An empirical artifact correction for proton computed tomography

Purpose: To reduce image artifacts of proton computed tomography (pCT) from a preclinical scanner, for imaging of the relative stopping power (RSP) needed for particle therapy treatment planning using a simple empirical artifact correction method.Methods: We adapted and employed a correction method previously used for beam-hardening correction in x-ray CT which makes use of a single scan of a custom-built homogeneous phantom with known RSP. Exploiting the linearity of the filtered backprojection operation, a function was found which corrects water-equivalent path lengths (RSP line integrals) in experimental scans using a prototype pCT scanner. The correction function was applied to projection values of subsequent scans of a homogeneous water phantom, a sensitometric phantom with various inserts and an anthropomorphic head phantom. Data were acquired at two different incident proton energies to test the robustness of the method.Results: Inaccuracies in the detection process caused an offset and known ring artifacts in the water phantom which were considerably reduced using the proposed method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of mean RSP values of all inserts of the sensitometric phantom and the water phantom was reduced from 0.87% to 0.44% and from 0.86% to 0.48% for the two incident energies respectively. In the head phantom a clear reduction of artifacts was observed.Conclusions: Image artifacts of experimental pCT scans with a prototype scanner could substantially be reduced both in homogeneous, heterogeneous and anthropomorphic phantoms. RSP accuracy was also improved.     

Beam angle optimization using angular dependency of range variation assessed via water equivalent path length (WEPL) calculation for head and neck proton therapy

PurposeTo investigate angular sensitivity of proton range variation due to anatomic change in patients and patient setup error via water equivalent path length (WEPL) calculations.MethodsProton range was estimated by calculating WEPL to the distal edge of target volume using planning CT (pCT) and weekly scatter-corrected cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of 11 head and neck patients. Range variation was estimated as the difference between the distal WEPLs calculated on pCT and scatter-corrected CBCT (cCBCT). This WEPL analysis was performed every five degrees ipsilaterally to the target. Statistics of the distal WEPL difference were calculated over the distal area to compare between different beam angles. Physician-defined contours were used for the WEPL calculation on both pCT and cCBCT, not considering local deformation of target volume. It was also tested if a couch kick (10°) can mitigate the range variation due to anatomic change and patient setup error.ResultsFor most of the patients considered, median, 75% quantile, and 95% quantile of the distal WEPL difference were largest for posterior oblique angles, indicating a higher chance of overdosing normal tissues at distal edge with these angles. Using a couch kick resulted in decrease in the WEPL difference for some posterior oblique angles.ConclusionsIt was demonstrated that the WEPL change has angular dependency for the cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Selecting beam configuration robust to anatomic change in patient and patient setup error may improve the treatment outcome of head and neck proton therapy.