The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends

The maintenance of genome stability depends on the DNA damage response (DDR), which is a functional network comprising signal transduction, cell cycle regulation and DNA repair. The metabolism of DNA double-strand breaks governed by the DDR is important for preventing genomic alterations and sporadic cancers, and hereditary defects in this response cause debilitating human pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. The MRE11 complex, composed of the meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11), RAD50 and Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1; also known as nibrin) proteins is central to the DDR, and recent insights into its structure and function have been gained from in vitro structural analysis and studies of animal models in which the DDR response is deficient.     

Haploinsufficiency of DNA Damage Response Genes and their Potential Influence in Human Genomic Disorders

Genomic disorders are a clinically diverse group of conditions caused by gain, loss or re-orientation of a genomic region containing dosage-sensitive genes. One class of genomic disorder is caused by hemizygous deletions resulting in haploinsufficiency of a single or, more usually, several genes. For example, the heterozygous contiguous gene deletion on chromosome 22q11.2 causing DiGeorge syndrome involves at least 20-30 genes. Determining how the copy number variation (CNV) affects human variation and contributes to the aetiology and progression of various genomic disorders represents important questions for the future. Here, I will discuss the functional significance of one form of CNV, haploinsufficiency (i.e. loss of a gene copy), of DNA damage response components and its association with certain genomic disorders. There is increasing evidence that haploinsufficiency for certain genes encoding key players in the cells response to DNA damage, particularly those of the Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)-pathway, has a functional impact. I will review this evidence and present examples of some well known clinically similar genomic disorders that have recently been shown to be defective in the ATR-dependent DNA damage response. Finally, I will discuss the potential implications of a haploinsufficiency-induced defective DNA damage response for the clinical management of certain human genomic disorders.Key Words: DNA damage response, ATR, haploinsufficiency, genomic disorders.     

A novel role for Greatwall kinase in recovery from DNA damage

Activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for genomic integrity and tumor suppression. The occurrence of DNA damage quickly evokes the DDR through ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction, which promotes DNA repair and activates the checkpoint to halt cell cycle progression. The shut off process of the DDR upon satisfaction of DNA repair, also known as “checkpoint recovery,” involves deactivation of DDR elements, but the mechanism is poorly understood. Greatwall kinase (Gwl) has been identified as a key element in the G₂/M transition and helps maintain M phase through inhibition of PP2A/B55δ, the principal phosphatase for Cdk-phosphorylated substrates. Here, we show that Gwl also promotes recovery from DNA damage and is itself directly inhibited by the DNA damage response (DDR). In Xenopus egg extracts, immunodepletion of Gwl increased the DDR to damaged DNA, whereas addition of wild-type, but not kinase-dead Gwl, inhibited the DDR. The removal of damaged DNA from egg extracts leads to recovery from checkpoint arrest and entry into mitosis, a process impaired by Gwl depletion and enhanced by Gwl overexpression. Moreover, activation of Cdk1 after the removal of damaged DNA is regulated by Gwl. Collectively, these results defines Gwl as a new regulator of the DDR, which plays an important role in recovery from DNA damage.Key words: Greatwall,; DNA damage; checkpoint recovery     

Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response

The view of DNA packaging into chromatin as a mere obstacle to DNA repair is evolving. In this review, we focus on histone variants and heterochromatin proteins as chromatin components involved in distinct levels of chromatin organization to integrate them as real players in the DNA damage response (DDR). Based on recent data, we highlight how some of these chromatin components play active roles in the DDR and contribute to the fine-tuning of damage signaling, DNA and chromatin repair. To take into account this integrated view, we revisit the existing access-repair-restore model and propose a new working model involving priming chromatin for repair and restoration as a concerted process. We discuss how this impacts on both genomic and epigenomic stability and plasticity.     

DNA lesions and DNA damage response: Even long lasting relationships need a "break"

The elucidation of the spatiotemporal map of the DNA damage response (DDR) has been critical to our understanding of how cells are protected against insults to genomic integrity. Recruitment and transient immobilization at DNA breaks is a typical characteristic of many DDR proteins. Here, I discuss evidence that stable association of DDR proteins with chromatin is sufficient to activate the DDR even in the absence of damage. These observations critically support the notion that nuclear repair compartments play a primary role in triggering and amplifying DDR.     

DNA damage response and repair in ovarian cancer: Potential targets for therapeutic strategies

Ovarian cancer is among the most lethal gynecologic malignancies with a poor survival prognosis. The current therapeutic strategies involve surgery and chemotherapy. Research is now focused on novel agents especially those targeting DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Understanding the DDR process in ovarian cancer necessitates having a detailed knowledge on a series of signaling mediators at the cellular and molecular levels. The complexity of the DDR process in ovarian cancer and how this process works in metastatic conditions is comprehensively reviewed. For evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents targeting DNA damage in ovarian cancer, we will discuss the components of this system including DDR sensors, DDR transducers, DDR mediators, and DDR effectors. The constituent pathways include DNA repair machinery, cell cycle checkpoints, and apoptotic pathways. We also will assess the potential of active mediators involved in the DDR process such as therapeutic and prognostic candidates that may facilitate future studies.     

The role of the DNA damage response pathways in brain development and microcephaly: insight from human disorders

A network of DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms functions co-ordinately to maintain genomic stability and ensure cellular survival in the face of exogenous and endogenous DNA damage. Defects in DDR pathways have been identified in a range of human disorders, collectively classified as DDR-defective syndromes. A common feature of these syndromes is a predisposition to cancer demonstrating the importance of the DDR in cancer avoidance. How the DDR mechanisms serve to maintain genomic stability has been the predominant focus of research into their function. However, many DRR-defective syndromes are also characterised by impaired development demonstrating broader roles for the DDR mechanisms. Microcephaly, representing reduced brain size, is a feature common to a diverse range of DDR-defective disorders. Microcephaly is most likely caused by loss (increased cell death) or failure of the developing neuronal stem cells or their progenitors to divide suggesting a fundamental role for the DDR in maintaining proliferative potential in the developing nervous system. Currently, it is unclear why the DDR proteins should be more important during neuronal development compared with the development of other tissues or why the embryonic brain is more sensitive than the adult brain. Here, we overview the DDR-defective disorders in the context of microcephaly and discuss a model underlying this striking phenotype.     

The dynamic interplay in chromatin remodeling factors polycomb and trithorax proteins in response to DNA damage

The dynamic interplay in polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (TrxG) proteins in response to DNA damage directly involves in the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) sites and potentially function in both homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways. The process includes chromatin remodeling that is a major mechanism used by cells to relax chromatin in DNA damage response (DDR) and repair. PcGs show resistance ability to the process while, some tumor suppressor genes involves in the DDR and repair by interacting with TrxGs. Understanding how the dynamic interplay in PcGs and TrxGs impacts on DDR will shed light on the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and develop a new target from anti-DDR related drugs.     

The multi-functionality of UHRF1: epigenome maintenance and preservation of genome integrity

During S phase, the cooperation between the macromolecular complexes regulating DNA synthesis, epigenetic information maintenance and DNA repair is advantageous for cells, as they can rapidly detect DNA damage and initiate the DNA damage response (DDR). UHRF1 is a fundamental epigenetic regulator; its ability to coordinate DNA methylation and histone code is unique across proteomes of different species. Recently, UHRF1’s role in DNA damage repair has been explored and recognized to be as important as its role in maintaining the epigenome. UHRF1 is a sensor for interstrand crosslinks and a determinant for the switch towards homologous recombination in the repair of double-strand breaks; its loss results in enhanced sensitivity to DNA damage. These functions are finely regulated by specific post-translational modifications and are mediated by the SRA domain, which binds to damaged DNA, and the RING domain. Here, we review recent studies on the role of UHRF1 in DDR focusing on how it recognizes DNA damage and cooperates with other proteins in its repair. We then discuss how UHRF1’s epigenetic abilities in reading and writing histone modifications, or its interactions with ncRNAs, could interlace with its role in DDR.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis: The mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double strand breaks with early signaling events

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic lesions with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signaling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signaling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G₁. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.Key words: mitosis, DNA damage response, DNA double-strand breaks, signaling cascade, chromatin     

Role of deubiquitinases in DNA damage response

DNA damage response (DDR) serves as an integrated cellular network to detect cellular stress and react by activating pathways responsible for halting cell cycle progression, stimulating DNA damage repair, and initiating apoptosis. Efficient DDR protects cells from genomic instability while defective DDR can allow DNA lesions to go unrepaired, causing permanent mutations that will affect future generations of cells and possibly cause disease conditions such as cancer. Therefore, DDR mechanisms must be tightly regulated in order to ensure organismal health and viability. One major way of DDR regulation is ubiquitination, which has been long known to control DDR protein localization, activity, and stability. The reversal of this process, deubiquitination, has more recently come to the forefront of DDR research as an important new angle in ubiquitin-mediated regulation of DDR. As such, deubiquitinases have emerged as key factors in DDR. Importantly, deubiquitinases are attractive small-molecule drug targets due to their well-defined catalytic residues that provide a promising avenue for developing new cancer therapeutics. This review focuses on the emerging roles of deubiquitinases in various DNA repair pathways.     

DNA damage accumulation and repair defects in acute myeloid leukemia: implications for pathogenesis,disease progression,and chemotherapy resistance

DNA damage repair mechanisms are vital to maintain genomic integrity. Mutations in genes involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) can increase the risk of developing cancer. In recent years, a variety of polymorphisms in DDR genes have been associated with increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or of disease relapse. Moreover, a growing body of literature has indicated that epigenetic silencing of DDR genes could contribute to the leukemogenic process. In addition, a variety of AML oncogenes have been shown to induce replication and oxidative stress leading to accumulation of DNA damage, which affects the balance between proliferation and differentiation. Conversely, upregulation of DDR genes can provide AML cells with escape mechanisms to the DDR anticancer barrier and induce chemotherapy resistance. The current review summarizes the DDR pathways in the context of AML and describes how aberrant DNA damage response can affect AML pathogenesis, disease progression, and resistance to standard chemotherapy, and how defects in DDR pathways may provide a new avenue for personalized therapeutic strategies in AML.     

Contribution of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint arrest to the maintenance of genomic stability

DNA damage response mechanisms encompass pathways of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint arrest and apoptosis. Together, these mechanisms function to maintain genomic stability in the face of exogenous and endogenous DNA damage. ATM is activated in response to double strand breaks and initiates cell cycle checkpoint arrest. Recent studies in human fibroblasts have shown that ATM also regulates a mechanism of end-processing that is required for a component of double strand break repair. Human fibroblasts rarely undergo apoptosis after ionising radiation and, therefore, apoptosis is not considered in our review. The dual function of ATM raises the question as to how the two processes, DNA repair and checkpoint arrest, interplay to maintain genomic stability. In this review, we consider the impact of ATM's repair and checkpoint functions to the maintenance of genomic stability following irradiation in G2. We discuss evidence that ATM's repair function plays little role in the maintenance of genomic stability following exposure to ionising radiation. ATM's checkpoint function has a bigger impact on genomic stability but strikingly the two damage response pathways co-operate in a more than additive manner. In contrast, ATM's repair function is important for survival post irradiation.     

The consequences of structural genomic alterations in humans: genomic disorders, genomic instability and cancer

Over the last decade or so, sophisticated technological advances in array-based genomics have firmly established the contribution of structural alterations in the human genome to a variety of complex developmental disorders, and also to diseases such as cancer. In fact, multiple 'novel' disorders have been identified as a direct consequence of these advances. Our understanding of the molecular events leading to the generation of these structural alterations is also expanding. Many of the models proposed to explain these complex rearrangements involve DNA breakage and the coordinated action of DNA replication, repair and recombination machinery. Here, and within the context of Genomic Disorders, we will briefly overview the principal models currently invoked to explain these chromosomal rearrangements, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Fork Stalling Template Switching (FoSTeS), Microhomology Mediated Break-Induced Repair (MMBIR) and Breakage-fusion-bridge cycle (BFB). We will also discuss an unanticipated consequence of certain copy number variations (CNVs) whereby the CNVs potentially compromise fundamental processes controlling genomic stability including DNA replication and the DNA damage response. We will illustrate these using specific examples including Genomic Disorders (DiGeorge/Veleocardiofacial syndrome, HSA21 segmental aneuploidy and rec (3) syndrome) and cell-based model systems. Finally, we will review some of the recent exciting developments surrounding specific CNVs and their contribution to cancer development as well as the latest model for cancer genome rearrangement; 'chromothripsis'.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signalling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signalling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G1. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.     

The DNA damage response in the chromatin context: A coordinated process

In the cell nucleus, DNA damage signaling and repair machineries operate on a chromatin substrate, the integrity of which is critical for cell function and viability. Here, we review recent advances in deciphering the tight coordination between chromatin maintenance and the DNA damage response (DDR). We discuss how the DDR impacts chromatin marks, organization and mobility, and, in turn, how chromatin alterations actively contribute to the DDR, providing additional levels of regulation. We present our current knowledge of the molecular bases of these critical processes in physiological and pathological conditions, and also highlight open questions that emerge in this expanding field.     

Dual-functional significance of ATM-mediated phosphorylation of spindle assembly checkpoint component Bub3 in mitosis and the DNA damage response

Both the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mitotic checkpoint are critical for the maintenance of genomic stability. Among proteins involved in these processes, the ataxia–telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase is required for both activation of the DDR and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). In mitosis without DNA damage, the enzymatic activity of ATM is enhanced; however, substrates of ATM in mitosis are unknown. Using stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture mass spectrometry analysis, we identified a number of proteins that can potentially be phosphorylated by ATM during mitosis. This list is highly enriched in proteins involved in cell cycle regulation and the DDR. Among them, we further validated that ATM phosphorylated budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 3 (Bub3), a major component of the SAC, on serine 135 (Ser135) both in vitro and in vivo. During mitosis, this phosphorylation promoted activation of another SAC component, benzimidazoles 1. Mutation of Bub3 Ser135 to alanine led to a defect in SAC activation. Furthermore, we found that ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Bub3 on Ser135 was also induced by ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. However, this event resulted in independent signaling involving interaction with the Ku70–Ku80–DNA-PKcs sensor/kinase complex, leading to efficient nonhomologous end-joining repair. Taken together, we highlight the functional significance of the crosstalk between the kinetochore-oriented signal and double-strand break repair pathways via ATM phosphorylation of Bub3 on Ser135.     

Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response

A timely and accurate cellular response to DNA damage requires tight regulation of the action of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins at lesions. A multitude of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of chromatin and chromatin‐associated proteins coordinates the recruitment of critical proteins that dictate the appropriate DNA repair pathway and enable the actual repair of lesions. Phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, neddylation, poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation, acetylation, and methylation are among the DNA damage‐induced PTMs that have taken center stage as important DDR regulators. Redundant and multivalent interactions of DDR proteins with PTMs may not only be a means to facilitate efficient relocalization, but also a feature that allows high temporal and spatial resolution of protein recruitment to, and extraction from, DNA damage sites. In this review, we will focus on the complex interplay between such PTMs, and discuss the importance of their interconnectivity in coding DNA lesions and maintaining the integrity of the genome.