Skin dose assessment in interventional radiology

For long, complex procedures in interventional radiology (IR) or in interventional cardiology (IC), the skin dose can be high and induce skin injuries. To improve patient follow-up, it is essential to measure and locate the peak skin dose (PSD). PSD can be measured using dosimeters or computed by skin dose calculation software solutions. Recently, a study was published (e.g. Malchair F et al Phys Med 2020; 80:75–83) listing all the software solutions developed and available and compared them in operation as regards accuracy of the calculated PSD and generated dose map. Similarities and differences exist between these different software packages, which are discussed here. The accuracy of PSD calculated on phantom studies with these software solutions are within ± 25% and poorer in patient studies. Improvements are therefore required for manufacturers of both software and IR systems. The medical physicists also have an important role to play in setting up and monitoring the dose in these software solutions to ensure the accuracy of the calculated PSD.     

Review of skin dose calculation software in interventional cardiology

PurposeIn interventional cardiology, patients may be exposed to high doses to the skin resulting in skin burns following single or multiple procedures. Reviewing and analysing available software (online or offline) may help medical physicists assessing the maximum skin dose to the patient together with the dose distribution during (or after) these procedures.Method and resultsCapabilities and accuracy of available software were analysed through an extensive bibliography search and contacts with both vendor and authors. Their markedly differed among developers.In total, 22 software were identified and reviewed according to their algorithms and their capabilities. Special attention was dedicated to their main features and limitations of interest for the intended clinical use.While the accuracy of the 12 software products validated with measurements on phantoms was acceptable (within ± 25%), the agreement was poor for the two products validated on patients (within ± 43% and ± 76%, respectively). In addition, no software has been validated on angiographic units from all manufacturers, though several software developers claimed vendor-independent transportability. Only one software allows for multiple procedures dose calculation.ConclusionLarge differences among vendors made it clear that work remains to be done before an accurate and reliable skin dose mapping is available for all patients.     

Accuracy of skin dose mapping in interventional cardiology: Comparison of 10 software products following a common protocol

PurposeOnline and offline software products can estimate the maximum skin dose (MSD) delivered to the patient during interventional cardiology procedures. The capabilities and accuracy of several skin dose mapping (SDM) software products were assessed on X-ray systems from the main manufacturers following a common protocol.MethodsSkin dose was measured on four X-ray systems following a protocol composed of nine fundamental irradiation set-ups and three set-ups simulating short, clinical procedures. Dosimeters/multimeters with semiconductor-based detectors, radiochromic films and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used. Results were compared with up to eight of 10 SDM products, depending on their compatibility.ResultsThe MSD estimates generally agreed with the measurements within ± 40% for fundamental irradiation set-ups and simulated procedures. Only three SDM products provided estimates within ± 40% for all tested configurations on at least one compatible X-ray system. No SDM product provided estimates within ± 40% for all combinations of configurations and compatible systems. The accuracy of the MSD estimate for lateral irradiations was variable and could be poor (up to 66% underestimation). Most SDM products produced maps which qualitatively represented the dimensions, the shape and the relative position of the MSD region. Some products, however, missed the MSD region when situated at the intersection of multiple fields, which is of radiation protection concern.ConclusionsIt is very challenging to establish a common protocol for quality control (QC) and acceptance testing because not all information necessary for accurate MSD calculation is available or standardised in the radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs).     

Radiation dose in repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations

ObjectiveTo calculate the cumulative effective and skin doses in patients that underwent repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations (RFA).Materials and methodsFrom all patients that had undergone RFA during a five years period those which had three or more RFAs were selected. Using the CT images DICOM data, the dose length product (DLP), effective dose (E), skin dose profiles as well as the peak skin dose (PSD) were calculated, using appropriate methods and software developed for this purpose. For each patient, cumulative DLP and E were also calculated from the sum of the respective figures of each individual procedure. To calculate PSD, the skin dose profiles of each procedure were overlaid on the same Z-axis scale using anatomical landmarks for reference and the skin doses to each point were summed up.ResultsFive patients were studied; four had undergone 3 RFAs and one 10 RFAs. Cumulative DLP, E and PSD ranges were 5.6–22.3 Gy cm, 0.08–0.36 Sv and 0.8–3.4 Gy, respectively. Median E and PSD values per RFA were 35 mSv and 0.4 Gy, respectively. For comparison purposes it must be noted that in this CT department a routine abdomen-pelvis scan results to an E of about 10 mSv.ConclusionsPatients that undergo repeated RFAs are exposed to considerably high radiation exposure levels. When these patients are in the final stage of malignant diseases, stochastic effects may not be of major concern. However, optimization of the exposure factors and monitoring of these patients to avoid skin injuries are required.     

Characterisation of grids of point detectors in maximum skin dose measurement in fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures

PurposePoint detectors are frequently used to measure patient's maximum skin dose (MSD) in fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures (IP). However, their performance and ability to detect the actual MSD are rarely evaluated. The present study investigates the sampling uncertainty associated with the use of grids of point detectors to measure MSD in IP.MethodChemoembolisation of the liver (CE), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and neuroembolisation (NE) procedures were studied. Spatial dose distributions were measured with XR-RV3 Gafchromic^® films for 176 procedures. These distributions were used to simulate measurements performed using grids of detectors such as thermoluminescence detectors, with detector spacing from 1.4 up to 10 cm.ResultsThe sampling uncertainty was the highest in PCI and NE procedures. With 40 detectors covering the film area (36 cm × 44 cm), the maximum dose would be on average 86% and 63% of the MSD measured with Gafchromic^® films in CE and PCI procedures, respectively. In NE procedures, with 27 detectors covering the film area (14 cm × 35 cm), the maximum dose measured would be on average 82% of the MSD obtained with the Gafchromic^® films.ConclusionThermoluminescence detectors show good energy and dose response in clinical beam qualities. However the poor spatial resolution of such point-like dosimeters may far outweigh their good dosimetric properties. The uncertainty from the sampling procedure should be estimated when point detectors are used in IP because it may lead to strong underestimation of the MSD.     

Dosimetric verification of dose optimisation algorithm during endovascular brachytherapy of the peripheral vessels

AimDosimetric verification of the dose optimisation model used in endovascular brachytherapy, evaluation of the optimised dose distributions using elaborated indices.BackgroundThe equipment used for standard radiotherapy is used in vascular brachytherapy for prevention of restenosis after angioplasty.Material and MethodA paraffin-wax phantom, thermoluminescent detectors and MD-55 Gafchromic® films were used for dose measurements. The edge dose index (EDI), central dose index (CDI) and treatment length index (TLI) were introduced to compare dose distributions calculated and measured.ResultsObtained values (p>0.05) show no statistically significant differences between calculated doses and measured doses. EDI values showed improvement in dose homogeneity on the edges of the application after optimisation. After optimisation CDI values from 0.9% to 1.6% for calculated and from ?1.8% to 3.1% for measured showed improvement in dose homogeneity in the central part of the application. Observed values of TLI from 3% to 21% for calculated doses and from 7% to 24% for doses measured by Gafchromic® films showed increase of RIL for optimised treatment plans.Conclusions1/ The designed phantom allowed repeatable dosimetric verification of dose distributions in endovascular brachytherapy. 2/ Measurements with thermoluminescent detectors and Gafchromic films proved the accuracy of the calculation algorithm in endovascular brachytherapy conditions. 3/ Elaborated indices were found to be a useful tool in describing dose homogeneity. They allowed the process of optimisation to be controlled and thus an increase in dose homogeneity by 30% at the edges and by 7% in the middle of the treated volume to be achieved.     

Dosimetric characterization of INTRABEAM® miniature accelerator flat and surface applicators for dermatologic applications

PurposeThis study aims at characterizing the dosimetric behavior of an INTRABEAM^® miniature accelerator equipped with flat and surface applicators, converting the spherical dose distribution into a flat one.MethodsDosimetric characterization was carried out in two steps. Firstly characterization was made in standard conditions for dermatologic applications, which is with the applicator directly on contact with the skin. Secondly, characterization was made in more clinical conditions, such as obliquities and heterogeneities.ResultsBehaviors of flat and surface applicators are different. Dose distribution for surface applicators is uniform at surface, whereas for flat applicator the maximum homogeneity is shown at a particular depth in water. Some results are different from previously published studies due to differences in the X-ray source design. The study showed that in the absence of a perfect contact between the applicator and the skin of the patient, there is a dose distribution spread on the edge of the irradiation field where the contact is not made. Dose loss due to lack of backscatter radiations is significant. By contrast, influence of a denser material behind the measurement point has no significant influence on the dose at this point. Thickness of tissue treated with flat and surface applicators is only a few millimeters, depending on the applicator's size, making these applicators ideal for superficial lesions, compared to high energy electrons and iridium brachytherapy.ConclusionsThe INTRABEAM^® miniature accelerator equipped with surface applicators is a reliable way of treating superficial cutaneous malignancies.     

Energy and dose dependence of GafChromic EBT3-V3 film across a wide energy range

AimTo determine the energy and dose dependence of GafChromic EBT3-V3 film over an energy range 0.2 mm Al HVL to 6 MV.BackgroundThe decay scheme of a brachytherapy source may be complex and the spectrum of energy can be wide. LiF TLDs are the golden standard recommended for dosimetric measures in brachytherapy, for their energy independence, but TLDs could be not available in some centres. An alternative way to perform dose measurements is to use GafChromic films, but they show energy dependence.Methods and materialsFilms have been irradiated at increasing dose with three different beams: 6 MV beam, TPR20, 10 = (0.684 ± 0.01), HVL = (2.00 ± 0.01)mmAl and HVL = (0.20 ± 0.01)mmAl. Calibration curves were generated using the same dose range (0cGy to 850cGy) for the three energies. Using the 6 MV calibration curve as reference, the film response in terms of net optical density (OD) was evaluated.ResultsThe difference in the calibration curve obtained by irradiating the film with 6 MV and 2 mm Al HVL energy beams is less than 3 %, within the calibration uncertainty, in the dose range 500-850cGy. The OD of EBT3-V3 film is significantly lower at 0.2 mmAl HVL compared to 6 MV, showing differences up to 25 %.ConclusionWithin the range 6 MV-2 mm Al HVL and dose higher than 500cGy, GafChromic EBT3-V3 films are energy independent. In this dose range, films can be calibrated in a simple geometry, using a 6 MV Linac beam, and can be used for brachytherapy sources dose measures. The use of EBT3 films can be extended to reference dosimetry in Ir-192 clinical brachytherapy.     

Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography

PurposeTo quantify the influence of different skin models on mammographic breast dosimetry, based on dosimetric protocols and recent breast skin thickness findings.MethodsBy using an adapted PENELOPE (v. 2014) + PenEasy (v. 2015) Monte Carlo (MC) code, simulations were performed in order to obtain the mean glandular dose (MGD), the normalized MGD by incident air Kerma (DgN), and the glandular depth dose (GDD(z)). The geometry was based on a cranio-caudal mammographic examination. Monoenergetic and polyenergetic beams were implemented, for a breast thickness from 2 cm to 9 cm, with different compositions. Seven skin models were used: a 5 mm adipose layer; a skin layer ranging from 5 mm to 1.45 mm, a 1.45 mm skin thickness with a subcutaneous adipose layer of 2 mm and 3.55 mm.ResultsThe differences, for monoenergetic beams, are higher (up to 200%) for lower energies (8 keV), thicker and low glandular content breasts, decreasing to less than 5% at 40 keV. Without a skin layer, the differences reach a maximum of 1240%. The relative difference in DgN values for 1.45 mm skin and 5 mm adipose layers and polyenergetic beams varies from −14% to 12%.ConclusionsThe implemented MC code is suitable for mammography dosimetry calculations. The skin models have major impacts on MGD values, and the results complement previous literature findings. The current protocols should be updated to include a more realistic skin model, which provides a reliable breast dose estimation.     

Validation of a method for “dose of the day” calculation in head-neck tomotherapy by using planning ct-to-MVCT deformable image registration

PurposeThe aim of this study was to test the feasibility and dosimetric accuracy of a method that employs planning CT-to-MVCT deformable image registration (DIR) for calculation of the daily dose for head and neck (HN) patients treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT).MethodsFor each patient, the planning kVCT (CTplan) was deformably registered to the MVCT acquired at the 15th therapy session (MV15) with a B-Spline Free Form algorithm using Mattes mutual information (open-source software 3D Slicer), resulting in a deformed CT (CTdef). On the same day as MVCT15, a kVCT was acquired with the patient in the same treatment position (CT15). The original HT plans were recalculated both on CTdef and CT15, and the corresponding dose distributions were compared; local dose differences <2% of the prescribed dose (DD2%) and 2D/3D gamma-index values (2%-2 mm) were assessed respectively with Mapcheck SNC Patient software (Sun Nuclear) and with 3D-Slicer.ResultsOn average, 87.9% ± 1.2% of voxels were found for DD2% (on average 27 slices available for each patient) and 94.6% ± 0.8% of points passed the 2D gamma analysis test while the 3D gamma test was satisfied in 94.8% ± 0.8% of body’s voxels.ConclusionsThis study represents the first demonstration of the dosimetric accuracy of kVCT-to-MVCT DIR for dose of the day computations. The suggested method is sufficiently fast and reliable to be used for daily delivered dose evaluations in clinical strategies for adaptive Tomotherapy of HN cancer.     

Geometric and dosimetric accuracy and imaging dose of the real-time tumour tracking system of a gimbal mounted linac

PurposeTo suggest a comprehensive testing scheme to evaluate the geometric and dosimetric accuracy and the imaging dose of the VERO dynamic tumour tracking (DTT) for its clinical implementation.MethodsGeometric accuracy was evaluated for gantry 0° and 90° in terms of prediction (E_P), mechanical (E_M) and tracking (E_T) errors for sinusoidal patterns with 10 and 20 mm amplitudes, 2–6 s periods and phase shift up to 1 s and for 3 patient patterns. The automatic 4D model update was investigated simulating changes in the breathing pattern during treatment.Dosimetric accuracy was evaluated with gafchromic films irradiated in static and moving phantom with and without DTT. The entrance skin dose (ESD) was assessed using a solid state detector and gafchromic films.ResultsThe RMS of E_P, E_M, and E_T were up to 0.8, 0.5 and 0.9 mm for all non phased-shifted motion patterns while for the phased-shifted ones, E_P and E_T increased to 2.2 and 2.6 mm. Up to 4 updates are necessary to restore a good correlation model, according to type of change.For 100 kVp and 1 mA s X-ray beam, the ESD per portal due to 20 s fluoroscopy was 16.6 mGy, while treatment verification at a frequency of 1 Hz contributed with 4.2 mGy/min.ConclusionsThe proposed testing scheme highlighted that the VERO DTT system tracks a moving target with high accuracy. The automatic update of the 4D model is a powerful tool to guarantee the accuracy of tracking without increasing the imaging dose.     

Assessment of clinically relevant dose distributions in pelvic IOERT using Gafchromic EBT3 films

PurposeIn IOERT a single dose of radiation is delivered to the tumour site during surgery. Manual dose calculations are used and the irradiation target volume, electron energy and applicator are decided on site by the radiation oncologist. This work assesses the effect that irregular and curved surfaces, typical of pelvic IOERT, may have on the expected dose distribution.MethodsThe feasibility of using Gafchromic EBT3 films and a slab phantom to obtain 2D dose distributions was investigated. Different set-ups were tested by comparison with water tank measurements, applying the gamma function analysis with 2% and 2 mm criteria. The validated set-up was then used to obtain reference dose distributions, which were converted to colour-coded graphical representations. Phantoms with step-like and curved surfaces were created to simulate typical pelvic IOERT irradiation surfaces, and the dose distributions were obtained and compared with the reference distributions.ResultsGood agreement with water tank measurements was obtained for all applicators below 2 mm, using the chosen setup in reference conditions. In non-reference conditions, the presence of a step-like surface creates an adjacent hotspot, followed by a quick reduction of the dose in depth. With curved surfaces, the dose distribution is shifted forward, becoming curved and deeper, but when the applicator is larger than the hole, hotspots are also observed.ConclusionsThe shape of the irradiation surfaces alters the dose distribution. Visualization of these effects is important to assess target coverage and interpret in vivo measurements in pelvic IOERT.     

Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for Dynamic WaveArc

PurposeTo conduct patient-specific geometric and dosimetric quality assurance (QA) for the Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) using logfiles and ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA).MethodsTwenty DWA plans, 10 for pituitary adenoma and 10 for prostate cancer, were created using RayStation version 4.7 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden). Root mean square errors (RMSEs) between the actual and planned values in the logfiles were evaluated. Next, the dose distributions were reconstructed based on the logfiles. The differences between dose-volumetric parameters in the reconstructed plans and those in the original plans were calculated. Finally, dose distributions were assessed using ArcCHECK. In addition, the reconstructed dose distributions were compared with planned ones.ResultsThe means of RMSEs for the gantry, O-ring, MLC position, and MU for all plans were 0.2°, 0.1°, 0.1 mm, and 0.4 MU, respectively. Absolute means of the change in PTV D_99% were 0.4 ± 0.4% and 0.1 ± 0.1% points between the original and reconstructed plans for pituitary adenoma and prostate cancer, respectively. The mean of the gamma passing rate (3%/3 mm) between the measured and planned dose distributions was 97.7%. In addition, that between the reconstructed and planned dose distributions was 99.6%.ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that the geometric accuracy and gamma passing rates were within AAPM 119 and 142 criteria during DWA. Dose differences in the dose-volumetric parameters using the logfile-based dose reconstruction method were also clinically acceptable in DWA.     

An effective calibration technique for radiochromic films using a single-shot dose distribution in Gamma Knife®

PurposeA method of calibrating radiochromic films for Gamma Knife^® (GK) dosimetry was developed. The applicability and accuracy of the new method were examined.MethodsThe dose distribution for a sixteen millimeter single-shot from a GK was built using a reference film that was calibrated using the conventional multi-film calibration (MFC) method. Another film, the test film, from a different set of films was irradiated under the same conditions as the reference film. The calibration curve for the second set of films was obtained by assigning the dose distribution of the reference film to the optical density of the test film, point by point. To assess the accuracy of this single-film calibration (SFC) method, differences between gamma index pass rates (GIPRs) were calculated.ResultsThe SFC curves were successfully obtained with estimated errors of 1.46%. GIPRs obtained with the SFC method for films irradiated using a single-shot showed differences less than one percentage point when dose difference criterion (ΔD) was 2% and the distance to agreement criterion (Δd) was 1 mm. The GIPRs of the SFC method when the films were irradiated following a virtual target treatment plan were consistent with the GIPRs of the MFC method, with differences of less than 0.2 percentage points for ΔD = 1% and Δd = 1 mm.ConclusionThe accuracy of the SFC method is comparable to that of conventional multi-film calibration method for GK film dosimetry.     

Feasibility of setting up generic alert levels for maximum skin dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures

PurposeThe feasibility of setting-up generic, hospital-independent dose alert levels to initiate vigilance on possible skin injuries in interventional procedures was studied for three high-dose procedures (chemoembolization (TACE) of the liver, neuro-embolization (NE) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) in 9 European countries.MethodsGafchromic® films and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to determine the Maximum Skin Dose (MSD). Correlation of the online dose indicators (fluoroscopy time, kerma- or dose-area product (KAP or DAP) and cumulative air kerma at interventional reference point (K_a,r)) with MSD was evaluated and used to establish the alert levels corresponding to a MSD of 2 Gy and 5 Gy. The uncertainties of alert levels in terms of DAP and K_a,r, and uncertainty of MSD were calculated.ResultsAbout 20–30% of all MSD values exceeded 2 Gy while only 2–6% exceeded 5 Gy. The correlations suggest that both DAP and K_a,r can be used as a dose indicator for alert levels (Pearson correlation coefficient p mostly >0.8), while fluoroscopy time is not suitable (p mostly <0.6). Generic alert levels based on DAP (Gy cm²) were suggested for MSD of both 2 Gy and 5 Gy (for 5 Gy: TACE 750, PCI 250 and NE 400). The suggested levels are close to the lowest values published in several other studies. The uncertainty of the MSD was estimated to be around 10–15% and of hospital-specific skin dose alert levels about 20–30% (with coverage factor k = 1).ConclusionsThe generic alert levels are feasible for some cases but should be used with caution, only as the first approximation, while hospital-specific alert levels are preferred as the final approach.     

Establishing the impact of temporary tissue expanders on electron and photon beam dose distributions

PurposeThis study investigates the effects of temporary tissue expanders (TTEs) on the dose distributions in breast cancer radiotherapy treatments under a variety of conditions.MethodsUsing EBT2 radiochromic film, both electron and photon beam dose distribution measurements were made for different phantoms, and beam geometries. This was done to establish a more comprehensive understanding of the implant's perturbation effects under a wider variety of conditions.ResultsThe magnetic disk present in a tissue expander causes a dose reduction of approximately 20% in a photon tangent treatment and 56% in electron boost fields immediately downstream of the implant. The effects of the silicon elastomer are also much more apparent in an electron beam than a photon beam.ConclusionsEvidently, each component of the TTE attenuates the radiation beam to different degrees. This study has demonstrated that the accuracy of photon and electron treatments of post-mastectomy patients is influenced by the presence of a tissue expander for various beam orientations. The impact of TTEs on dose distributions establishes the importance of an accurately modelled high-density implant in the treatment planning system for post-mastectomy patients.     

On dose cube pixel spacing pre-processing for features extraction stability in dosiomic studies

PurposeDosiomics allows to parameterize regions of interest (ROIs) and to produce quantitative dose features encoding the spatial and statistical distribution of radiotherapy dose. The stability of dosiomics features extraction on dose cube pixel spacing variation has been investigated in this study.Material and MethodsBased on 17 clinical delivered dose distributions (P_n), dataset has been generated considering all the possible combinations of four dose grid resolutions and two calculation algorithms. Each dose voxel cube has been post-processed considering 4 different dose cube pixel spacing values: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 3x3x3 mm³ and the one equal to the planning CT. Dosiomics features extraction has been performed from four different ROIs. The stability of each extracted dosiomic feature has been analyzed in terms of coefficient of variation (CV) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe highest CV mean values were observed for PTV ROI and for the grey level size zone matrix features family. On the other hand, the lowest CV mean values have been found for RING ROI for the grey level co-occurrence matrix features family. P₃ showed the highest percentage of CV >1 (1.14%) followed by P₁₅ (0.41%), P₁ (0.29%) and P13 (0.19%). ICC analysis leads to identify features with an ICC >0.95 that could be considered stable to use in dosiomic studies when different dose cube pixel spacing are considered, especially the features in common among the seventeen plans.ConclusionConsidering the observed variability, dosiomic studies should always provide a report not only on grid resolution and algorithm dose calculation, but also on dose cube pixel spacing.     

Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique

AimTo examine the impact of beam rate on dose distribution in IMRT plans and then to evaluate agreement of calculated and measured dose distributions for various beam rate values.BackgroundAccelerators used in radiotherapy utilize some beam rate modes which can shorten irradiation time and thus reduce ability of patient movement during a treatment session. This aspect should be considered in high conformal dynamic techniques.Materials and methodsDose calculation was done for two different beam rates (100 MU/min and 600 MU/min) in an IMRT plan. For both, a comparison of Radiation Planning Index (RPI) and MU was conducted. Secondly, the comparison of optimal fluence maps and corresponding actual fluence maps was done. Next, actual fluence maps were measured and compared with the calculated ones. Gamma index was used for that assessment. Additionally, positions of each leaf of the MLC were controlled by home made software.ResultsDose distribution obtained for lower beam rates was slightly better than for higher beam rates in terms of target coverage and risk structure protection. Lower numbers of MUs were achieved in 100 MU/min plans than in 600 MU/min plans. Actual fluence maps converted from optimal ones demonstrated more similarity in 100 MU/min plans. Better conformity of the measured maps to the calculated ones was obtained when a lower beam rate was applied. However, these differences were small. No correlation was found between quality of fluence map conversion and leaf motion accuracy.ConclusionExecution of dynamic techniques is dependent on beam rate. However, these differences are minor. Analysis shows a slight superiority of a lower beam rate. It does not significantly affect treatment accuracy.     

Effect of patient positioning on carbon-ion therapy planned dose distribution to pancreatic tumors and organs at risk

PurposePancreatic tumor treatment dose distribution variations associated with supine and prone patient positioning were evaluated.MethodsA total of 33 patients with pancreatic tumors who underwent CT in the supine and prone positions were analyzed retrospectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), and organs at risk (OARs) (duodenum and stomach) were contoured. The prescribed dose of 55.2 Gy (RBE) was planned from four beam angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°). Patient collimator and compensating boli were designed for each field. Dose distributions were calculated for each field in the supine and prone positions. To improve dose distribution, patient positioning was selected from supine or prone for each beam field.ResultsCompared with conventional beam angle and patient positioning, D2cc of 1st-2nd portion of duodenum (D1-D2), 3rd-4th portion of duodenum (D3-D4), and stomach could be reduced to a maximum of 6.4 Gy (RBE), 3.5 Gy (RBE), and 4.5 Gy (RBE) by selection of patient positioning. V10 of D1-D2, D3-D4, and stomach could be reduced to a maximum of 7.2 cc, 11.3 cc, and 11.5 cc, respectively. D95 of GTV and PTV were improved to a maximum of 6.9% and 3.7% of the prescribed dose, respectively.ConclusionsOptimization of patient positioning for each beam angle in treatment planning has the potential to reduce OARs dose maintaining tumor dose in pancreatic treatment.     

Assessment of skin dose in breast cancer radiotherapy: on-phantom measurement and Monte Carlo simulation

AimThe main purpose of the present study is assessment of skin dose in breast cancer radiotherapy.BackgroundAccurate assessment of skin dose in radiotherapy can provide useful information for clinical considerations.Materials and methodsA RANDO phantom was irradiated using a 6 MV Siemens Primus linac with medial and tangential radiotherapy fields for simulating breast cancer treatment. Dosimetry was also performed on various positions across the fields using an EBT3 radiochromic film. Similar conditions of measurement on the RANDO phantom including field size, irradiation angle, number of fields, etc. were subsequently simulated via the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport code (MCNP). Ultimately, dose values for corresponding points from both methods were compared.ResultsConsidering dosimetry using radiochromic films on the RANDO phantom, there were points having underdose and overdose based on the prescribed dose and skin tolerance levels. In this respect, 81.25% and 18.75% of the points had underdose and overdose, respectively. In some cases, several differences were observed between the measurement and the MCNP simulation results associated with skin dose.ConclusionBased on the results of the points which had underdose, it was suggested that a bolus should be used for the given points. With regard to overdose points, it was advocated to consider skin tolerance dose in treatment planning. Differences between the measurement and the MCNP simulation results might be due to voxel size of tally cells in simulations, effect of beam’s angle of incidence, validation time of linac’s head, lack of electronic equilibrium in the build-up region, as well as MCNP tally type.