| 现生太行山猕猴与猕猴化石骨指数的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 苏亚,王训练,赵晓进. 现生太行山猕猴与猕猴化石骨指数的比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(1): 126-130 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 苏亚 王训练 赵晓进 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古师范大学生命科学与技术学院;中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院;河南师范大学生命科学学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 内蒙古师范大学高层次人才科研项目(2013YJRC038) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为探讨现生太行山猕猴与猕猴化石骨指数的差异,对太行山猕猴与广西崇左早更新世猕猴化石的肢间指数(Intermembral index,IM)、臂指数(Brachial index,BI)、股指数(Crural index,CI)和股骨粗壮指数(Robusticity index,RI)等指数进行比较。结果表明,猕猴化石IM值(96)高于太行山猕猴,BI值(94.5)和CI值(88.5)均低于太行山猕猴,推测该猕猴化石在早更新世时期可能地栖生活,适合于陆地四足行走,同时也验证了太行山猕猴主要为半树栖生活。结合对猕猴化石伴生哺乳动物习性的分析,推测广西崇左早更新世的气候温暖潮湿并有一定的水域,植被以森林和灌木为主,有局部的草地或草坡,其自然环境非常适宜高等灵长类生息繁衍。
|
| 关 键 词： | 太行山猕猴 猕猴化石 骨指数, |
Comparison of the Bone Index Between Living Macaca mulatta and Fossil Macaques |
| |
| SU Ya;WANG Xunlian;ZHAO Xiaojin. Comparison of the Bone Index Between Living Macaca mulatta and Fossil Macaques[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2015, 34(1): 126-130 |
| |
| Authors: | SU Ya WANG Xunlian ZHAO Xiaojin |
| |
| Affiliation: | SU Ya;WANG Xunlian;ZHAO Xiaojin;Institute of Life Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Normal University;School of the Earth Sciences and Resources,China University of Geosciences (Beijing);College of Life Science, Henan Normal University; |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper, intermembral index (IM), brachial index (BI), crural index (CI) and robusticity index (RI) were compared between Macaca mulatta from the Taihang Mountains and macaque fossils from the Early Pleistocene Queque Cave site, Chongzuo, Guangxi. The results show that the IM (96) of macaque fossil is higher than in living Macaca mulatta and that the BI (94.5) and CI (88.5) indices are lower in fossils. Inferring from primate movement type, macaque fossils may have lived on the ground and were suitable for quadrupedism, and that living Macaca mulatta may be partly arboreal. Combining life habits of mammal fossils including this macaque |
| |
| Keywords: | Macaca mulatta Taihang mountains Fossil Bone index, |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《人类学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《人类学学报》下载全文 |
|
