Low Rho activity in hepatocytes prevents apical from basolateral cargo separation during trans‐Golgi network to surface transport

Hepatocytes, the main epithelial cells of the liver, organize their polarized membrane domains differently from ductal epithelia. They also differ in their biosynthetic delivery of single‐membrane‐spanning and glycophosphatidylinositol‐anchored proteins to the apical domain. While ductal epithelia target apical proteins to varying degrees from the trans‐Golgi network (TGN) to the apical surface directly, hepatocytes target them first to the basolateral domain, from where they undergo basolateral‐to‐apical transcytosis. How TGN‐to‐surface transport differs in both scenarios is unknown. Here, we report that the basolateral detour of a hepatocyte apical protein is due, in part, to low RhoA activity at the TGN, which prevents its segregation from basolateral transport carriers. Activating Rho in hepatocytic cells, which switches their polarity from hepatocytic to ductal, also led to apical‐basolateral cargo segregation at the TGN as is typical for ductal cells, affirming a central role for Rho‐signaling in different aspects of the hepatocytic polarity phenotype. Nevertheless, Rho‐induced cargo segregation was not sufficient to target the apical protein directly; thus, failure to recruit apical targeting machinery also contributes to its indirect itinerary.     

Selective delivery of secretory cargo in Golgi-derived carriers of nonepithelial cells

In epithelial cells, soluble cargo proteins destined for basolateral or apical secretion are packaged into distinct trans-Golgi network-derived transport carriers. Similar carriers, termed basolateral- and apical-like, have been observed in nonepithelial cells using ectopically expressed membrane marker proteins. Whether these cells are capable of selectively packaging secretory proteins into distinct carriers is still an open question. Here, we have addressed this issue by analyzing the packaging and transport of secretory human chromogranin B fusion proteins using a green fluorescent protein-based high-resolution, dual-color imaging technique. We were able to show that these secretory markers were selectively packaged at the Golgi into tubular/vesicular-like transport carriers containing basolateral membrane markers, resulting in extensive cotransport. In contrast, deletion mutants of the human chromogranin B fusion proteins lacking an N-terminal loop structure were efficiently transported in both basolateral- and apical-like carriers, the latter displaying a spherical morphology. Similarly, in polarized epithelial cells, the human chromogranin B fusion protein was secreted basolaterally and the loop-deleted analogue into both the basolateral and apical medium. These findings suggest that nonepithelial cells, like their epithelial counterparts, possess a sorting machinery capable of selective packaging of secretory cargo into distinct types of carriers.     

Clathrin and AP1 are required for apical sorting of glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol‐anchored proteins in biosynthetic and recycling routes in Madin‐Darby canine kidney cells

Recently, studies in animal models demonstrate potential roles for clathrin and AP1 in apical protein sorting in epithelial tissue. However, the precise functions of these proteins in apical protein transport remain unclear. Here, we reveal mistargeting of endogenous glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol‐anchored proteins (GPI‐APs) and soluble secretory proteins in Madin‐Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells upon clathrin heavy chain or AP1 subunit knockdown (KD). Using a novel directional endocytosis and recycling assay, we found that these KD cells are not only affected for apical sorting of GPI‐APs in biosynthetic pathway but also for their apical recycling and basal‐to‐apical transcytosis routes. The apical distribution of the t‐SNARE syntaxin 3, which is known to be responsible for selective targeting of various apical‐destined cargo proteins in both biosynthetic and endocytic routes, is compromised suggesting a molecular explanation for the phenotype in KD cells. Our results demonstrate the importance of biosynthetic and endocytic routes for establishment and maintenance of apical localization of GPI‐APs in polarized MDCK cells.      

Polarized sorting and trafficking in epithelial cells

The polarized distribution of proteins and lipids at the surface membrane of epithelial cells results in the formation of an apical and a basolateral domain, which are separated by tight junctions. The generation and maintenance of epithelial polarity require elaborate mechanisms that guarantee correct sorting and vectorial delivery of cargo molecules. This dynamic process involves the interaction of sorting signals with sorting machineries and the formation of transport carriers. Here we review the recent advances in the field of polarized sorting in epithelial cells. We especially highlight the role of lipid rafts in apical sorting.     

Apical Plasma Membrane Proteins and Endolyn-78 Travel through a Subapical Compartment in Polarized WIF-B Hepatocytes

We studied basolateral-to-apical transcytosis of three classes of apical plasma membrane (PM) proteins in polarized hepatic WIF-B cells and then compared it to the endocytic trafficking of basolaterally recycling membrane proteins. We used antibodies to label the basolateral cohort of proteins at the surface of living cells and then followed their trafficking at 37°C by indirect immunofluorescence. The apical PM proteins aminopeptidase N, 5′nucleotidase, and the polymeric IgA receptor were efficiently transcytosed. Delivery to the apical PM was confirmed by microinjection of secondary antibodies into the bile canalicular-like space and by EM studies. Before acquiring their apical steady-state distribution, the trafficked antibodies accumulated in a subapical compartment, which had a unique tubulovesicular appearance by EM. In contrast, antibodies to the receptors for asialoglycoproteins and mannose-6-phosphate or to the lysosomal membrane protein, lgp120, distributed to endosomes or lysosomes, respectively, without accumulating in the subapical area. However, the route taken by the endosomal/lysosomal protein endolyn-78 partially resembled the transcytotic pathway, since anti–endolyn-78 antibodies were found in a subapical compartment before delivery to lysosomes. Our results suggest that in WIF-B cells, transcytotic molecules pass through a subapical compartment that functions as a second sorting site for a subset of basolaterally endocytosed membrane proteins reaching this compartment.Polarity is a fundamental characteristic of most eukaryotic cells, either as a transient phenomenon (e.g., in a moving fibroblast) or a permanent feature (e.g., of an epithelial layer) (Drubin and Nelson, 1996). In epithelial cells, polarity is evident at many levels. At the cell surface, the basolateral and apical membrane domains face different environments (internal and external, respectively) and each membrane contains a distinct set of proteins and lipids (Simons and Fuller, 1985). Acquisition of the fully polarized epithelial phenotype requires assembly of tight and adhering junctions, which serve as barriers separating the apical and basolateral surfaces, and the selective delivery of plasma membrane (PM)¹ molecules and/or their retention at each surface (Rodriguez-Boulan and Powell, 1992; Simons et al., 1992; Wollner and Nelson, 1992).There is great variety among epithelial cells in the way specific PM proteins reach the same or different destinations. For example, kidney-derived MDCK cells sort most apical and basolateral membrane components in the TGN and then export this cargo directly to the “correct” surface (Matter and Mellman, 1994), although a variant line was recently found that delivers Na⁺,K⁺-ATPase to all PM domains randomly and then achieves a predominant basolateral distribution by selective retention (Hammerton et al., 1991; Mays et al., 1995). In other epithelial cells, apical PM proteins are first transported to the basolateral surface and then subsequently transcytosed to the apical domain, with sorting occurring in the endocytic pathway. The extent to which this more circuitous or “indirect” pathway to the apical surface is used depends on the specific protein and cell type (Rodriguez-Boulan and Zurzolo, 1993; Matter and Mellman, 1994). For delivery of apical membrane proteins, hepatocytes in vivo appear to use the indirect pathway exclusively (Bartles et al., 1987; Schell et al., 1992; Maurice et al., 1994), whereas cultured HepG2 cells reportedly deliver selected membrane lipids directly from the TGN to the apical PM (Zaal et al., 1994).The structural information directing membrane proteins through the transcytotic pathway has been elucidated only for the polymeric IgA receptor (pIgA-R). It is a sacrificial receptor whose 103-amino acid cytoplasmic tail contains multiple signals that direct the protein through the secretory pathway and into the transcytotic branch of the endocytic system. pIgA-R''s final destination is the apical membrane where an 80-kD proteolytic fragment of the receptor''s ectodomain is released into the apical milieu. An important difference between the pIgA-R and resident apical PM proteins studied so far is that the latter usually have short cytoplasmic tails with no apparent sorting signal (e.g., aminopeptiase N [APN] and dipeptidyl peptidase IV [DPPIV]), or are glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)- anchored (e.g., 5′-nucleotidase [5′NT]). Positive sorting information is present elsewhere in these proteins, e.g., the glycolipid anchor of GPI-proteins (Lisanti and Rodriguez-Boulan, 1990) and the large ectodomains of APN and DPPIV (Vogel et al., 1992, 1995; Weisz et al., 1992), but finer resolution of such global signals has not yet been attained.Many studies have described the membrane compartments involved in the basolateral-to-apical transcytosis of soluble and/or membrane-bound cargo (e.g., Bomsel et al., 1989; Brändli et al., 1990; Hayakawa et al., 1990; van Deurs et al., 1990; van Genderen and van Meer, 1995). Although it is now clear that multiple compartments participate, the existence of stations or carriers that are unique to the transcytotic pathway is still an open question (e.g., Barroso and Sztul, 1994, versus Apodaca et al., 1994), as are the number and location(s) of the sorting site(s) for transcytotic cargo versus cargo destined for the recycling or lysosomal branches of the endocytic system (for reviews see Courtoy, 1993; Sandoval and Bakke, 1994; Gruenberg and Maxfield, 1995; Mostov and Cardone, 1995). The remarkable plasticity of the endocytic system as well as the possibility of real differences in the transport of soluble and membrane cargo may explain some of the apparent paradoxes. Early immuno-EM studies reported that in hepatocytes in vivo, the pIgA-R shares clathrin-coated entry sites with receptors that recycle between the PM and endosomal compartments (asialoglycoprotein receptor [ASGP-R] and mannose-6-phosphate receptor [M6P-R]), but is then segregated from them at the level of peripheral endosomes (called compartment for uncoupling of receptors and ligands) (Geuze et al., 1984). In contrast, the entry site(s) for resident apical proteins transiently present at the basolateral surface is still unknown. However, in liver in situ, newly synthesized DPPIV colocalizes with transcytosing pIgA-R in subapical tubulovesicular structures, suggesting that, at least in these cells, the last steps of transcytosis are common (Barr and Hubbard, 1993). Moreover, transcytotic membranes can be isolated that contain pIgA-R and newly synthesized DPPIV (Barr et al., 1995). Nevertheless, the extent to which different membrane protein classes with a common destination share a common pathway is still unclear.The newly developed WIF-B cell line is an ideal in vitro model for studying PM protein trafficking in polarized hepatocytes (Ihrke et al., 1993; Shanks et al., 1994). WIF-B cells grow in monolayers and acquire a polarized phenotype reminiscent of hepatocytes in vivo; that is, neighboring cells form bile canalicular-like spaces (BC). Each BC is completely sequestered from the surrounding medium as well as the substratum and apical PM proteins are highly concentrated in the BC membrane. Tight junctions prevent mixing of apical and basolateral PM proteins and block diffusion of large molecules such as antibodies from the culture medium into the BC (Ihrke et al., 1993).As a first step toward understanding the transcytotic pathway(s) in WIF-B cells and ultimately in liver, we define here the intracellular trafficking pathways taken by three different classes of membrane proteins that pass through the basolateral membrane: (a) apical PM proteins and pIgA-R; (b) basolaterally recycling receptors; and (c) proteins of the endosomal/lysosomal pathway that cycle through the PM. These proteins were tracked in living WIF-B cells by labeling with specific antibodies at the basolateral surface and determining the distributions of the antigen–antibody complexes at later times. Antibodies to a variety of apical PM proteins and the pIgA-R were specifically and efficiently transcytosed from the basolateral to the apical domain; all passed through a prominent subapical compartment before fusion with the apical PM. In contrast, antibodies to cycling membrane proteins, such as the ASGP-R, transferrin receptor (Tf-R), and M6P-R, and the lysosomal membrane protein lgp120, did not appear to pass through the subapical compartment, but rather were directly transported to the intracellular compartments that contained the highest concentrations of their antigens at steady state. However, antibodies to endolyn-78, another endosomal/lysosomal membrane protein (Croze et al., 1989), appeared transiently in the apical region of the cells before accumulating in lysosomes. Thus, the trafficking of endolyn-78 resembled to some degree the transcytotic route of apical PM proteins and pIgA-R.Our observations verify that transcytosis is a pathway for the delivery of apical PM proteins to the apical surface in WIF-B cells, as is seen in hepatocytes in vivo. Our findings suggest that two successive sorting compartments operate in WIF-B cells. Basolaterally endocytosed proteins pass first through peripheral endosomes, the compartment from which most ASGP-R and transferrin receptor (Tf-R) molecules recycle; from there lysosomal proteins such as lgp120 are directed towards lysosomes whereas transcytotic molecules are sorted out for transport to the apical pole. However, segregation of apical residents from at least one endosomal/lysosomal marker, endolyn-78, appears to occur after these proteins are delivered to an endomembrane compartment in the subapical region.²     

Membrane Organization and Dynamics in Cell Polarity

The establishment and maintenance of cell polarity is important to a wide range of biological processes ranging from chemotaxis to embryogenesis. An essential feature of cell polarity is the asymmetric organization of proteins and lipids in the plasma membrane. In this article, we discuss how polarity regulators such as small GTP-binding proteins and phospholipids spatially and kinetically control vesicular trafficking and membrane organization. Conversely, we discuss how membrane trafficking contributes to cell polarization through delivery of polarity determinants and regulators to the plasma membrane.Cell polarity is essential in most if not all eukaryotes for their development and physiological functions at the tissue and organism level. Although there are significant differences in gross morphology and function among various tissues and organisms, at the cellular level, the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity tend to follow common themes.A basic feature of cell polarity is the asymmetric organization of the plasma membrane (see McCaffrey and Macara 2009; Nelson 2009). This is mostly achieved through membrane trafficking along cytoskeleton tracks under the control of signaling molecules. In general, membrane trafficking occurs through sequential budding, transport, and fusion of vesicles from donor membranes to acceptor membranes (for recent reviews, see Bonifacino and Glick 2004; Cai et al. 2007). During budding, protein complexes interact with phospholipids to induce membrane curvature and generate vesicular carriers that capture different cargos from the donor compartments. After vesicles form, they are delivered to their acceptor compartments, most often along the cytoskeletons. Vesicle fusion at the acceptor membrane is mediated by the assembly of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors) complexes. Before membrane fusion, proteins or protein complexes tether the vesicles to the acceptor membranes and likely promote SNARE assembly. The Arf and Rab family of small GTPases are localized to different membrane compartments and regulate various stages of membrane trafficking.Polarized distribution of proteins at the plasma membrane often results from a balance of vesicle delivery and fusion with the plasma membrane (“exocytosis”), two-dimensional spread through the plasma membrane (“diffusion”), and internalization and membrane recycling (“endocytosis”). There are two main layers of regulation that control polarized protein transport and incorporation to the plasma membrane. The first involves sorting at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and endosomal compartments, such as the recycling endosomes. Protein sorting involves recognition of sorting signals in the cargo proteins by the adaptor protein (AP) complexes. There are a number of different AP complexes, and each is localized to different membrane compartments and captures distinct sets of cargo proteins before targeting to their correct destination. Protein sorting before delivery to different domains of the plasma membrane has been best characterized in epithelial cells, which have distinctive basolateral and apical domains separated by junctional complexes. This layer of regulation has been discussed in a recent review (Mellman and Nelson 2008) and is further discussed by Nelson (Nelson 2009), so it will not be discussed further here. The second layer of regulation of membrane protein polarization is through the polarized tethering and docking of vesicles at specific domains of the plasma membrane (Fig. 1). Tethering proteins (i.e., the exocyst) target secretory vesicles to specific domains of the plasma membrane and SNARE assembly eventually drives membrane fusion. Proteins at the plasma membrane can be retrieved back into the cell via endocytosis. These proteins are internalized via clathrin-coated pits, and transported through different endosomal compartments either for degradation in the lysosomes or for recycling back to the plasma membrane. The endosomal compartment that mediates the transport of internalized plasma membrane proteins back to the cell surface is called the “recycling endosome.” Recycling endosomes are major sources of cargo destined to the plasma membrane for exocytosis in many types of cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Membrane trafficking to the plasma membrane. Schematic of the endocytic and exocytic routes involving trans-Golgi network (TGN), endosomal compartments, and the plasma membrane. During exocytosis, cargo leaves the TGN or recycling endosomes in vesicular carriers to the plasma membrane. Once on the membrane, proteins can be internalized and transported to early endosomes, and then either travel through late endosomes to the lysosome to be degraded or return to the plasma membrane through the recycling endosomes. Early endosomes may serve as sorting stations for the next stages of cargo transport.Signaling molecules such as the Rho family of small GTPases spatially and kinetically regulate membrane trafficking during cell polarization (see McCaffrey and Macara 2009; Slaughter et al. 2009). Reversely, vesicular trafficking is required for the polarized deposition and accrual of these regulators. In the first part of this article, we examine the membrane organization and dynamics of cell polarity, focusing on the polarized tethering and docking of vesicles at the plasma membrane. We highlight key components and regulators of polarized exocytosis including the exocyst, small GTPases, and phospholipids. We also use different organisms and systems to show analogous mechanisms during cell polarization. In the second part of this article, we focus on the aforementioned reciprocal effects of cell polarity and membrane trafficking using two representative examples, one from yeast (Cdc42 polarization) and one in mammalian epithelial cells (E-cadherin trafficking).     

KIF16B delivers for transcytosis

EMBO J 32 15, 2125–2139 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.130; published online June072013Protein sorting pathways control correct delivery of membrane proteins to specific compartments of the plasma membrane and are required to maintain the physiological functions in all epithelia. Most clathrin-dependent cargoes require the adaptor protein complexes AP-1A and AP-1B for proper sorting to the basolateral plasma membrane. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Perez Bay et al (2013) shed light on the mechanism of basal-to-apical protein transport, or transcytosis, of the transferrin receptor in natively AP-1B-deficient epithelia. In AP-1B-deficient epithelia, the transferrin receptor transcytoses through the apical recycling endosome, and requires Rab11. Furthermore, they characterize a novel and specific role for the endosomal microtubule motor Kinesin KIF16B in transferrin receptor apical transport. These findings constitute the first characterization of a specific microtubule motor involved in basal-to-apical transcytosis in epithelia.Epithelial cells present a compartmentalized plasma membrane, where the composition of each compartment is tightly controlled by a precise protein and lipid sorting machinery (Folsch, 2008). The two most conspicuous compartments are the apical and basolateral domains, which generate and segregate from each other through the formation of apically localized junctional complexes. Protein sorting mechanisms ensure delivery of newly synthesized or recycled, protein components to their proper localization in either the apical or basolateral plasma membrane domains. Vectorial transport of proteins requires sorting determinants that are present in the cytoplasmic, transmembrane or extracellular domains. Most of the information that we have about these sorting determinants comes from the basolateral traffic, which depends on clathrin adaptor proteins (APs) AP-1A/B, AP-3 and AP-4 (Gonzalez and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2009). Specific APs bind to cytoplasmic sorting motifs in transmembrane proteins and recruit clathrin-coat components, which sequentially induce membrane curvature, clathrin oligomerization, vesicle budding and fission (Ohno, 2006; Hirst et al, 2011). Mammalian cells present five different AP complexes (AP1–5), each constituted by a heterotetramer of one α-, γ-, δ-, ɛ- or ζ-subunit, one β(1–5) subunit, one σ(1–5) subunit and one μ(1–5) subunit. How these clathrin-coated vesicles deliver membranes to precise compartments in the cell to regulate protein sorting is still poorly understood. The AP1 complex is a key regulator of basolateral polarity (Folsch et al, 1999; Gan et al, 2002; Gravotta et al, 2012). The AP1 complex μ-subunit presents two isoforms μ1A and μ1B, which define the formation of two different complexes, AP-1A and AP-1B, both required for basolateral polarity. AP-1A is ubiquitously expressed in different tissues and localizes mainly to the trans-Golgi network. In contrast, AP-1B is primarily localized to common recycling endosomes (CRE) and is specifically expressed in the majority of epithelial tissues, with the remarkable exception of retinal pigment epithelium and the proximal convoluted tubule in the nephron, which sort most of the basolateral cargo to the apical surface.A wide array of model membrane proteins requires AP-1B to properly localize to the basolateral membrane, including the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), the VSV-G protein and the transferrin receptor (TfR). Furthermore, the expression of μ1B in μ1B-deficient epithelial cell line LLC-PK1 is sufficient to prevent apical sorting of TfR, indicating that AP-1B is a main player in this clathrin-mediated basolateral sorting pathway. Interestingly, the results of the present study suggest that transcytosis (a membrane trafficking pathway that transports apical or basolateral proteins to the opposite domain in the plasma membrane) is the main mechanism for apical transport of clathrin-dependent cargoes in AP-1B-deficient cells. Basal-to-apical transcytosis of the polymeric IgA receptor (pIgAR) is the best-known transcytotic pathway, and requires several steps in which the receptor complex traverses multiple compartments before reaching a Rab11-positive apical recycling compartment, from where it is sorted to the apical plasma membrane (Golachowska et al, 2010). Polymeric IgA receptor transcytosis requires the function of cytoskeletal proteins for its correct delivery to the apical membrane, including microtubules and actin binding motors. However, no specific microtubule motor has ever been described associated with transcytosis.In the present study, Perez Bay et al (2013) analyse how the TfR is transported to the apical membrane in μ1B-deficient epithelia using as model system the retinal pigment epithelium cell line, which lacks AP-1B, and MDCK cells. They show that basolateral administration of labelled Tf results in its endocytosis and transcytosis towards the apical membrane in AP-1B-depleted MDCK cells, following a pathway that involves Rab11-positive apical recycling endosomes (AREs), and requires Rab11 for its correct delivery. Additionally, they find that TfR transport into AREs depends on microtubules and the kinesin KIF16B, a specific microtubule motor present in the CRE (Figure 1). KIF16B is a plus-end microtubule motor that binds to PtdIns(3)P and GTP-bound Rab14 and regulates the distribution of early endosomes (Hoepfner et al, 2005; Ueno et al, 2011). Surprisingly though, apical transport of pIgAR is not affected by the expression of a KIF16B-dominant negative mutant, which suggests that assembly of KIF16B/TfR carriers occurs downstream of cargo separation during transcytosis. It is also tempting to speculate that more than one transcytosis pathways are at play, and while TfR uses the KIF16B-dependent pathway, pIgAR is transported through a KIF16B independent mechanism. This article is the first study of KIF16B in epithelial cells, and the first showing involvement of a microtubule motor in transcytosis, more than 20 years after the pioneering studies that characterized the role of microtubules in this process (Hunziker et al, 1990).Open in a separate windowFigure 1KIF16B controls basal-to-apical transcytosis of transferrin receptor in AP-1B-deficient epithelia. In AP-1B-expressing epithelia (such as MDCK cells), transferrin receptor (TfR) is endocytosed and sorted to common recycling endosomes, where AP-1B-clathrin-vesicles assemble and transport the protein to the basolateral plasma membrane. In AP-1B-deficient epithelia (such as RPE cells), internalized TfR is instead sorted by the plus-end directed microtubule motor KIF16B towards the ARE, and then transcytosed to the apical plasma membrane through a Rab11-regulated pathway. Polymeric IgA receptor is internalized into the same basolateral endosomes, but it uses a KIF16B-independent pathway to reach the apical membrane.As a whole, this paper represents a significant advance in our understanding of the protein sorting machinery in epithelial cells, and importantly, opens new questions that will be addressed in future studies. First, is the KIF16B-dependent recycling/sorting pathway required for other cargoes, especially in AP-1B-positive epithelia? Second, why TfR, but not pIgAR, requires KIF16B for correct sorting? Although KIF16B is not required for pIgAR transcytosis, its transport route still requires microtubules, thus opening the possibility for discovery of additional microtubule motors involved in transcytosis. And finally, what is the mechanism of KIF16B binding to TfR-positive recycling endosomes? It is possible that the mechanism depends on the activation of Rab14, which has been characterized as a regulator of lipid-raft transport from the Golgi apparatus to recycling endosomes (Ueno et al, 2011).     

SNX27–Retromer directly binds ESCPE-1 to transfer cargo proteins during endosomal recycling

Coat complexes coordinate cargo recognition through cargo adaptors with biogenesis of transport carriers during integral membrane protein trafficking. Here, we combine biochemical, structural, and cellular analyses to establish the mechanistic basis through which SNX27–Retromer, a major endosomal cargo adaptor, couples to the membrane remodeling endosomal SNX-BAR sorting complex for promoting exit 1 (ESCPE-1). In showing that the SNX27 FERM (4.1/ezrin/radixin/moesin) domain directly binds acidic-Asp-Leu-Phe (aDLF) motifs in the SNX1/SNX2 subunits of ESCPE-1, we propose a handover model where SNX27–Retromer captured cargo proteins are transferred into ESCPE-1 transport carriers to promote endosome-to-plasma membrane recycling. By revealing that assembly of the SNX27:Retromer:ESCPE-1 coat evolved in a stepwise manner during early metazoan evolution, likely reflecting the increasing complexity of endosome-to-plasma membrane recycling from the ancestral opisthokont to modern animals, we provide further evidence of the functional diversification of yeast pentameric Retromer in the recycling of hundreds of integral membrane proteins in metazoans.

Coat complexes coordinate cargo recognition with biogenesis of transport carriers during integral membrane protein trafficking. Mechanistic study of the function and evolution of the SNX27:Retromer:ESCPE-1 assembly provides new insight into pathway defects associated with neurodegenerative disease and an interesting comparison with the yeast pentameric Retromer.     

Cellular distribution of the aquaporins: A family of water channel proteins

A group of transmembrane proteins that are related to the major intrinsic protein of lens fibers (MIP26) have been named aquaporins to reflect their role as water channels. These proteins are located at strategic membrane sites in a variety of epithelia, most of which have well-defined physiological functions in fluid absorption or secretion. However, some aquaporins have been localized in cell types where their role is at present unknown. Most of the aquaporins are delivered to the plasma membrane in a non-regulated (constitutive) fashion, but AQP2 enters the regulated exocytotic pathway and its membrane expression is controlled by the action of the antidiuretic hormone, vasopressin. These pathways of constitutive versus regulated delivery to the plasma membrane have been reconstituted in transfected LLC-PK₁ epithelial cells, indicating that the information encoded within the protein sequence is sufficient to allow sorting of newly synthesized protein into distinct intracellular vesicles. Finally, different members of the aquaporin family can be targeted to apical, basolateral or both apical and basolateral plasma membrane domains of polarized epithelial cells. This implies that signals for the polarized targeting of these proteins also is located in non-homologous regions of these similar proteins. Thus, future investigations on the aquaporin family of proteins will provide important information not only on the physiology of membrane transport processes in many cell types, but also on the targeting and trafficking signals that allow proteins to enter distinct intracellular vesicular pathways in epithelial cells. In the case of AQP2, the availability of the transfected cell culture system will allow the intracellular signaling pathway, and the accessory molecules that are involved in this pathway, to be dissected and identified.     

Newly synthesized and recycling pools of the apical protein gp135 do not occupy the same compartments

Polarized epithelial cells sort newly synthesized and recycling plasma membrane proteins into distinct trafficking pathways directed to either the apical or basolateral membrane domains. While the trans‐Golgi network is a well‐established site of protein sorting, increasing evidence indicates a key role for endosomes in the initial trafficking of newly synthesized proteins. Both basolateral and apical proteins have been shown to traverse endosomes en route to the plasma membrane. In particular, apical proteins traffic through either subapical early or recycling endosomes. Here we use the SNAP tag system to analyze the trafficking of the apical protein gp135, also known as podocalyxin. We show that newly synthesized gp135 traverses the apical recycling endosome, but not the apical early endosomes (AEEs). In contrast, post‐endocytic gp135 is delivered to the AEE before recycling back to the apical membrane. The pathways pursued by the newly synthesized and recycling gp135 populations do not detectably intersect, demonstrating that the biosynthetic and post‐endocytic pools of this protein are subjected to distinct sorting processes.      

Cargo carriers from the Golgi to the cell surface

EMBO J (2012) 31 20, 3976–3990 doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.235; published online August212012In this issue, Malhotra and colleagues use biochemical approaches to identify a new class of secretory cargo carriers (CARTS) that do not contain the larger cargoes, collagen or Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-G glycoprotein. CARTS appear to be basolateral membrane-directed carriers that use myosin for their motility but not for their formation.Protein secretion involves the collection of proteins into transport carriers that form at the exit (or ‘trans'') face of the Golgi apparatus for delivery to the cell surface. Multiple classes of secretory carriers form at the trans Golgi (Anitei and Hoflack, 2011). Some deliver cargo continuously to the cell surface; others release cargo in response to a signal. Regulated and constitutive secretory cargoes traverse the Golgi complex together and are sorted just before their exit. Proteins destined for different domains of the plasma membrane are also packaged into different carriers that bud from the Golgi and are delivered to either the apical or basolateral surface, respectively. Also departing the Golgi are clathrin-coated vesicles that carry newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes to endocytic compartments.Despite the importance of protein secretion, the carriers that transport cargo from the Golgi to the cell surface have not yet been isolated or characterized. When visualized in live cells expressing GFP-tagged cargo, Golgi-to-cell surface carriers appear as variably sized vesicles and tubules of 1–8 μm in length (Hirschberg et al, 1998; Toomre et al, 1999; Polishchuk et al, 2003; Anitei and Hoflack, 2011). Both actin- and microtubule-based motors participate in their formation, along with phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate that is needed to recruit components that participate in membrane budding and scission.In this issue, Wakana et al (2012) report the identification of transport carriers (CARriers from the trans Golgi network to the cell surface or CARTS) that mediate the Golgi-to-cell surface transport of a select set of cargo proteins. Unexpectedly, the authors report that collagen and VSV-G glycoprotein use a different carrier for their transport to the cell surface; CARTS also use myosin II for motility but not for vesicle scission (see Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1PAUF and collagen export from the Golgi require protein kinase D, which distinguishes these export events from the transport of proteins to the apical surface. Small cargoes like PAUF use myosin II for vesicle motility after carrier formation; large cargoes like collagen and VSV-G may use myosin for both carrier formation and motility.Wakana et al (2012) first characterize the vesicle formation process by monitoring TGN46. TGN46 is a protein of unknown function that localizes to the trans Golgi at steady state but cycles between the Golgi and the cell surface. Thus, TGN46 should be present in the Golgi and to a lesser extent, in secretory transport vesicles and endocytic and recycling vesicles. The authors use digitonin to permeabilize HeLa cells and monitor vesicle budding that occurs upon addition of ATP and rat liver cytosol. They use differential centrifugation to remove large membranes and identify a population of putative carriers that only sediment upon centrifugation at high speed and form in the presence of ATP and cytosol. TGN46-vesicle formation requires protein kinase D, a kinase needed for secretory carrier formation in cells (Liljedahl et al, 2001). Next, the authors use antibodies that recognize the cytoplasmic domain of TGN46 to immuno-isolate intact vesicles; controls show that the isolated membranes do not represent lysosomes, endosomes or the Golgi itself. Satisfyingly, the isolated vesicles include a secretory cargo: exogenously expressed, signal sequence containing, horseradish peroxidase. This is good evidence that the isolated carriers represent exocytic vesicles.Mass spectrometry was used to identify candidate transport vesicle proteins; low yields precluded the authors from carrying out a rigorous analysis. Nevertheless, pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor (PAUF or ZG16B) and lysozyme were identified and confirmed as endogenous, soluble cargo proteins, together with synaptotagmin II, Rab6A, Rab8A and myosin II. Expression of a protein kinase D mutant enabled the authors to accumulate PAUF in trans Golgi tubules; in cells, PAUF carriers were distinct from those coated with COPI, COPII and clathrin. By EM, the carriers were round to elongated, 100–250 nm diameter structures. The identification of an endogenous, constitutively secreted protein will be valuable to those studying secretion.Myosin II has been reported to play a role in the formation of vesicles containing VSV-G glycoprotein (cf. Miserey-Lenkei et al, 2010). Wakana et al (2012) showed that PAUF secretion was inhibited in the presence of blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor. However, in the presence of blebbistatin, PAUF-containing punctate structures detected by light microscopy were unchanged in total number or distribution, suggesting that CARTS formation is myosin II independent.Many studies of protein secretion have monitored the trafficking of VSV-G glycoprotein (Hirschberg et al, 1998; Toomre et al, 1999; Polishchuk et al, 2003). G protein is convenient and well studied but an important property that is often overlooked is the tendency of viral glycoproteins to form crystalline arrays within the secretory pathway, especially if proteins are accumulated in the trans Golgi by incubation of cells at 20°C (Griffiths et al, 1985). Under these conditions, cryoelectron microscopy has documented the oligomerization of viral glycoproteins. Large protein assemblies like these and like collagen may require modification of the vesicle formation process to accommodate the larger proteins (Malhotra and Erlmann, 2011; Jin et al, 2012). Thus, it was especially interesting that collagen and VSV-G protein are not detected in PAUF-containing vesicles en route to the cell surface. This may explain why PAUF carriers were not dependent upon myosin II (Wakana et al, 2012) while VSV-G carriers were (Miserey-Lenkei et al, 2010)—perhaps the larger carriers of VSV-G and collagen have a greater need for myosin II in their formation.Several models can explain the formation of the two transport vesicle classes detected. A trivial explanation would be that the carriers are distinct because they are destined for different plasma membrane domains—apical versus basolateral. However, only basolateral transport requires protein kinase D (Yeaman et al, 2004) and protein kinase D is important for all the cargoes studied here—suggesting that both carrier types are basolaterally directed. Simply by default, collection of large assemblies into a nascent vesicle may physically exclude soluble PAUF protein. Alternatively, larger cargoes may use a molecularly distinct class of transport carrier. Yet to be identified are the protein constituents that define CARTS—proteins that collect cargoes together with the vesicle targeting and fusion machinery that must be included in all functional, newly formed transport vesicles. Once these markers are identified, it will become possible to distinguish between these two models and to isolate CARTS in larger quantities for full mass spec analysis. For now, the findings confirm the segregation of small and large cargoes into different vesicles that traverse the path from the Golgi to the cell surface and clarify the role of myosin in transporting these vesicles, but not necessarily pinching them off from the trans Golgi.     

Distinct cytoskeletal tracks direct individual vesicle populations to the apical membrane of epithelial cells

A key aspect in the structure of epithelial and neuronal cells is the maintenance of a polarized organization based on highly specific sorting machinery at the exit site of the trans Golgi network (TGN). Epithelial cells sort protein and lipid components into different sets of carriers for the apical or basolateral plasma membrane. The two intestinal proteins lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) and sucrase-isomaltase (SI) are delivered to the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells with high fidelity but differ in their affinity to detergent-insoluble, glycolipid-enriched complexes (DIGs). Using a two-color labeling technique, we have recently characterized two post-Golgi vesicle populations that direct LPH and SI separately to the apical cell surface. Here, we investigated the structure and identification of protein components in these vesicle populations and assessed the role of cytoskeletal post-Golgi transport routes for apical cargo. Apart from the central role of microtubules in vesicle transport, we demonstrate that the transport of SI-carrying apical vesicles (SAVs) occurs along actin tracks in the cellular periphery, whereas LPH-carrying apical vesicles (LAVs) are transferred in an actin-independent fashion to the apical membrane. Our data further indicate that myosin 1A is the actin-associated motor protein that drives SAVs along actin filaments to the apical cell surface.     

Kinetically Distinct Sorting Pathways through the Golgi Exhibit Different Requirements for Arf1

To investigate the role of cytoplasmic sequences in directing transmembrane protein trafficking through the Golgi, we analyzed the sorting of VSV tsO45 G fusions with either the native G cytoplasmic domain (G) or an alternative cytoplasmic tail derived from the chicken AE1‐4 anion exchanger (G^AE). At restrictive temperature G^AE and G accumulated in the ER, and upon shifting the cells to permissive temperature both proteins folded and underwent transport through the Golgi. However, G^AE and G did not form hetero‐oligomers upon the shift to permissive temperature and they progressed through the Golgi with distinct kinetics. In addition, the transport of G through the proximal Golgi was Arf1 and COPI‐dependent, while G^AE progression through the proximal Golgi was Arf1 and COPI‐independent. Although Arf1 did not regulate the sorting of G^AE in the cis‐Golgi, Arf1 did regulate the exit of G^AE from the TGN. The trafficking of G^AE through the Golgi was similar to that of the native AE1‐4 anion exchanger, in that the progression of both proteins through the proximal Golgi was Arf1‐independent, while both required Arf1 to exit the TGN. We propose that the differential recognition of cytosolic signals in membrane‐spanning proteins by the Arf1‐dependent sorting machinery may influence the rate at which cargo progresses through the Golgi.      

A Conserved Di‐Basic Motif of Drosophila Crumbs Contributes to Efficient ER Export

The Drosophila type I transmembrane protein Crumbs is an apical determinant required for the maintenance of apico‐basal epithelial cell polarity. The level of Crumbs at the plasma membrane is crucial, but how it is regulated is poorly understood. In a genetic screen for regulators of Crumbs protein trafficking we identified Sar1, the core component of the coat protein complex II transport vesicles. sar1 mutant embryos show a reduced plasma membrane localization of Crumbs, a defect similar to that observed in haunted and ghost mutant embryos, which lack Sec23 and Sec24CD, respectively. By pulse‐chase assays in Drosophila Schneider cells and analysis of protein transport kinetics based on Endoglycosidase H resistance we identified an RNKR motif in Crumbs, which contributes to efficient ER export. The motif identified fits the highly conserved di‐basic RxKR motif and mediates interaction with Sar1. The RNKR motif is also required for plasma membrane delivery of transgene‐encoded Crumbs in epithelial cells of Drosophila embryos. Our data are the first to show that a di‐basic motif acts as a signal for ER exit of a type I plasma membrane protein in a metazoan organism.      

Immunocytochemical characterization of two types of microvillar cells in rodent olfactory epithelium

Microvillar cells (MCs) have been identified in the olfactory epithelium of various mammalian species from rodents to humans. Studies on properties and functions of MCs to date have yielded partially controversial results, supporting alternatively an epithelial or a neuronal nature of these cells. In the present study, single and double immunolabeling investigations were carried out using antibodies against cytoskeletal and integral membrane proteins in order to further characterize MCs in rat and mouse olfactory epithelium. Application of antibodies against ankyrin (ANK), a protein that links integral membrane proteins to the submembrane cytoskeleton, led to intense labeling of the basolateral membranes of numerous cells with characteristic MC morphology. ANK-immunoreactive (ir) cells bore an apical tuft of -actin-ir microvilli, were filled with cytokeratin 18 (CK18)-ir filamentous network, and extended a basal process that appeared to end above the basal membrane. Immunoreactions for villin, an actin-crosslinking protein particularly prominently expressed in brush cells in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tract epithelia, and for the -subunit of sodium-potassium ATPase (Na⁺, K⁺-ATPase), revealed that ANK-ir MCs fall into two subpopulations. The less frequent type I MCs displayed villin immunoreactivity in their apical microvilli and underneath the basolateral membranes; the more numerous type II MCs were negative for villin but possessed intense basolateral immunoreactivity for Na⁺, K⁺-ATPase. Strong reactivity for the epithelial-type integral membrane protein of adherens junctions, E-Cadherin, was localized in basolateral membranes of both types of MCs. Our results support an epithelial nature of ANK-ir MCs in rat and mouse olfactory epithelium. Type I MCs strongly resemble brush cells in their immunocytochemical characteristics, namely, their ANK reactivity, CK18 reactivity, and villin reactivity. The intense Na⁺, K⁺-ATPase reactivity of type II MCs implicates these cells in transport processes.     

Polarized nature of taurine transport in LLC-PK1 and MDCK cells: Further characterization of divergent transport models

Summary Taurine transport was measured in cultured epithelial cells-LLC-PK1 and MDCK-grown on permeable membrane supports. Taurine transport by LLC-PK1 cells was greater on the apical surface compared to the basolateral surface. MDCK cells exhibited greater taurine uptake from the basolateral side. Transepithelial taurine flux was in the direction of apical to basolateral in the LLC-PK1 monolayers. There was no net transepithelial movement of taurine in the MDCK monolayers. Efflux of taurine from the apical and the basolateral membrane surfaces of LLC-PK1 cell monolayers was stimulated by external-alanine but not L-alanine. Efflux of taurine from MDCK cell monolayers was stimulated by-alanine on the basolateral surface. While the competitive inhibitor guainidinoeithane sulfonate (GES) competitively inhibited taurine uptake to a similar degree on the apical and basolateral surface of LLC-PK1 cell monolayers, GES had a more potent inhibitory effect on the basolateral taurine uptake in MDCK cells when compared to its inhibition of apical taurine transport. We conclude that there are characteristic differences in transport of taurine by apical and basolateral surfaces of LLC-PK1 and MDCK cells which may be the consequence of asymmetric distribution or unique structural properties of the taurine transporter.Supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (DK 37223), the American Heart Association (92-004470).     

Rab12 Localizes to Shiga Toxin‐Induced Plasma Membrane Invaginations and Controls Toxin Transport

Several exogenous and endogenous cargo proteins are internalized independently of clathrin, including the bacterial Shiga toxin. The mechanisms underlying early steps of clathrin‐independent uptake remain largely unknown. In this study, we have designed a protocol to obtain gradient fractions containing Shiga toxin internalization intermediates. Using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and quantitative mass spectrometry, Rab12 was found in association with these very early uptake carriers. The localization of the GTPase on Shiga toxin‐induced plasma membrane invaginations was shown by fluorescence microscopy in cells transfected with GFP‐Rab12. Furthermore, using a quantitative biochemical assay, it was found that the amount of receptor‐binding B‐subunit of Shiga toxin reaching the trans‐Golgi/TGN membranes was decreased in Rab12‐depleted cells, and that cells were partially protected against intoxication by Shiga‐like toxin 1 under these conditions. These findings demonstrate the functional importance of Rab12 for retrograde toxin trafficking. Among several other intracellular transport pathways, only the steady‐state localizations of TGN46 and cation‐independent mannose‐6‐phosphate receptor were affected. These data thus strongly suggest that Rab12 functions in the retrograde transport route.      

PLCγ1 Participates in Protein Transport and Diacylglycerol Production Triggered by cargo Arrival at the Golgi

Diacylglycerol (DAG) is required for membrane traffic and structural organization at the Golgi. DAG is a lipid metabolite of several enzymatic reactions present at this organelle, but the mechanisms by which they are regulated are still unknown. Here, we show that cargo arrival at the Golgi increases the recruitment of the DAG‐sensing constructs C1‐PKCθ‐GFP and the PKD‐wt‐GFP. The recruitment of both constructs was reduced by PLCγ1 silencing. Post‐Golgi trafficking of transmembrane and soluble proteins was impaired in PLCγ1‐silenced cells. Under basal conditions, PLCγ1 contributed to the maintenance of the pool of DAG associated with the Golgi and to the structural organization of the organelle. Finally, we show that cytosolic phospholipase C (PLC) can hydrolyse phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate in isolated Golgi membranes. Our results indicate that PLCγ1 is part of the molecular mechanism that couples cargo arrival at the Golgi with DAG production to co‐ordinate the formation of transport carriers for post‐Golgi traffic.      

Delivery of raft-associated, GPI-anchored proteins to the apical surface of polarized MDCK cells by a transcytotic pathway

Epithelial cell polarity depends on mechanisms for targeting proteins to different plasma membrane domains. Here, we dissect the pathway for apical delivery of several raft-associated, glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins in polarized MDCK cells using live-cell imaging and selective inhibition of apical or basolateral exocytosis. Rather than trafficking directly from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to the apical plasma membrane as previously thought, the GPI-anchored proteins followed an indirect, transcytotic route. They first exited the TGN in membrane-bound carriers that also contained basolateral cargo, although the two cargoes were laterally segregated. The carriers were then targeted to and fused with a zone of lateral plasma membrane adjacent to tight junctions that is known to contain the exocyst. Thereafter, the GPI-anchored proteins, but not basolateral cargo, were rapidly internalized, together with endocytic tracer, into clathrin-free transport intermediates that transcytosed to the apical plasma membrane. Thus, apical sorting of these GPI-anchored proteins occurs at the plasma membrane, rather than at the TGN.     

Structural and enzymatic studies on the plasma membrane domains and sodium pump enzymes of absorptive epithelial cells in the avian lower intestine

Summary The coprodaeum of the domestic hen maintained on a low-NaCl diet adapts by enhanced sodium transport. This study examines the adaptive response at the single cell and whole organ levels. Surface areas of apical (microvillous) and basolateral plasma membranes of columnar absorptive epithelial cells were estimated by use of ultrastructural stereology. The activities of succinic dehydrogenase (a mitochondrial enzyme) and ouabain-sensitive, potassium-dependent paranitrophenyl phosphatase (a sodium pump enzyme) were determined in tissue homogenates. Sodium, potassium-ATPase (pump enzyme) activity in cell membranes was localized by ultrastructural cytochemistry. Apical and basolateral membranes responded differently. In high-NaCl hens, the membrane signature of the average cell was 32 m² (apical), 932 m² (lateral) and 17 m² (basal). Cells from low-NaCl hens had more apical membrane (49 m² per cell) but essentially the same area of basolateral membrane. However, total surfaces per organ were greater for all membranes. Sodium pump enzymes were localized in basolateral membranes. Enzyme activities per unit mitochondrial volume and per unit basolateral membrane surface were higher in low-NaCl birds. These findings are discussed in the context of known mechanisms of transcellular sodium transport via apical ion channels and basolateral pumps.