Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients |
| |
| Authors: | William Godsoe Janet Franklin F. Guillaume Blanchet |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Bio‐Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand;2. School of Geographical Sciences & Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;4. Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (i.e., interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would be tremendously useful to quantify its effects on species' distributions. An approach to studying the large‐scale effects of competition or other biotic interactions is to fit species' distributions models (SDMs) and assess the effect of competitors on the distribution and abundance of the species of interest. It is often difficult to validate the accuracy of this approach with available data. Here, we simulate virtual species that experience competition. In these simulated datasets, we can unambiguously identify the effects that competition has on a species' distribution. We then fit SDMs to the simulated datasets and test whether we can use the outputs of the SDMs to infer the true effect of competition in each simulated dataset. In our simulations, the abiotic environment influenced the effects of competition. Thus, our SDMs often inferred that the abiotic environment was a strong predictor of species abundance, even when the species' distribution was strongly affected by competition. The severity of this problem depended on whether the competitor excluded the focal species from highly suitable sites or marginally suitable sites. Our results highlight how correlations between biotic interactions and the abiotic environment make it difficult to infer the effects of competition using SDMs. |
| |
| Keywords: | competition dispersal ecological niche priority effect range limits species' distribution model |
|
|
