首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

生态网络分析方法研究综述
引用本文:李中才,徐俊艳,吴昌友,张漪.生态网络分析方法研究综述[J].生态学报,2011,31(18):5396-5405.
作者姓名:李中才  徐俊艳  吴昌友  张漪
作者单位:山东工商学院管理科学与工程学院,烟台,264005
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70973069); 教育部人文社会科学规划基金(10YJA630091,09YJA630086); 山东省社科规划研究项目(09CJGZ24,10CJGJ48)
摘    要:生态网络分析方法是分析生态系统作用关系、辨识系统内在、整体属性的一种有效的系统分析方法。总结了生态网络分析方法的主要研究成果:网络结构特性、网络稳定性、网络上升性、网络效能等;介绍了构建生态网络模型过程和群落构建规则;以德国西部城市诺伊斯河口氮循环为例,介绍David K是如何运用生态网络分析方法来揭示网络中的微动力流循环规律。生态网络分析方法的主要贡献:(1)对人们凭经验感知的生态系统分室间的关联关系,采用了严密的数学模型和推导进行了描述和证明;(2)为生态系统的微动力流循环的研究提供了方法,对生态系统中物质流的间接循环作用进行了科学论证;(3)不仅为分析生态系统提供了一种科学的数学方法,而且,它为探索生态系统提供了不同与牛顿世界观的崭新的认识论。总结与回顾生态网络分析方法,有益于该方法的运用和进一步完善。

关 键 词:生态网络分析  系统分析  微动力流循环流
收稿时间:2010/11/29 0:00:00
修稿时间:8/1/2011 12:00:00 AM

A review of studies using ecological network analysis
LI Zhongcai,Xu Junyan,WU Changyou and ZHANG Yi.A review of studies using ecological network analysis[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(18):5396-5405.
Authors:LI Zhongcai  Xu Junyan  WU Changyou and ZHANG Yi
Institution:College of Management and Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Shandong, Yantai 264005, China;College of Management and Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Shandong, Yantai 264005, China;College of Management and Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Shandong, Yantai 264005, China;College of Management and Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Shandong, Yantai 264005, China
Abstract:Ecosystems are complicated and macroscopic living systems with self-organization properties. Ecosystem components are interconnected, interrelated, and form a network. The structure of ecosystem networks determines the makeup of adjacent (direct) and non-adjacent (indirect) pathways over which energy, matter, and information flow. Ecological network analysis (ENA) is a system-oriented methodology used to analyze within-system interactions, which helps researchers identify holistic properties that are otherwise not evident from empirical observations. ENA is introduced in the paper as a promising approach for studying ecosystems. We outline some of the main achievements of ENA, which include network structure, network stability, network ascendancy, network utility and so on. We introduce the steps for one approach in constructing network models and in giving rules for modeling a community. The first step in ENA is to identify the system of interest and place boundaries around it. The second step is to make a list of the major or functional groups in the ecosystem. Third, a unit of currency for the network is selected. Fourth, the adjacency matrix is constructed to document any possible flow interactions. Fifth, field data are obtained related to inputs, outputs and throughflows. Sixth, ENA is applied to the network. Seventh, a sensitivity analysis is conducted. We also provide a brief overview of the algorithmic methods used to construct ecological network typologies. We chose a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, United States, as an example to explain how D. K. Gattie developed insight into the essence of microdynamic environ flows in an ecological network. The ENA method contributed three significant achievements related to ecosystem study. First, ENA uses a mathematical model and derivations to study the interconnective relationships between different compartments within ecosystem. Second, ENA is a promising method for analyzing microdynamic environ flows in an ecological network. This method indicates indirect effects from non-adjacent network relationships are very important for an ecosystem, and allows exploration of the indirect mechanisms that maintain an ecological network in a steady-state. Third, ENA not only is a system-oriented methodology used to analyze within-system interactions and used to identify holistic properties, but also provides a scientific method different than that built on Newton's principle. Although ENA has evident advantages useful in analyzing ecosystem properties, difficulties remain in constructing ecosystem networks. First, ENA often requires a substantial amount of data and sometimes the data are not available. Second, it is generally difficult to establish the steady-state of a real system based solely on field data. Third, no standard method exists for delimiting an ecosystem, which leads to errors during network analysis. The method has an inherent level of difficulty because ecosystems are intangible by nature since they have no actual boundaries. Our goals are to help other researchers who are considering the construction of network models as well as assist them in further refining the ENA method.
Keywords:ecological network analysis  ecosystem analysis  microdynamic environ flows
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号