Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement |
| |
| Authors: | Anavekar Nagesh,Bais Renze,Carney Shane,Davidson James,Eris Josette,Gallagher Martin,Johnson David,Jones Graham,Sikaris Ken,Lonergan Maureen,Ludlow Marie,Mackie James,Mathew Tim,May Steve,McBride Grant,Meerkin Matthew,Peake Michael,Power David,Snelling Paul,Voss David,Walker Rowan Australian Creatinine Consensus Working Group |
| |
| Affiliation: | Baker Heart Institute, VIC. |
| |
| Abstract: | The systematic staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by glomerular filtration measurement and proteinuria has allowed the development of rational and appropriate management plans. One of the barriers to early detection of CKD is the lack of a precise, reliable and consistent measure of kidney function.The most common measure of kidney function is currently serum creatinine concentration. It varies with age, sex, muscle mass and diet, and interlaboratory variation between measurements is as high as 20%.The reference interval for serum creatinine concentration includes up to 25% of people (particularly thin, elderly women) who have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) that is significantly reduced (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m). The recent publication of a validated formula (MDRD) to estimate GFR from age, sex, race and serum creatinine concentration, without any requirement for measures of body mass, allows pathology laboratories to "automatically" generate eGFR from data already acquired. Automatic laboratory reporting of eGFR calculated from serum creatinine measurements would help to identify asymptomatic kidney dysfunction at an earlier stage. eGFR correlates well with complications of CKD and an increased risk of adverse outcomes such as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We recommend that pathology laboratories automatically report eGFR each time a serum creatinine test is ordered in adults. As the accuracy of eGFR is suboptimal in patients with normal or near-normal renal function, we recommend that calculated eGFRs above 60 mL/min/1.73 m be reported by laboratories as "> 60 mL/min/1.73 m", rather than as a precise figure. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
|
