Understanding the basis of a class of paradoxical mutations in AraC through simulations

Most mutations at position 15 in the N‐terminal arm of the regulatory protein AraC leave the protein incapable of responding to arabinose and inducing the proteins required for arabinose catabolism. Mutations at other positions of the arm do not have this behavior. Simple energetic analysis of the interactions between the arm and bound arabinose do not explain the uninducibility of AraC with mutations at position 15. Extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, carried out largely on the Open Science Grid, were done of the wild‐type protein with and without bound arabinose and of all possible mutations at position 15, many of which were constructed and measured for this work. Good correlation was found for deviation of arm position during the simulations and inducibility as measured in vivo of the same mutant proteins. Analysis of the MD trajectories revealed that preservation of the shape of the arm is critical to inducibility. To maintain the correct shape of the arm, the strengths of three interactions observed to be strong in simulations of the wild‐type AraC protein need to be preserved. These interactions are between arabinose and residue 15, arabinose and residues 8–9, and residue 13 and residue 15. The latter interaction is notable because residues L9, Y13, F15, W95, and Y97 form a hydrophobic cluster which needs to be preserved for retention of the correct shape. Proteins 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Determining residue-base interactions between AraC protein and araI DNA

Depurination/depyrimidation binding-interference experiments (missing contact probing) identified specific candidate residue-base interactions lost by mutants of Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon regulatory protein, AraC, to one of its binding sites, araI. These candidates were then checked more rigorously by comparing the affinities of wild-type and alanine-substituted AraC protein to variants of araI with alterations in the candidate contacted positions. Residues 208 and 212 apparently contact DNA and support, but do not prove the existence of a helix-turn-helix structure in this region of AraC protein whereas contacts by mutants with alterations at positions 256, 257 and 261 which are within another potential helix-turn-helix region do not support the existence of such a structure there. The missing contacts displayed by three AraC mutants are found within two major groove regions of the DNA and are spaced 21 base-pairs apart in a pattern indicating a direct repeat orientation for the subunits of AraC.     

AraC-DNA looping: orientation and distance-dependent loop breaking by the cyclic AMP receptor protein.

The arabinose operon promoter, pBAD, is negatively regulated in the absence of arabinose by AraC protein, which forms a DNA loop by binding to two sites separated by 210 base-pairs, araO2 and araI1. pBAD is also positively regulated by AraC-arabinose and the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP. We provide evidence that CRP breaks the araO2-araI1 repression loop in vitro. The ability of CRP to break the loop in vitro and to activate pBAD in vivo is dependent upon the orientation and distance of the CRP binding site relative to araI1. An insertion of one DNA helical turn, 11 base-pairs, between CRP and araI only partially inhibits CRP loop breaking and activation of pBAD, while an insertion of less than one DNA helical turn, 4 base-pairs, not only abolishes CRP activation and loop breaking, but actually causes CRP to stabilize the loop and increases the araO2-mediated repression of pBAD. Both integral and non-integral insertions of greater than one helical turn completely abolish CRP activation and loop breaking in vitro.     

Solution structure of the DNA binding domain of AraC protein

We report the solution structure of the DNA binding domain of the Escherichia coli regulatory protein AraC determined in the absence of DNA. The 20 lowest energy structures, determined on the basis of 1507 unambiguous nuclear Overhauser restraints and 180 angle restraints, are well resolved with a pair wise backbone root mean square deviation of 0.7 Å. The protein, free of DNA, is well folded in solution and contains seven helices arranged in two semi‐independent sub domains, each containing one helix‐turn‐helix DNA binding motif, joined by a 19 residue central helix. This solution structure is discussed in the context of extensive biochemical and physiological data on AraC and with respect to the DNA‐bound structures of the MarA and Rob homologs. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A new and unexpected domain-domain interaction in the AraC protein

An interaction between the dimerization domains and DNA binding domains of the dimeric AraC protein has previously been shown to facilitate repression of the Escherichia coli araBAD operon by AraC in the absence of arabinose. A new interaction between the domains of AraC in the presence of arabinose is reported here, the regulatory consequences of which are unknown. Evidence for the interaction is the following: the dissociation rate of arabinose-bound AraC from half-site DNA is considerably faster than that of free DNA binding domain, and the affinity of the dimerization domains for arabinose is increased when half-site DNA is bound. In addition, an increase in the fluorescence intensity of tryptophan residues located in the arabinose-bound dimerization domain is observed upon binding of half-site DNA to the DNA binding domains. Direct physical evidence of the new domain-domain interaction is demonstrated by chemical crosslinking and NMR experiments.     

Equilibrium DNA-binding of AraC protein. Compensation for displaced ions

Experiments on the AraC regulatory protein of Escherichia coli suggest a mechanism that DNA-binding proteins can use to reduce potentially drastic alterations in their affinity for DNA resulting from changes in salt concentration. Measurement of the net number of ions apparently displaced as AraC protein binds DNA and of fluorescence changes in the protein lead to the following picture. About 14 ions are displaced from the DNA as the protein binds the araI site. As the protein binds the DNA, however, it undergoes a conformational change and binds about ten ions. Consequently, the net order of the reaction is reduced from 15th to about fourth order in salt concentration.     

In vivo association of protein fragments giving active AraC

Frameshift mutations in a restricted portion of the arabinose operon regulatory gene araC from Escherichia coli give rise to active AraC protein, likely from the in vivo synthesis of two Incomplete fragments that are active together. Synthesis of corresponding fragments, each separately inactive, from two plasmids within cells also resulted in complementation. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Analysis of amino acid substitutions in AraC variants that respond to triacetic acid lactone

The Escherichia coli regulatory protein AraC regulates expression of ara genes in response to l ‐arabinose. In efforts to develop genetically encoded molecular reporters, we previously engineered an AraC variant that responds to the compound triacetic acid lactone (TAL). This variant (named “AraC‐TAL1”) was isolated by screening a library of AraC variants, in which five amino acid positions in the ligand‐binding pocket were simultaneously randomized. Screening was carried out through multiple rounds of alternating positive and negative fluorescence‐activated cell sorting. Here we show that changing the screening protocol results in the identification of different TAL‐responsive variants (nine new variants). Individual substituted residues within these variants were found to primarily act cooperatively toward the gene expression response. Finally, X‐ray diffraction was used to solve the crystal structure of the apo AraC‐TAL1 ligand‐binding domain. The resolved crystal structure confirms that this variant takes on a structure nearly identical to the apo wild‐type AraC ligand‐binding domain (root‐mean‐square deviation 0.93 Å), suggesting that AraC‐TAL1 behaves similar to wild‐type with regard to ligand recognition and gene regulation. Our results provide amino acid sequence–function data sets for training and validating AraC modeling studies, and contribute to our understanding of how to design new biosensors based on AraC.     

Repression of the araBAD promoter from araO1.

DNA looping between the araO2 and araI sites holds the uninduced or basal level of expression of the araBAD genes from the pBAD promoter at a low level. Despite the presence of another and closer site potentially capable of mediating looping to araI, no repression from this site, called araO1, is observed. Here we show, using both in vivo and in vitro experiments, that the araO1 site is not normally occupied by AraC protein under repressing conditions, but that if AraC protein is overproduced and the araO2 site is absent, araO1 is then occupied and repression of pBAD can be observed.     

Sequence-specific transitions of the torsion angle gamma change the polar-hydrophobic profile of the DNA grooves: implication for indirect protein–DNA recognition

Variations of the shape and polarity of the DNA grooves caused by changes of the DNA conformation play an important role in the DNA readout. Despite the fact that non-canonical trans and gauche- conformations of the DNA backbone angle γ (O5′–C5′–C4′–C3′) are frequently found in the DNA crystal structures, their possible role in the DNA recognition has not been studied systematically. In order to fill in this gap, we analyze the available high-resolution crystal structures of the naked and complexed DNA. The analysis shows that the non-canonical γ angle conformations are present both in the naked and bound DNA, more often in the bound vs. naked DNA, and in the nucleotides with the A-like vs. the B-like sugar pucker. The alternative angle γ torsions are more frequently observed in the purines with the A-like sugar pucker and in the pyrimidines with the B-like sugar conformation. The minor groove of the nucleotides with non-canonical γ angle conformation is more polar, while the major groove is more hydrophobic than in the nucleotides with the classical γ torsions due to variations in exposure of the polar and hydrophobic groups of the DNA backbone. The propensity of the nucleotides with different γ angle conformations to participate in the protein–nucleic acid contacts in the minor and major grooves is connected with their sugar pucker and sequence-specific. Our findings imply that the angle γ transitions contribute to the process of the protein–DNA recognition due to modification of the polar/hydrophobic profile of the DNA grooves.     

Altered DNA contacts made by a mutant AraC protein.

Mutant AraC proteins were selected for their ability to induce but not to repress, or their ability to repress but not to induce the araBAD operon. One such unusual mutant is able to bind to the araI site with an affinity only two to three-fold weaker than the wild type AraC protein, but the mutant protein was shown, both in crude extracts and when purified, to contact only two of the three major groove regions of the DNA that are contacted by the wild type protein.