A comparison of camera trap and permanent recording video camera efficiency in wildlife underpasses |
| |
| Authors: | Jonathan Jumeau Lana Petrod Yves Handrich |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Strasbourg, France;2. Conseil Départemental du Bas‐Rhin, Place du Quartier Blanc, Strasbourg, Cedex 9, France;3. Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Rennes Cedex, France |
| |
| Abstract: | In the current context of biodiversity loss through habitat fragmentation, the effectiveness of wildlife crossings, installed at great expense as compensatory measures, is of vital importance for ecological and socio‐economic actors. The evaluation of these structures is directly impacted by the efficiency of monitoring tools (camera traps…), which are used to assess the effectiveness of these crossings by observing the animals that use them. The aim of this study was to quantify the efficiency of camera traps in a wildlife crossing evaluation. Six permanent recording video systems sharing the same field of view as six Reconyx HC600 camera traps installed in three wildlife underpasses were used to assess the exact proportion of missed events (event being the presence of an animal within the field of view), and the error rate concerning underpass crossing behavior (defined as either Entry or Refusal). A sequence of photographs was triggered by either animals (true trigger) or artefacts (false trigger). We quantified the number of false triggers that had actually been caused by animals that were not visible on the images (“false” false triggers). Camera traps failed to record 43.6% of small mammal events (voles, mice, shrews, etc.) and 17% of medium‐sized mammal events. The type of crossing behavior (Entry or Refusal) was incorrectly assessed in 40.1% of events, with a higher error rate for entries than for refusals. Among the 3.8% of false triggers, 85% of them were “false” false triggers. This study indicates a global underestimation of the effectiveness of wildlife crossings for small mammals. Means to improve the efficiency are discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | camera trapping false trigger monitoring study small mammals triggered cameras wildlife crossings |
|
|
