transformed cells through increased DNA base excision repair capability. The heightened dependency of RAS-transformed cells on base excision repair may provide a therapeutic window that could be exploited with drugs that specifically target this pathway.     

Molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair: progress in plants

Despite stable genomes of all living organisms, they are subject to damage by chemical and physical agents in the environment (e.g., UV and ionizing. radiations, chemical mutagens, fungal and bacterial toxins, etc.) and by free radicals or alkylating agents endogenously generated in metabolism. DNA is also damaged because of errors during its replication. The DNA lesions produced by these damaging agents could be altered base, missing base, mismatch base, deletion or insertion, linked pyrimidines, strand breaks, intra- and inter-strand cross-links. These DNA lesions could be genotoxic or cytotoxic to the cell. Plants are most affected by the UV-B radiation of sunlight, which penetrates and damages their genome by inducing oxidative damage (pyrimidine hydrates) and cross-links (both DNA protein and DNA-DNA) that are responsible for retarding the growth and development. The DNA lesions can be removed by repair, replaced by recombination, or retained, leading to genome instability or mutations or carcinogenesis or cell death. Mostly organisms respond to genome damage by activating a DNA damage response pathway that regulates cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. To prevent the harmful effect of DNA damage and maintain the genome integrity, all organisms have developed various strategies to either reverse, excise, or tolerate the persistence of DNA damage products by generating a network of DNA repair mechanisms. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported that include direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, photoreactivation, bypass, double-strand break repair pathway, and mismatch repair pathway. The direct reversal and photoreactivation require single protein, all the rest of the repair mechanisms utilize multiple proteins to remove or repair the lesions. The base excision repair pathway eliminates single damaged base, while nucleotide excision repair excises a patch of 25- to 32-nucleotide-long oligomer, including the damage. The double-strand break repair utilizes either homologous recombination or nonhomologous endjoining. In plant the latter pathway is more error prone than in other eukaryotes, which could be an important driving force in plant genome evolution. The Arabidopsis genome data indicated that the DNA repair is highly conserved between plants and mammals than within the animal kingdom, perhaps reflecting common factors such as DNA methylation. This review describes all the possible mechanisms of DNA damage and repair in general and an up to date progress in plants. In addition, various types of DNA damage products, free radical production, lipid peroxidation, role of ozone, dessication damage of plant seed, DNA integrity in pollen, and the role of DNA helicases in damage and repair and the repair genes in Arabidopsis genome are also covered in this review.     

DNA repair: exploiting the Fanconi anemia pathway as a potential therapeutic target

DNA repair is an active cellular process to respond to constant DNA damage caused by metabolic processes and environmental factors. Since the outcome of DNA damage is generally adverse and long term effects may contribute to oncogenesis, cells have developed a variety of DNA repair mechanisms, which operate depending on the type of DNA damage inflicted. At least 15 Fanconi anemia (FA) proteins interact in a common pathway involved in homologous recombination. Inherited homozygous mutations in any of these FA genes cause a rare disease, Fanconi anemia, characterized by congenital abnormalities, progressive bone-marrow failure and cancer susceptibility. Heterozygous germline FA mutations predispose to various types of cancer. In addition, somatic FA mutations have been identified in diverse cancer types. Evidence exists that cells deficient in the FA pathway become dependent on alternative pathways for survival. Additional inhibition of such alternative pathways is thus expected to result in cell death, creating a relationship of synthetic lethality. Identifying these relationships can reveal yet unknown mechanisms of DNA repair and new targets for therapy.     

Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase.

The catalytic DNA primase subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex is encoded by the essential PRI1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To identify factors that functionally interact with yeast DNA primase in living cells, we developed a genetic screen for mutants that are lethal at the permissive temperature in a cold-sensitive pril-2 genetic background. Twenty-four recessive mutations belonging to seven complementation groups were identified. Some mutants showed additional phenotypes, such as increased sensitivity to UV irradiation, methyl methanesulfonate, and hydroxyurea, that were suggestive of defects in DNA repair and/or checkpoint mechanisms. We have cloned and characterized the gene of one complementation group, PIP3, whose product is necessary both for delaying entry into S phase or mitosis when cells are UV irradiated in G1 or G2 phase and for lowering the rate of ongoing DNA synthesis in the presence of methyl methanesulfonate. PIP3 turned out to be the MEC3 gene, previously identified as a component of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. The finding that Mec3 is also required for the G1- and S-phase DNA damage checkpoints, together with the analysis of genetic interactions between a mec3 null allele and several conditional DNA replication mutations at the permissive temperature, suggests that Mec3 could be part of a mechanism coupling DNA replication with repair of DNA damage, and DNA primase might be involved in this process.     

Preferential post-replication repair of DNA lesions situated on the leading strand of plasmids in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli , RecF-dependent post-replication repair (PRR) permits cells to tolerate the potentially lethal effects of blocking lesions at the replication fork. We have developed an in vivo experimental system to study the PRR mechanisms that allow blocked replication forks to be rescued by homologous sequences. We show that approximately 80% of the PRR events observed in SOS-uninduced cells are generated by RecA-mediated excision repair, a novel nucleotide excision repair- and RecA/RecF-dependent mechanism, while 20% are generated by RecF-dependent homologous recombination. Moreover, we show that in a wild-type background, PRR is approximately an order of magnitude more efficient in processing DNA containing a blocked leading strand, as compared with a blocked lagging strand. This strand bias is abolished in cells that are deficient in nucleotide excision repair. These results are discussed in the context of recent models describing the mechanisms of replication past damaged templates.     

Differential effects of caffeine on DNA damage and replication cell cycle checkpoints in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Caffeine potentiates the lethal effects of ultraviolet and ionising radiation on wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells. In previous studies this was attributed to the inhibition by caffeine of a novel DNA repair pathway in S. pombe that was absent in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies with radiation-sensitive S. pombe mutants suggested that this caffeine-sensitive pathway could repair ultraviolet radiation damage in the absence of nucleotide excision repair. The alternative pathway was thought to be recombinational and to operate in the G₂ phase of the cell cycle. However, in this study we show that cells held in G₁ of the cell cycle can remove ultraviolet-induced lesions in the absence of nucleotide excision repair. We also show that recombination-defective mutants, and those now known to define the alternative repair pathway, still exhibit the caffeine effect. Our observations suggest that the basis of the caffeine effect is not due to direct inhibition of recombinational repair. The mutants originally thought to be involved in a caffeine-sensitive recombinational repair process are now known to be defective in arresting the cell cycle in S and/or G₂ following DNA damage or incomplete replication. The gene products may also have an additional role in a DNA repair or damage tolerance pathway. The effect of caffeine could, therefore, be due to interference with DNA damage checkpoints, or inhibition of the DNA damage repair/tolerance pathway. Using a combination of flow cytometric analysis, mitotic index analysis and fluorescence microscopy we show that caffeine interferes with intra-S phase and G₂ DNA damage checkpoints, overcoming cell cycle delays associated with damaged DNA. In contrast, caffeine has no effect on the DNA replication S phase checkpoint in reponse to inhibition of DNA synthesis by hydroxyurea.     

Effects of bleomycin on growth kinetics and survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model of repair pathways.

In order to analyze the roles of some repair genes in the processing of bleomycin-induced DNA damage and, especially, the interrelationships among the involved repair pathways, we investigated the potentially lethal effect of bleomycin on radiosensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in recombination, excision, and RAD6-dependent DNA repair. Using single, double, and triple rad mutants, we analyzed growth kinetics and survival curves as a function of bleomycin concentration. Our results indicate that genes belonging to the three epistasis groups interact in the repair of bleomycin-induced DNA damage to different degrees depending on the concentration of bleomycin. The most important mechanisms involved are recombination and postreplication repair. The initial action of a potentially inducible excision repair gene could provide intermediate substrates for the RAD6- and RAD52-dependent repair processes. Interaction between RAD6 and RAD52 genes was epistatic for low bleomycin concentrations. RAD3 and RAD52 genes act independently in processing DNA damage induced by high concentrations of bleomycin. The synergistic interaction observed at high concentrations in the triple mutant rad2-6 rad6-1 rad52-1 indicates partial independence of the involved repair pathways, with possible common substrates. On the basis of the present results, we propose a heuristic model of bleomycin-induced DNA damage repair.     

Mutations in recombinational repair and in checkpoint control genes suppress the lethal combination of srs2Delta with other DNA repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The SRS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a DNA helicase that is active in the postreplication repair pathway and homologous recombination. srs2 mutations are lethal in a rad54Delta background and cause poor growth or lethality in rdh54Delta, rad50Delta, mre11Delta, xrs2Delta, rad27Delta, sgs1Delta, and top3Delta backgrounds. Some of these genotypes are known to be defective in double-strand break repair. Many of these lethalities or poor growth can be suppressed by mutations in other genes in the DSB repair pathway, namely rad51, rad52, rad55, and rad57, suggesting that inhibition of recombination at a prior step prevents formation of a lethal intermediate. Lethality of the srs2Delta rad54Delta and srs2Delta rdh54Delta double mutants can also be rescued by mutations in the DNA damage checkpoint functions RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, and MEC3, indicating that the srs2 rad54 and srs2 rdh54 mutant combinations lead to an intermediate that is sensed by these checkpoint functions. When the checkpoints are intact the cells never reverse from the arrest, but loss of the checkpoints releases the arrest. However, cells do not achieve wild-type growth rates, suggesting that unrepaired damage is still present and may lead to chromosome loss.