Adaptive and non‐adaptive evolution of trait means and genetic trait correlations for herbivory resistance and performance in an invasive plant |
| |
| Authors: | Karin Schrieber Sabrina Wolf Catherina Wypior Diana Höhlig Isabell Hensen Susanne Lachmuth |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Inst. of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther Univ. Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany;2. Faculty of Biology, Dept. of Chemical Ecology, Univ. Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany;3. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | The EICA‐hypothesis predicts that invading plants adapt to their novel environment by evolving increased performance and reduced resistance in response to the release from natural enemies, and assumes a resource allocation tradeoff among both trait groups as mechanistic basis of this evolutionary change. Using the plant Silene latifolia as a study system, we tested these predictions by investigating whether 1) invasive populations evolved lower resistance and higher performance, 2) this evolutionary change is indeed adaptive, and 3) there is a negative genetic correlation between performance and resistance (i.e. a tradeoff) in native and introduced individuals. Moreover, we sampled eight native and eight invasive populations and determined their population co‐ancestry based on neutral SSR‐markers. We performed controlled crossings to produce five sib‐groups per population and exposed them to increased and reduced levels of enemy attack in a full‐factorial experiment to estimate performance and resistance. With these data, we performed trait‐by‐trait comparisons between ranges with ‘animal models’ that account for population co‐ancestry to quantify the amount of variance in traits explained by non‐adaptive versus adaptive evolution. Moreover, we tested for genetic correlations among performance and resistance traits within sib‐groups. We found significant reductions in resistance and increases in performance in invasive versus native populations, which could largely be attributed to adaptive evolution. While we detected a non‐significant trend towards negative genetic performance × resistance correlations in native populations, invasive populations exhibited both significant and non‐significant positive correlations. In summary, these results do not support a shift of performance and resistance trait values along a tradeoff line in response to enemy release, as predicted by EICA. They rather suggest that the independent evolution of both traits is not constrained by a tradeoff, and that various selective agents (including resource availability) interact in shaping both traits and in weakening negative genetic correlations in the invaded habitat. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
