Rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex

The rate of capping of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was measured by inhibition of elongation of the barbed ends of actin filaments. Polymeric actin (0.1-1.0 microM) was added to 0.5 microM monomeric actin and various concentrations of the gelsolin-actin complex (0.08-2.4 nM) to induce nucleated polymerization. As under the experimental conditions (2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 37 degrees C, actin monomer concentration less than or equal to 0.5 microM) actin filaments treadmilled, filaments elongated only at the barbed ends and the gelsolin-actin complex did not nucleate actin filaments to polymerize towards the pointed ends. The rate of nucleated actin polymerization in the presence of the gelsolin-actin complex was quantitatively analyzed. The rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was found to be about 10(7) M-1 s-1.     

Nucleated polymerization of actin from the membrane-associated ends of microvillar filaments in the intestinal brush border

We examined the nucleated polymerization of actin from the two ends of filaments that comprise the microvillus (MV) core in intestinal epithelial cells by electron microscopy. Three different in vitro preparations were used to nucleate the polymerization of muscle G- actin: (a) MV core fragments containing "barbed" and "pointed" filament ends exposed by shear during isolation, (b) isolated, membrane-intact brush borders, and (c) brush borders demembranated with Triton-X 100. It has been demonstrated that MV core fragments nucleate filament growth from both ends with a strong bias for one end. Here we identify the barbed end of the core fragment as the fast growing end by decoration with myosin subfragment one. Both cytochalasin B (CB) and Acanthamoeba capping protein block filament growth from the barbed but not the pointed end of MV core fragments. To examine actin assembly from the naturally occurring, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments, isolated membrane-intact brush borders were used to nucleate the polymerization of G-actin. Addition of salt (75 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) to brush borders preincubated briefly at low ionic strength with G- actin induced the formation of 0.2-0.4 micron "growth zones" at the tips of microvilli. The dense plaque at the tip of the MV core remains associated with the membrane and the presumed growing ends of the filaments. We also observed filament growth from the pointed ends of core filaments in the terminal web. We did not observe filament growth at the membrane-associated ends of core filaments when the latter were in the presence of 2 microM CB or if the low ionic strength incubation step was omitted. Addition of G-actin to demembranated brush borders, which retain the dense plaque on their MV tips, resulted in filament growth from both ends of the MV core. Again, 2 microM CB blocked filament growth from only the barbed (tip) end of the core. The dense plaque remained associated with the tip-end of the core in the presence of CB but usually was dislodged in control preparations where nucleated polymerization from the tip-end of the core occurred. Our results support the notion that microvillar assembly and changes in microvillar length could occur by actin monomer addition/loss at the barbed, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments.     

Rate constants for the reactions of ATP- and ADP-actin with the ends of actin filaments

I measured the rate of elongation at the barbed and pointed ends of actin filaments by electron microscopy with Limulus sperm acrosomal processes as nuclei. With improvements in the mechanics of the assay, it was possible to measure growth rates from 0.05 to 280 s-1. At 22 degrees C in 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM imidazole (pH 7), 0.2 mM ATP with 1 mM EGTA or 50 microM CaCl2 or with EGTA and 50 mM KCl, the elongation rates at both ends have a linear dependence on the ATP-actin concentration from the critical concentration to 20 microM. Consequently, over a wide range of subunit addition rates, the rate constants for association and dissociation of ATP-actin are constant. This shows that the nucleotide composition at or near the end of the growing filament is either the same over this range of growth rates or has no detectable effect on the rate constants. Under conditions where polymerization is fastest (MgCl2 + KCl + EGTA) the rate constants have these values: (table; see text) Compared with ATP-actin, ADP-actin associates slower at both ends, dissociates faster from the barbed end, but dissociates slower from the pointed end. Taking into account the events at both ends, these constants and a simple Oosawa-type model account for the complex three-phase dependence of the rate of polymerization in bulk samples on the concentration of ATP-actin monomers observed by Carlier, M.-F., D. Pantaloni, and E. D. Korn (1985, J. Biol. Chem., 260:6565-6571). These constants can also be used to predict the reactions at steady state in ATP. There will be slow subunit flux from the barbed end to the pointed end. There will also be minor fluctuations in length at the barbed end due to occasional rapid dissociation of strings of ADP subunits but the pointed end will be relatively stable.     

Direct measurement of actin polymerization rate constants by electron microscopy of actin filaments nucleated by isolated microvillus cores

We used actin filament bundles isolated from intestinal brush-border microvilli to nucleate the polymerization of pure muscle actin monomers into filaments. Growth rates were determined by electron microscopy by measuring the change in the length of the filaments as a function of time. The linear dependence of the growth rates on the actin monomer concentration provided the rate constants for monomer association and dissociation at the two ends of the growing filament. The rapidly growing ("barbed") end has higher association and dissociation rate constants than the slowly growing ("pointed") end. The values of these rate constants differ in 20 mM KCl compared with 75 mM KCl, 5 mM MgSO4. 2 microM cytochalasin B blocks growth entirely at the barbed end, apparently by reducing both association and dissociation rate constants to near zero, but inhibits growth at the pointed end to only a small extent.     

Effects of cytochalasin, phalloidin, and pH on the elongation of actin filaments

We used electron microscopy to measure the effects of cytochalasins, phalloidin, and pH on the rates of elongation at the barbed and pointed ends of actin filaments. In the case of the cytochalasins, we compared the effects on ATP- and ADP-actin monomers. Micromolar concentrations of either cytochalasin B (CB) or cytochalasin D (CD) inhibit elongation at both ends of the filament, about 95% at the barbed end and 50% at the pointed end, so that the two ends contribute about equally to the rate of growth. Half-maximal inhibition of elongation at the barbed end is at 0.1 microM CB and 0.02 microM CD for ATP-actin and at 0.1 microM CD for ADP-actin. At the pointed end, CD inhibits elongation by ATP-actin and ADP-actin about equally. At high (2 microM) concentrations, the cytochalasins reduce the association and dissociation rate constants in parallel for both ADP- and ATP-actin, so their effects on the critical concentrations are minimal. These observations confirm and extend those of Bonder and Mooseker [Bonder, E. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 282-288]. The dependence of the elongation rate on the concentration of both cytochalasin and actin can be explained quantitatively by a mechanism that includes the effects of cytochalasin binding to actin monomers [Godette, D. W., & Frieden, C. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 5974-5980] and a partial cap of the barbed end of the filament by the complex of ADP-actin and cytochalasin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Direct electron microscopic visualization of barbed end capping and filament cutting by intestinal microvillar 95-kdalton protein (villin): a new actin assembly assay using the Limulus acrosomal process

We have re-examined the Ca(++)-dependent interaction of an intestinal microvillar 95- kdalton protein (MV-95K) and actin using the isolated acrosomal process bundles from limulus sperm. Making use of the processes as nuclei for assembling actin filaments, we quantitatively and qualitatively examined MV-95K’s effect on filament assembly and on F- actin, both in the presence and in the absence of Ca(++). The acrosomal processes are particularly advantageous for this approach because they nucleate large numbers of filaments, they are extremely stable, and their morphology can be used to determine the polarity of any nucleated filaments. When filament nucleation was initiated in the presence of MV-95K and the absence of Ca(++), there was biased filament assembly from the bundle ends. The calculated elongation rates from both the barbed and pointed filament ends were virtually indistinguishable from control preparations. In the presence of Ca(++), MV-95K completely inhibited filament assembly from the barbed filament end without affecting the initial rate of assembly from the pointed filament end. The inhibition of assembly results from MV-95K binding to and capping the barbed filament end, thereby preventing monomer addition. This indicates that, while MV-95K is a potent nucleator of actin assembly, it is also a potent inhibitor of actin filament elongation. To examine the effects of MV-95K on F-actin in the presence of Ca(++), we developed an assay where MV-95K is added to filaments previously assembled from acrosomal processes without causing filament breakage during mixing. These results clearly demonstrated that rapid filament shortening by MV-95K results through a mechanism of disrupting intrafilament monomer-monomer interactions. Finally, we show that tropomyosin-containing actin filaments are insensitive to cutting, but not to capping, by MV-95K in the presence of Ca(++).     

Rate constants and equilibrium constants for binding of the gelsolin-actin complex to the barbed ends of actin filaments in the presence and absence of calcium

The equilibrium constant for binding of the gelsolin-actin complex to the barbed ends of actin filaments was measured by the depolymerizing effect of the gelsolin-actin complex on actin filaments. When the gelsolin-actin complex blocks monomer consumption at the lengthening barbed ends of treadmilling actin filaments, monomers continue to be produced at the shortening pointed ends until a new steady state is reached in which monomer production at the pointed ends is balanced by monomer consumption at the uncapped barbed ends. By using this effect the equilibrium constant for binding was determined to be about 1.5 X 10(10) M-1 in excess EGTA over total calcium (experimental conditions: 1 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, pH 7.5, 37 degrees C). In the presence of Ca2+ the equilibrium constant was found to be in the range of or above 10(11) M-1. The rate constant of binding of the gelsolin-actin complex to the barbed ends was measured by inhibition of elongation of actin filaments. Nucleation of new filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex towards the pointed ends was prevented by keeping the monomer concentration below the critical monomer concentration of the pointed ends where the barbed ends of treadmilling actin filaments elongate and the pointed ends shorten. The gelsolin-actin complex was found to bind fourfold faster to the barbed ends in the presence of Ca2+ (10 X 10(6) M-1 s-1) than in excess EGTA (2.5 X 10(6) M-1 s-1). Dissociation of the gelsolin-actin complex from the barbed ends can be calculated to be rather slow. In excess EGTA the rate constant of dissociation is about 1.7 X 10(-4) s-1. In the presence of Ca2+ this dissociation rate constant is in the range of or below 10(-4) s-1.     

Actin binding proteins that change extent and rate of actin monomer-polymer distribution by different mechanisms

Actin binding proteins control actin assembly and disassembly by altering the critical concentration and by changing the kinetics of polymerization. All of these control mechanisms in some way or the other make use of the energy of hydrolysis of actin-bound ATP. Capping of barbed filament ends increases the critical concentration as long as ATP hydrolysis maintains a difference in the actin monomer binding constants of the two ends. A further increase in the critical concentration on adding a second cap, tropomodulin, to the other, pointed filament end also requires ATP hydrolysis as described by the model presented here. Changes in the critical concentration are amplified into much larger changes of the monomer pool by actin sequestering proteins, provided their actin binding equilibrium constants fall within a relatively narrow range around the values for the two critical concentrations of actin. Cofilin greatly speeds up treadmilling, which requires ATP hydroysis, by increasing the rate constant of depolymerization. Profilin increases the rate of elongation at the barbed filament end, coupled to a lowering of the critical concentration, only if ATP hydrolysis makes profilin binding to the barbed end independent of its binding constant for actin monomers.     

Mechanism of action of cytochalasin B on actin

Substoichiometric cytochalasin B (CB) inhibits both the rate of actin polymerization and the interaction of actin filaments in solution. The polymerization rate is reduced by inhibition of actin monomer addition to the "barbed" end of the filaments where monomers normally add more rapidly. 2 microM CB reduces the polymerization rate by up to 90%, but has little effect on the rate of monomer addition at the slow ("pointed") end of the filaments and no effect on the rate of filament annealing. Under most ionic conditions tested, 2 microM CB reduces the steady state high shear viscosity by 10-20% and increases the steady state monomer concentration by a factor of 2.5 or less. In addition to the effects on the polymerization process, 2 microM CB strongly reduces the low shear viscosity of actin filaments alone and actin filaments cross-linked by a variety of macromolecules. This may be due to inhibition of actin filament-filament interactions which normally contribute to network formation. Since the inhibition of monomer addition and of actin filament network formation have approximately the same CB concentration dependence, a common CB binding site, probably the barbed end of the filament, may be responsible for both effects.     

Capping one end of an actin filament affects elongation at the other end

The rates of elongation at the free ends of actin filaments were compared to those of intact filaments, when the one end was masked with muscle beta-actinin or cytochalasin D, using fixed actoheavy meromyosin and Limulus acrosomal actin bundles as seeds. Experimental conditions were chosen so as to prevent spontaneous filament formation as far as possible. The rate of elongation at the barbed end of fixed actoheavy meromyosin was reduced to about one-fourth when the other pointed end was capped by beta-actinin, and that at the pointed end was reduced to one-third when the barbed end was blocked by cytochalasin D. Similar effects were also observed with the packed actin bundles of horseshoe crab sperm, although the decreases in elongation were less marked: 50-60% of the control both in the presence of beta-actinin and cytochalasin D. To explain the peculiar "end effect" described above, it is proposed that possible conformational changes at one end of an actin filament caused by the binding of a capping substance are transmitted successively to the other end so as to affect the elongation there.     

Interaction of plasma gelsolin with G-actin and F-actin in the presence and absence of calcium ions

Plasma gelsolin formed a very tight 1:2 complex with G-actin in the presence of Ca2+, but no interaction between gelsolin and G-actin was detected in the presence of excess EGTA. However, the 1:2 complex dissociated into a 1:1 gelsolin:actin complex and monomeric actin when excess EGTA was added. Plasma gelsolin bound tightly to the barbed ends of actin filaments and also severed filaments in the presence of Ca2+ and bound weakly to the filament barbed end in the presence of EGTA. The 1:2 gelsolin-actin complex bound to the barbed ends of filaments but did not sever them. By blocking the barbed end of filaments with plasma gelsolin, we determined the critical concentration at the pointed end in 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM ATP to be 4 microM. The dissociation rate constant for ADP-G-actin from the pointed end was estimated to be about 0.4 s-1 and the association rate constant to be about 5 X 10(4) M-1 s-1. Finally, we obtained evidence that plasma gelsolin accelerates but does not bypass the nucleation step and, therefore, that the concentration of gelsolin does not directly determine the concentration of filaments polymerized in its presence. Thus, gelsolin-capped filaments may not provide an absolutely reliable method for determining the rate constant for the association of ATP-G-actin at the pointed ends of filaments, but a reasonable estimate would be 1 X 10(5) M-1 s-1 in 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM ATP.     

ATP hydrolysis by the gelsolin-actin complex and at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped filaments

To obtain kinetic information about the pointed ends of actin filaments, experiments were carried out in the presence of gelsolin which blocks all events at the kinetically dominant barbed ends. The 1:2 gelsolin-actin complex retains 1 mol/mol of actin-bound ATP, but it neither hydrolyzes the ATP nor exchanges it with ATP free in solution at a significant rate. On the other hand, the actin filaments with their barbed ends capped with gelsolin hydrolyze ATP relatively rapidly at steady state, apparently as a result of the continued interaction of ATP-G-actin with the pointed ends of the filaments. ATP hydrolysis during spontaneous polymerization of actin in the presence of relatively high concentrations of gelsolin lags behind filament elongation so that filaments consisting of as much as 50% ATP-actin subunits are transiently formed. Probably for this reason, during polymerization the actin monomer concentration transiently reaches a concentration lower than the final steady-state critical concentration of the pointed end. At steady state, however, there is no evidence for an ATP cap at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped filaments, which differs from the barbed ends which do have an ATP cap in the absence of gelsolin. As there is no reason presently to think that gelsolin has any effect on events at the pointed ends of filaments, the properties of the pointed ends deduced from these experiments with gelsolin-capped filaments are presumably equally applicable to the pointed ends of filaments in which the barbed ends are free.     

Equilibrium constant for binding of an actin filament capping protein to the barbed end of actin filaments

Depolymerization of treadmilling actin filaments by a capping protein isolated from bovine brain was used for determination of the equilibrium constant for binding of the capping protein to the barbed ends of actin filaments. When the capping protein blocks monomer consumption at the lengthening barbed ends, monomers continue to be produced at the shortening pointed ends until a new steady state is reached in which monomer production at the pointed ends is balanced by monomer consumption at the uncapped barbed ends. In this way the ratio of capped to uncapped filaments could be determined as a function of the capping protein concentration. Under the experimental conditions (100 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5, 37 degrees C) the binding constant was found to be about 2 X 10(9) M-1. Capping proteins effect the actin monomer concentration only at capping protein concentrations far above the reciprocal of their binding constant. Half-maximal increase of the monomer concentration requires capping of about 99% of the actin filaments. A low proportion of uncapped filaments has a great weight in determining the monomer concentration because association and dissociation reactions occur at the dynamic barbed ends with higher frequencies than at the pointed ends.     

Tropomodulin caps the pointed ends of actin filaments

Many proteins have been shown to cap the fast growing (barbed) ends of actin filaments, but none have been shown to block elongation and depolymerization at the slow growing (pointed) filament ends. Tropomodulin is a tropomyosin-binding protein originally isolated from red blood cells that has been localized by immunofluorescence staining to a site at or near the pointed ends of skeletal muscle thin filaments (Fowler, V. M., M. A., Sussman, P. G. Miller, B. E. Flucher, and M. P. Daniels. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 120: 411-420). Our experiments demonstrate that tropomodulin in conjunction with tropomyosin is a pointed end capping protein: it completely blocks both elongation and depolymerization at the pointed ends of tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in concentrations stoichiometric to the concentration of filament ends (Kd < or = 1 nM). In the absence of tropomyosin, tropomodulin acts as a "leaky" cap, partially inhibiting elongation and depolymerization at the pointed filament ends (Kd for inhibition of elongation = 0.1-0.4 microM). Thus, tropomodulin can bind directly to actin at the pointed filament end. Tropomodulin also doubles the critical concentration at the pointed ends of pure actin filaments without affecting either the rate of extent of polymerization at the barbed filament ends, indicating that tropomodulin does not sequester actin monomers. Our experiments provide direct biochemical evidence that tropomodulin binds to both the terminal tropomyosin and actin molecules at the pointed filament end, and is the long sought-after pointed end capping protein. We propose that tropomodulin plays a role in maintaining the narrow length distributions of the stable, tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in striated muscle and in red blood cells.     

Brevin and vitamin D binding protein: comparison of the effects of two serum proteins on actin assembly and disassembly

Actin depolymerizing activity in serum can be attributed to the two proteins brevin and vitamin D binding protein (DBP). To investigate their mechanisms of action, we used a number of techniques, including procedures involving the fluorescent pyrene-labeled actin probe, to compare the interaction of the two proteins with G- and F-actin in vitro. With a fluorescence enhancement assay, we determined that brevin forms a 1:2 complex and DBP forms a 1:1 complex with pyrene-G-actin. We also found that both proteins reduce the viscosity of F-actin measured with high-shear and low-shear viscometers, with brevin effective at much lower concentrations than DBP. In polymerization experiments, brevin inhibits filament elongation at substoichiometric levels by inhibiting monomer addition at the barbed end but can also accelerate polymerization by nucleating assembly of filaments which grow from the pointed end. DBP does not nucleate filament assembly and inhibits filament elongation at either end only at near-stoichiometric levels. Brevin, but not DBP, accelerates disassembly of filaments diluted into a depolymerizing medium. This is consistent with the capability of brevin to sever preformed filaments associated with erythrocyte membranes and to increase the number of filament ends as estimated by a cytochalasin binding assay. In steady-state experiments involving the use of pyrene-actin, brevin produces only a small increase in the apparent monomer concentration when the critical concentrations at the two ends of the filaments are the same (i.e., in 0.1 M KCl). However, when the critical concentration at the pointed end is higher than that at the barbed end (i.e., in 2 mM MgCl2), low molar ratios of brevin sharply increase the monomer concentration to the critical concentration of the pointed end. This allows substoichiometric amounts of brevin to completely depolymerize filaments when the total actin concentration is at or below that of the pointed end. In contrast to brevin, DBP increases the amount of nonfilamentous actin in a stoichiometric and dose-dependent manner regardless of the nature of the salt in the medium. We conclude from this study that brevin is similar in its mechanism of action to other proteins known to bind to the barbed end of filaments and that DBP is related in its action to proteins that complex monomers and prevent them from participating in the polymerization process.     

Actin from Thyone sperm assembles on only one end of an actin filament: a behavior regulated by profilin

Thyone sperm were demembranated with Triton X-100 and, after washing, extracted with 30 mM Tris at pH 8.0 and 1 mM MgCl2. After the insoluble contaminants were removed by centrifugation, the sperm extract was warmed to 22 degrees C. Actin filaments rapidly assembled and aggregated into bundles when KCl was added to the extract. When we added preformed actin filaments, i.e., the acrosomal filament bundles of Limulus sperm, to the extract, the actin monomers rapidly assembled on these filaments. What was unexpected was that assembly took place on only one end of the bundle--the end corresponding to the preferred end for monomer addition. We showed that the absence of growth on the nonpreferred end was not due to the presence of a capper because exogenously added actin readily assembled on both ends. We also analyzed the sperm extract by SDS gel electrophoresis. Two major proteins were present in a 1:1 molar ratio: actin and a 12,500-dalton protein whose apparent isoelectric point was 8.4. The 12,500-dalton protein was purified by DEAE chromatography. We concluded that it is profilin because of its size, isoelectric point, molar ratio to actin, inability to bind to DEAE, and its effect on actin assembly. When profilin was added to actin in the presence of Limulus bundles, addition of monomers on the nonpreferred end of the bundle was inhibited, even though actin by itself assembled on both ends. Using the Limulus bundles as nuclei, we determined the critical concentration for assembly off each end of the filament and estimated the Kd for the profilin-actin complex (approximately 10 microM). We present a model to explain how profilin may regulate the extension of the Thyone acrosomal process in vivo: The profilin-actin complex can add to only the preferred end of the filament bundle. Once the actin monomer is bound to the filament, the profilin is released, and is available to bind to additional actin monomers. This mechanism accounts for the rapid rate of filament elongation in the acrosomal process in vivo.     

Quantitative analysis of the effect of Acanthamoeba profilin on actin filament nucleation and elongation

The current view of the mechanism of action of Acanthamoeba profilin is that it binds to actin monomers, forming a complex that cannot polymerize [Tobacman, L. S., & Korn, E. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4166-4170; Tseng, P., & Pollard, T. D. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 94, 213-218; Tobacman, L. S., Brenner, S. L., & Korn, E. D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8806-8812]. This simple model fails to predict two new experimental observations made with Acanthamoeba actin in 50 mM KC1, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA. First, Acanthamoeba profilin inhibits elongation of actin filaments far more at the pointed end than at the barbed end. According, to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is less than 5 microM on the basis of observations at the pointed end and greater than 50 microM for the barbed end. Second, profilin inhibits nucleation more strongly than elongation. According to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is 60-140 microM on the basis of two assays of elongation but 2-10 microM on the basis of polymerization kinetics that reflect nucleation. These new findings can be explained by a new and more complex model for the mechanism of action that is related to a proposal of Tilney and co-workers [Tilney, L. G., Bonder, E. M., Coluccio, L. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 113-124]. In this model, profilin can bind both to actin monomers with a Kd of about 5 microM and to the barbed end of actin filaments with a Kd of about 50-100 microM. An actin monomer bound to profilin cannot participate in nucleation or add to the pointed end of an actin filament. It can add to the barbed end of a filament. When profilin is bound to the barbed end of a filament, actin monomers cannot bind to that end, but the terminal actin protomer can dissociate at the usual rate. This model includes two different Kd's--one for profilin bound to actin monomers and one for profilin bound to an actin molecule at the barbed end of a filament. The affinity for the end of the filament is lower by a factor of 10 than the affinity for the monomer, presumably due to the difference in the conformation of the two forms of actin or to steric constraints at the end of the filament.     

Direct measurement of critical concentrations and assembly rate constants at the two ends of an actin filament

Actin filament bundles isolated from Limulus sperm were used for quantitative electron microscope studies of F-actin assembly. The assembly rate constants were calculated. In addition, the critical concentrations (C_os) for both filament ends were directly determined. In 75 mM KCI and 1–5 mM Mg⁺⁺, the C_os were 0.1 μM and 0.5 μM for the barbed and pointed ends, respectively. Substitution of Ca⁺⁺ (20–200 μM) for Mg⁺⁺ resulted in C_os of 0.4 μM for both filament ends. Consistent with these findings, filament growth occurred only from the barbed ends of Limulus bundles “seeded” into F-actin solutions in KCI and Mg⁺⁺. Finally, filaments originally grown from the pointed filament ends of Limulus bundles were gradually lost as the actin solution reached steady state. These results demonstrate that actin filaments can “treadmill” under physiological conditions, albeit at very slow rates.     

Interaction of annexin VI with actin

Actin polymerization was investigated using fluorescence probe N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide, which was bound covalently to reactive sulfhydryl group, Cys-373. Labeled actin in the bulk was 0.5 to 1% of total actin concentration. Actin polymerization at concentration 12 mM was started by addition of 20 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl2. The label fluorescence was excited at 365 nm and registered at 386 nm. Under actin polymerization the label fluorescence increased almost 10 times. Two main phases may be distinguished in the process of actin polymerization: 1) monomer activation and nucleus (trimer) formation, 2) growth of actin filaments on the nuclei. In our experimental conditions, both for pure actin and for that with added annexin VI, the 1st phase continued for about 3 min and after that the 2nd phase was perfectly approximated by exponential dependence. An analysis of the exponential curves showed that actin monomer lifetime increased from 327 s, at annexin absence, to about 373 s at 0.7 microM annexin and more. Calculation of rate constants at two ends of growing actin filament suggests that annexin VI binds with pointed ("slow") end so that at sufficient annexin concentration the filament grows only on barbed ("fast") end. Our results, together with data of other researchers showing that annexin VI binds with the inner membrane surface of smooth muscle cell through Ca2+, may indicate that, at Ca2+ entering the cell, this annexin binds actin filament pointed ends to cell surface making it ready for the act of contraction.     

Real-time measurements of actin filament polymerization by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy

Understanding the mechanism of actin polymerization and its regulation by associated proteins requires an assay to monitor polymerization dynamics and filament topology simultaneously. The only assay meeting these criteria is total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (Amann and Pollard, 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2002). The fluorescence signal is fourfold stronger with actin labeled on Cys-374 with Oregon green rather than rhodamine. To distinguish growth at barbed and pointed ends we used image drift correction and maximum intensity projections to reveal points where single N-ethylmaleimide inactivated myosins attach filaments to the glass coverslip. We estimated association rates at high actin concentrations and dissociation rates near and below the critical actin concentration. At the barbed end, the association rate constant for Mg-ATP-actin is 7.4 microM(-1) s(-1) and the dissociation rate constant is 0.89 s(-1). At the pointed end the association and dissociation rate constants are 0.56 microM(-1) s(-1) and 0.19 s(-1). When vitamin D binding protein sequesters all free monomers, ADP-actin dissociates from barbed ends at 1.4 s(-1) and from pointed ends at 0.16 s(-1) regardless of buffer nucleotide.