PharmGKB: the Pharmacogenetics Knowledge Base

The Pharmacogenetics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB; http://www.pharmgkb.org/) contains genomic, phenotype and clinical information collected from ongoing pharmacogenetic studies. Tools to browse, query, download, submit, edit and process the information are available to registered research network members. A subset of the tools is publicly available. PharmGKB currently contains over 150 genes under study, 14 Coriell populations and a large ontology of pharmacogenetics concepts. The pharmacogenetic concepts and the experimental data are interconnected by a set of relations to form a knowledge base of information for pharmacogenetic researchers. The information in PharmGKB, and its associated tools for processing that information, are tailored for leading-edge pharmacogenetics research. The PharmGKB project was initiated in April 2000 and the first version of the knowledge base went online in February 2001.     

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in oncology therapeutic antibody development

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are keys to the success of personalized medicine, prescribing drugs based on a patient's individual genetic and biological profile. In this review, we will focus on the application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in developing monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapeutics in oncology. The significance of pharmacogenomics in MAb therapeutics is highlighted by the association between polymorphisms in Fc receptors and clinical response to anti-CD20 MAb rituximab (Rituxan) or anti-ganglioside GD2 MAb 3F8, as well as the potential link between polymorphisms in HER2 and cardiac toxicity in patients treated with the anti-HER2 MAb trastuzumab (Herceptin). The dependence on gene copy number or expression levels of HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for therapeutic efficacy of trastuzumab and cetuximab (Erbitux), respectively, supports the importance of selecting suitable patient populations based on their pharmacogenetic profile. In addition, a better understanding of target mutation status and biological consequences will benefit MAAb development and may guide clinical development and use of these innovative therapeutics. The application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in developing MAb therapeutics will be largely dependent on the discovery of novel surrogate biomarkers and identification of disease- and therapeutics-relevant polymorphisms. Challenges and opportunities in biomarker discovery and validation, and in implementing clinical pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in oncology MAb development and clinical practice will also be discussed.     

Pharmacogenetics in drug regulation: promise, potential and pitfalls

Pharmacogenetic factors operate at pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic levels-the two components of the dose-response curve of a drug. Polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters and/or pharmacological targets of drugs may profoundly influence the dose-response relationship between individuals. For some drugs, although retrospective data from case studies suggests that these polymorphisms are frequently associated with adverse drug reactions or failure of efficacy, the clinical utility of such data remains unproven. There is, therefore, an urgent need for prospective data to determine whether pre-treatment genotyping can improve therapy. Various regulatory guidelines already recommend exploration of the role of genetic factors when investigating a drug for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dose-response relationship and drug interaction potential. Arising from the global heterogeneity in the frequency of variant alleles, regulatory guidelines also require the sponsors to provide additional information, usually pharmacogenetic bridging data, to determine whether data from one ethnic population can be extrapolated to another. At present, sponsors explore pharmacogenetic influences in early clinical pharmacokinetic studies but rarely do they carry the findings forward when designing dose-response studies or pivotal studies. When appropriate, regulatory authorities include genotype-specific recommendations in the prescribing information. Sometimes, this may include the need to adjust a dose in some genotypes under specific circumstances. Detailed references to pharmacogenetics in prescribing information and pharmacogenetically based prescribing in routine therapeutics will require robust prospective data from well-designed studies. With greater integration of pharmacogenetics in drug development, regulatory authorities expect to receive more detailed genetic data. This is likely to complicate the drug evaluation process as well as result in complex prescribing information. Genotype-specific dosing regimens will have to be more precise and marketing strategies more prudent. However, not all variations in drug responses are related to pharmacogenetic polymorphisms. Drug response can be modulated by a number of non-genetic factors, especially co-medications and presence of concurrent diseases. Inappropriate prescribing frequently compounds the complexity introduced by these two important non-genetic factors. Unless prescribers adhere to the prescribing information, much of the benefits of pharmacogenetics will be squandered. Discovering highly predictive genotype-phenotype associations during drug development and demonstrating their clinical validity and utility in well-designed prospective clinical trials will no doubt better define the role of pharmacogenetics in future clinical practice. In the meantime, prescribing should comply with the information provided while pharmacogenetic research is deservedly supported by all concerned but without unrealistic expectations.     

Context, ethics and pharmacogenetics

Most of the literature on pharmacogenetics assumes that the main problems in implementing the technology will be institutional ones (due to funding or regulation) and that although it involves genetic testing, the ethical issues involved in pharmacogenetics are different from, even less than, 'traditional' genetic testing. Very little attention has been paid to how clinicians will accept this technology, their attitudes towards it and how it will affect clinical practice. This paper presents results from interviews with clinicians who are beginning to use pharmacogenetics and explores how they view the ethics of pharmacogenetic testing, its use to exclude some patients from treatment, and how this kind of testing fits into broader debates around genetics. In particular this paper examines the attitudes of breast cancer and Alzheimer's disease specialists. The results of these interviews will be compared with the picture of pharmacogenetics painted in the published literature, as a way of rooting this somewhat speculative writing in clinical practice.     

Lay perspective on pharmacogenetics and its application to future drug treatment: a Danish quantitative survey

The purpose of the present survey is to describe the Danish perspective on pharmacogenetics and public willingness to adopt and utilize it as part of drug treatment. An Internet-based quantitative survey of a representative segment of the Danish population from ages 18 to 70 was conducted in March 2005. A total of 3,000 participated in the survey, with a response rate of 59%. Only 14.1% of respondents indicated they had heard of pharmacogenetics, while 79% said they had not. However, 81% indicated that they would choose pharmacogenetic drugs rather than ordinary drugs, while 6% would choose the drugs currently available. In addition, 89% indicated willingness to receive pharmacogenetic treatment in future. The population in general has a low level of knowledge about pharmacogenetics, and certain aspects are seen as disadvantageous: the lack of drug treatment for everyone, for example. Nonetheless, the attitude towards the use of pharmacogenetics is generally positive, and pharmacogenetic treatment is considered better than the treatment available at present.     

Pharmacogenetics education in British medical schools

Pharmacogenetic tests allow medications to be tailored to individual patients to improve efficacy and reduce drug toxicity. In 2005, the International Society of Pharmacogenomics (ISP) made recommendations for undergraduate medical teaching in pharmacogenetics. We aimed to establish the quantity and scope of this in British medical schools. An electronic survey was sent to all British medical schools. Nineteen out of 34 (56%) medical schools responded. Sixteen of the 19 (84%) respondents provided pharmacogenetics teaching, usually 1–2 h in total. Only four (21%) medical schools offered the four or more hours of teaching recommended by the ISP. However, 10 of 16 (63%) schools felt the amount of pharmacogenetic teaching offered was sufficient. The quantity of undergraduate teaching of pharmacogenetics is low. However, a majority of UK medical schools teach it, covering a broad scope of elements. It is encouraging that future clinicians are being provided with the knowledge to deliver pharmacogenetics into clinical practice.     

Pharmacogenetics: the bioethical problem of DNA investment banking

Concern about the ethics of clinical drug trials research on patients and healthy volunteers has been the subject of significant ethical analysis and policy development--protocols are reviewed by Research Ethics Committees and subjects are protected by informed consent procedures. More recently attention has begun to be focused on DNA banking for clinical and pharmacogenetics research. It is, however, surprising how little attention has been paid to the commercial nature of such research, or the unique issues that present when subjects are asked to consent to the storage of biological samples. Our contention is that in the context of pharmacogenetic add-on studies to clinical drug trials, the doctrine of informed consent fails to cover the broader range of social and ethical issues. Applying a sociological perspective, we foreground issues of patient/subject participation or 'work', the ambiguity of research subject altruism, and the divided loyalties facing many physicians conducting clinical research. By demonstrating the complexity of patient and physician involvement in clinical drug trials, we argue for more comprehensive ethical review and oversight that moves beyond reliance on informed consent to incorporate understandings of the social, political and cultural elements that underpin the diversity of ethical issues arising in the research context.     

The AmpliChip CYP450 genotyping test: Integrating a new clinical tool

The AmpliChip CYP450 Test, which analyzes patient genotypes for cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, is a major step toward introducing personalized prescribing into the clinical environment. Interest in adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the genetic revolution, and pharmacogenetics have converged with the introduction of this tool, which is anticipated to be the first of a new wave of such tools to follow over the next 5-10 years. The AmpliChip CYP450 Test is based on microarray technology, which combines hybridization in precise locations on a glass microarray and a fluorescent labeling system. It classifies individuals into two CYP2C19 phenotypes (extensive metabolizers [EMs] and poor metabolizers [PMs]) by testing three alleles, and into four CYP2D6 phenotypes (ultrarapid metabolizers [UMs], EMs, intermediate metabolizers [IMs], and PMs) by testing 27 alleles, including seven duplications. CYP2D6 is a metabolic enzyme with four activity levels (or phenotypes): UMs with unusually high activity; normal subjects, known as EMs; IMs with low activity; and PMs with no CYP2D6 activity (7% of Caucasians and 1-3% in other ethnic groups). Levels of evidence for the association between CYP2D6 PMs and ADRs are relatively reasonable and include systematic reviews of case-control studies of some typical antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Evidence for other phenotypes is considerably more limited. The CYP2D6 PM phenotype may be associated with risperidone ADRs and discontinuation due to ADRs. Venlafaxine, aripiprazole, duloxetine, and atomoxetine are newer drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 but studies of the clinical relevance of CYP2D6 genotypes are needed. Non-psychiatric drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 include metoprolol, tamoxifen, and codeine-like drugs. CYP2C19 PMs (3-4% of Caucasians and African Americans, and 14-21% of Asians) may require dose adjustment for some TCAs, moclobemide, and citalopram. Other drugs metabolized by CYP2C19 are diazepam and omeprazole. The future of pharmacogenetics depends on the ability to overcome serious obstacles, including the difficulties of conducting and publishing studies in light of resistance from grant agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and some scientific reviewers. Assuming more studies are published, pharmacogenetic clinical applications may be compromised by economic factors and the lack of physician education. The combination of a US FDA-approved test, such as the AmpliChip CYP450 Test, and an FDA definition of CYP2D6 as a 'valid biomarker' makes CYP2D6 genotyping a prime candidate to be the first successful pharmacogenetic test in the clinical environment. One can use microarray technology to test for hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) but, taking into account the difficulties for single gene approaches such as CYP2D6, it is unlikely that very complex pharmacogenetic approaches will reach the clinical market in the next 5-10 years.     

The legacy of pharmacogenetics and potential applications

Some 40 years of pharmacogenetic research indicates that knowledge of human genetic diversity is essential to a broader understanding of variation in human drug response, and suggests that drug therapy tailored to the genetic characteristics of the individual may be a realistic goal. Aided by new technologies, molecular studies of genetic polymorphisms of many human enzymes, receptors, and other proteins indicate that only a limited number of important protein variants account for the diversity in drug response, raising the prospect that these variants may be cataloged relatively soon for many human populations. The next great challenge of pharmacogenetics is to pin down the cellular location and effect of these variant proteins on the pathways and networks that govern individual variation in responses to drugs and other exogenous chemicals. In this paper, we will discuss some the current challenges to progress in pharmacogenetics and newer strategies that might be used to improve prospects of drug design and personalized therapy.     

Pharmacogenetics of cancer chemotherapy

Significant heterogeneity in the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents is observed within cancer populations. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is the study of inheritance in interindividual variation in drug disposition. The allure of pharmacogenetics, in the treatment of cancer patients, comes from the potential for individualisation of cancer therapy, minimizing toxicity, while maximizing efficacy. In this review we will focus on the current and potential clinical applications of pharmacogenetics in cancer therapy by citing relevant examples and discussing the possible approaches which may be used to establish a reliable, reproducible and cost-effective test for clinically relevant genetic polymorphisms, using easily accessible biological samples (e.g., blood and tumour samples). Ideally, routine management of patients would include analysis of their single nucleotide polymorphism linkage disequilibrium (SNP-LD) profile prior to treatment, allowing stratification of patients into treatment groups, thus individualising their therapy. In order to achieve this ambition, a combination of different approaches (candidate gene, genome-wide and pathway driven) will be required from scientists and clinician scientists, as well as an increased understanding and incorporation of pharmacogenetic aims and endpoints into current and future clinical trials.     

Pharmacogenetics in Primary Care: The Promise of Personalized Medicine and the Reality of Racial Profiling

Many anticipate that expanding knowledge of genetic variations associated with disease risk and medication response will revolutionize clinical medicine, making possible genetically based Personalized Medicine where health care can be tailored to individuals, based on their genome scans. Pharmacogenetics has received especially strong interest, with many pharmaceutical developers avidly working to identify genetic variations associated with individual differences in drug response. While clinical applications of emerging genetic knowledge are becoming increasingly available, genetic tests for drug selection are not as yet widely accessible, and many primary care clinicians are unprepared to interpret genetic information. We conducted interviews with 58 primary care clinicians, exploring how they integrate emerging pharmacogenetic concepts into their practices. We found that in their current practices, pharmacogenetic innovations have not led to individually tailored treatment, but instead have encouraged use of essentialized racial/ethnic identity as a proxy for genetic heritage. Current manifestations of Personalized Medicine appear to be reinforcing entrenched notions of inherent biological differences between racial groups, and promoting the belief that racial profiling in health care is supported by cutting-edge scientific authority. Our findings raise concern for how pharmacogenetic innovations will actually affect diverse populations, and how unbiased treatment can be assured.     

Efforts to enhance the efficiency of tumor chemotherapy

Antiproliferative cytotoxic agents, of which several are still in clinical practice nowadays, could be characterized by low selectivity, narrow therapeutic index, medium or serious side effects and rapid formation of resistance. In the limited efficacy of these drugs several factors are playing a role such as the age, gender and pharmacogenetics of the patients, the morphological and biological feature of the tumor, moreover, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs. The question could be justified if there are methods which, by influencing the above parameters, are helpful in enhancing the efficacy and decreasing the toxic side effects of these drugs. Since a long time we have been interested in evaluating methods of preclinical and clinical level for increasing drug efficacy. The aim of this minireview is to give a short summary about our previous and present projects aiming: 1.) to characterize and mitigate toxic side effects of several cytotoxic agents; 2.) to decrease the toxic side effects and improve the antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil by biochemical modulation and 3.) to study the possibility of individualized drug selection, based on the pharmacobiochemical and pharmacogenetic characteristics of the patients.     

Pharmacogenetic testing, informed consent and the problem of secondary information

Numerous benefits for patients have been predicted if prescribing decisions were routinely accompanied by pharmacogenetic testing. So far, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the routine application of this new technology could result in considerable harm to patients. This article emphasises that pharmacogenetic testing shares both the opportunities and the pitfalls with 'conventional' disease-genetic testing. It demonstrates that performing pharmacogenetic tests as well as interpreting the results are extraordinarily complex issues requiring a high level of expertise. It further argues that pharmacogenetic testing can have a huge impact on clinical decisions and may influence the therapeutic strategy as well as the clinical monitoring of a patient. This view challenges the predominant paradigm that pharmacogenetic testing will predict patients' responses to medicines, but that it will not provide any other significant disease-specific predictive information about the patient or family members. The article also questions published proposals to reduce the consent procedure for pharmacogenetic testing to a simple statement that the physician wishes to test a sample of the patient's DNA to see if a drug will be safe or whether it will work, and presents an alternative model that is better suited to protect patient's interests and to obtain meaningful informed consent. The paper concludes by outlining conditions for the application of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice in a way that can make full use of its potential benefits while minimising possible harm to patients and their families.     

iGMDR:Integrated Pharmacogenetic Resource Guide to Cancer Therapy and Research

Current pharmacogenetic studies have obtained many genetic models that can predict the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs. Although some of these models are of crucial importance and have been used in clinical practice, these very valuable models have not been well adopted into cancer research to promote the development of cancer therapies due to the lack of integration and standards for the existing data of the pharmacogenetic studies. For this purpose, we built a resource investigating genetic model of drug response (iGMDR), which integrates the models from in vitro and in vivo pharmacogenetic studies with different omics data from a variety of technical systems. In this study, we introduced a standardized process for all integrations, and described how users can utilize these models to gain insights into cancer. iGMDR is freely accessible at https://igmdr.modellab.cn.     

In vitro assessment of pharmacogenetic susceptibility to toxic drug metabolites in humans

An experimental approach to the pharmacogenetics of human idiosyncratic drug reactions requires an assay for determining individual differences in susceptibility that does not expose patients to further drug-related risk. We have developed an in vitro drug toxicity assay designed to test the hypothesis that differences in susceptibility may be based on genetic abnormalities in the detoxification of electrophilic drug metabolites. Lymphocytes are challenged with metabolites generated by a murine hepatic microsomal system. By using cells from patients deficient in glutathione synthetase, we found that cells with decreased glutathione defenses are more sensitive to toxicity from metabolites of drugs such as acetaminophen, nitrofurantoin, and metronidazole. The assay was then applied to studying the pharmacogenetics of phenytoin hepatotoxicity. We found an inherited defect in the detoxification of phenytoin arene oxide metabolites in cells from patients and their relatives. The studies have led to an elucidation of a genetically heterogeneous group of detoxification defects for arene oxide metabolites of various aromatic drugs. Such experimental approaches may be useful in diagnosing idiosyncratic drug reactions, in establishing their pharmacogenetic basis, and perhaps in predicting toxicity potential of drugs for selected patients and families.     

Pharmacogenetics and drug development: the path to safer and more effective drugs

Pharmacogenetics provides opportunities for informed decision-making along the pharmaceutical pipeline. There is a growing literature of retrospective studies of marketed medicines that describe efficacy or safety on the basis of patient genotypes. These studies emphasize the potential prospective use of genome information to enhance success in finding new medicines. An example of a prospective efficacy pharmacogenetic Phase-IIA proof-of-concept study is described. Inserting a rapidly performed efficacy pharmacogenetic step after initial clinical data are obtained can provide confidence for a commitment to full drug development. The rapid identification of adverse events during and after drug development using genomic mapping tools is also reviewed.