Estrogen receptor mutations in breast cancer

The malignant potential of solid tumors is related to the ability to invade adjacent tissue and to metastasize. These properties of cancer cells depend on the synthesis of proteolytic enzymes which are able to digest adjacent connective tissue and basement membranes. We hypothesized that all elements of the plasminogen activation system might be overexpressed in malignant human breast tumors, functioning as an essential element in tumor invasion and metastasis. As determined by histopathological methods, the malignant tumors showed statistically significantly higher expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), and especially urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) than benign tissues. All those elements were present in higher amounts in the cancer cells than in the cells of benign or normal breast tissues. High exhibition of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) found in cancer seems to be random and not related to the malignant or benign state, since benign and malignant tumors show overexpression of tissue plasminogen activator with similar frequency. When the tumors express high amounts of uPA, they express a high amount of uPAR in 50% of cases and PAI-1 in 57.3% of cases. When urokinase is expressed in low amount, the receptor is low in 28.6% and inhibitor in 21.4% of malignant breast tumors. This statistically significant consensus, 78.6% in the case of urokinase and its receptor and 78.6% in case of urokinase and its inhibitor, suggests that these activities may be the result of a unique mechanism of control, activated in the last steps of malignant transformation.     

Estrogen receptor beta in the breast: role in estrogen responsiveness and development of breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer observed in women. Endogenous estrogen is thought to play a major role in its development and estrogen receptor blockers are the most important drugs in its treatment. It has long been thought that any conditions or exposures, which enhance estrogenic responses, would result in an increased risk for breast cancer. The discovery of the second estrogen receptor, ERbeta, which can have effects opposite to those of the well-known 'original' estrogen receptor (now called ERalpha) challenges this simplistic view. In order to understand breast cancer one must first understand how the normal breast is maintained. The functions of ERbeta in the breast remain to be defined but from what we have learnt about its activities in in vitro systems, this estrogen receptor may have a protective role in the breast. Studies in human and rodent breasts as well as in human breast cancer biopsies reveal that ERbeta is by far the more abundant of the two ERs. Despite the role of estrogen in proliferation of the breast, neither of the two ERs appears to located in epithelial cells which divide in response to estrogen. In order to define the functions of ERbeta in the normal and malignant breast, we have created mice in which the ERbeta gene has been inactivated. Studies of the breasts of ERbeta knock out mice (BERKO) revealed abnormal epithelial growth, overexpression of Ki67 and severe cystic breast disease as mice age.     

Estrogen receptors in human breast cancer

The present study defines criteria for determining the presence of estrogen-receptors in human breast carcinomas demonstrated by a histochemical assay using 17 beta-estradiol-carboxy-methyl-oxim-bovine serum albumen-FITC. The criteria were: 1) the percentage of cells showing fluorescence; 2) the intensity of the fluorescence observed, and 3) the percentage of epithelial structures in tissue specimens. Using these predefined criteria in 132 human breast carcinomas as 91.6% agreement was found between the results of the histochemical assay and those of the biochemical Charcoal method. The main causes of disagreement (7 of the 11 cases) were sampling errors between the tissue specimens used for the histochemical and biochemical assay, and an insufficient percentage of epithelial structures (less than 15%) to allow biochemical identification of estrogen receptor activity. In the hands of pathologists with experience of the field of histochemistry this histochemical assay may be the method of choice for the assessment of estrogen receptors.     

Estrogen receptor alpha negative breast cancer patients: estrogen receptor beta as a therapeutic target

Clinical management of breast cancer is increasingly guided by assessment of tumor phenotypic parameters. One of these is estrogen receptor (ER) status, currently defined by ERalpha expression. However with the discovery of a second ER, ERbeta and its variant isoforms, the definition of ER status is potentially more complex. In breast tumors there are two ERbeta expression cohorts. One where ERbeta is co-expressed with ERalpha and the other expressing ERbeta alone. In the latter subgroup of currently defined ER negative patients ERbeta has the potential to be a therapeutic target. Characterization of the nature and role of ERbeta in ERalpha negative tumors is essentially unexplored but available data suggest that the role of ERbeta may be different when co-expressed with ERalpha and when expressed alone. This review summarizes available data and explores the possibility that ERbeta signaling may be a therapeutic target in these tumors. Evidence so far supports the idea that the role of ERbeta in breast cancer is different in ERalpha negative compared to ERalpha positive tumors. However, cohort size and numbers of independent studies are small to date, and more studies are needed with better standardization of antibodies and protocols. Also, the ability to determine the role of ERbeta in ERalpha negative breast cancer and therefore assess ERbeta signaling pathways as therapeutic targets would be greatly facilitated by identification of specific downstream markers of ERbeta activity in breast cancer.     

Breast weight and hormone receptor status in women with breast cancer

Introduction

Aromatase activity in peripheral tissues including the breast is the main source of estrogen in postmenopausal women. There is evidence that local estrogen synthesis by breast aromatase contributes to mammary carcinogenesis. Therefore, we have postulated that high breast weight is associated with ER+ tumours.     

Estrogen and growth factor receptor interactions in human breast and non-small cell lung cancer cells

Extranuclear estrogen receptors may mediate rapid effects of estradiol that communicate with nuclear receptors and contribute to proliferation of human cancers bearing these signaling proteins. To assess these growth-promoting pathways, we undertook controlled homogenization and fractionation of NIH-H23 non-small cell lung cancer cells. As many breast tumors, NIH-H23 cells express estrogen receptors (ER), with the bulk of specific estradiol binding in nuclear fractions. However, as in breast cells, a significant portion of specific, high-affinity estradiol-17beta binding-sites are also enriched in plasma membranes of lung tumor cells. These estrogen binding-sites co-purify with plasma membrane-marker enzymes and are not significantly contaminated by cytosol or nuclei. On further purification of membrane caveolae from lung tumor cells, proteins recognized by monoclonal antibodies to nuclear ER-alpha and to ER-beta were identified in close association with EGF receptor in caveolae. In parallel studies, ER-alpha and ER-beta are also detected in nuclear and extranuclear sites in archival human breast and lung tumor samples and are noted to occur in clusters at the cell membrane by using confocal microscopy to visualize fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibodies to ER-alpha. Data on site-directed mutagenesis of cysteine-447 in ER-alpha suggest that association of ER forms with membrane sites may depend on acylation of cysteine by palmitate. Estrogen-induced growth of MCF-7 breast cancer and NIH-H23 lung cancer cells in vitro correlated closely with acute hormonal activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and was significantly reduced by treatment with Faslodex, a pure anti-estrogen. Further, combination of Faslodex with selected growth factor receptor inhibitors elicited a more pronounced inhibiton of tumor cell growth. Thus, extranuclear forms of ER play a role in promoting downstream signaling for hormone-mediated proliferation and survival of breast, as well as lung, cancers and offer a new target for anti-tumor therapy.     

Estrogen receptor β in the breast: role in estrogen responsiveness and development of breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer observed in women. Endogenous estrogen is thought to play a major role in its development and estrogen receptor blockers are the most important drugs in its treatment. It has long been thought that any conditions or exposures, which enhance estrogenic responses, would result in an increased risk for breast cancer. The discovery of the second estrogen receptor, ERβ, which can have effects opposite to those of the well-known ‘original’ estrogen receptor (now called ER) challenges this simplistic view. In order to understand breast cancer one must first understand how the normal breast is maintained. The functions of ERβ in the breast remain to be defined but from what we have learnt about its activities in in vitro systems, this estrogen receptor may have a protective role in the breast. Studies in human and rodent breasts as well as in human breast cancer biopsies reveal that ERβ is by far the more abundant of the two ERs. Despite the role of estrogen in proliferation of the breast, neither of the two ERs appears to located in epithelial cells which divide in response to estrogen. In order to define the functions of ERβ in the normal and malignant breast, we have created mice in which the ERβ gene has been inactivated. Studies of the breasts of ERβ knock out mice (BERKO) revealed abnormal epithelial growth, overexpression of Ki67 and severe cystic breast disease as mice age.     

Estrogen, alcohol and breast cancer risk

Estrogen replacement has been used for many years to reverse the hypoestrogenic symptoms of menopause and prevent osteoporosis. Studies have found that estrogen replacement also decreases cardiovascular risk. In addition, social use of alcohol has been found to decrease cardiovascular risk. Therefore, both estrogen replacement therapy and alcohol use have been proposed to have cardiovascular benefits, and are often used in combination. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that estrogen replacement therapy after menopause increases breast cancer risk. Regular alcohol consumption is also associated with increase in risk. However, interactions between the two are poorly understood. In addition, if alcohol alters circulating estrogen levels in estrogen users, this may have implications in terms of altering the risks:benefit ratio of estrogen replacement in an undesirable direction. For example, there are data suggesting that the use of both alcohol and estrogen may increase breast cancer risk more than the use of either one alone. Data support both acute and chronic effects of alcohol in raising circulating estrogen levels in premenopausal women on no hormonal medications. In postmenopausal women studies focusing on acute effects of alcohol on estrogen metabolism indicate that alcohol has a much more pronounced effect in women using estrogen replacement than in those who do not. Studies evaluating chronic effects of alcohol ingestion on circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women are needed.     

Agreement of self-reported hormone receptor status with cancer registry data in young breast cancer patients

BackgroundThough breast cancer subtype is a key determinant of treatment choice and prognosis, few studies have assessed breast cancer patients’ knowledge of estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status.MethodsWomen diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 18–64 years in 2007 were recruited from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, and mailed a questionnaire that asked respondents to identify their ER/PR status. There were 2191 respondents included in the analysis. Agreement between self-report and cancer registry ER/PR status was assessed using kappa statistic. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of demographic, socioeconomic, and tumor factors with inaccurate self-report of ER/PR status.ResultsFifty-nine percent of respondents reported ER/PR positive status, 15% reported ER/PR negative status, 17% responded ‘don’t know’, and 9% did not respond. Overall, there was 69% agreement between self-report and cancer registry data, and fair agreement as measured by kappa (0.36). After excluding women who did not know or did not report their ER/PR status, there was 93% agreement, and substantial agreement as measured by kappa (0.76). Women who were older, non-white, less educated, lower income, and had ER/PR negative disease were significantly more likely to inaccurately report their ER/PR status.ConclusionsThough a significant proportion of women do not know their hormone receptor status, women who reported their ER/PR status were accurate. Our results suggest room for improvement in patient knowledge of tumor subtypes, but also that self-reported ER/PR status may be a useful surrogate when medical record or cancer registry data is unavailable.     

Family history and breast cancer hormone receptor status in a Spanish cohort

Background

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease that impacts racial/ethnic groups differently. Differences in genetic composition, lifestyles, reproductive factors, or environmental exposures may contribute to the differential presentation of breast cancer among Hispanic women.

Materials and Methods

A population-based study was conducted in the city of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. A total of 645 women diagnosed with operable invasive breast cancer between 1992 and 2005 participated in the study. Data on demographics, breast cancer risk factors, and clinico-pathological characteristics of the tumors were collected. Hormone receptor negative tumors were compared with hormone receptor postive tumors on their clinico-pathological characteristics as well as risk factor profiles.

Results

Among the 645 breast cancer patients, 78% were estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+), and 22% were ER−&PR−. Women with a family history of breast cancer were more likely to have ER−&PR− tumors than women without a family history (Odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–2.26). This association was limited to cancers diagnosed before age 50 (Odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.34–5.81).

Conclusions

An increased proportion of ER−&PR− breast cancer was observed among younger Spanish women with a family history of the disease.     

Estrogen receptors: new perspectives in breast cancer management

The imbalance between proliferative and differentiative estrogenic effect, caused by quantitative and qualitative alteration of the estrogen receptor (ER) expression, may play a determinant role in mammary neoplastic transformation. Our studies demonstrate that ER levels are significantly higher in human mammary neoplastic tissues when compared to perineoplastic tissues and that increased ER expression is associated with ER gene hypomethylation. During progressive multifactorial carcinogene, ER overexpression may represent an early step in neoplastic transformation. In fact, high levels of ER represent good markers of differentiation and can predict the likelihood of benefiting from anti-estrogen therapy. Nevertheless, about 35% of ER-positive breast cancers are resistant to endocrine therapy and 10% of ER-negative tumors behave as hormone-sensitive tumors. Recent studies on ER mRNA variants, which naturally occur in human breast tumors, demonstrated mutations, deletions and alternative splicings, yielding deletions of exons 3, 4, 5 and 7. ER variants exhibited altered functions or changed the responsiveness to hormonal therapy. Analysis of these variants could be a useful parameter to better predict tumor responsiveness to anti-estrogen therapy. Recently, a regain of hormonal responsiveness by ER-negative breast cancer cells has been reported following ER gene transfection. However, estradiol treatment inhibits rather than stimulates cell growth as well as the metastatic and invasive potential of the ER gene transduced cells. Transfer of the ER gene may be considered as a new therapeutic approach in the management of hormone-independent breast cancer.     

Estrogen and progesterone receptor status in primary breast cancer--a study of 11,273 patients from the year 1990 to 2002

The aim of this study was to gain insight of the breast cancer hormone receptor status of our patients, its stratification according to age as well as its changes during the period of 13 years. 11,273 patients with primary breast cancer from several towns in Croatia were included in this study. Patients' tumour specimens were collected from 1990 to 2002 and were analysed on estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors in the Laboratory of the Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb. More than half of our breast cancer patients had ER positive tumours (54.3%). We observed ER + tumours increased with age continuously, with highest percentage in the age group of 70 to 79 years (68.1%). Similarly, proportion of PR + tumours was higher in the older age groups, being the highest between 40 and 49 years (55.9%). During 13 years of the study, the increase in frequency and proportion of ER + tumours was observed (from 52% in 1990 to 62% in 2002) and decrease of PR + tumours (56% to 53%). We confirm previous findings that the risk of hormone dependent breast cancer increases with aging. Risk of ER + breast cancer increased for 10% from 1990 to 2002 and PR + tumours decreased for 3.5% in the same period.     

Estrogen regulation of cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells

Estrogens are potent mitogens in a number of target tissues including the mammary gland where they play a pivotal role in the development and progression of mammary carcinoma. The demonstration that estrogen-induced mitogenesis is associated with the recruitment of non-cycling, G₀, cells into the cell cycle and an increased rate of progression through G₁ phase, has focused attention on the estrogenic regulation of molecules with a known role in the control of G₁–S phase progression. These experiments provide compelling evidence that estrogens regulate the expression and function of c-Myc and cyclin D1 and activate cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes, all of which are rate limiting for progression from G₁ to S phase. Furthermore, these studies reveal a novel mechanism of activation of cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes whereby estrogens promote the formation of high molecular weight complexes lacking the CDK inhibitor p21. Inducible expression of either c-Myc or cyclin D1 can mimic the effects of estrogen in activating the cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes and promoting S phase entry, providing evidence for distinct c-Myc and cyclin D1 pathways in estrogen-induced mitogenesis which converge on the activation of cyclin E-Cdk2. These data provide new mechanistic insights into the known mitogenic effects of estrogens and identify potential downstream targets that contribute to their role in oncogenesis.