Fusion peptides and the mechanism of viral fusion

Segments of viral fusion proteins play an important role in viral fusion. They are defined by a number of criteria, including the sensitivity of this region of the viral fusion protein to loss of function as a consequence of mutation. In addition, small model peptides designed to mimic this segment of viral fusion proteins often have some membrane perturbing activity. The properties of viral fusion peptides are quite varied. Many are found at the amino terminus of viral fusion proteins. As isolated peptides, they have been found to form both α-helical as well as β-structure. In addition, some viruses have internal fusion peptides. Just as there are several structural motifs for viral fusion peptides, there are also several mechanisms by which they accelerate the process of membrane fusion. These include the promotion of negative curvature, lowering the rupture tension of the lipid monolayer, acting as an anchor to join the fusion membranes, transmitting a force to the membrane or imparting energy to the system by other means. It is not likely that the fusion peptide can fulfill all of these diverse roles and future studies will elucidate which of these mechanisms is most important for the action of individual viral fusion peptides.     

Peptides and Membrane Fusion: Towards an Understanding of the Molecular Mechanism of Protein-Induced Fusion

Processes such as endo- or exocytosis, membrane recycling, fertilization and enveloped viruses infection require one or more critical membrane fusion reactions. A key feature in viral and cellular fusion phenomena is the involvement of specific fusion proteins. Among the few well-characterized fusion proteins are viral spike glycoproteins responsible for penetration of enveloped viruses into their host cells, and sperm proteins involved in sperm-egg fusion. In their sequences, these proteins possess a ``fusion peptide,' a short segment (up to 20 amino acids) of relatively hydrophobic residues, commonly found in a membrane-anchored polypeptide chain. To simulate protein-mediated fusion, many studies on peptide-induced membrane fusion have been conducted on model membranes such as liposomes and have employed synthetic peptides corresponding to the putative fusion sequences of viral proteins, or de novo synthesized peptides. Here, the application of peptides as a model system to understand the molecular details of membrane fusion will be discussed in detail. Data obtained from these studies will be correlated to biological studies, in particular those that involve viral and sperm-egg systems. Structure-function relationships will be revealed, particularly in the context of protein-induced membrane perturbations and bilayer-to-nonbilayer transition underlying the mechanism of fusion. We will also focus on the involvement of lipid composition of membranes as a potential regulating factor of the topological fusion site in biological systems. Received: 3 August 1998/Revised: 15 October 1998     

Mechanisms of Initiation of Membrane Fusion: Role of Lipids

Main emphasis in studies on the mechanisms of fusion of cellular membranes has been in the roles of various proteins, with far less interest in the properties of lipids. Yet, on a molecular level fusion involves the merging of lipid bilayers. Studies so far have revealed lipids forming inverted non-lamellar phases to be important in controlling membrane fusion. However, the underlying molecular level mechanisms have remained controversial. While this review is focused on presenting one possible mechanism, involving so-called extended lipid conformation, we are also advocating the view, that in order to obtain a more complete understanding of this process it is necessary to merge the relevant physicochemical properties of lipids with the models describing the specific functions of proteins. To this end, taking into account the central importance of fusion in a wide range of cellular processes, we may anticipate its control to open novel possibilities also for therapeutic intervention.     

Intracellular Bacteria Encode Inhibitory SNARE-Like Proteins

Pathogens use diverse molecular machines to penetrate host cells and manipulate intracellular vesicular trafficking. Viruses employ glycoproteins, functionally and structurally similar to the SNARE proteins, to induce eukaryotic membrane fusion. Intracellular pathogens, on the other hand, need to block fusion of their infectious phagosomes with various endocytic compartments to escape from the degradative pathway. The molecular details concerning the mechanisms underlying this process are lacking. Using both an in vitro liposome fusion assay and a cellular assay, we showed that SNARE-like bacterial proteins block membrane fusion in eukaryotic cells by directly inhibiting SNARE-mediated membrane fusion. More specifically, we showed that IncA and IcmG/DotF, two SNARE-like proteins respectively expressed by Chlamydia and Legionella, inhibit the endocytic SNARE machinery. Furthermore, we identified that the SNARE-like motif present in these bacterial proteins encodes the inhibitory function. This finding suggests that SNARE-like motifs are capable of specifically manipulating membrane fusion in a wide variety of biological environments. Ultimately, this motif may have been selected during evolution because it is an efficient structural motif for modifying eukaryotic membrane fusion and thus contribute to pathogen survival.     

The multi-functional SNARE protein Ykt6 in autophagosomal fusion processes

Autophagy is a degradative pathway in which cytosolic material is enwrapped within double membrane vesicles, so-called autophagosomes, and delivered to lytic organelles. SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins are key to drive membrane fusion of the autophagosome and the lytic organelles, called lysosomes in higher eukaryotes or vacuoles in plants and yeast. Therefore, the identification of functional SNARE complexes is central for understanding fusion processes and their regulation. The SNARE proteins Syntaxin 17, SNAP29 and Vamp7/VAMP8 are responsible for the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes in higher eukaryotes. Recent studies reported that the R-SNARE Ykt6 is an additional SNARE protein involved in autophagosome-lytic organelle fusion in yeast, Drosophila, and mammals. These current findings point to an evolutionarily conserved role of Ykt6 in autophagosome-related fusion events. Here, we briefly summarize the principal mechanisms of autophagosome-lytic organelle fusion, with a special focus on Ykt6 to highlight some intrinsic features of this unusual SNARE protein.     

Plasma membrane targeting of exocytic SNARE proteins

SNARE proteins play a central role in the process of intracellular membrane fusion. Indeed, the interaction of SNAREs present on two opposing membranes is generally believed to provide the driving force to initiate membrane fusion. Eukaryotic cells express a large number of SNARE isoforms, and the function of individual SNAREs is required for specific intracellular fusion events. Exocytosis, the fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, employs the proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25 as plasma membrane SNAREs. As a result, exocytosis is dependent upon the targeting of these proteins to the plasma membrane; however, the mechanisms that underlie trafficking of exocytic syntaxin and SNAP-25 proteins to the cell surface are poorly understood. The intracellular trafficking itinerary of these proteins is particularly intriguing as syntaxins are tail-anchored (or Type IV) membrane proteins, whereas SNAP-25 is anchored to membranes via a central palmitoylated domain-there is no common consensus for the trafficking of such proteins within the cell. In this review, we discuss the plasma membrane targeting of these essential exocytic SNARE proteins.     

Interplay between lipids and the proteinaceous membrane fusion machinery

For membrane fusion to occur, opposed lipid bilayers initially establish a fusion pore, often followed by complete mixing of the fusing membranes. Contemporary views suggest that during fusion lipid bilayers are continuous passive platforms that are disrupted and remodeled by catalytic proteins. Some models propose that even the architecture and composition of the fusion pore might be dominated by proteins rather than lipids. Hence, lipids have no regulatory contribution to this process; they simply adapt their shape passively for filling space between otherwise autonomous protein machineries.However, an increasing number of experimental findings indicate that membrane fusion critically depends on a variety of lipids and lipid derivatives. Therefore, a purely proteocentric view describes fusion mechanisms insufficiently. Instead, lipids have functions probably at different levels, as (i) a general influence on the propensity of lipid bilayers to fuse, (ii) a role in recruiting exocytotic proteins to the plasma membrane, (iii) a role in organizing membrane domains for fusion and (iv) direct regulatory effects on fusion protein complexes. In this review we have made an attempt to bring together the large body of evidence supporting a major role for lipids in membrane fusion either directly or indirectly.     

Membrane Fusion

The fusion of biological membranes results in two bilayer-based membranes merging into a single membrane. In this process the lipids have to undergo considerable rearrangement. The nature of the intermediates that are formed during this rearrangement has been investigated. Certain fusion proteins facilitate this process. In many cases short segments of these fusion proteins have a particularly important role in accelerating the fusion process. Studies of the interaction of model peptides with membranes have allowed for increased understanding at the molecular level of the mechanism of the promotion of membrane fusion by fusion proteins. There is an increased appreciation of the roles of several independent segments of fusion proteins in promoting the fusion process.Many of the studies of the fusion of biological membranes have been done with the fusion of enveloped viruses with other membranes. One reason for this is that the number of proteins involved in viral fusion is relatively simple, often requiring only a single protein. For many enveloped viruses, the structure of their fusion proteins has certain common elements, suggesting that they all promote fusion by an analogous mechanism. Some aspects of this mechanism also appears to be common to intracellular fusion, although several proteins are involved in that process which is more complex and regulated than is fusion.     

Regulated Exocytosis in the Pancreatic Acinar Cell

The studies reported here will summarize the major events taking place during the synthesis, intracellular transport and discharge of secretory proteins from the pancreatic acinar cell. We will summarize the work that led to the definition of the regulated secretory pathway in the acinar cell followed by an update of the major steps in the pathway to incorporate new information on vesicular transport that has been gathered over the past 10 years from a number of laboratories. These studies arise from an amazing convergence of information derived from studies on the simpler eukaryote, S. cerevisiae, from biochemical analysis of neurotransmitter release, and from in vitro membrane fusion systems that have allowed for the dissection of the proteins involved in membrane recognition and fusion. Taken together, these studies have shown that the major proteins involved in membrane targeting and fusion, and the accessory proteins that control these events, are highly conserved over vast periods of evolutionary time. Thus, information derived from each of these systems and approaches can be transferred directly to regulated exocytosis in the pancreatic acinar cell — a system that has superimposed on it the complexities of organization into a polarized epithelium and control from the extracellular milieu via neurohormones. The ensuing hypothesis that integrates this body of information is termed the SNARE hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the core complex of NSF (N-ethylmaleimide sensitive fusion protein) and SNAPs (soluble NSF attachment proteins) pair with their cognate receptors, SNAREs, present on the vesicles (v-SNARE) and the target membrane (t-SNARE) to form a complex that can lead to specific docking and fusion of the vesicles with their target membranes. This process is believed to be controlled by a variety of accessory proteins including synaptotagmin, a Ca²⁺ binding clamp for exocytosis and members of the rab family of low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins. Several of these proteins have been found by us to be present in the pancreatic acinar cell and are likely involved in similar processes that have been worked out in simpler systems. For example, we have shown that rab3D is uniquely associated with the cytosolic side of zymogen granule membranes as an integral membrane protein and that peptides from the effector domain of the rab proteins are able to induce secretion from permeabilized acinar cells, suggesting a role for this process in regulated exocytosis. These types of approaches are being used to define the localizaiton and function of members of the SNARE family of proteins and of proteins that control formation of the SNARE complex with a particular emphasis on their role in hormonally-elicited secretion. In our presentations, we will also discuss the acquisition of stimulus secretion coupling during the perinatal period in the developing rat pancreas since this system provides the possibility of defining, in a system that does not require exogenous transfection, the sequential expression of factors involved in membrane targeting and fusion. For example, during secretogenesis, rab3D is initially cytosolic at a time when the machinery of exocytosis is present but not functional, and only becomes associated with zymogen granule membranes after birth when stimulus-secretion coupling is acquired.     

Mechanisms of cell entry by influenza virus

A wide range of viruses, including many human and animal pathogens representing various taxonomic groups, contain genomes that are enclosed in lipid envelopes. These envelopes are generally acquired in the final stages of assembly, as viruses bud from regions of the membrane of the infected cell at which virally encoded membrane proteins have accumulated. The viruses procure their membranes during this process and mature particles 'pinch off' from the cellular membranes. Under most circumstances, initiation of another round of infection is dependent on two critical functions supplied by the envelope proteins. The virus must bind to cell-surface receptors of a new host cell, and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes must occur to transfer the viral genome into the cell. Enveloped viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to execute these two basic functions. Owing to their relative simplicity, studies of binding and fusion using enveloped viruses and their components have contributed significantly to the overall understanding of receptor-ligand interactions and membrane fusion processes - fundamental activities involved in a plethora of biological functions.     

Exocytosis in plants

Exocytosis is the final event in the secretory pathway and requires the fusion of the secretory vesicle membrane with the plasma membrane. It results in the release to the outside of vesicle cargo from the cell interior and also the delivery of vesicle membrane and proteins to the plasma membrane. An electrophysiological assay that measures changes in membrane capacitance has recently been used to monitor exocytosis in plants. This complements information derived from earlier light and electron microscope studies, and allows both transient and irreversible fusion of single exocytotic vesicles to be followed with high resolution in protoplasts. It also provides a tool to investigate bulk exocytotic activity in single protoplasts under the influence of cytoplasmic modulators. This research highlights the role of intracellular Ca²⁺, GTP and pressure in the control of exocytosis in plants.In parallel to these functional studies, plant proteins with the potential to regulate exocytosis are being identified by molecular analysis. In this review we describe these electrophysiological and molecular advances, and emphasise the need for parallel biochemical work to provide a complete picture of the mechanisms controlling vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane of plant cells.     

Binding contribution between synaptic vesicle membrane and plasma membrane proteins in neurons: an AFM study.

The final step in the exocytotic process is the docking and fusion of membrane-bound secretory vesicles at the cell plasma membrane. This docking and fusion is brought about by several participating vesicle membrane, plasma membrane and soluble cytosolic proteins. A clear understanding of the interactions between these participating proteins giving rise to vesicle docking and fusion is essential. In this study, the binding force profiles between synaptic vesicle membrane and plasma membrane proteins have been examined for the first time using the atomic force microscope. Binding force contributions of a synaptic vesicle membrane protein VAMP1, and the plasma membrane proteins SNAP-25 and syntaxin, are also implicated from these studies. Our study suggests that these three proteins are the major, if not the only contributors to the interactive binding force that exist between the two membranes.     

膜融合机制研究进展

膜的融合是一个基本的生命过程,在生物的生长发育中有着重要作用。通过融合,两套独立的双层脂分子合二为一,完成一定的生物功能。膜融合分子机制的关键在于其主要成分：融合蛋白。Ⅰ、Ⅱ类病毒融合蛋白形成“发夹”,胞内囊泡与目标膜各提供的融合蛋白形成“类亮氨酸拉链”,这些结构将独立的膜拉近,继而促使膜合为一体。细胞与细胞间融合蛋白的作用机制目前还未明确,在各种膜融合中,脂双层的变化可能是类似的,但介导融合的分子机制应该是不同的。目前,对于膜融合很多方面的理解还停留在假说阶段。理解了膜融合的过程和分子机制不仅将极大地促进生物学的发展,更重要是将为相关的疾病治疗打下坚实的基础。     

SNARE and regulatory proteins induce local membrane protrusions to prime docked vesicles for fast calcium‐triggered fusion

Synaptic vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane in response to Ca²⁺ influx, thereby releasing neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft. The protein machinery that mediates this process, consisting of soluble N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) and regulatory proteins, is well known, but the mechanisms by which these proteins prime synaptic membranes for fusion are debated. In this study, we applied large‐scale, automated cryo‐electron tomography to image an in vitro system that reconstitutes synaptic fusion. Our findings suggest that upon docking and priming of vesicles for fast Ca²⁺‐triggered fusion, SNARE proteins act in concert with regulatory proteins to induce a local protrusion in the plasma membrane, directed towards the primed vesicle. The SNAREs and regulatory proteins thereby stabilize the membrane in a high‐energy state from which the activation energy for fusion is profoundly reduced, allowing synchronous and instantaneous fusion upon release of the complexin clamp.     

Palmitoylation of the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery

The fusion of synaptic vesicles with the pre-synaptic plasma membrane mediates the secretion of neurotransmitters at nerve terminals. This pathway is regulated by an array of protein–protein interactions. Of central importance are the soluble NSF ( N -ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins syntaxin 1 and SNAP25, which are associated with the pre-synaptic plasma membrane and vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP2), a synaptic vesicle SNARE. Syntaxin 1, SNAP25 and VAMP2 interact to form a tight complex bridging the vesicle and plasma membranes, which has been suggested to represent the minimal membrane fusion machinery. Synaptic vesicle fusion is stimulated by a rise in intraterminal Ca²⁺ levels, and a major Ca²⁺ sensor for vesicle fusion is synaptotagmin I. Synaptotagmin is likely to couple Ca²⁺ entry to vesicle fusion via Ca²⁺-dependent and independent interactions with membrane phospholipids and the SNARE proteins. Intriguingly, syntaxin 1, SNAP25, VAMP2 and synaptotagmin I have all been reported to be modified by palmitoylation in neurons. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms and dynamics of palmitoylation of these proteins and speculate on how palmitoylation might contribute to the regulation of synaptic vesicle fusion.     

Viral fusion mechanisms

The majority of viral fusion proteins can be divided into two classes. The influenza hemagglutinin (HA) belongs to the class I fusion proteins and undergoes a series of conformational changes at acidic pH, leading to membrane fusion. The crystal structures of the prefusion and the postfusion forms of HA have been revealed in 1981 and 1994, respectively. On the basis of these structures, a model for the mechanism of membrane fusion mediated by the conformational changes of HA has been proposed. The flavivirus E and alphavirus E1 proteins belong to the class II fusion proteins and mediate membrane fusion at acidic pH. Their prefusion structures are distinct from that of HA. Last year, however, it has become evident that the postfusion structures of these class I and class II fusion proteins are similar. The paramyxovirus F protein belongs to the class I fusion proteins. In contrast to HA, an interaction between F and its homologous attachment protein is required for F to undergo the conformational changes. Since F mediates fusion at neutral pH, the infected cells can fuse with neighboring uninfected cells. The crystal structures of F and the attachment protein HN have recently been clarified, which will facilitate studies of the molecular mechanism of F-mediated membrane fusion.     

The Role of the Transmembrane and of the Intraviral Domain of Glycoproteins in Membrane Fusion of Enveloped Viruses

Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped -helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.     

Structures and mechanisms of viral membrane fusion proteins: multiple variations on a common theme

Recent work has identified three distinct classes of viral membrane fusion proteins based on structural criteria. In addition, there are at least four distinct mechanisms by which viral fusion proteins can be triggered to undergo fusion-inducing conformational changes. Viral fusion proteins also contain different types of fusion peptides and vary in their reliance on accessory proteins. These differing features combine to yield a rich diversity of fusion proteins. Yet despite this staggering diversity, all characterized viral fusion proteins convert from a fusion-competent state (dimers or trimers, depending on the class) to a membrane-embedded homotrimeric prehairpin, and then to a trimer-of-hairpins that brings the fusion peptide, attached to the target membrane, and the transmembrane domain, attached to the viral membrane, into close proximity thereby facilitating the union of viral and target membranes. During these conformational conversions, the fusion proteins induce membranes to progress through stages of close apposition, hemifusion, and then the formation of small, and finally large, fusion pores. Clearly, highly divergent proteins have converged on the same overall strategy to mediate fusion, an essential step in the life cycle of every enveloped virus.