MIXED MODEL APPROACHES FOR ESTIMATING GENETIC VARIANCES AND COVARIANCES

The limitations of methods for analysis of variance(ANOVA)in estimating genetic variances are discussed. Among the three methods(maximum likelihood ML, restricted maximum likelihood REML, and minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation MINQUE)for mixed linear models, MINQUE method is presented with formulae for estimating variance components and covariances components and for predicting genetic effects. Several genetic models, which cannot be appropriately analyzed by ANOVA methods, are introduced in forms of mixed linear models. Genetic models with independent random effects can be analyzed by MINQUE(1)method whieh is a MINQUE method with all prior values setting 1. MINQUE(1)method can give unbiased estimation for variance components and covariance components, and linear unbiased prediction (LUP) for genetic effects. There are more complicate genetic models for plant seeds which involve correlated random effects. MINQUE(0/1)method, which is a MINQUE method with all prior covariances setting 0 and all prior variances setting 1, is suitable for estimating variance and covariance components in these models. Mixed model approaches have advantage over ANOVA methods for the capacity of analyzing unbalanced data and complicated models. Some problems about estimation and hypothesis test by MINQUE method are discussed.     

Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects I. A genetic model for diploid plant seeds and animals

A genetic model for modified diallel crosses is proposed for estimating variance and covariance components of cytoplasmic, maternal additive and dominance effects, as well as direct additive and dominance effects. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the efficiencies of minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation (MINQUE) methods. For both balanced and unbalanced mating designs, MINQUE (0/1), which has 0 for all the prior covariances and 1 for all the prior variances, has similar efficiency to MINQUE(), which has parameter values for the prior values. Unbiased estimates of variance and covariance components and their sampling variances could be obtained with MINQUE(0/1) and jackknifing. A t-test following jackknifing is applicable to test hypotheses for zero variance and covariance components. The genetic model is robust for estimating variance and covariance components under several situations of no specific effects. A MINQUE(0/1) procedure is suggested for unbiased estimation of covariance components between two traits with equal design matrices. Methods of unbiased prediction for random genetic effects are discussed. A linear unbiased prediction (LUP) method is shown to be efficient for the genetic model. An example is given for a demonstration of estimating variance and covariance components and predicting genetic effects.     

On selection criteria and estimation of parameters when the variance is heterogeneous

Summary Procedures for ranking candidates for selection and for estimating genetic and environmental parameters when variances are heterogeneous are discussed. The best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) accounts automatically for heterogeneous variance provided that the covariance structure is known and that the assumptions of the model hold. Under multivariate normality BLUP allowing for heterogeneous variance maximizes expected genetic progress. Examples of application of BLUP to selection when residual or genetic variances are heterogeneous are given. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of heterogeneous variances and covariances via the expectation-maximization algorithm is presented.     

Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects. II. Genetic models for triploid endosperms

Genetic models for quantitative traits of triploid endosperms are proposed for the analysis of direct gene effects, cytoplasmic effects, and maternal gene effects. The maternal effect is partitioned into maternal additive and dominance components. In the full genetic model, the direct effect is partitioned into direct additive and dominance components and high-order dominance component, which are the cumulative effects of three-allele interactions. If the high-order dominance effects are of no importance, a reduced genetic model can be used. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted in this study for demonstrating unbiasedness of estimated variance and covariance components from the MINQUE (0/1) procedure, which is a minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation (MINQUE) method setting 0 for all the prior covariances and 1 for all the prior variances. Robustness of estimating variance and covariance components for the genetic models was tested by simulations. Both full and reduced genetic models are shown to be robust for estimating variance and covariance components under several situations of no specific effects. Efficiency of predicting random genetic effects for the genetic models by the MINQUE (0/1) procedure was compared with the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). A worked example is given to illustrate the use of the reduced genetic model for kernel growth characteristics in corn (Zea mays L.).     

Multibreed analysis by splitting the breeding values

An equivalent model for multibreed variance covariance estimation is presented. It considers the additive case including or not the segregation variances. The model is based on splitting the additive genetic values in several independent parts depending on their genetic origin. For each part, it expresses the covariance between relatives as a partial numerator relationship matrix times the corresponding variance component. Estimation of fixed effects, random effects or variance components provided by the model are as simple as any model including several random factors. We present a small example describing the mixed model equations for genetic evaluations and two simulated examples to illustrate the Bayesian variance component estimation.     

THE COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN POPULATIONS

A statistical method for comparing matrices of genetic variation and covariation between groups (e.g., species, populations, a single population grown in distinct environments) is proposed. This maximum-likelihood method provides a test of the overall null hypothesis that two covariance component matrices are identical. Moreover, when the overall null hypothesis is rejected, the method provides a framework for isolating the particular components that differ significantly between the groups. Simulation studies reveal that discouragingly large experiments are necessary to obtain acceptable power for comparing genetic covariance component matrices. For example, even in cases of a single trait measured on 900 individuals in a nested design of 100 sires and three dams per sire in each population, the power was only about 0.5 when additive genetic variance differed by a factor of 2.5. Nevertheless, this flexible method makes valid comparison of covariance component matrices possible.     

Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects

Genetic models including sex-linked and maternal effects as well as autosomal gene effects are described. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare efficiencies of estimation by minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation (MINQUE) and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) methods. MINQUE(1), which has 1 for all prior values, has a similar efficiency to MINQUE(), which requires prior estimates of parameter values. MINQUE(1) has the advantage over REML of unbiased estimation and convenient computation. An adjusted unbiased prediction (AUP) method is developed for predicting random genetic effects. AUP is desirable for its easy computation and unbiasedness of both mean and variance of predictors. The jackknife procedure is appropriate for estimating the sampling variances of estimated variances (or covariances) and of predicted genetic effects. A t-test based on jackknife variances is applicable for detecting significance of variation. Worked examples from mice and silkworm data are given in order to demonstrate variance and covariance estimation and genetic effect prediction.     

THE EVOLVABILITY OF GROWTH FORM IN A CLONAL SEAWEED

Although modular construction is considered the key to adaptive growth or growth‐form plasticity in sessile taxa (e.g., plants, seaweeds and colonial invertebrates), the serial expression of genes in morphogenesis may compromise its evolutionary potential if growth forms emerge as integrated wholes from module iteration. To explore the evolvability of growth form in the red seaweed, Asparagopsis armata, we estimated genetic variances, covariances, and cross‐environment correlations for principal components of growth‐form variation in contrasting light environments. We compared variance–covariance matrices across environments to test environmental effects on heritable variation and examined the potential for evolutionary change in the direction of plastic responses to light. Our results suggest that growth form in Asparagopsis may constitute only a single genetic entity whose plasticity affords only limited evolutionary potential. We argue that morphological integration arising from modular construction may constrain the evolvability of growth form in Asparagopsis, emphasizing the critical distinction between genetic and morphological modularity in this and other modular taxa.     

On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data

When data come from several independent studies for the purpose of estimating treatment control differences, meta-analysis can be carried out either on the best linear unbiased estimators computed from each study or on the pooled individual patient data modelled as a two-way model without interaction, where the two factors represent the different studies and the different treatments. Assuming that observations within and between studies are independent having a common variance, Olkin and Sampson (1998) have obtained the surprising result that the two meta-analytic procedures are equivalent, i.e., they both produce the same estimator. In this article, the same equivalence is established for the two-way fixed-effects model without interaction with the only assumption that the observations across studies be independent. A consequence of the equivalence result is that, regardless of the covariance structure, it is possible to get an explicit representation for the best linear unbiased estimator of any vector of treatment contrasts in a two-way fixed-effects model without interaction as long as the studies are independent. Another interesting consequence is that, for the purpose of best linear unbiased estimation, an unbalanced two-way fixed-effects model without interaction can be treated as several independent unbalanced one-way models, regardless of the covariance structure, when the studies are independent.     

Longitudinal analysis of pre- and post-treatment measurements with equal baseline assumptions in randomized trials

For continuous variables of randomized controlled trials, recently, longitudinal analysis of pre- and posttreatment measurements as bivariate responses is one of analytical methods to compare two treatment groups. Under random allocation, means and variances of pretreatment measurements are expected to be equal between groups, but covariances and posttreatment variances are not. Under random allocation with unequal covariances and posttreatment variances, we compared asymptotic variances of the treatment effect estimators in three longitudinal models. The data-generating model has equal baseline means and variances, and unequal covariances and posttreatment variances. The model with equal baseline means and unequal variance–covariance matrices has a redundant parameter. In large sample sizes, these two models keep a nominal type I error rate and have high efficiency. The model with equal baseline means and equal variance–covariance matrices wrongly assumes equal covariances and posttreatment variances. Only under equal sample sizes, this model keeps a nominal type I error rate. This model has the same high efficiency with the data-generating model under equal sample sizes. In conclusion, longitudinal analysis with equal baseline means performed well in large sample sizes. We also compared asymptotic properties of longitudinal models with those of the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and t-test.     

Covariance between relatives in multibreed populations: additive model

Covariance between relatives in a multibreed population was derived for an additive model with multiple unlinked loci. An efficient algorithm to compute the inverse of the additive genetic covariance matrix is given. For an additive model, the variance for a crossbred individual is a function of the additive variances for the pure breeds, the covariance between parents, and segregation variances. Provided that the variance of a crossbred individual is computed as presented here, the covariance between crossbred relatives can be computed using formulae for purebred populations. For additive traits the inverse of the genotypic covariance matrix given here can be used both to obtain genetic evaluations by best linear unbiased prediction and to estimate genetic parameters by maximum likelihood in multibreed populations. For nonadditive traits, the procedure currently used to analyze multibreed data can be improved using the theory presented here to compute additive covariances together with a suitable approximation for nonadditive covariances.Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch Projects 35-0345 (RLF) and 35-0367 (MG)     

Analysis of Conditional Genetic Effects and Variance Components in Developmental Genetics

A genetic model with additive-dominance effects and genotype X environment interactions is presented for quantitative traits with time-dependent measures. The genetic model for phenotypic means at time t conditional on phenotypic means measured at previous time (t - 1) is defined. Statistical methods are proposed for analyzing conditional genetic effects and conditional genetic variance components. Conditional variances can be estimated by minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation (MINQUE) method. An adjusted unbiased prediction (AUP) procedure is suggested for predicting conditional genetic effects. A worked example from cotton fruiting data is given for comparison of unconditional and conditional genetic variances and additive effects.     

Quantitative trait loci mapping in F(2) crosses between outbred lines

We develop a mixed-model approach for QTL analysis in crosses between outbred lines that allows for QTL segregation within lines as well as for differences in mean QTL effects between lines. We also propose a method called "segment mapping" that is based in partitioning the genome in a series of segments. The expected change in mean according to percentage of breed origin, together with the genetic variance associated with each segment, is estimated using maximum likelihood. The method also allows the estimation of differences in additive variances between the parental lines. Completely fixed random and mixed models together with segment mapping are compared via simulation. The segment mapping and mixed-model behaviors are similar to those of classical methods, either the fixed or random models, under simple genetic models (a single QTL with alternative alleles fixed in each line), whereas they provide less biased estimates and have higher power than fixed or random models in more complex situations, i.e., when the QTL are segregating within the parental lines. The segment mapping approach is particularly useful to determining which chromosome regions are likely to contain QTL when these are linked.     

The Utilization of Kurtosis in the Estimation of the Parameters of the One‐Way Random Effects Model

This paper deals with the problem of estimating the components of the variance of one‐way random effects model under non‐normality situation using a prior knowledge of coefficient of kurtosis. We have suggested two classes of estimators and for the within and between variances respectively. Optimum estimators in the classes of and are identified with their mean squared errors formulae and compared with that of usual ANOVA unbiased and Shoukri , Tracy and Mian 's (1990) estimators. It is found that the proposed estimators are more efficient than the ANOVA unbiased estimators and Shoukri , Tracy and Mian (1990) estimators.     

A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN THE ADVERTISEMENT CALL OF THE GRAY TREEFROG,HYLA VERSICOLOR

Genetic variation in sexual displays is crucial for an evolutionary response to sexual selection, but can be eroded by strong selection. Identifying the magnitude and sources of additive genetic variance underlying sexually selected traits is thus an important issue in evolutionary biology. We conducted a quantitative genetics experiment with gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) to investigate genetic variances and covariances among features of the male advertisement call. Two energetically expensive traits showed significant genetic variation: call duration, expressed as number of pulses per call, and call rate, represented by its inverse, call period. These two properties also showed significant genetic covariance, consistent with an energetic constraint to call production. Combining the genetic variance–covariance matrix with previous estimates of directional sexual selection imposed by female preferences predicts a limited increase in call duration but no change in call rate despite significant selection on both traits. In addition to constraints imposed by the genetic covariance structure, an evolutionary response to sexual selection may also be limited by high energetic costs of long‐duration calls and by preferences that act most strongly against very short‐duration calls. Meanwhile, the persistence of these preferences could be explained by costs of mating with males with especially unattractive calls.     

On the Effect of Unbalancedness and Heteroscedasticity on the ANOVA Estimator of Group Variance Component in One-Way Random Model

The expression for rth cumulant of ANOVA estimator of group variance component is derived in the One-way unbalanced random model under heteroscedasticity. The expression is used to study the effect of unbalancedness and heteroscedasticity on the mean and variance of the estimator, numerically. The computed results reveal that the unbalancedness and heteroscedasticity have a combined effect on the mean and variance of the estimator. For certain situations of unequal group sizes and error variances, the mean and variance of the estimator are increased and for certain other situations the values are decreased.     

MIVQUE and REML Estimators of Variance Components under Proportionality Condition

In this study, a one-way random effect model with unequal cell variances is considered, and the Minimum Variance Quadratic Unbiased Estimator (MIVQUE) and Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimator of the variance components are studied. The algebraic inversion of the variance matrix of the observation vector is obtained to achieve some computational convenience. Using the proportionality condition described by Talukder (1992) that the cell sizes are proportional to the cell variances, MIVQUE and REML estimators are shown to be the same as the ANOVA estimators.     

among-Environment Heteroscedasticity and Genetic Autocorrelation: Implications for the Study of Phenotypic Plasticity

The impact of among-environment heteroscedasticity and genetic autocorrelation on the analysis of phenotypic plasticity is examined. Among-environment heteroscedasticity occurs when genotypic variances differ among environments. Genetic autocorrelation arises whenever the responses of a genotype to different environments are more or less similar than expected for observations randomly associated. In a multivariate analysis-of-variance model, three transformations of genotypic profiles (reaction norms), which apply to the residuals of the model while preserving the mean responses within environments, are derived. The transformations remove either among-environment heteroscedasticity, genetic autocorrelation or both. When both nuisances are not removed, statistical tests are corrected in a modified univariate approach using the sample covariance matrix of the genotypic profiles. Methods are illustrated on a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii data set. When heteroscedasticity was removed, the variance component associated with the genotype-by-environment interaction increased proportionally to the genotype variance component. As a result, the genetic correlation r(g) was altered. Genetic autocorrelation was responsible for statistical significance of the genotype-by-environment interaction and genotype main effects on raw data. When autocorrelation was removed, the ranking of genotypes according to their stability index dramatically changed. Evolutionary implications of our methods and results are discussed.     

Testing for homogeneity of gametic disequilibrium across strata

Background

Variance component (VC) models are commonly used for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) mapping in outbred populations. Here, the QTL effect is given as a random effect and a critical part of the model is the relationship between the phenotypic values and the random effect. In the traditional VC model, each individual has a unique QTL effect and the relationship between these random effects is given as a covariance structure (known as the identity-by-descent (IBD) matrix).

Results

We present an alternative notation of the variance component model, where the elements of the random effect are independent base generation allele effects and sampling term effects. The relationship between the phenotypic vales and the random effect is given by an incidence matrix, which results in a novel, but statistically equivalent, version of the traditional VC model. A general algorithm to estimate this incidence matrix is presented. Since the model is given in terms of base generation allele effects and sampling term effects, these effects can be estimated separately using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). From simulated data, we showed that biallelic QTL effects could be accurately clustered using the BLUP obtained from our model notation when markers are fully informative, and that the accuracy increased with the size of the QTL effect. We also developed a measure indicating whether a base generation marker homozygote is a QTL heterozygote or not, by comparing the variances of the sampling term BLUP and the base generation allele BLUP. A ratio greater than one gives strong support for a QTL heterozygote.

Conclusion

We developed a simple presentation of the VC QTL model for identification of base generation allele effects in QTL linkage analysis. The base generation allele effects and sampling term effects were separated in our model notation. This clarifies the assumptions of the model and should also enhance the development of genome scan methods.     

The Contribution of Quantitative Trait Loci and Neutral Marker Loci to the Genetic Variances and Covariances among Quantitative Traits in Random Mating Populations

Using Cockerham's approach of orthogonal scales, we develop genetic models for the effect of an arbitrary number of multiallelic quantitative trait loci (QTLs) or neutral marker loci (NMLs) upon any number of quantitative traits. These models allow the unbiased estimation of the contributions of a set of marker loci to the additive and dominance variances and covariances among traits in a random mating population. The method has been applied to an analysis of allozyme and quantitative data from the European oyster. The contribution of a set of marker loci may either be real, when the markers are actually QTLs, or apparent, when they are NMLs that are in linkage disequilibrium with hidden QTLs. Our results show that the additive and dominance variances contributed by a set of NMLs are always minimum estimates of the corresponding variances contributed by the associated QTLs. In contrast, the apparent contribution of the NMLs to the additive and dominance covariances between two traits may be larger than, equal to or lower than the actual contributions of the QTLs. We also derive an expression for the expected variance explained by the correlation between a quantitative trait and multilocus heterozygosity. This correlation explains only a part of the genetic variance contributed by the markers, i.e., in general, a combination of additive and dominance variances and, thus, provides only very limited information relative to the method supplied here.