Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis

Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.     

Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees II: adaptations of eyes and ocelli to nocturnal and diurnal lifestyles

Most bees are diurnal, with behaviour that is largely visually mediated, but several groups have made evolutionary shifts to nocturnality, despite having apposition compound eyes unsuited to vision in dim light. We compared the anatomy and optics of the apposition eyes and the ocelli of the nocturnal carpenter bee, Xylocopa tranquebarica, with two sympatric species, the strictly diurnal X. leucothorax and the occasionally crepuscular X. tenuiscapa. The ocelli of the nocturnal X. tranquebarica are unusually large (diameter ca. 1 mm) and poorly focussed. Moreover, their apposition eyes show specific visual adaptations for vision in dim light, including large size, large facets and very wide rhabdoms, which together make these eyes 9 times more sensitive than those of X. tenuiscapa and 27 times more sensitive than those of X. leucothorax. These differences in optical sensitivity are surprisingly small considering that X. tranquebarica can fly on moonless nights when background luminance is as low as 10⁻⁵ cd m⁻², implying that this bee must employ additional visual strategies to forage and find its way back to the nest. These strategies may include photoreceptors with longer integration times and higher contrast gains as well as higher neural summation mechanisms for increasing visual reliability in dim light.     

Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella

The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth Cameraria ohridella measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males consist of ca. 417 hexagonal facets, while those of females contain 367. In both sexes facet diameters are approximately 11.5 μm. Despite the size differences of the eyes in the two sexes, ultrastructurally they are identical and both possess ommatidia of 80 μm mean length. The ultrastructure of the eye is described and compared with that of other compound eyes of Lepidoptera. Anatomically the eyes represent a type intermediate between apposition and refractive superposition kind. A distal rhabdom is present in the space that in the eyes of larger moths with superposition optics is occupied by the so-called clear zone. A tracheal tapetum and longitudinal screening pigment migrations, typical of superposition but not apposition eyes are present despite the lack of a clear zone. Thus, our results support an earlier calculated minimal theoretical limit for superposition eyes.     

Compound eyes of insects and crustaceans: Some examples that show there is still a lot of work left to be done

Similarities and differences between the 2 main kinds of compound eye (apposition and superposition) are briefly explained before several promising topics for research on compound eyes are being introduced. Research on the embryology and molecular control of the development of the insect clear‐zone eye with superposition optics is one of the suggestions, because almost all of the developmental work on insect eyes in the past has focused on eyes with apposition optics. Age‐ and habitat‐related ultrastructural studies of the retinal organization are another suggestion and the deer cad Lipoptena cervi, which has an aerial phase during which it is winged followed by a several months long parasitic phase during which it is wingless, is mentioned as a candidate species. Sexual dimorphism expressing itself in many species as a difference in eye structure and function provides another promising field for compound eye researchers and so is a focus on compound eye miniaturization in very small insects, especially those that are aquatic and belong to species, in which clear‐zone eyes are diagnostic or are tiny insects that are not aquatic, but belong to taxa like the Diptera for instance, in which open rather than closed rhabdoms are the rule. Structures like interommatidial hairs and glands as well as corneal microridges are yet another field that could yield interesting results and in the past has received insufficient consideration. Finally, the dearth of information on distance vision and depth perception is mentioned and a plea is made to examine the photic environment inside the foam shelters of spittle bugs, chrysales of pupae and other structures shielding insects and crustaceans.     

Morphology of the reflecting superposition eyes of larval oplophorid shrimps

The eyes of larval and juvenile oplophorid shrimps are described for the first time. Variations in eye development occur depending on whether the zoeal stages are lecithotrophic or planktotrophic. In those genera where the first free-living stage is planktonic, the eyes are of the transparent apposition type seen in other decapod zoeas. However, where the eggs hatch after completion of the lecithotrophic zoeal stages, the eyes are laready developing the superposition optics found in the adult. In Oplophorus spinosus the changeover from hexagonal to square facets, indicative of superposition optics, proceeds from anterior to posterior. In Systellaspis debilis the square facets appear first on the lateral face of the eye. Eventually, in both species, only the most dorsal ommatidia retain apposition optics. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The Ultrastructure of the Compound Eye of Two Species of Marine Ostracodes (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Cypridinidae)

Ultrastructurally, the compound eyes of the luminescent marine ostracodes Vargula graminkola and V. tsujii are similar. These ostracodes have two lateral compound eyes, with relatively few ommatidia (13 and 20 respectively). They exhibit apposition type compound eyes as seen in many other arthropods. Each ommatidium includes: a flat, ectodermal cuticular covering, corneagen cells, two long cone cells that give rise to a large conspicuous crystalline cone, retinular cells, pigment cells, a microvillar rhabdom and proximal axonal neurons. The axons merge to form an optic nerve that extends into the brain through a short, muscular stalk that is surrounded externally by a cuticle. The number of retinular cells is typically six per ommatidium in V. graminicola and eight per ommatidium in V. tsujii. Screening pigment cells surround each ommatidium forming a layer that is about 5–15 pigment granules thick. In addition to pigment cells, the cytoplasm of the retinular cells includes numerous screening pigment granules. In light/dark adaptation, there are no obvious morphological differences in the orientation of the rhabdom or in the organization of the screening pigments. Both Vargula species studied are nocturnally active and bioluminescent suggesting that these eyes are capable receptors of the bright conspecific luminescence.     

Butterfly optics exceed the theoretical limits of conventional apposition eyes

Optical experiments on butterfly compound eyes show that they have angular sensitivities narrower than expected from conventional apposition eyes. This superior performance is explained by a theoretical model where the cone stalk is considered as a modecoupling device. In this model the Airy diffraction pattern of the corneal facet excites a combination of the two waveguide modes LP₀₁ and LP₀₂. When the two modes propagate through the cone stalk the power of LP₀₂ is transferred to LP₀₁ alone which is supported by the rhabdom. This mechanism produces a higher on-axis sensitivity and a narrower angular sensitivity than conventional apposition optics. Several predictions of the model were confirmed experimentally.     

Retinal and optical adaptations for nocturnal vision in the halictid bee<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Megalopta genalis</Emphasis>

The apposition compound eye of a nocturnal bee, the halictid Megalopta genalis, is described for the first time. Compared to the compound eye of the worker honeybee Apis mellifera and the diurnal halictid bee Lasioglossum leucozonium, the eye of M. genalis shows specific retinal and optical adaptations for vision in dim light. The major anatomical adaptations within the eye of the nocturnal bee are (1) nearly twofold larger ommatidial facets and (2) a 4–5 times wider rhabdom diameter than found in the diurnal bees studied. Optically, the apposition eye of M. genalis is 27 times more sensitive to light than the eyes of the diurnal bees. This increased optical sensitivity represents a clear optical adaptation to low light intensities. Although this unique nocturnal apposition eye has a greatly improved ability to catch light, a 27-fold increase in sensitivity alone cannot account for nocturnal vision at light intensities that are 8 log units dimmer than during daytime. New evidence suggests that additional neuronal spatial summation within the first optic ganglion, the lamina, is involved.B.G. is thankful for travel awards from the Royal Physiographic Society, the Per Westlings Fond, the Foundation of Dagny and Eilert Ekvall and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. E.J.W. is grateful for the support of a Smithsonian Short-Term Research Fellowship, the Swedish Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation and the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund for their ongoing support     

An apposition‐like compound eye with a layered rhabdom in the small diving beetle Agabus japonicus (Coleoptera,Dytiscidae)

The fine structure of the compound eyes of the adult diving beetle Agabus japonicus is described with light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. The eye of A. japonicus is mango‐shaped and consists of about 985 ommatidia. Each ommatidium is composed of a corneal facet lens, an eucone type of crystalline cone, a fused layered rhabdom with a basal rhabdomere, seven retinula cells (including six distal cells and one basal cell), two primary pigment cells and an undetermined number of secondary pigment cells that are restricted to the distalmost region of the eye. A clear‐zone, separating dioptric apparatus from photoreceptive structures, is not developed and the eye thus resembles an apposition eye. The cross‐sectional areas of the rhabdoms are relatively large indicative of enhanced light‐sensitivity. The distal and central region of the rhabdom is layered with interdigitating microvilli suggesting polarization sensitivity. According to the features mentioned above, we suggest that 1) the eye, seemingly of the apposition type, occurs in a taxon for which the clear‐zone (superposition) eye is characteristic; 2) the eye possesses adaptations to function in a dim‐light environment; 3) the eye may be sensitive to underwater polarized light or linearly water‐reflected polarized light. J. Morphol. 275:1273–1283, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Challenging limits: Ultrastructure and size‐related functional constraints of the compound eye of Stigmella microtheriella (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae)

With a body length of only 2 mm, the nepticulid Stigmella microtheriella (Stainton, 1854) is one of the smallest moths known to date. We investigated the optical design of its lemon‐shaped compound eyes, which measure 83.60 μm in anterior–posterior and 119.77 μm in dorso‐ventral direction. The eyes consist of about 123 facets, each of the latter just 9.9 μm in diameter. Transmission electron microscopy reveals an optical design with features intermediate between apposition and superposition optics similar to that known from two other small species of moths (one Nepticulid and one Gracillarid). Size‐related evolutionary adaptations of the ommatidial organization include (1) the involvement of only five rhabdomeres in the formation of the distal rhabdom (2) the complete absence of a rhabdomere of the eighth (= basal) retinula cell, (3) the “hourglass” shape of the rhabdom with a characteristic narrow waist separating distal from proximal portion, and (4) the reduction to one single layer of tracheoles as an adaptation to the overall restricted space available in this minute eye. J. Morphol. 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Ontogeny and optics of the eyes of the common prawn Palaemon (Palaemon) serratus (Pennant, 1777)

A brief review of the work on crustacean compound eyes is given. Two main types of eye have been recognized: apposition and superposition. The ontogeny of the eyes of the common prawn Palaemon serratus is examined using a variety of methods: photography of live specimens, histological sections, SEM and TEM. In common with other decapod larvae, the common prawn hatches with apposition eyes having circular lenses packed hexagonally. After metamorphosis the gradual squaring of the eye facets, begun during the larval phase, is completed. This is an essential prerequisite for the functioning of the facultative superposition reflecting optics found in long-bodied decapods (e.g. shrimps, prawns and lobsters) and some Anomura. The possible phylogenetical significance of superposition, reflecting optics is also discussed.     

Nocturnal vision and landmark orientation in a tropical halictid bee

BACKGROUND: Some bees and wasps have evolved nocturnal behavior, presumably to exploit night-flowering plants or avoid predators. Like their day-active relatives, they have apposition compound eyes, a design usually found in diurnal insects. The insensitive optics of apposition eyes are not well suited for nocturnal vision. How well then do nocturnal bees and wasps see? What optical and neural adaptations have they evolved for nocturnal vision? RESULTS: We studied female tropical nocturnal sweat bees (Megalopta genalis) and discovered that they are able to learn landmarks around their nest entrance prior to nocturnal foraging trips and to use them to locate the nest upon return. The morphology and optics of the eye, and the physiological properties of the photoreceptors, have evolved to give Megalopta's eyes almost 30 times greater sensitivity to light than the eyes of diurnal worker honeybees, but this alone does not explain their nocturnal visual behavior. This implies that sensitivity is improved by a strategy of photon summation in time and in space, the latter of which requires the presence of specialized cells that laterally connect ommatidia into groups. First-order interneurons, with significantly wider lateral branching than those found in diurnal bees, have been identified in the first optic ganglion (the lamina ganglionaris) of Megalopta's optic lobe. We believe that these cells have the potential to mediate spatial summation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity of photons, Megalopta is able to visually orient to landmarks at night in a dark forest understory, an ability permitted by unusually sensitive apposition eyes and neural photon summation.     

Vision in the mantispid: a sit‐and‐wait and stalking predatory insect

Mantispids (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) are remarkable insects as a result of their close resemblance to the praying mantis (order Mantodea). Although not closely related phylogenetically, as a result of similar selective pressures, both mantispids and mantids have evolved powerful raptorial forelegs for capturing insects. Another striking feature is the hypermetamorphosis in mantispid development, as well as the parasitizing behaviour of the first‐instar larvae. The present review focuses on the role of mantispid vision. First, the morphology and functional significance of the larval eyes (stemmata) are examined. In principle, the stemmata are suitable for spatial vision because of their arrangement and structure. This is then followed by a discussion of how adult mantispids are able to capture fast‐moving insects successfully, although, in contrast to the praying mantis, mantispids rely on superposition eyes rather than on apposition eyes with a frontal region of high acuity. For both larvae and adults, comparisons are made with other insect groups. The present review also addresses the role of mantispid vision as an important cue for triggering mating behaviour; accordingly, sex‐specific differences are considered. Finally, vision in the context of orientation flight is discussed.     

The structures of dorsal and ventral regions of a dragonfly retina

Summary The apposition eyes of the corduliid dragonfly Hemicordulia tau are each divided by pigment colour, facet size and facet arrangement into three regions: dorsal, ventral, and a posterior larval strip. Each ommatidium has two primary pigment cells, twenty-five secondary pigment cells, and eight receptor cells, all surrounded by tracheae which probably prevent light passing between ommatidia, and reduce the weight of the eye. Electron microscopy reveals that the receptor cells are of two types: small vestigial cells making virtually no contribution to the rhabdom, and full-size typical cells. The ventral ommatidia have a distal typical cell (oriented either horizontally or vertically), four medial typical cells, two proximal typical cells and one full-length vestigial cell. The dorsal ommatidia have only four full-length typical cells, and one distal and three vestigial full-length cells. The cross-section of dorsal rhabdoms is small and circular distally, but expands to a large three-pointed star medially and proximally. The tiered receptor arrangement in the ventral ommatidia is typical of other Odonata but the dorsal structure has not been fully described in other species. Specialised dorsal eye regions are typical of insects that detect others against the sky.     

The ring nerve of the box jellyfish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Tripedalia cystophora</Emphasis>

Box jellyfish have the most elaborate sensory system and behavioural repertoire of all cnidarians. Sensory input largely comes from 24 eyes situated on four club-shaped sensory structures, the rhopalia, and behaviour includes obstacle avoidance, light shaft attractance and mating. To process the sensory input and convert it into the appropriate behaviour, the box jellyfish have a central nervous system (CNS) but this is still poorly understood. The CNS has two major components: the rhopalial nervous system and the ring nerve. The rhopalial nervous system is situated within the rhopalia in close connection with the eyes, whereas the ring nerve encircles the bell. We describe the morphology of the ring nerve of the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora as ascertained by normal histological techniques, immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. By light microscopy, we have estimated the number of cells in the ring nerve by counting their nuclei. In cross sections at the ultrastructural level, the ring nerve appears to have three types of neurites: (1) small “normal”-looking neurites, (2) medium-sized neurites almost completely filled by electron-lucent vacuoles and (3) giant neurites. In general, only one giant neurite is seen on each section; this type displays the most synapses. Epithelial cells divide the ring nerve into compartments, each having a tendency to contain neurites of similar morphology. The number and arrangement of the compartments vary along the length of the ring nerve. Dan Nilsson acknowledges grant no. 621-2002-4873 from the Swedish Research Council. Anders Garm acknowledges grant no. 2005-1-74 from the Carlsberg Foundation.     

Book Announcements

G. Erdtman, Handbook of Palynology, 2nd edition, 1992 (Ed. S. Nilsson & J. Praglowski), 676 pages and numerous illustrations. Munksgaard.

S. Nilsson & Th. M. Spieksma (ds.). Traveller's Allergy Service Guide. Publishers: Swedish Museum of Natural History. Palynological laboratory & Fisons Sweden AB, ISBN 91–86510–215.     

The Fine Structure of the Compound Eye of Tanais cavolinii Milne-Edwards (Crustacea: Tanaidacea)

Abstract The compound (apposition) eyes of Tanais cavolinii are not well developed: the number of ommatidia is small and there are certain irregularities in structure. The refractive components are formed by the cornea and the cone. The latter is built up by two cone cells. In addition, there are two accessory cone cells confined to the distal part of the cone. The eight pigmented retinular cells extend from the cornea to the basement membrane. Proximal to the cone, they form a fused continuous rhabdom, which in cross section has a rectangular outline. In the middle part of the rhabdom, the microvilli are arranged perpendicular to the long axis of the rhabdom when seen in cross section. The microvilli outside of this area can be arranged either parallel or perpendicular to the microvilli of the middle part. Other irregularities occur in the ommatidium, e.g. the position of the retinular cell nuclei, which are found at different levels. Extensions from the cone cells fuse and form a mesh proximal to the rhabdom. Between the mesh and basal lamina is a basal cell type enveloping the proximal parts of the retinular cells and their axons. These cells also form the basal lamina, which delimits the compound eye from the haemocoel. No special pigment cells are present in the compound eye of Tanais cavolinii.     

Ultrastructure of pigmented eyes in Dorvilleidae (Annelida,Errantia, Eunicida) and their importance for understanding the evolution of eyes in polychaetes

Among polychaetes, the errant forms are the only group known so far possessing true multicellular eyes in adults which are preceded by bicellular larval eyes in many species. Most likely, two pairs of such eyes showing a specific structure belong to the ground pattern of Errantia = Aciculata. However, these eyes have primarily been investigated in only two subgroups of Errantia, but data on the third main taxon, Eunicida, are available for only two taxa. In the present investigation, the eyes in two additional species of Eunicida, the dorvilleids Protodorvillea kefersteini and Schistomeringos neglecta, were studied. In P. kefersteini, usually described as possessing one pair of small eyes, two pairs could be detected, whereas in S. neglecta only one pair was found. Each eye is made up of rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells, pigment cells and unpigmented supportive cells. Lenses or vitreous bodies are absent. From their structure most likely all eyes represent adult eyes and even the small anterior eyes in P. kefersteini structurally resemble miniaturized adult eyes. Neither persisting larval eyes nor unpigmented rhabdomeric ocelli were found in the two species. The observations in Dorvilleidae confirm the hypothesis of a common origin of adult eyes in Errantia.     

The properties of photoreconvertible fluorophore systems in insect eyes resemble those of quinones

Summary Photoreconvertible fluorophore systems were found in the superposition compound eyes of the mothDeilephila and the neuropterAscalaphus. The systems are very similar to those first described by Schlecht et al. (1987) on the apposition eye of the blowflyCalliphora. The fluorophore systems in the cone cells ofDeilephila andAscalaphus closely agree with those in the Semper cells ofCalliphora. In all 3 species the primary fluorophore is converted by UV into a blue-absorbing fluorophore with its _max in the range between 410 and 450 nm. The intensity of the fluorescence from the photoproducts in all 3 pigment systems is highly dependent on pH; maximal intensity is recorded if pH5. The pK point is at 6.0 (Deilephila). The fluorescence from the Semper cells (and rhabdomeres) inCalliphora is maximal at low retinoid content showing that the chromophoric group of the fluorophore systems is not a retinoid. The probable candidates for the chromophoric group in these systems are quinones, like ubiquin-one. Phospholipid vesicles into which ubiquinone has been incorporated have fluorophore characteristics comparable to those of the fluorophores in the compound eyes: photoreconversion is induced by UV and blue light, the excitation maxima of the primary and secondary fluorophore are similar, and the intensity of the fluorescence from the secondary fluorophore is highly dependent on pH. The intensity of the fluorescence from the vesicles also depends on the direction of the pH gradient across the membrane, suggesting that this pH dependence is due to an asymmetric distribution of the quinone rings at the inner and outer membrane surface.