Fine root responses to temporal nutrient heterogeneity and competition in seedlings of two tree species with different rooting strategies |
| |
| Authors: | Peng Wang Meng Shu Pu Mou Jacob Weiner |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China;2. College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;3. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark |
| |
| Abstract: | There is little direct evidence for effects of soil heterogeneity and root plasticity on the competitive interactions among plants. In this study, we experimentally examined the impacts of temporal nutrient heterogeneity on root growth and interactions between two plant species with very different rooting strategies: Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum), which shows high root plasticity in response to soil nutrient heterogeneity, and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine), a species with less plastic roots. Seedlings of the two species were grown in sandboxes in inter‐ and intraspecific combinations. Nutrients were applied in a patch either in a stable (slow‐release) or in a variable (pulse) manner. Plant aboveground biomass, fine root mass, root allocation between nutrient patch and outside the patch, and root vertical distribution were measured. L. styraciflua grew more aboveground (40% and 27% in stable and variable nutrient treatment, respectively) and fine roots (41% and 8% in stable and variable nutrient treatment, respectively) when competing with P. taeda than when competing with a conspecific individual, but the growth of P. taeda was not changed by competition from L. styraciflua. Temporal variation in patch nutrient level had little effect on the species’ competitive interactions. The more flexible L. styraciflua changed its vertical distribution of fine roots in response to competition from P. taeda, growing more roots in deeper soil layers compared to its roots in conspecific competition, leading to niche differentiation between the species, while the fine root distribution of P. taeda remained unchanged across all treatments. Synthesis. L. styraciflua showed greater flexibility in root growth by changing its root vertical distribution and occupying space of not occupied by P. taeda. This flexibility gave L. styraciflua an advantage in interspecific competition. |
| |
| Keywords: |
Liquidambar styraciflua
nutrient heterogeneity
Pinus taeda
plant– plant interactions root competition root foraging root plasticity vertical root distribution |
|
|
