Determinants of the in vivo folding of the prion protein. A bipartite function of helix 1 in folding and aggregation

Misfolding of the mammalian prion protein (PrP) is implicated in the pathogenesis of prion diseases. We analyzed wild type PrP in comparison with different PrP mutants and identified determinants of the in vivo folding pathway of PrP. The complete N terminus of PrP including the putative transmembrane domain and the first beta-strand could be deleted without interfering with PrP maturation. Helix 1, however, turned out to be a major determinant of PrP folding. Disruption of helix 1 prevented attachment of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and the formation of complex N-linked glycans; instead, a high mannose PrP glycoform was secreted into the cell culture supernatant. In the absence of a C-terminal membrane anchor, however, helix 1 induced the formation of unglycosylated and partially protease-resistant PrP aggregates. Moreover, we could show that the C-terminal GPI anchor signal sequence, independent of its role in GPI anchor attachment, mediates core glycosylation of nascent PrP. Interestingly, conversion of high mannose glycans to complex type glycans only occurred when PrP was membrane-anchored. Our study indicates a bipartite function of helix 1 in the maturation and aggregation of PrP and emphasizes a critical role of a membrane anchor in the formation of complex glycosylated PrP.     

Characterization of the properties and trafficking of an anchorless form of the prion protein

Conversion of PrP(C) into PrP(Sc) is the central event in the pathogenesis of transmissible prion diseases. Although the molecular basis of this event and the intracellular compartment where it occurs are not yet understood, the association of PrP with cellular membranes and in particular its presence in detergent-resistant microdomains appears to be of critical importance. In addition it appears that scrapie conversion requires membrane-bound glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked PrP. The GPI anchor may affect either the conformation, the intracellular localization, or the association of the prion protein with specific membrane domains. However, how this occurs is not known. To understand the relevance of the GPI anchor for the cellular behavior of PrP, we have studied the biosynthesis and localization of a PrP version which lacks the GPI anchor attachment signal (PrP Delta GPI). We found that PrP Delta GPI is tethered to cell membranes and associates to membrane detergent-resistant microdomains but does not assume a transmembrane topology. Differently to PrP(C), this protein does not localize at the cell surface but is mainly released in the culture media in a fully glycosylated soluble form. The cellular behavior of anchorless PrP explains why PrP Delta GPI Tg mice can be infected but do not show the classical signs of the disorder, thus indicating that the plasma membrane localization of PrP(C) and/or of the converted scrapie form might be necessary for the development of a symptomatic disease.     

The N-terminal region of the prion protein ectodomain contains a lipid raft targeting determinant

The association of the prion protein (PrP) with sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich lipid rafts is instrumental in the pathogenesis of the neurodegenerative prion diseases. Although the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is an exoplasmic determinant of raft association, PrP remained raft-associated in human neuronal cells even when the GPI anchor was deleted or substituted for a transmembrane anchor indicating that the ectodomain contains a raft localization signal. The raft association of transmembrane-anchored PrP occurred independently of Cu(II) binding as it failed to be abolished by either deletion of the octapeptide repeat region (residues 51-90) or treatment of cells with a Cu(II) chelator. Raft association of transmembrane-anchored PrP was only abolished by the deletion of the N-terminal region (residues 23-90) of the ectodomain. This region was sufficient to confer raft localization when fused to the N terminus of a non-raft transmembrane-anchored protein and suppressed the clathrin-coated pit localization signal in the cytoplasmic domain of the amyloid precursor protein. These data indicate that the N-terminal region of PrP acts as a cellular raft targeting determinant and that residues 23-90 of PrP represent the first proteinaceous raft targeting signal within the ectodomain of a GPI-anchored protein.     

Residues Surrounding the Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor Attachment Site of PrP Modulate Prion Infection: Insight from the Resistance of Rabbits to Prion Disease

Prion diseases are a group of transmissible, invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases that affect both humans and animals. According to the protein-only hypothesis, the infectious agent is a prion (proteinaceous infectious particle) that is composed primarily of PrP^Sc, the disease-associated isoform of the cellular prion protein, PrP. PrP^Sc arises from the conformational change of the normal, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein, PrP^C. The mechanism by which this process occurs, however, remains enigmatic. Rabbits are one of a small number of mammalian species reported to be resistant to prion infection. Sequence analysis of rabbit PrP revealed that its C-terminal amino acids differ from those of PrP from other mammals and may affect the anchoring of rabbit PrP through its GPI anchor. Using a cell culture model, this study investigated the effect of the rabbit PrP-specific C-terminal amino acids on the addition of the GPI anchor to PrP^C, PrP^C localization, and PrP^Sc formation. The incorporation of rabbit-specific C-terminal PrP residues into mouse PrP did not affect the addition of a GPI anchor or the localization of PrP. However, these residues did inhibit PrP^Sc formation, suggesting that these rabbit-specific residues interfere with a C-terminal PrP^Sc interaction site.Prion diseases, traditionally known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), are a group of invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases that affect both humans and animals. According to the protein-only hypothesis, an abnormal isoform of the host-encoded prion protein (PrP^C), referred to as PrP^Sc, is the sole or major component of the infectious agent causing these diseases (33). These disorders affect a wide range of mammals and include diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), variant CJD, Gerstmann-Straüssler-Scheinker (GSS) syndrome, kuru, and fatal familial insomnia (FFI) in humans, scrapie in sheep and goats, chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle. The term “prion” was first used to describe the unique infectious agent and was derived from “proteinaceous infectious particle” to distinguish it from conventional pathogens such as bacteria and viruses (33).To date, rabbits are one of the few mammalian species reported to be resistant to prion infection. Rabbits do not develop clinical disease after inoculation with brain tissue from individuals affected by the human prion diseases CJD and kuru, or by a number of animal forms of the disease, including scrapie and transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) (12). In addition, mouse neuroblastoma (MNB) cells overexpressing rabbit PrP are also resistant to prion infection (45). Evidence that rabbit cells per se have the correct cellular machinery to support prion propagation has come from studies using the rabbit kidney epithelial cell line RK13. Upon transfection with appropriate PrP-expressing transgenes, these cells are a highly efficient and robust model of prion infection (6, 25, 41, 43). RK13 cells do not have detectable levels of endogenous rabbit PrP^C and are therefore ideal for studying exogenous PrP^C and the propagation of prions from different species (6). Originally, it was shown that RK13 cells overexpressing ovine PrP became susceptible to infection with scrapie (43), and more recently, RK13 cells expressing rodent PrP^C, from either the mouse or the bank vole, were readily infected by prions adapted to and propagated in these two species (6, 41). RK13 cells expressing human PrP^C, however, were resistant to infection with human prions derived directly from a patient with sporadic CJD (25). Since RK13 cells overexpressing PrP are a well-established model of prion propagation, we can therefore conclude that while these cells apparently have the appropriate cellular machinery to support prion propagation, it may be a characteristic of the rabbit prion protein itself that results in the resistance of this species to prion infection. However, the loss of a cellular cofactor may also be a contributing factor.Analysis of the rabbit PrP amino acid sequence shows that it has all the features previously described for members of the PrP protein family, including an N-terminal signal peptide, an octapeptide repeat region, and a C-terminal signal sequence (26). While amino acid sequence comparison of both mouse and rabbit PrP species reveals 87% sequence homology, there are 22 amino acid differences between the two, and several of these reside in regions of PrP known to be important in PrP^Sc formation. In scrapie-infected MNB cells, the residues Gly99 and Met108 within the N terminus, Ser173 within the central region, and Ile214 within the C terminus of rabbit PrP were shown to inhibit PrP^Sc generation when incorporated into mouse PrP, suggesting that multiple amino acid residues in rabbit PrP inhibit PrP^Sc formation (45). Approximately one-third (9/33 residues in the immature sequence) of the amino acid difference between mouse and rabbit PrPs was shown to occur at the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor attachment site (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). As yet, studies involving this region of rabbit PrP have not been performed. Therefore, this region of rabbit PrP may provide further insight into the resistance of rabbits to prion infection.GPI anchor addition occurs via a transamination reaction in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) following cleavage of the C-terminal signal sequence (39). There is no consensus sequence with which to identify the C-terminal cleavage site, but there are three key C-terminal elements: (i) the cleavage site, or ω site, where the GPI anchor attaches to the COOH group of the ω amino acid; (ii) a hydrophilic spacer region of 8 to 12 amino acids (ω + 1 up to ω + 10); and (iii) a hydrophobic region of 10 to 20 amino acids (ω + 11 onwards) (9). Analysis of known GPI-anchored proteins has given rise to sequence motifs in the C-terminal signal peptide allowing the prediction of the ω site of proteins. Due to the complexity of experimentally determining the ω site of GPI-anchored proteins, relatively few of the many known GPI-anchored proteins have had their ω sites determined (36 of 340 proteins in 2008) (32) The ω site of hamster PrP was determined experimentally to be at amino acid 231 (34) and is predicted to be at the same site for PrPs from all mammals, based on amino acid sequence comparison. Amino acid substitutions near the ω site of mouse PrP revealed that mouse PrP has an ω site at residue 230 (17). It was also shown that single amino acid substitutions at and near the ω site of mouse PrP affect the anchoring and conversion efficiency of PrP (17). It is therefore possible that the amino acids at the C terminus and within the GPI anchor signal sequence of rabbit PrP lead to the resistance to prion infection.To date, no protein structures containing a GPI anchor have been determined by X-ray crystallography, and although the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of mouse and rabbit PrP have been solved, they do not contain any structural information for the residues immediately preceding the GPI anchor. We therefore created a mutant mouse PrP model containing rabbit PrP-specific amino acids at the ω site to investigate whether these residues are involved in rabbit resistance to prion infection. Here we demonstrate that the GPI anchor attachment site is an important site that controls the ability of PrP to be converted into PrP^Sc and that residues ω and ω + 1 of PrP are important modulators of this pathogenic process.     

Membrane topology influences N-glycosylation of the prion protein

The glycosylation state of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored cellular prion protein (PrPC) can influence the formation of the disease form of the protein responsible for the neurodegenerative spongiform encephalopathies. We have investigated the role of membrane topology in the N-glycosylation of PrP by expressing a C-terminal transmembrane anchored form, PrP-CTM, an N-terminal transmembrane anchored form, PrP-NTM, a double-anchored form, PrP-DA, and a truncated form, PrPDeltaGPI, in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Wild-type PrP, PrP- CTM and PrP-DA were membrane anchored and present on the cell surface as glycosylated forms. In contrast, PrP-NTM, although membrane anchored and localized at the cell surface, was not N-glycosylated. PrPDeltaGPI was secreted from the cells into the medium in a hydrophilic form that was unglycosylated. The 4-fold slower rate at which PrPDeltaGPI was trafficked through the cell compared with wild-type PrP was due to the absence of the GPI anchor not the lack of N-glycans. Retention of PrPDeltaGPI in the endoplasmic reticulum did not lead to its glycosylation. These results indicate that C-terminal membrane anchorage is required for N-glycosylation of PrP.     

Amino acid conditions near the GPI anchor attachment site of prion protein for the conversion and the GPI anchoring

Prion protein (PrP) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein, and the C-terminal GPI anchor signal sequence (GPI-SS) of PrP is cleaved before GPI anchoring. However, mutations near the GPI anchor attachment site (the ω site) in the GPI-SS have been recognized in human genetic prion diseases. Moreover, the ω site of PrP has not been identified except hamster, though it is known that amino acid restrictions are very severe at the ω and ω + 2 sites in other GPI-anchored proteins. To investigate the effect of mutations near the ω site of PrP on the conversion and the GPI anchoring, and to discover the ω site of murine PrP, we systematically created mutant murine PrP with all possible single amino acid substitutions at every amino acid residue from codon 228 to 240. We transfected them into scrapie-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells and examined the conversion efficiencies and the GPI anchoring of each mutant PrP. Mutations near the ω site altered the conversion efficiencies and the GPI anchoring efficiencies. Especially, amino acid restrictions for the conversion and the GPI anchoring were severe at codons 230 and 232 in murine PrP, though they were less severe than in other GPI-anchored proteins. Only the mutant PrPs presented on a cell surface via a GPI anchor were conversion competent. The present study shows that mutations in the GPI-SS can affect the GPI anchoring and the conversion efficiency of PrP. We clarified for the first time the ω site of murine PrP and the amino acid conditions near the ω site for the conversion as well as GPI anchoring.     

Comparative efficiencies of C‐terminal signals of native glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)‐anchored proproteins in conferring GPI‐anchoring

Every protein fated to receive the glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor post‐translational modification has a C‐terminal GPI‐anchor attachment signal sequence. This signal peptide varies with respect to length, content, and hydrophobicity. With the exception of predictions based on an upstream amino acid triplet termed ω→ω + 2 which designates the site of GPI uptake, there is no information on how the efficiencies of different native signal sequences compare in the transamidation reaction that catalyzes the substitution of the GPI anchor for the C‐terminal peptide. In this study we utilized the placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) minigene, miniPLAP, and replaced its native 3′ end‐sequence encoding ω‐2 to the C‐terminus with the corresponding C‐terminal sequences of nine other human GPI‐anchored proteins. The resulting chimeras then were fed into an in vitro processing microsomal system where the cleavages leading to mature product from the nascent preproprotein could be followed by resolution on an SDS–PAGE system after immunoprecipitation. The results showed that the native signal of each protein differed markedly with respect to transamidation efficiency, with the signals of three proteins out‐performing the others in GPI‐anchor addition and those of two proteins being poorer substrates for the GPI transamidase. The data additionally indicated that the hierarchical order of efficiency of transamidation did not depend solely on the combination of permissible residues at ω→ω + 2. J. Cell. Biochem. 84: 68–83, 2002. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Removal of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor from PrP(Sc) by cathepsin D does not reduce prion infectivity

According to the protein-only hypothesis of prion propagation, prions are composed principally of PrP(Sc), an abnormal conformational isoform of the prion protein, which, like its normal cellular precursor (PrP(C)), has a GPI (glycosylphosphatidylinositol) anchor at the C-terminus. To date, elucidating the role of this anchor on the infectivity of prion preparations has not been possible because of the resistance of PrP(Sc) to the activity of PI-PLC (phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C), an enzyme which removes the GPI moiety from PrP(C). Removal of the GPI anchor from PrP(Sc) requires denaturation before treatment with PI-PLC, a process that also abolishes infectivity. To circumvent this problem, we have removed the GPI anchor from PrP(Sc) in RML (Rocky Mountain Laboratory)-prion-infected murine brain homogenate using the aspartic endoprotease cathepsin D. This enzyme eliminates a short sequence at the C-terminal end of PrP to which the GPI anchor is attached. We found that this modification has no effect (i) on an in vitro amplification model of PrP(Sc), (ii) on the prion titre as determined by a highly sensitive N2a-cell based bioassay, or (iii) in a mouse bioassay. These results show that the GPI anchor has little or no role in either the propagation of PrP(Sc) or on prion infectivity.     

The role of the prion protein membrane anchor in prion infection

In transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE or prion diseases) such as sheep scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy and human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, normally soluble and protease-sensitive prion protein (PrP-sen or PrPC) is converted to an abnormal, insoluble and protease-resistant form termed PrP-res or PrPSc. PrP-res/PrPSc is believed to be the main component of the prion, the infectious agent of the TSE/prion diseases. Its precursor, PrP-sen, is anchored to the cell surface at the C-terminus by a co-translationally added glycophosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) membrane anchor which can be cleaved by the enzyme phosphatidyl-inositol specific phospholipase (PIPLC). The GPI anchor is also present in PrP-res, but is inaccessible to PIPLC digestion suggesting that conformational changes in PrP associated with PrP-res formation have blocked the PIPLC cleavage site. Although the GPI anchor is present in both PrP-sen and PrP-res, its precise role in TSE diseases remains unclear primarily because there are data to suggest that it both is and is not necessary for PrP-res formation and prion infection.     

Fatal Transmissible Amyloid Encephalopathy: A New Type of Prion Disease Associated with Lack of Prion Protein Membrane Anchoring

Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases of humans and animals characterized by gray matter spongiosis and accumulation of aggregated, misfolded, protease-resistant prion protein (PrPres). PrPres can be deposited in brain in an amyloid-form and/or non-amyloid form, and is derived from host-encoded protease-sensitive PrP (PrPsen), a protein normally anchored to the plasma membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI). Previously, using heterozygous transgenic mice expressing only anchorless PrP, we found that PrP anchoring to the cell membrane was required for typical clinical scrapie. However, in the present experiments, using homozygous transgenic mice expressing two-fold more anchorless PrP, scrapie infection induced a new fatal disease with unique clinical signs and altered neuropathology, compared to non-transgenic mice expressing only anchored PrP. Brain tissue of transgenic mice had high amounts of infectivity, and histopathology showed dense amyloid PrPres plaque deposits without gray matter spongiosis. In contrast, infected non-transgenic mice had diffuse non-amyloid PrPres deposits with significant gray matter spongiosis. Brain graft studies suggested that anchored PrPsen expression was required for gray matter spongiosis during prion infection. Furthermore, electron and light microscopic studies in infected transgenic mice demonstrated several pathogenic processes not seen in typical prion disease, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy and ultrastructural alterations in perivascular neuropil. These findings were similar to certain human familial prion diseases as well as to non-prion human neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer''s disease.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of a mimetic membrane-anchored prion protein

During pathogenesis of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) an abnormal form (PrP(Sc)) of the host encoded prion protein (PrP(C)) accumulates in insoluble fibrils and plaques. The two forms of PrP appear to have identical covalent structures, but differ in secondary and tertiary structure. Both PrP(C) and PrP(Sc) have glycosylphospatidylinositol (GPI) anchors through which the protein is tethered to cell membranes. Membrane attachment has been suggested to play a role in the conversion of PrP(C) to PrP(Sc), but the majority of in vitro studies of the function, structure, folding and stability of PrP use recombinant protein lacking the GPI anchor. In order to study the effects of membranes on the structure of PrP, we synthesized a GPI anchor mimetic (GPIm), which we have covalently coupled to a genetically engineered cysteine residue at the C-terminus of recombinant PrP. The lipid anchor places the protein at the same distance from the membrane as does the naturally occurring GPI anchor. We demonstrate that PrP coupled to GPIm (PrP-GPIm) inserts into model lipid membranes and that structural information can be obtained from this membrane-anchored PrP. We show that the structure of PrP-GPIm reconstituted in phosphatidylcholine and raft membranes resembles that of PrP, without a GPI anchor, in solution. The results provide experimental evidence in support of previous suggestions that NMR structures of soluble, anchor-free forms of PrP represent the structure of cellular, membrane-anchored PrP. The availability of a lipid-anchored construct of PrP provides a unique model to investigate the effects of different lipid environments on the structure and conversion mechanisms of PrP.     

A nonfunctional sequence converted to a signal for glycophosphatidylinositol membrane anchor attachment

The COOH terminus of decay-accelerating factor (DAF) contains a signal that directs glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor attachment in a process involving concerted proteolytic removal of 28 COOH-terminal residues. At least two elements are required for anchor addition: a COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain and a cleavage/attachment site located NH2-terminal to it, requiring a small amino acid as the acceptor for GPI addition. We previously showed that the last 29-37 residues of DAF, making up the COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain plus 20 residues of the adjacent serine/threonine-rich domain (including the anchor addition site), when fused to the COOH terminus of human growth hormone (hGH) will target the fusion protein to the plasma membrane via a GPI anchor. In contrast, a similar fusion protein (hGH-LDLR-DAF17, abbreviated HLD) containing a fragment of the serine/threonine-rich domain of the LDL receptor (LDLR) in place of the DAF-derived serine/threonine-rich sequences, does not become GPI anchored. We now show that this null sequence for GPI attachment can be converted to a strong GPI signal by mutating a pair of residues (valine-glutamate) in the LDLR sequence at a position corresponding to the normal cleavage/attachment site, to serine-glycine, as found in the DAF sequence. A single mutation (converting valine at the anchor addition site to serine, the normal acceptor for GPI addition in DAF) was insufficient to produce GPI anchoring, as was mutation of the valine-glutamate pair to serine-phenylalanine (a bulky residue). These results suggest that a pair of small residues (presumably flanking the cleavage point) is required for GPI attachment. By introducing the sequence serine-glycine (comprising a cleavage-attachment site for GPI addition) at different positions in the LDLR sequence of the fusion protein, HLD, we show that optimal GPI attachment requires a processing site positioned 10-12 residues NH2-terminal to the hydrophobic domain, the efficiency anchor attachment dropping off sharply as the cleavage site is moved beyond these limits. These data suggest that the GPI signal consists solely of a hydrophobic domain combined with a processing site composed of a pair of small residues, positioned 10-12 residues NH2-terminal to the hydrophobic domain. No other structural motifs appear necessary.     

Prion protein—Semisynthetic prion protein (PrP) variants with posttranslational modifications

Deciphering the pathophysiologic events in prion diseases is challenging, and the role of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as glypidation and glycosylation remains elusive due to the lack of homogeneous protein preparations. So far, experimental studies have been limited in directly analyzing the earliest events of the conformational change of cellular prion protein (PrP^C) into scrapie prion protein (PrP^Sc) that further propagates PrP^C misfolding and aggregation at the cellular membrane, the initial site of prion infection, and PrP misfolding, by a lack of suitably modified PrP variants. PTMs of PrP, especially attachment of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, have been shown to be crucially involved in the PrP^Sc formation. To this end, semisynthesis offers a unique possibility to understand PrP behavior invitro and invivo as it provides access to defined site‐selectively modified PrP variants. This approach relies on the production and chemoselective linkage of peptide segments, amenable to chemical modifications, with recombinantly produced protein segments. In this article, advances in understanding PrP conversion using semisynthesis as a tool to obtain homogeneous posttranslationally modified PrP will be discussed.     

The GPI anchor signal sequence dictates the folding and functionality of the Als5 adhesin from Candida albicans

Background

Proteins destined to be Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored are translocated into the ER lumen completely before the C-terminal GPI anchor attachment signal sequence (SS) is removed by the GPI-transamidase and replaced by a pre-formed GPI anchor precursor. Does the SS have a role in dictating the conformation and function of the protein as well?

Methodology/Principal Findings

We generated two variants of the Als5 protein without and with the SS in order to address the above question. Using a combination of biochemical and biophysical techniques, we show that in the case of Als5, an adhesin of C. albicans, the C-terminal deletion of 20 amino acids (SS) results in a significant alteration in conformation and function of the mature protein.

Conclusions/Significance

We propose that the locking of the conformation of the precursor protein in an alternate conformation from that of the mature protein is one probable strategy employed by the cell to control the behaviour and function of proteins intended to be GPI anchored during their transit through the ER.     

Monoacylated cellular prion protein modifies cell membranes, inhibits cell signaling, and reduces prion formation

Prion diseases occur following the conversion of the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) into a disease related, protease-resistant isoform (PrP(Sc)). In these studies, a cell painting technique was used to introduce PrP(C) to prion-infected neuronal cell lines (ScGT1, ScN2a, or SMB cells). The addition of PrP(C) resulted in increased PrP(Sc) formation that was preceded by an increase in the cholesterol content of cell membranes and increased activation of cytoplasmic phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)). In contrast, although PrP(C) lacking one of the two acyl chains from its glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (PrP(C)-G-lyso-PI) bound readily to cells, it did not alter the amount of cholesterol in cell membranes, was not found within detergent-resistant membranes (lipid rafts), and did not activate cPLA(2). It remained within cells for longer than PrP(C) with a conventional GPI anchor and was not converted to PrP(Sc). Moreover, the addition of high amounts of PrP(C)-G-lyso-PI displaced cPLA(2) from PrP(Sc)-containing lipid rafts, reduced the activation of cPLA(2), and reduced PrP(Sc) formation in all three cell lines. In addition, ScGT1 cells treated with PrP(C)-G-lyso-PI did not transmit infection following intracerebral injection to mice. We propose that that the chemical composition of the GPI anchor attached to PrP(C) modified the local membrane microenvironments that control cell signaling, the fate of PrP(C), and hence PrP(Sc) formation. In addition, our observations raise the possibility that pharmacological modification of GPI anchors might constitute a novel therapeutic approach to prion diseases.     

Hypoxia induces expression of a GPI-anchorless splice variant of the prion protein

The human prion protein (PrP) is a glycoprotein with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor at its C-terminus. Here we report alternative splicing within exon 2 of the PrP gene (PRNP) in the human glioblastoma cell line T98G. The open reading frame of the alternatively spliced mRNA lacked the GPI anchor signal sequence and encoded a 230 amino acid polypeptide. Its product, GPI-anchorless PrP (GPI(-) PrPSV), was unglycosylated and soluble in non-ionic detergent, and was found in the cytosolic fraction. We also detected low levels of alternatively spliced mRNA in human brain and non-neuronal tissues. When long-term passaged T98G cells were placed in a low-oxygen environment, alternatively spliced mRNA expression increased and expression of normally spliced PrP mRNA decreased. These findings imply that oxygen tension regulates GPI(-) PrPSV expression in T98G cells.     

Scrapie-induced defects in learning and memory of transgenic mice expressing anchorless prion protein are associated with alterations in the gamma aminobutyric acid-ergic pathway

After infection with RML murine scrapie agent, transgenic (tg) mice expressing prion protein (PrP) without its glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor (GPI(-/-) PrP tg mice) continue to make abundant amounts of the abnormally folded disease-associated PrPres but have a normal life span. In contrast, all age-, sex-, and genetically matched mice with a GPI-anchored PrP become moribund and die due to a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disease by 160 days after RML scrapie agent infection. We report here that infected GPI(-/-) PrP tg mice, although free from progressive neurodegenerative disease of the cerebellum and extrapyramidal and pyramidal systems, nevertheless suffer defects in learning and memory, long-term potentiation, and neuronal excitability. Such dysfunction increases over time and is associated with an increase in gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibition but not loss of excitatory glutamate/N-methyl-d-aspartic acid. Enhanced deposition of abnormally folded infectious PrP (PrPsc or PrPres) in the central nervous system (CNS) localizes with GABAA receptors. This occurs with minimal evidence of CNS spongiosis or apoptosis of neurons. The use of monoclonal antibodies reveals an association of PrPres with GABAA receptors. Thus, the clinical defects of learning and memory loss in vivo in GPI(-/-) PrP tg mice infected with scrapie agent may likely involve the GABAergic pathway.     

Retrotranslocation of prion proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum by preventing GPI signal transamidation

Neurodegeneration in diseases caused by altered metabolism of mammalian prion protein (PrP) can be averted by reducing PrP expression. To identify novel pathways for PrP down-regulation, we analyzed cells that had adapted to the negative selection pressure of stable overexpression of a disease-causing PrP mutant. A mutant cell line was isolated that selectively and quantitatively routes wild-type and various mutant PrPs for ER retrotranslocation and proteasomal degradation. Biochemical analyses of the mutant cells revealed that a defect in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor synthesis leads to an unprocessed GPI-anchoring signal sequence that directs both ER retention and efficient retrotranslocation of PrP. An unprocessed GPI signal was sufficient to impart ER retention, but not retrotranslocation, to a heterologous protein, revealing an unexpected role for the mature domain in the metabolism of misprocessed GPI-anchored proteins. Our results provide new insights into the quality control pathways for unprocessed GPI-anchored proteins and identify transamidation of the GPI signal sequence as a step in PrP biosynthesis that is absolutely required for its surface expression. As each GPI signal sequence is unique, these results also identify signal recognition by the GPI-transamidase as a potential step for selective small molecule perturbation of PrP expression.     

GPI anchoring facilitates propagation and spread of misfolded Sup35 aggregates in mammalian cells

Prion diseases differ from other amyloid‐associated protein misfolding diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's) because they are naturally transmitted between individuals and involve spread of protein aggregation between tissues. Factors underlying these features of prion diseases are poorly understood. Of all protein misfolding disorders, only prion diseases involve the misfolding of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)‐anchored protein. To test whether GPI anchoring can modulate the propagation and spread of protein aggregates, a GPI‐anchored version of the amyloidogenic yeast protein Sup35NM (Sup35^GPI) was expressed in neuronal cells. Treatment of cells with Sup35NM fibrils induced the GPI anchor‐dependent formation of self‐propagating, detergent‐insoluble, protease‐resistant, prion‐like aggregates of Sup35^GPI. Live‐cell imaging showed intercellular spread of Sup35^GPI aggregation to involve contact between aggregate‐positive and aggregate‐negative cells and transfer of Sup35^GPI from aggregate‐positive cells. These data demonstrate GPI anchoring facilitates the propagation and spread of protein aggregation and thus may enhance the transmissibility and pathogenesis of prion diseases relative to other protein misfolding diseases.     

Analysis of the signal for attachment of a glycophospholipid membrane anchor

The COOH terminus of decay accelerating factor (DAF) contains a signal that directs attachment of a glycophospholipid (GPI) membrane anchor. To define this signal we deleted portions of the DAF COOH terminus and expressed the mutant cDNAs it CV1 origin-deficient SV-40 cells. Our results show that the COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain (17 residues) is absolutely required for GPI anchor attachment. However, when fused to the COOH terminus of a secreted protein this hydrophobic domain is insufficient to direct attachment of a GPI anchor. Additional specific information located within the adjacent 20 residues appears to be necessary. We speculate that by analogy with signal sequences for membrane translocation, GPI anchor attachment requires both a COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain (the GPI signal) as well as a suitable cleavage/attachment site located NH2 terminal to the signal.