首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉林不同坡向土壤养分及肥力研究
引用本文:高郯,李江荣,卢杰,郑维列,陈甲瑞,王建科,段斐.色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉林不同坡向土壤养分及肥力研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1331-1341.
作者姓名:高郯  李江荣  卢杰  郑维列  陈甲瑞  王建科  段斐
作者单位:西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所, 林芝 860000;西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室, 林芝 860000;西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 林芝 860000
基金项目:科技部国家野外科学研究观测站(生态系统)运行补助项目(西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究2015-2020);藏东南林线微气候特征及其对天然更新的影响(XZ2018ZR G-16)
摘    要:以色季拉山不同坡向急尖长苞冷杉(Abies georgei var.smithii)天然林为研究对象,采用单因素方差、化学计量比及内梅罗指数等方法对不同坡向0—100 cm土壤的pH和7种养分含量及肥力状况进行研究,以期为色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉的经营管理提供理论依据。结果表明:(1)色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉林土壤pH7,为酸性。0—100 cm土层中除土壤全钾含量外,其他各养分含量及变异系数的均值均表现为:阳坡阴坡,且均属于中等变异程度。除全磷、全钾含量较低外,其他指标均处于"中等"及以上水平。(2)土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮随土层的增加而降低,总体上表层与深层差异显著(P0.05),其他土层之间差异不显著(P0.05);其他养分随土层变化规律不一致,各土层之间差异不显著(P0.05)。(3)阳坡各土壤化学计量比总体上表现为随土壤深度增加而降低,阴坡呈波动性变化,除C∶N外,阳坡C∶P、C∶K、N∶P、N∶K、P∶K均小于阴坡。(4)阴坡的土壤肥力指数(1.44)大于阳坡(1.32),不同坡向土壤肥力均属于"中等"水平。坡向通过影响多种因素使土壤理化性质具有一定差异性,阴坡的土壤养分含量及肥力状况优于阳坡,全钾是第一限制因子,全磷是第二限制因子。

关 键 词:急尖长苞冷杉  天然林  坡向  土壤养分  肥力指数  色季拉山
收稿时间:2018/12/6 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/10/24 0:00:00

Soil nutrient and fertility of different slope directions in the Abies georgei var. smithii forest in Sejila Mountain
GAO Tan,LI Jiangrong,LU Jie,ZHENG Weilie,CHEN Jiarui,WANG Jianke and DUAN Fei.Soil nutrient and fertility of different slope directions in the Abies georgei var. smithii forest in Sejila Mountain[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(4):1331-1341.
Authors:GAO Tan  LI Jiangrong  LU Jie  ZHENG Weilie  CHEN Jiarui  WANG Jianke and DUAN Fei
Institution:Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China,Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China,Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China,Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China,Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China,Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China and Res. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University), Ministry of Education, Nyingchi 860000, China;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment, Nyingchi 860000, China
Abstract:Aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the manager of Sejila Mountain, we studied the natural Abies georgei var. smithii forest from different slope directions. The pH, 7 nutrients content, and fertility status in different slope directions from 0 to 100 cm soil were measured by one-way variance, stoichiometric ratio and, Nemero index. The results showed that (1) the soil pH of the Abies georgei var. smithii forest was less than 7. Except the soil total potassium content, the mean values of other nutrient contents and coefficient of variation of 0-100 cm soil layer were all expressed as sunny slopes < Shady slope. All were moderate variation. Except for the lower content of total phosphorus and total potassium, other indicators were at medium level and above. (2) The soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and available nitrogen decreased with the increase of soil layer, and the difference between surface layer and deep layer was significant (P<0.05). There was not consistent variation in other nutrients with the deepening of soil layer, and the difference between the soil layers was not significant (P>0.05). (3) The soil stoichiometric ratios of the sunny slopes generally decreased as the soil depth increased, while the shady slopes fluctuated. Except C:N, C:P, C:K, N:P, N:K, P:K in the sunny slopes were less than those in the shady slope. (4) The soil fertility index of the shady slope (1.44) was higher than that of the sunny slope (1.32). The slope direction had certain differences in the physical and chemical properties of the soil by affecting various factors. The soil nutrient content and fertility status of the shady slope were better than those of the sunny slope. The total potassium was the first limiting factor, and the total phosphorus was the second limiting factor.
Keywords:Abies georgei var  smithii  natural forest  aspect  soil nutrient  fertility index  Sejila Mountain
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号