Controlling the size of organs and organisms

A key difference between yeast and metazoans is the need of the latter to regulate cell proliferation and growth to create organs (and organisms) of reproducible size and shape. Great progress has been made in understanding how growth, cell size and the cell cycle are controlled in metazoans. Recent work has shown that disruption of conserved components of the insulin and Tor kinase pathways can alter organ size, indicating that the normal functioning of these pathways is essential for organ size control. However, disruption of genes that regulate patterning and of genes that control cell adhesion and cell polarity has a much more dramatic effect on final organ size than does manipulation of the cell cycle or of basal growth control mechanisms. These data point to an 'organ-size checkpoint' that regulates cell division, cell growth and apoptosis. Recent data suggests that cell competition may play an important role in implementing the organ-size checkpoint.     

Genetic control of size in Drosophila

During the past ten years, significant progress has been made in understanding the basic mechanisms of the development of multicellular organisms. Genetic analysis of the development of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila has unearthed a fruitful number of genes involved in establishing the basic body plan, patterning of limbs, specification of cell fate and regulation of programmed cell death. The genes involved in these developmental processes have been conserved throughout evolution and homologous genes are involved in the patterning of insect and human limbs. Despite these important discoveries, we have learned astonishingly little about one of the most obvious distinctions between animals: their difference in body size. The mass of the smallest mammal, the bumble-bee bat, is 2 g while that of the largest mammal, the blue whale, is 150 t or 150 million grams. Remarkably, even though they are in the same class, body size can vary up to 75-million-fold. Furthermore, this body growth can be finite in the case of most vertebrates or it can occur continuously throughout life, as for trees, molluscs and large crustaceans. Currently, we know comparatively little about the genetic control of body size. In this article we will review recent evidence from vertebrates and particularly from Drosophila that implicates insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I and other growth pathways in the control of cell, organ and body size.     

Pom1 and cell size homeostasis in fission yeast

Cells sense their size and use this information to coordinate cell division with cell growth to maintain a constant cell size within a given population. A model has been proposed for cell size control in the rod-shaped cells of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This involves a protein localized to the cell ends, which inhibits mitotic activators in the middle of the cell in a cell size-dependent manner. This protein, Pom1, along with another tip-localized protein, Nif1, have been implicated as direct sensors of cell size controlling the onset of mitosis. Here we have investigated cell size variability and size homeostasis at the G₂/M transition, focusing on the role of pom1 and nif1. Cells deleted for either of these 2 genes show wild-type size homeostasis both in size variability analyses and size homeostasis experiments. This indicates that these genes do not have a critical role as direct cell size sensors in the control mechanism. Cell size homeostasis also seems to be independent of Cdc2–Tyr15 phosphorylation, suggesting that the size sensing mechanism in fission yeast may act through an unidentified pathway regulating CDK activity by an unknown mechanism.     

控制植物器官大小的分子机理

植物器官大小是植物形态的一个重要特征并受严格的遗传调控。器官大小与两个不同的过程有关：细胞扩张和细胞分裂。分子遗传分析已经鉴定了许多基因,这些基因通过作用于其中一个或两个过程来影响器官的最终大小。某种植物个体间器官大小的差异是由控制该器官特征的基因表达水平变化引起的,通过拟南芥的遗传分析显示这些基因是如何受控制或被修饰的。以上这些资料阐明了植物如何确定继续或停止生长,同时也提供了改变植物积累生物量的方法。     

植物器官大小相关基因研究进展

器官大小是植物形态的一个重要特征,而且具有严格的种属特异性。植物器官大小虽然受到外在的环境因素（如光照、营养等）的影响,但它由内在特有的细胞数目和细胞大小决定。许多通过转录调节、蛋白合成、激素调节或松弛细胞壁等途径作用于植物细胞繁殖和/或细胞扩张的基因已经被鉴定,它们的过表达或缺失表达能促进植物器官大小和加快植物生长。尽管如此,这些基因通过相对独立的途径起作用,在植物中难以阐明一个相对整合的器官大小基因调控网络,这也是该研究领域的亟待需要解决的问题。目前,一些器官大小相关基因已经应用农作物育种,并培育出显著增大的农作物品种,这也证实了利用器官大小基因进行植物品种选育的可行性。因此,通过研究药用植物器官大小的基因,人为地在分子水平上有目的的调控器官的大小和形态,是缓解当前许多药用植物面临的资源紧缺、枯竭濒危困境的可考虑途径之一。     

Molecular mechanism of size control in development and human diseases

How multicellular organisms control their size is a fundamental question that fascinated generations of biologists. In the past 10 years, tremendous progress has been made toward our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying size control. Original studies from Drosophila showed that in addition to extrinsic nutritional and hormonal cues, intrinsic mechanisms also play important roles in the control of organ size during development. Several novel signaling pathways such as insulin and Hippo-LATS signaling pathways have been identified that control organ size by regulating cell size and/or cell number through modulation of cell growth, cell division, and cell death. Later studies using mammalian cell and mouse models also demonstrated that the signaling pathways identified in flies are also conserved in mammals. Significantly, recent studies showed that dysregulation of size control plays important roles in the development of many human diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and hypertrophy.     

Molecular genetic determinants of human brain size

Cognitive skills such as tool use, syntactical languages, and self-awareness differentiate humans from other primates. The underlying basis for this cognitive difference has been widely associated with a high encephalization quotient and an anatomically distinct, exceptionally large cerebral cortex. Investigations on congenital microcephaly had revealed several genes that affect mammalian brain size when mutated. At least four of these, microcephalin (MCPH1), abnormal spindle-like microcephaly-associated (ASPM), cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulatory associated protein 2 (CDK5RAP2), and centromere-associated protein J (CENPJ) are known to have undergone significant positive selection in the great apes and human lineages during primate evolution. MCPH1 and ASPM both have very young single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes associated with modern humans, and these genes are presumably still evolving in Homo sapiens. Microcephalin has a role in DNA damage response and regulation of cell cycle checkpoints. The other known microcephaly-associated genes encode microtubule-associated centrosomal proteins that might regulate neural progenitor cell division and cell number. Recent reports have also unveiled a previously unknown function of ephrins and Eph in the regulation of neural progenitor cell death with a consequential effect on brain size. Understanding the mechanism for developmental control of brain organogenesis by these genes, and others such as FOXP2, shall provide fresh perspectives on the evolution of human intelligence.     

Seed size: a priority trait in cereal crops

Crop production and productivity must be increased to provide a balanced diet for the global population. The entire genome sequences of crop species allow the elucidation of genes that regulate important traits related to the final crop seed yield, which frequently depends mainly on seed size. Seed size is a major factor that controls seed quantity and it is strongly affected by various biotic, abiotic and genetic factors. Epigenetic marks in the genome and phytohormones are also important factors affecting seed growth and development. Several genes are known to be involved in the control of seed size, but their interaction and functional characterization have yet to be resolved. In this review, we discuss the different factors that govern seed size in cereal crops and Arabidopsis.     

A new look at relationships between size at maturity and asymptotic size

Comparative studies have revealed positive correlations between size at maturity and asymptotic size in several taxa with asymptotic growth after maturity. Using a simple growth model, we show that positive correlations between size at maturity and asymptotic size are predicted for different individuals in the same species if growth costs of reproduction are inversely related to size at maturity. Several processes might lead to higher growth costs of reproduction for smaller individuals; these include effects of body size on competition for resources required for breeding, on the space available within the body cavity for food processing in gravid individuals, and on the costs of transporting eggs or young in relation to the total energy budget. We confirm several key elements of the growth model using data from female Iguana iguana lizards, including the novel assumption that instantaneous growth rates of adults of the same length will be positively related to their length at maturity. These analyses suggest a simple and possibly general explanation for positive correlations between size at maturity and asymptotic size within-and perhaps also among-species that continue to grow after maturity.     

The control of body size in insects

Control mechanisms that regulate body size and tissue size have been sought at both the cellular and organismal level. Cell-level studies have revealed much about the control of cell growth and cell division, and how these processes are regulated by nutrition. Insulin signaling is the key mediator between nutrition and the growth of internal organs, such as imaginal disks, and is required for the normal proportional growth of the body and its various parts. The insulin-related peptides of insects do not appear to control growth by themselves, but act in conjunction with other hormones and signaling molecules, such as ecdysone and IDGFs. Size regulation cannot be understood solely on the basis of the mechanisms that control cell size and cell number. Size regulation requires mechanisms that gather information on a scale appropriate to the tissue or organ being regulated. A new model mechanism, using autocrine signaling, is outlined by which tissue and organ size regulation can be achieved. Body size regulation likewise requires a mechanism that integrates information at an appropriate scale. In insects, this mechanism operates by controlling the secretion of ecdysone, which is the signal that terminates the growth phase of development. The mechanisms for size assessment and the pathways by which they trigger ecdysone secretion are diverse and can be complex. The ways in which these higher-level regulatory mechanisms interact with cell- and molecular- level mechanisms are beginning to be elucidated.     

A matter of size: developmental control of organ size in plants

The intrinsic size of plant organs is determined by developmental signals, yet the molecular and genetic mechanisms that control organ size are largely unknown. Ongoing functional analysis of Arabidopsis genes is defining important regulators involved in these mechanisms. Key features of this control are the coordinated activation of growth and cell division by growth regulators and the maintenance of meristematic competence by the ANT gene, which acts as an organ-size checkpoint. Alterations of genome size by polyploidization and endoreduplication can reset this checkpoint by ploidy-dependent, epigenetically regulated differential gene expression. In addition, the regulation of polarized growth and phytohormone signaling also affect final organ size. These findings reveal unique aspects of plant organ-size control that are distinct from animal organ-size control.     

Differential division rates and size control in the wing disc

We have generated wing disc compartments that contain marked fast growing M+ clones surrounded by slow dividing M/+ cells. Under these conditions the interactions between fast and slow dividing cells at the clone borders frequently lead to cell competition. However, our assay suppressing apoptosis indicates that cell competition plays no major role in size control. We argue that cells within a compartment proliferate according to their genotype independently of each other and that their contribution to the final structure will depend solely on their proliferation rate. This model is supported by a computer simulation that predicts values similar to those found experimentally. Our results on the growth of M+ clones within compartments and on the expression of developmental genes like vestigial and wingless suggest the existence of a non-cell autonomous mechanism that functions at the level of the entire cell population. It measures the population size in each moment, determines the corresponding expression levels of developmental genes and establishes the time to arrest growth.     

EBP1 regulates organ size through cell growth and proliferation in plants

Plant organ size shows remarkable uniformity within species indicating strong endogenous control. We have identified a plant growth regulatory gene, functionally and structurally homologous to human EBP1. Plant EBP1 levels are tightly regulated; gene expression is highest in developing organs and correlates with genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and function. EBP1 protein is stabilised by auxin. Elevating or decreasing EBP1 levels in transgenic plants results in a dose-dependent increase or reduction in organ growth, respectively. During early stages of organ development, EBP1 promotes cell proliferation, influences cell-size threshold for division and shortens the period of meristematic activity. In postmitotic cells, it enhances cell expansion. EBP1 is required for expression of cell cycle genes; CyclinD3;1, ribonucleotide reductase 2 and the cyclin-dependent kinase B1;1. The regulation of these genes by EBP1 is dose and auxin dependent and might rely on the effect of EBP1 to reduce RBR1 protein level. We argue that EBP1 is a conserved, dose-dependent regulator of cell growth that is connected to meristematic competence and cell proliferation via regulation of RBR1 level.     

Cell size and mutual cell adhesion

Summary HeLa cells harvested from density-inhibited or fast growing suspension cultures, were incubated in NaCl solutions of different tonicity. Cell size enlargement produced by hypotonicity is accompanied by an increased sedimentation rate of the density-inhibited cells, whereas no appreciable change is observed in the sedimentation rate of fast growing cells. Hypotonicity also has no effect on the sedimentation rate of density-inhibited cells which previously had been treated with neuraminidase or trypsin. It is shown that the effect of hypotonicity on density-inhibited cells cannot be ascribed to release of cell surface sialic acids during hypotonic incubation. Several arguments are presented which indicate that the changes in sedimentation rate, as measured in the rotating suspension system, are not the direct consequence of the alterations in cell size, but rather must be attributed to differences in intercellular adhesiveness resulting from the size alterations. Analogous changes in intercellular adhesiveness and cell size are shown to occur during growth in isotonic suspension culture. The results can be explained by assuming that changes in cell size affect the intercellular adhesiveness by modifying the extent to which cell surface sialic acids counteract adhesion.     

Extracellular control of cell size

Both cell growth (cell mass increase) and progression through the cell division cycle are required for sustained cell proliferation. Proliferating cells in culture tend to double in mass before each division, but it is not known how growth and division rates are co-ordinated to ensure that cell size is maintained. The prevailing view is that coordination is achieved because cell growth is rate-limiting for cell-cycle progression. Here, we challenge this view. We have investigated the relationship between cell growth and cell-cycle progression in purified rat Schwann cells, using two extracellular signal proteins that are known to influence these cells. We find that glial growth factor (GGF) can stimulate cell-cycle progression without promoting cell growth. We have used this restricted action of GGF to show that, for cultured Schwann cells, cell growth rate alone does not determine the rate of cell-cycle progression and that cell size at division is variable and depends on the concentrations of extracellular signal proteins that stimulate cell-cycle progression, cell growth, or both.     

Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape

Leaf initiation at the shoot apical meristem involves a balance between cell proliferation and commitment to make primordia. Several genes, such as CLAVATA1, CLAVATA3, WUSCHEL, KNOTTED1, and PHANTASTICA, play key roles in these processes. When expressed in the leaf primordium, however, these 'meristem' genes can profoundly affect leaf shape and size, possibly by regulating hormone gradients and transport. The KNOTTED1-like genes are involved in regulating changes in hormonal levels. Recent studies have elaborated on the role that hormones, such as auxin, play in releasing biophysical constraints on leaf initiation and growth. Final leaf form is elaborated by a coordination of these hormonally regulated processes, cell division and cellular differentiation.