Coevolution of Specificity Determinants in Eukaryotic Glutamyl- and Glutaminyl-tRNA Synthetases

The glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) enzyme, which pairs glutamine with tRNA^Gln for protein synthesis, evolved by gene duplication in early eukaryotes from a nondiscriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) that aminoacylates both tRNA^Gln and tRNA^Glu with glutamate. This ancient GluRS also separately differentiated to exclude tRNA^Gln as a substrate, and the resulting discriminating GluRS and GlnRS further acquired additional protein domains assisting function in cis (the GlnRS N-terminal Yqey domain) or in trans (the Arc1p protein associating with GluRS). These added domains are absent in contemporary bacterial GlnRS and GluRS. Here, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzymes as models, we find that the eukaryote-specific protein domains substantially influence amino acid binding, tRNA binding and aminoacylation efficiency, but they play no role in either specific nucleotide readout or discrimination against noncognate tRNA. Eukaryotic tRNA^Gln and tRNA^Glu recognition determinants are found in equivalent positions and are mutually exclusive to a significant degree, with key nucleotides located adjacent to portions of the protein structure that differentiated during the evolution of archaeal nondiscriminating GluRS to GlnRS. These findings provide important corroboration for the evolutionary model and suggest that the added eukaryotic domains arose in response to distinctive selective pressures associated with the greater complexity of the eukaryotic translational apparatus. We also find that the affinity of GluRS for glutamate is significantly increased when Arc1p is not associated with the enzyme. This is consistent with the lower concentration of intracellular glutamate and the dissociation of the Arc1p:GluRS complex upon the diauxic shift to respiratory conditions.     

The Root of the Universal Tree of Life Inferred from Anciently Duplicated Genes Encoding Components of the Protein-Targeting Machinery

The key protein of the signal recognition particle (termed SRP54 for Eucarya and Ffh for Bacteria) and the protein (termed SRα for Eucarya and Ftsy for bacteria) involved in the recognition and binding of the ribosome SRP nascent polypeptide complex are the products of an ancient gene duplication that appears to predate the divergence of all extant taxa. The paralogy of the genes encoding the two proteins (both of which are GTP triphosphatases) is argued by obvious sequence similarities between the N-terminal half of SRP54(Ffh) and the C-terminal half of SRα(Ftsy). This enables a universal phylogeny based on either protein to be rooted using the second protein as an outgroup. Phylogenetic trees inferred by various methods from an alignment (220 amino acid positions) of the shared SRP54(Ffh) and SRα(Ftsy) regions generate two reciprocally rooted universal trees corresponding to the two genes. The root of both trees is firmly positioned between Bacteria and Archaea/Eucarya, thus providing strong support for the notion (Iwabe et al. 1989; Gogarten et al. 1989) that the first bifurcation in the tree of life separated the lineage leading to Bacteria from a common ancestor to Archaea and Eucarya. None of the gene trees inferred from the two paralogues support a paraphyletic Archaea with the crenarchaeota as a sister group to Eucarya. Received: 19 March 1998 / Accepted: 5 June 1998     

Evidence for the early divergence of tryptophanyl- and tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases

Each amino acid is attached to its cognate tRNA by a distinct aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS). The conventional evolutionary view is that the modern complement of synthetases existed prior to the divergence of eubacteria and eukaryotes. Thus comparisons of prokaryotic and eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases of the same type (charging specificity) should show greater sequence similarities than comparisons between synthetases of different types—and this is almost always so. However, a recent study [Ribas de Pouplana L, Furgier M, Quinn CL, Schimmel P (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:166–170] suggested that tryptophanyl- (TrpRS) and tyrosyl-tRNA (TyrRS) synthetases of the Eucarya (eukaryotes) are more similar to each other than either is to counterparts in the Bacteria (eubacteria). Here, we reexamine the evolutionary relationships of TyrRS and TrpRS using a broader range of taxa, including new sequence data from the Archaea (archaebacteria) as well as species of Eucarya and Bacteria. Our results differ from those of Ribas de Pouplana et al.: All phylogenetic methods support the separate monophyly of TrpRS and TyrRS. We attribute this result to the inclusion of the archaeal data which might serve to reduce long branch effects possibly associated with eukaryotic TrpRS and TyrRS sequences. Furthermore, reciprocally rooted phylogenies of TrpRS and TyrRS sequences confirm the closer evolutionary relationship of Archaea to eukaryotes by placing the root of the universal tree in the Bacteria. Received: 7 December 1996 / Accepted: 11 February 1997     

Structure of an archaeal non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase: a missing link in the evolution of Gln-tRNAGln formation

The molecular basis of the genetic code relies on the specific ligation of amino acids to their cognate tRNA molecules. However, two pathways exist for the formation of Gln-tRNA^Gln. The evolutionarily older indirect route utilizes a non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-GluRS) that can form both Glu-tRNA^Glu and Glu-tRNA^Gln. The Glu-tRNA^Gln is then converted to Gln-tRNA^Gln by an amidotransferase. Since the well-characterized bacterial ND-GluRS enzymes recognize tRNA^Glu and tRNA^Gln with an unrelated α-helical cage domain in contrast to the β-barrel anticodon-binding domain in archaeal and eukaryotic GluRSs, the mode of tRNA^Glu/tRNA^Gln discrimination in archaea and eukaryotes was unknown. Here, we present the crystal structure of the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ND-GluRS, which is the evolutionary predecessor of both the glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and the eukaryotic discriminating GluRS. Comparison with the previously solved structure of the Escherichia coli GlnRS-tRNA^Gln complex reveals the structural determinants responsible for specific tRNA^Gln recognition by GlnRS compared to promiscuous recognition of both tRNAs by the ND-GluRS. The structure also shows the amino acid recognition pocket of GluRS is more variable than that found in GlnRS. Phylogenetic analysis is used to reconstruct the key events in the evolution from indirect to direct genetic encoding of glutamine.     

Mutant enzymes and tRNAs as probes of the glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase: tRNA interaction

This paper focuses on several aspects of the specificity of mutants of Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and tRNA^Gln. Temperature-sensitive mutants located in glnS, the gene for GlnRS, have been described previously. The mutations responsible for the temperature-sensitive phenotype were analyzed, and pseudorevertants of these mutants isolated and characterized. The nature of these mutations is discussed in terms of their location in the three-dimensional structure of the tRNA^Gln: GlnRS complex. In order to characterize the specificity of the aminoacylation reaction, mutant tRNA^Gln species were synthesized with either a 2′-deoxy AMP or 3′-deoxy AMP as their 3′-terminal nucleotide. Subsequent assays for aminoacylation and ATP/PP_i exchange activity established the esterification of glutamine to the 2′-hydroxyl of the terminal adenosine: there is no glutaminylation of the 3′-OH group. This correlates with the classification of GlnRS as a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Mutations in tRNA^Gln are discussed which affect the recognition of GlnRS and the current concept of glutamine identity in E coli is reviewed.     

On the evolution of the tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, GatCAB and GatDE

Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase evolved from glutamyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively, after the split in the last universal communal ancestor (LUCA). Glutaminyl-tRNA^Gln and asparaginyl-tRNA^Asn were likely formed in LUCA by amidation of the mischarged species, glutamyl-tRNA^Gln and aspartyl-tRNA^Asn, by tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, as is still the case in most bacteria and all known archaea. The amidotransferase GatCAB is found in both domains of life, while the heterodimeric amidotransferase GatDE is found only in Archaea. The GatB and GatE subunits belong to a unique protein family that includes Pet112 that is encoded in the nuclear genomes of numerous eukaryotes. GatE was thought to have evolved from GatB after the emergence of the modern lines of decent. Our phylogenetic analysis though places the split between GatE and GatB, prior to the phylogenetic divide between Bacteria and Archaea, and Pet112 to be of mitochondrial origin. In addition, GatD appears to have emerged prior to the bacterial-archaeal phylogenetic divide. Thus, while GatDE is an archaeal signature protein, it likely was present in LUCA together with GatCAB. Archaea retained both amidotransferases, while Bacteria emerged with only GatCAB. The presence of GatDE has favored a unique archaeal tRNA^Gln that may be preventing the acquisition of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase in Archaea. Archaeal GatCAB, on the other hand, has not favored a distinct tRNA^Asn, suggesting that tRNA^Asn recognition is not a major barrier to the retention of asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase in many Archaea.     

The role of the catalytic domain of E. coli GluRS in tRNA discrimination

Discrimination of tRNA^Gln is an integral function of several bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRS). The origin of the discrimination is thought to arise from unfavorable interactions between tRNA^Gln and the anticodon-binding domain of GluRS. From experiments on an anticodon-binding domain truncated Escherichia coli (E. coli) GluRS (catalytic domain) and a chimeric protein, constructed from the catalytic domain of E. coli GluRS and the anticodon-binding domain of E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS), we show that both proteins discriminate against E. coli tRNA^Gln. Our results demonstrate that in addition to the anticodon-binding domain, tRNA^Gln discriminatory elements may be present in the catalytic domain in E. coli GluRS as well.     

Dispensability of zinc and the putative zinc-binding domain in bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

The putative zinc-binding domain (pZBD) in Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is known to correctly position the tRNA acceptor arm and modulate the amino acid-binding site. However, its functional role in other bacterial species is not clear since many bacterial GluRSs lack a zinc-binding motif in the pZBD. From experimental studies on pZBD-swapped E. coli GluRS, with Thermosynechoccus elongatus GluRS, Burkholderia thailandensis GluRS and E. coli glutamyl-queuosine-tRNA^Asp synthetase (Glu-Q-RS), we show that E. coli GluRS, containing the zinc-free pZBD of B. thailandensis, is as functional as the zinc-bound wild-type E. coli GluRS, whereas the other constructs, all zinc-bound, show impaired function. A pZBD-tinkered version of E. coli GluRS that still retained Zn-binding capacity, also showed reduced activity. This suggests that zinc is not essential for the pZBD to be functional. From extensive structural and sequence analyses from whole genome database of bacterial GluRS, we further show that in addition to many bacterial GluRS lacking a zinc-binding motif, the pZBD is actually deleted in some bacteria, all containing either glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) or a second copy of GluRS (GluRS2). Correlation between the absence of pZBD and the occurrence of glutamine amidotransferase CAB (GatCAB) in the genome suggests that the primordial role of the pZBD was to facilitate transamidation of misacylated Glu-tRNA^Gln via interaction with GatCAB, whereas its role in tRNA^Glu interaction may be a consequence of the presence of pZBD.     

GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE IN MARINE ALGAE: NEW SURPRISES FROM AN OLD ENZYME

Glutamine synthetase (GS), which catalyzes the formation of glutamine from ammonium and glutamate in the presence of ATP, is encoded by three distinct gene families: GSI, GSII, and GSIII. Genes encoding GSI are found in the Bacteria and Archaea, whereas GSII genes are found in eukaryotes and a few species of Bacteria. Members of the third family, GSIII, have been described from a limited number of bacteria; however, recent biochemical and molecular data suggest that this type of enzyme is broadly distributed among the algae. Peptide fragments obtained from GS purified from the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum (Greville) Cleve are 77% identical to a partial sequence of GSIII from Chaetoceros compressum Lauder, which permits the unambiguous assignment of the biochemically characterized enzyme to the GSIII gene family. The N-terminal sequence was 43% identical to the GSIII-like enzyme purified from the haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi (Lohm.) Hay et Miller and several residues were conserved among bacterial and eukaryotic GSIII enzymes. The presence of genes encoding GSIII in diatoms and haptophytes indicates that this enzyme family is more broadly distributed in eukaryotes than previously suspected.     

Recognition of tRNAGln by Helicobacter pylori GluRS2—a tRNAGln-specific glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Accurate aminoacylation of tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) plays a critical role in protein translation. However, some of the aaRSs are missing in many microorganisms. Helicobacter pylori does not have a glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) but has two divergent glutamyl-tRNA synthetases: GluRS1 and GluRS2. Like a canonical GluRS, GluRS1 aminoacylates tRNA^Glu1 and tRNA^Glu2. In contrast, GluRS2 only misacylates tRNA^Gln to form Glu-tRNA^Gln. It is not clear how GluRS2 achieves specific recognition of tRNA^Gln while rejecting the two H. pylori tRNA^Glu isoacceptors. Here, we show that GluRS2 recognizes major identity elements clustered in the tRNA^Gln acceptor stem. Mutations in the tRNA anticodon or at the discriminator base had little to no impact on enzyme specificity and activity.     

The Archaea Monophyly Issue: A Phylogeny of Translational Elongation Factor G(2) Sequences Inferred from an Optimized Selection of Alignment Positions

A global alignment of EF-G(2) sequences was corrected by reference to protein structure. The selection of characters eligible for construction of phylogenetic trees was optimized by searching for regions arising from the artifactual matching of sequence segments unique to different phylogenetic domains. The spurious matchings were identified by comparing all sections of the global alignment with a comprehensive inventory of significant binary alignments obtained by BLAST probing of the DNA and protein databases with representative EF-G(2) sequences. In three discrete alignment blocks (one in domain II and two in domain IV), the alignment of the bacterial sequences with those of Archaea–Eucarya was not retrieved by database probing with EF-G(2) sequences, and no EF-G homologue of the EF-2 sequence segments was detected by using partial EF-G(2) sequences as probes in BLAST/FASTA searches. The two domain IV regions (one of which comprises the ADP-ribosylatable site of EF-2) are almost certainly due to the artifactual alignment of insertion segments that are unique to Bacteria and to Archaea–Eucarya. Phylogenetic trees have been constructed from the global alignment after deselecting positions encompassing the unretrieved, spuriously aligned regions, as well as positions arising from misalignment of the G′ and G″ subdomain insertion segments flanking the ``fifth' consensus motif of the G domain (?varsson, 1995). The results show inconsistencies between trees inferred by alternative methods and alternative (DNA and protein) data sets with regard to Archaea being a monophyletic or paraphyletic grouping. Both maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony methods do not allow discrimination (by log-likelihood difference and difference in number of inferred substitutions) between the conflicting (monophyletic vs. paraphyletic Archaea) topologies. No specific EF-2 insertions (or terminal accretions) supporting a crenarchaeal–eucaryal clade are detectable in the new EF-G(2) sequence alignment.     

A chimaeric glutamyl:glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase: implications for evolution

aaRSs (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases) are multi-domain proteins that have evolved by domain acquisition. The anti-codon binding domain was added to the more ancient catalytic domain during aaRS evolution. Unlike in eukaryotes, the anti-codon binding domains of GluRS (glutamyl-tRNA synthetase) and GlnRS (glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase) in bacteria are structurally distinct. This originates from the unique evolutionary history of GlnRSs. Starting from the catalytic domain, eukaryotic GluRS evolved by acquiring the archaea/eukaryote-specific anti-codon binding domain after branching away from the eubacteria family. Subsequently, eukaryotic GlnRS evolved from GluRS by gene duplication and horizontally transferred to bacteria. In order to study the properties of the putative ancestral GluRS in eukaryotes, formed immediately after acquiring the anti-codon binding domain, we have designed and constructed a chimaeric protein, cGluGlnRS, consisting of the catalytic domain, Ec GluRS (Escherichia coli GluRS), and the anti-codon binding domain of EcGlnRS (E. coli GlnRS). In contrast to the isolated EcN-GluRS, cGluGlnRS showed detectable activity of glutamylation of E. coli tRNA(glu) and was capable of complementing an E. coli ts (temperature-sensitive)-GluRS strain at non-permissive temperatures. Both cGluGlnRS and EcN-GluRS were found to bind E. coli tRNA(glu) with native EcGluRS-like affinity, suggesting that the anticodon-binding domain in cGluGlnRS enhances k(cat) for glutamylation. This was further confirmed from similar experiments with a chimaera between EcN-GluRS and the substrate-binding domain of EcDnaK (E. coli DnaK). We also show that an extended loop, present in the anticodon-binding domains of GlnRSs, is absent in archaeal GluRS, suggesting that the loop was a later addition, generating additional anti-codon discrimination capability in GlnRS as it evolved from GluRS in eukaryotes.     

Phylogenomic Analysis of the α Proteasome Gene Family from Early-Diverging Eukaryotes

We employed a phylogenomic approach to study the evolution of α subunits of the proteasome gene family from early diverging eukaryotes. BLAST similarity searches of the Giardia lamblia genome identified all seven α proteasome genes characteristic of eukaryotes from the crown group. In addition, a PCR strategy for the amplification of multiple α subunit sequences generated single α proteasome products for representatives of the Kinetoplastida (Leishmania major), the Parabasalia (Trichomonas vaginalis), and the Microsporidia (Vairimorpha sp., Nosema sp., Endoreticulata sp., and Spraguea lophii). The kinetoplastid Trypanosoma cruzi and the eukaryote crown group Acanthamoeba castellanii yielded two distinct α proteasome genes each. The presence of seven distinct α proteasome genes in G. lamblia, one of the earliest-diverging eukaryotes, indicates that the α proteasome gene family evolved rapidly from a minimum of one gene in Archaea to seven or more in Eukarya. Results from the phylogenomic analysis are consistent with the idea that the Diplomonida (as represented by G. lamblia), the Kinetoplastida, the Parabasalia, and the Microsporidia diverged after the duplication events that originated the α proteasome gene family. A model for the early origin and evolution of the proteasome gene family is presented. Received: 14 February 2000 / Accepted: 14 August 2000     

The Evolutionary History of Carbamoyltransferases: A Complex Set of Paralogous Genes Was Already Present in the Last Universal Common Ancestor

Forty-four sequences of ornithine carbamoyltransferases (OTCases) and 33 sequences of aspartate carbamoyltransferases (ATCases) representing the three domains of life were multiply aligned and a phylogenetic tree was inferred from this multiple alignment. The global topology of the composite rooted tree (each enzyme family being used as an outgroup to root the other one) suggests that present-day genes are derived from paralogous ancestral genes which were already of the same size and argues against a mechanism of fusion of independent modules. A closer observation of the detailed topology shows that this tree could not be used to assess the actual order of organismal descent. Indeed, this tree displays a complex topology for many prokaryotic sequences, with polyphyly for Bacteria in both enzyme trees and for the Archaea in the OTCase tree. Moreover, representatives of the two prokaryotic Domains are found to be interspersed in various combinations in both enzyme trees. This complexity may be explained by assuming the occurrence of two subfamilies in the OTCase tree (OTC α and OTC β) and two other ones in the ATCase tree (ATC I and ATC II). These subfamilies could have arisen from duplication and selective losses of some differentiated copies during the successive speciations. We suggest that Archaea and Eukaryotes share a common ancestor in which the ancestral copies giving the present-day ATC II/OTC β combinations were present, whereas Bacteria comprise two classes: one containing the ATC II/OTC α combination and the other harboring the ATC I/OTC β combination. Moreover, multiple horizontal gene transfers could have occurred rather recently amongst prokaryotes. Whichever the actual history of carbamoyltransferases, our data suggest that the last common ancestor to all extant life possessed differentiated copies of genes coding for both carbamoyltransferases, indicating it as a rather sophisticated organism.     

On the Occurrence of Horizontal Gene Transfer Among an Arbitrarily Chosen Group of 26 Genes

The deduced amino acid sequences from 1200 Haemophilus influenzae genes was compared to a data set that contained the orfs from yeast, two different Archaea and the Gram+ and Gram− bacteria, Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. The results of the comparison yielded a 26 orthologous gene set that had at least one representative from each of the four groups. A four taxa phylogenetic relationship for these 26 genes was determined. The statistical significance of each minimal tree was tested against the two alternative four taxa trees. The result was that four genes significantly supported the (Archaea, Eukaryota) (Gram+, Gram−) topology, two genes supported the one where Gram− and Eukaryota form a clade, and one gene supported the tree where Gram+ and Eukaryota define one clade. The remaining genes do not uniquely support any phylogeny, thereby collapsing the two central nodes into a single node. These are referred to as star phylogenies. I offer a new suggestion for the mechanism that gave rise to the star phylogenies. Namely, these are genes that are younger than the underlying lineages that currently harbor them. This hypothesis is examined with two proteins that display the star phylogeny; namely onithine transcarbamylase and tryptophan synthetase. It is shown, using the distance matrix rate test, that the rate of evolution of these two proteins is comparable to a control gene when rates are determined by comparing closely related species. This implies that the genes under comparison experience comparable functional constraint. However, when the genes from remotely related species are compared, a plateau is encountered. Since we see no unusual levels of functional constraint this plateau cannot be attributed to the divergence of the protein having reached saturation. The simplest explanation is that the genes displaying the star phylogenies were introduced after Archaea, Eukaryota, and Bacteria had diverged from one another. They presumably spread through life by horizontal gene transfer. Received: 12 July 2001 / Accepted: 27 July 2001     

A Functional Loop Spanning Distant Domains of Glutaminyl-tRNA Synthetase Also Stabilizes a Molten Globule State

Molten globule and other disordered states of proteins are now known to play important roles in many cellular processes. From equilibrium unfolding studies of two paralogous proteins and their variants, glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and two of its variants [glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) and its isolated domains, and a GluRS-GlnRS chimera], we demonstrate that only GlnRS forms a molten globule-like intermediate at low urea concentrations. We demonstrated that a loop in the GlnRS C-terminal anticodon binding domain that promotes communication with the N-terminal domain and indirectly modulates amino acid binding is also responsible for stabilization of the molten globule state. This loop was inserted into GluRS in the eukaryotic branch after the archaea-eukarya split, right around the time when GlnRS evolved. Because of the structural and functional importance of the loop, it is proposed that the insertion of the loop into a putative ancestral GluRS in eukaryotes produced a catalytically active molten globule state. Because of their enhanced dynamic nature, catalytically active molten globules are likely to possess broad substrate specificity. It is further proposed that the putative broader substrate specificity allowed the catalytically active molten globule to accept glutamine in addition to glutamic acid, leading to the evolution of GlnRS.     

Extensive Gene Duplication in the Early Evolution of Animals Before the Parazoan–Eumetazoan Split Demonstrated by G Proteins and Protein Tyrosine Kinases from Sponge and Hydra

To know whether genes involved in cell–cell communication typical of multicellular animals dramatically increased in concert with the Cambrian explosion, the rapid evolutionary burst in the major groups of animals, and whether these genes exist in the sponge lacking cell cohesiveness and coordination typical of eumetazoans, we have carried out cloning of the G-protein α subunit (Gα) and the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) cDNAs from Ephydatia fluviatilis (freshwater sponge) and Hydra magnipapillata strain 105 (hydra). We obtained 13 Gα and 20 PTK cDNAs. Generally animal gene families diverged first by gene duplication (subtype duplication) that gave rise to diverse subtypes with different primary functions, followed by further gene duplication in the same subtype (isoform duplication) that gave rise to isoform genes with virtually identical function. Phylogenetic trees of Gα and PTK families including cDNAs from sponge and hydra revealed that most of the present-day subtypes had been established in the very early evolution of animals before the parazoan–eumetazoan split, the earliest branching among the extant animal phyla, by extensive subtype duplication: for PTK and Gα families, 23 and 9 subtype duplications were observed in the early stage before the parazoan–eumetazoan split, respectively, and after that split, only 2 and 1 subtype duplications were found, respectively. After the separation from arthropods, vertebrates underwent frequent isoform duplications before the fish–tetrapod split. Furthermore, rapid amino acid changes appear to have occurred in concert with the extensive subtype duplication and isoform duplication. Thus the pattern of gene diversification during animal evolution might be characterized by bursts of gene duplication interrupted by considerably long periods of silence, instead of proceeding gradually, and there might be no direct link between the Cambrian explosion and the extensive gene duplication that generated diverse functions (subtypes) of these families. Received: 4 November 1998 / Accepted: 17 November 1998     

Divergence of glutamate and glutamine aminoacylation pathways: Providing the evolutionary rationale for mischarging

Aminoacyl-tRNA for protein synthesis is produced through the action of a family of enzymes called aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. A general rule is that there is one aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for each of the standard 20 amino acids found in all cells. This is not universal, however, as a majority of prokaryotic organisms and eukaryotic organelles lack the enzyme glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, which is responsible for forming Gln-tRNA^Gln in eukaryotes and in Gram-negative eubacteria. Instead, in organisms lacking glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, Gln-tRNA^Gln is provided by misacylation of tRNA^Gln with glutamate by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, followed by the conversion of tRNA-bound glutamate to glutamine by the enzyme Glu-tRNA^Gln amidotransferase. The fact that two different pathways exist for charging glutamine tRNA indicates that ancestral prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms evolved different cellular mechanisms for incorporating glutamine into proteins. Here, we explore the basis for diverging pathways for aminoacylation of glutamine tRNA. We propose that stable retention of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase in prokaryotic organisms following a horizontal gene transfer event from eukaryotic organisms (Lamour et al. 1994) was dependent on the evolving pool of glutamate and glutamine tRNAs in the organisms that acquired glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase by this mechanism. This model also addresses several unusual aspects of aminoacylation by glutamyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases that have been observed.Based on a presentation made at a workshop—Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and the Evolution of the Genetic Code—held at Berkeley, CA, July 17–20, 1994 Correspondence to: D. Söll     

Synthesis of beta-ketophosphonate analogs of glutamyl and glutaminyl adenylate, and selective inhibition of the corresponding bacterial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-beta-ketophosphonate-adenosines (aa-KPA) are stable analogs of the aminoacyl adenylates, which are high-energy intermediates in the formation of aminoacyl-tRNA catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS). We have synthesized glutamyl-beta-ketophosphonate-adenosine (Glu-KPA) and glutaminyl-beta-ketophosphonate-adenosine (Gln-KPA), and have tested them as inhibitors of their cognate aaRS, and of a non-cognate aaRS. Glu-KPA is a competitive inhibitor of Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) with a K(i) of 18microM with respect to its substrate glutamate, and binds at one site on this monomeric enzyme; the non-cognate Gln-KPA also binds this GluRS at one site, but is a much weaker (K(i)=2.9mM) competitive inhibitor. By contrast, Gln-KPA inhibits E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) by binding competitively but weakly at two distinct sites on this enzyme (average K(i) of 0.65mM); the non-cognate Glu-KPA shows one-site weak (K(i)=2.8mM) competitive inhibition of GlnRS. These kinetic results indicate that the glutamine and the AMP modules of Gln-KPA, connected by the beta-ketophosphonate linker, cannot bind GlnRS simultaneously, and that one Gln-KPA molecule binds the AMP-binding site of GlnRS through its AMP module, whereas another Gln-KPA molecule binds the glutamine-binding site through its glutamine module. This model suggests that similar structural constraints could affect the binding of Glu-KPA to the active site of mammalian cytoplasmic GluRSs, which are evolutionarily much closer to bacterial GlnRS than to bacterial GluRS. This possibility was confirmed by the fact that Glu-KPA inhibits bovine liver GluRS 145-fold less efficiently than E. coli GluRS by competitive weak binding at two distinct sites (average K(i)=2.6mM). Moreover, these kinetic differences reveal that the active sites of bacterial GluRSs and mammalian cytoplasmic GluRSs have substantial structural differences that could be further exploited for the design of better inhibitors specific for bacterial GluRSs, promising targets for antimicrobial therapy.