Signal recognition and chemoelectrical transduction in olfaction

The mimicking of olfaction is considered to be a promising approach for the construction of artificial odour-sensing systems. In the nose, the detection of volatile odorants begins when the odorant ligands interact with specific odorant receptors in the ciliary membrane of the olfactory neurons. A large family of genes encoding putative odorant receptors has been identified recently. Individual receptor types are expressed in subsets of cells distributed in distinct zones of the olfactory epithelium. Ligand-receptor interaction triggers a rapid multistep reaction cascade, resulting in a “pulse” of second messengers that initiates an electrical response from the receptor neuron. Olfactory signalling is terminated by phosphorylation of receptors via a negative feedback reaction, catalyzed by specific kinases.     

An odorant derivative as an antagonist for an olfactory receptor

Different odorants are recognized by different combinations of G protein-coupled olfactory receptors, and thereby, odor identity is determined by a combinatorial receptor code for each odorant. We recently demonstrated that odorants appeared to compete for receptor sites to act as an agonist or an antagonist. Therefore, in natural circumstances where we always perceive a mixture of various odorants, olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants may result in a receptor code for the mixture that cannot be predicted from the codes for its individual components. Here we show that stored isoeugenol has an antagonistic effect on a mouse olfactory receptor, mOR-EG. However, freshly purified isoeugenol did not have an inhibitory effect. Instead, an isoeugenol derivative produced during storage turned out to be a potent competitive antagonist of mOR-EG. Structural analysis revealed that this derivative is an oxidatively dimerized isoeugenol that naturally occurs by oxidative reaction. The current study indicates that as odorants age, they decompose or react with other odorants, which in turn affects responsiveness of an olfactory receptor(s).     

High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity

Odorants create unique and overlapping patterns of olfactory receptor activation, allowing a family of approximately 1,000 murine and 400 human receptors to recognize thousands of odorants. Odorant ligands have been published for fewer than 6% of human receptors^1-11. This lack of data is due in part to difficulties functionally expressing these receptors in heterologous systems. Here, we describe a method for expressing the majority of the olfactory receptor family in Hana3A cells, followed by high-throughput assessment of olfactory receptor activation using a luciferase reporter assay. This assay can be used to (1) screen panels of odorants against panels of olfactory receptors; (2) confirm odorant/receptor interaction via dose response curves; and (3) compare receptor activation levels among receptor variants. In our sample data, 328 olfactory receptors were screened against 26 odorants. Odorant/receptor pairs with varying response scores were selected and tested in dose response. These data indicate that a screen is an effective method to enrich for odorant/receptor pairs that will pass a dose response experiment, i.e. receptors that have a bona fide response to an odorant. Therefore, this high-throughput luciferase assay is an effective method to characterize olfactory receptors—an essential step toward a model of odor coding in the mammalian olfactory system.     

Odorant-receptor interactions and odor percept: a chemical perspective

Receptor-ligand interaction models are generally based on a 'lock and key' concept. How far this holds true for olfactory receptors and odor molecules is currently uncertain. Here, we have investigated the response of a human olfactory receptor, OR1D2, to a broad array of odorants and found that there is no simple, direct correlation between a molecule's ability to activate this receptor and the odor impression elicited in the brain. In a parallel study on specific anosmia, we have found no evidence for odor-specific anosmia to either musk or amber, but rather to specific molecules within these categories. Cluster analysis confirmed that there is no simple correlation between molecular structure and impaired perception in either odor type. There are some differences in patterns of impairment between the two odor types and some evidence to suggest that subjects with specific anosmia to a given substance can identify its presence in a mixture. Taken together, our results show that simplistic 'lock and key' models of olfaction based on a concept of odor-quality-tuned receptors are inadequate, irrespective of the nature of the lock-key interaction. Receptor activation is only one step in a long chain of events leading from inhalation of odorants to perception of odor in the higher brain, and, therefore, although structure-odor correlations are useful tools for the design of novel odorants, caution should be exercised when extrapolating them to models of olfactory perception. Those seeking to understand the odorant-receptor interaction should use receptor activation rather than odor as input data.     

Human olfactory receptor families and their odorants

The human nose detects volatile chemical stimuli by at least three different receptor families: odorant receptors, trace amine-associated receptors, and vomeronasal type-1 receptors. As G protein-coupled receptors, all of the few functionally characterized olfactory receptors share major functional features: when expressed in heterologous cell systems, they 1) respond to odorants of certain chemical groups, e.g., amines, aliphatic carboxylic acids or aldehydes, floral or fruity odorants, including certain key-food odorants, and putative pheromones, and 2) transduce their signals to intracellular cAMP signaling. However, little is known yet about specific differences in the functional designation of the three olfactory receptor families. Recently, two heterologous cell systems expressing olfactory signaling molecules have been developed. Different screening strategies will shed light on the yet sparsely available odorant specificity profiles and structure-function relationships of olfactory receptors, as well as the structure-activity relationships of their odorants.     

Cellular and molecular constituents of olfactory sensation in vertebrates

Since the discovery of odorant-activated adenylate cyclase in the olfactory receptor cilia, research into the olfactory perception of vertebrates has rapidly expanded. Recent studies have shown how the odor discrimination starts at the receptor level: each of 700-1000 types of the olfactory neurons in the neural olfactory epithelium contains a single type of odor receptor protein. Although the receptors have relatively low specific affinities for odorants, excitation of different types of receptors forms an excitation pattern specific to each odorant in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb. It was demonstrated that adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) is very likely the sole second messenger for olfactory transduction. It was also demonstrated that the affinity of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel for cAMP regulated by Ca(2+)/calmodulin is solely responsible for the adaptation of the cell. However, many other regulatory components were found in the transduction cascade. Regulated by Ca(2+) and/or the protein-phosphorylation, many of them may serve for the adaptation of the cell, probably on a longer time scale. It may be important to consider the resensitization as a part of this adaptation, as well as to collect kinetic data of each reaction to gain further insight into the olfactory mechanism.     

Specificity of odorant-binding proteins: a factor influencing the sensitivity of olfactory receptor-based biosensors

Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) primarily function in the transport of hydrophobic odorants. In this study, OBPs originating from rat and pig were cloned into a mammalian expression vector, pcDNA3, and expressed in HEK-293 cells, and their specificity for odorants and olfactory receptors was examined. Results suggest that OBPs have a high affinity for the olfactory receptors when both the OBP and receptor originate from the same species. The rat OBPs were bound not only to the rat olfactory receptor I7 but also to the odorant specific to I7. The solubility of the odorant was increased by both OBP2 and OBP3, which originate from rat, but with different efficiencies. These results demonstrate that OBPs specifically interact with odorants as well as olfactory receptors, and these interactions can influence the sensitivity of olfactory receptor-based biosensors.     

Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants

The detection of thousands of volatile odorants is mediated by several hundreds of different G protein-coupled olfactory receptors (ORs). The main strategy in encoding odorant identities is a combinatorial receptor code scheme in that different odorants are recognized by different sets of ORs. Despite increasing information on agonist-OR combinations, little is known about the antagonism of ORs in the mammalian olfactory system. Here we show that odorants inhibit odorant responses of OR(s), evidence of antagonism between odorants at the receptor level. The antagonism was demonstrated in a heterologous OR-expression system and in single olfactory neurons that expressed a given OR, and was also visualized at the level of the olfactory epithelium. Dual functions of odorants as an agonist and an antagonist to ORs indicate a new aspect in the receptor code determination for odorant mixtures that often give rise to novel perceptual qualities that are not present in each component. The current study also provides insight into strategies to modulate perceived odorant quality.     

Olfactory receptor neuron profiling using sandalwood odorants

The mammalian olfactory system can discriminate between volatile molecules with subtle differences in their molecular structures. Efforts in synthetic chemistry have delivered a myriad of smelling compounds of different qualities as well as many molecules with very similar olfactive properties. One important class of molecules in the fragrance industry are sandalwood odorants. Sandalwood oil and four synthetic sandalwood molecules were selected to study the activation profile of endogenous olfactory receptors when exposed to compounds from the same odorant family. Dissociated rat olfactory receptor neurons were exposed to the sandalwood molecules and the receptor activation studied by monitoring fluxes in the internal calcium concentration. Olfactory receptor neurons were identified that were specifically stimulated by sandalwood compounds. These neurons expressed olfactory receptors that can discriminate between sandalwood odorants with slight differences in their molecular structures. This is the first study in which an important class of perfume compounds was analyzed for its ability to activate endogenous olfactory receptors in olfactory receptor neurons.     

Odorant receptor genes in humans.

The sense of smell is highly sophisticated in vertebrates but Homo sapiens ranks low in olfactory performance when compared to other species - why? Olfaction initiates with the interaction of odorants with specific receptors on the surface of olfactory sensory neurons in the nose. The genes encoding odorant receptors form the largest family in the vertebrate genome, numbering as many as 1000 in rodents. It has recently come to light that the repertoire of human odorant receptor genes, unlike in other vertebrates, is riddled with pseudogenes.     

Structural determinants of odorant recognition by the human olfactory receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2

An interaction of odorants with olfactory receptors is thought to be the initial step in odorant detection. However, ligands have been reported for only 6 out of 380 human olfactory receptors, with their structural determinants of odorant recognition just beginning to emerge. Guided by the notion that amino acid positions that interact with specific odorants would be conserved in orthologs, but variable in paralogs, and based on the prediction of a set of 22 of such amino acid positions, we have combined site-directed mutagenesis, rhodopsin-based homology modelling, and functional expression in HeLa/Olf cells of receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. We found that (i) their odorant profiles are centred around citronellic terpenoid structures, (ii) two evolutionary conserved amino acid residues in transmembrane domain 3 are necessary for the responsiveness of OR1A1 and the mouse ortholog Olfr43 to (S)-(-)-citronellol, (iii) changes at these two positions are sufficient to account for the differential (S)-(-)-citronellol responsiveness of the paralogs OR1A1 and OR1A2, and (iv) the interaction sites for (S)-(-)-citronellal and (S)-(-)-citronellol differ in both human receptors. Our results show that the orientation of odorants within a homology modelling-derived binding pocket of olfactory receptor orthologs is defined by evolutionary conserved amino acid positions.     

Searching for the Ligands of Odorant Receptors

Through the sense of smell mammals can detect and discriminate between a large variety of odorants present in the surrounding environment. Odorants bind to a large repertoire of odorant receptors located in the cilia of olfactory sensory neurons of the nose. Each olfactory neuron expresses one single type of odorant receptor, and neurons expressing the same type of receptor project their axons to one or a few glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, creating a map of odorant receptor inputs. The information is then passed on to other regions of the brain, leading to odorant perception. To understand how the olfactory system discriminates between odorants, it is necessary to determine the odorant specificities of individual odorant receptors. These studies are complicated by the extremely large size of the odorant receptor family and by the poor functional expression of these receptors in heterologous cells. This article provides an overview of the methods that are currently being used to investigate odorant receptor–ligand interactions.     

Receptor heterogeneity and its effect on sensitivity and coding range in olfactory sensory neurons

Signal processing in the olfactory system is initiated by binding of odorant molecules to receptor molecules embedded in the membranes of sensory neurons. Most analyses of odorant—receptor interaction focus on one or more types of odorants binding with one type of receptors. Here, two basic models of this first step are investigated under the assumption that the population of receptors is not homogenous and is characterized by different activation/deactivation rates. Both, discrete and continuous variation of the rates are considered. The steady-state characteristics of the models are derived. In addition, time to crossing a threshold, defined as a response time, is also investigated. The achieved results are compared with those valid for models with the homogenous population of receptors and interpreted in terms of information coding. The obvious implications of the modeling study—that the heterogeneity of receptors enlarges the coding range and increases the sensitivity of the system—are quantified.     

Improving the odorant sensitivity of olfactory receptor-expressing yeast with accessory proteins

Olfaction depends on the selectivity and sensitivity of olfactory receptors. Previous attempts at constructing a mammalian olfactory receptor-based artificial odorant sensing system in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae suffered from low sensitivity and activity. This result may be at least in part due to poor functional expression of olfactory receptors and/or limited solubility of some odorants in the medium. In this study, we examined the effects of two types of accessory proteins, receptor transporting protein 1 short and odorant binding proteins, in improving odor-mediated activation of olfactory receptors expressed in yeast. We found that receptor transporting protein 1 short enhanced the membrane expression and ligand-induced responses of some olfactory receptors. Coexpression of odorant binding proteins of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori enhanced the sensitivity of a mouse olfactory receptor. Our results suggest that different classes of accessory proteins can confer sensitive and robust responses of olfactory receptors expressed in yeast. Inclusion of accessory proteins may be essential in the future development of practical olfactory receptor-based odorant sensors.     

Molecular and cellular basis of human olfaction

The human olfactory systems recognize and discriminate a large number of different odorant molecules. The detection of chemically distinct odorants begins with the binding of an odorant ligand to a specific receptor protein in the ciliary membrane of olfactory neurons. To address the problem of olfactory perception at a molecular level, we have cloned, functionally expressed, and characterized some of the human olfactory receptors from chromosome 17. Our results show that a receptor protein is capable of recognizing the particular chemical substructure of an odor molecule and, therefore, is able to respond only to odorants that have a defined molecular structure. These findings represent the beginning of the molecular understanding of odorant recognition in humans. In the future, this knowledge could be used for the design of synthetic ideal receptors for specific odors (biosensors), or the perfect odor molecule for a given receptor.     

Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel activation is not required for activity-dependent labeling of zebrafish olfactory receptor neurons by amino acids

The olfactory epithelium of fish is heterogeneous both with respect to the types of receptor cells (ORNs) present and the families of odorant receptors expressed in these cells. As a consequence of this diversity, the transduction cascade(s) activated by odorants has yet to be unambiguously established. In the current study, electrophysiological and activity-dependent labeling techniques were used to assess the role of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel in zebrafish olfactory transduction. Both amino acid and bile salt odorants elicited robust electrophysiological responses, however, activity-dependent labeling of ORNs could be stimulated only by the amino acid odorants. An adenylate cyclase (AC) activator (forskolin) and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, IBMX) also elicited robust electrophysiological responses; generally larger than the responses elicited by either the amino acid or bile salt odorants. However, neither forskolin alone or a mixture of forskolin and IBMX stimulated activity-dependent labeling. Bathing the olfactory epithelium with forskolin, which presumably increased the intracellular concentration of cAMP, reduced the responses to bile salt odorants to a significantly greater extent than amino acid odorants. Collectively, these findings suggest that the transduction of amino acid input does not rely primarily on cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channel activation and that CNG channel activation may be required for the transduction of bile salt input. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Development of wiring specificity in the olfactory system

The olfactory system discriminates a large number of odorants using precisely wired neural circuits. It offers an excellent opportunity to study mechanisms of neuronal wiring specificity at the single synapse level. Each olfactory receptor neuron typically expresses only one olfactory receptor from many receptor genes (1000 in mice). In mice, this striking singularity appears to be ensured by a negative feedback mechanism. Olfactory receptor neurons expressing the same receptor converge their axons to stereotypical positions with high precision, a feature that is conserved from insects to mammals. Several molecules have recently been identified that control this process, including olfactory receptors themselves in mice. The second order neurons, mitral cells in mammals and projection neurons in insects, have a similar degree of wiring specificity: studies in Drosophila suggest that projection neuron-intrinsic mechanisms regulate their precise dendritic targeting. Finally, recent studies have revealed interactions of different cell types during circuit assembly, including axon-axon interactions among olfactory receptor neurons and dendro-dendritic interactions of projection neurons, that are essential in establishing wiring specificity of the olfactory circuit.     

The molecular basis of odor coding in the Drosophila antenna

We have undertaken a functional analysis of the odorant receptor repertoire in the Drosophila antenna. Each receptor was expressed in a mutant olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) used as a "decoder," and the odor response spectrum conferred by the receptor was determined in vivo by electrophysiological recordings. The spectra of these receptors were then matched to those of defined ORNs to establish a receptor-to-neuron map. In addition to the odor response spectrum, the receptors dictate the signaling mode, i.e., excitation or inhibition, and the response dynamics of the neuron. An individual receptor can mediate both excitatory and inhibitory responses to different odorants in the same cell, suggesting a model of odorant receptor transduction. Receptors vary widely in their breadth of tuning, and odorants vary widely in the number of receptors they activate. Together, these properties provide a molecular basis for odor coding by the receptor repertoire of an olfactory organ.