Improving the analysis of dinoflagellate phylogeny based on rDNA

Phylogenetic studies of dinoflagellates are often conducted using rDNA sequences. In analyses to date, the monophyly of some of the major lineages of dinoflagellates remain to be demonstrated. There are several reasons for this uncertainty, one of which may be the use of models of evolution that may not closely fit the data. We constructed and examined alignments of SSU and partial LSU rRNA along with a concatenated alignment of the two molecules. The alignments showed several characteristics that may confound phylogeny reconstruction: paired helix (stem) regions that contain non-independently evolving sites, high levels of compositional heterogeneity among some of the sequences, high levels of incompatibility (homoplasy), and rate heterogeneity among sites. Taking into account these confounding factors, we analysed the data and found that the Gonyaulacales, a well-supported clade, may be the most recently diverged order. Other supported orders were, in the analysis based on SSU, the Suessiales and the Dinophysiales; however, the Gymnodiniales and Prorocentrales appeared to be polyphyletic. The Peridiniales without Heterocapsa species appeared as a monophyletic group in the analysis based on LSU; however, the support was low. The concatenated alignment did not provide a better phylogenetic resolution than the single gene alignments.     

Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria

Sequences from ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have made a huge contribution to our current understanding of metazoan phylogeny and indeed the phylogeny of all of life. That said, some parts of this rRNA-based phylogeny remain unresolved. One approach to increase the resolution of these trees would be to use more appropriate models of sequence evolution in phylogenetic analysis. RNAs transcribed from rRNA genes have a complex secondary structure mediated by base pairing between sometimes distant regions of the rRNA molecule. The pairing between the stem nucleotides has important consequences for their evolution which differs from that of unpaired loop nucleotides. These differences in evolution should ideally be accounted for when using rRNA sequences for phylogeny estimation. We use a novel permutation approach to demonstrate the significant superiority of models of sequence evolution that allow stem and loop regions to evolve according to separate models and, in common with previous studies, we show that 16-state models that take base pairing of stems into account are significantly better than simpler, 4-state, single-nucleotide models. One of these 16-state models has been applied to the phylogeny of the Bilateria using small subunit rRNA (SSU) sequences. Our optimal tree largely echoes previous results based on SSU in particular supporting the tripartite Bilaterian tree of deuterostomes, lophotrochozoans, and ecdysozoans. There are also a number of differences, however, perhaps most important of which is the observation of a clade consisting of the gastrotrichs plus platyheminthes that is basal to all other lophotrochozoan taxa. Use of 16-state models also appears to reduce the Bayesian support given to certain biologically improbable groups found using standard 4-state models.     

Molecular phylogeny of onygenalean fungi based on small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequences

Phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide data from small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequences (ca. 1685 bp.) was performed on 19 taxa of the Onygenales and three related mitosporic fungi. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining method with the sequence data of related taxa obtained from DNA databases. The species in the Onygenales form two clusters and seven subclusters, and the tree topology reflects the traditional classification by Currah (1985) with some exceptions. The Myxotrichaceae is placed in the different lineage, separate from other plectomycetous taxa and among the Leotiales and the Erysiphales. Furthermore, two separate lineages in the Myxotrichaceae were found. Tree topology suggested the Onygenaceae is polyphyletic and composed of three subgroups; 1) most members of Onygenaceae, 2)Spiromastix warcupii, and 3) pathogenic dimorphic fungi classified inAjellomyces.     

基于rDNA ITS序列对绒泡菌目黏菌系统发育的探讨

绒泡菌目Physarida是黏菌纲Myxogastria最大的一个目,对其系统发育关系的研究一直是根据形态特征。为了从分子水平探讨绒泡菌目乃至黏菌纲的系统发育关系,以黏菌r DNA ITS通用引物对绒泡菌目5属8种黏菌的r DNA ITS进行扩增和测序,结合Gen Bank中已有的黏菌r DNA ITS序列,利用贝叶斯推断法(Bayesian inference,BI)和最大似然法(Maximum likelihood,ML)构建系统发育树。结果表明:绒泡菌目不同物种的r DNA ITS区在碱基组成和长度上差异明显,长度为777–1 445bp,G+C mol%在53.4%–61.9%之间。绒泡菌目与发网菌目Stemonitida聚类为两个明显的分支,在绒泡菌目分支上,绒泡菌科Physaraceae和钙皮菌科Didymiaceae各聚为一支,支持了形态学上以孢丝是否具有石灰质为依据区分这两个科的观点。由多份不同地理来源的鳞钙皮菌Didymium squamulosum材料组成的钙皮菌科又形成3个分支,证实了这个形态种是由地域来源广泛、繁殖亲和性各异和遗传变异较大的不同生物种组成的复合体。     

Phylogenetic analysis of the non-pathogenic genusSpiromastix (Onygenaceae) and related onygenalean taxa based on large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences

The phylogenetic positioning of the non-pathogenic genusSpiromastix in the Onygenales was studied based on large subunit rDNA (LSU rDNA) partial sequences (ca. 570 bp.). FourSpiromastix species and 28 representative taxa of the Onygenales were newly sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and evaluated by the maximum parsimony (MP) method with the data of 13 taxa retrieved from DNA databases.Spiromastix and dimorphic systemic pathogens,Ajellomyces andParacoccidioides, appear to be a monophyletic group with 74% bootstrap probability (BP) in the NJ tree constructed with the representative taxa of the Onygenales. The tree topology was concordant with the NJ tree based on SSU rDNA sequences of our previous work and corresponded to the classification system of the Onygenales by Currah (1985) and its minor modification by Udagawa (1997) with the exception of the classification of the Onygenaceae. The Onygeneceae sensu Udagawa may still be polyphyletic, since three independent lineages were recognized. The taxa forming helicoid peridial appendages were localized to two clades on the tree. The topology of the NJ tree constructed withSpiromastix and its close relatives suggested that the helicoid peridial appendages were apomorphic and acquired independently in the two clades of the Onygenales.     

Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability

Owing to the exponential growth of genome databases, phylogenetic trees are now widely used to test a variety of evolutionary hypotheses. Nevertheless, computation time burden limits the application of methods such as maximum likelihood nonparametric bootstrap to assess reliability of evolutionary trees. As an alternative, the much faster Bayesian inference of phylogeny, which expresses branch support as posterior probabilities, has been introduced. However, marked discrepancies exist between nonparametric bootstrap proportions and Bayesian posterior probabilities, leading to difficulties in the interpretation of sometimes strongly conflicting results. As an attempt to reconcile these two indices of node reliability, we apply the nonparametric bootstrap resampling procedure to the Bayesian approach. The correlation between posterior probabilities, bootstrap maximum likelihood percentages, and bootstrapped posterior probabilities was studied for eight highly diverse empirical data sets and were also investigated using experimental simulation. Our results show that the relation between posterior probabilities and bootstrapped maximum likelihood percentages is highly variable but that very strong correlations always exist when Bayesian node support is estimated on bootstrapped character matrices. Moreover, simulations corroborate empirical observations in suggesting that, being more conservative, the bootstrap approach might be less prone to strongly supporting a false phylogenetic hypothesis. Thus, apparent conflicts in topology recovered by the Bayesian approach were reduced after bootstrapping. Both posterior probabilities and bootstrap supports are of great interest to phylogeny as potential upper and lower bounds of node reliability, but they are surely not interchangeable and cannot be directly compared.