首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

三种园林植物对夜间光照的响应与适应特征
引用本文:陈良华,曹艺,杨万勤,张健,何书惠.三种园林植物对夜间光照的响应与适应特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):549-556.
作者姓名:陈良华  曹艺  杨万勤  张健  何书惠
作者单位:四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川省林业生态工程重点实验室, 成都 611130;四川农业大学长江上游生态安全协同创新中心, 成都 611130,四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川省林业生态工程重点实验室, 成都 611130,四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川省林业生态工程重点实验室, 成都 611130;四川农业大学长江上游生态安全协同创新中心, 成都 611130,四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川省林业生态工程重点实验室, 成都 611130;四川农业大学长江上游生态安全协同创新中心, 成都 611130,四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川省林业生态工程重点实验室, 成都 611130
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(31300513);国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题资助项目(2011BAC09B05)
摘    要:光污染是城市生态系统中重要的污染类型,目前的研究集中在光污染对人类健康、昆虫生活史、生活习性、活动规律等方面,对植物生理生态的效应研究则较少。以凤仙花(Impatiens balsamina)、小叶栀子(Gardenia jasminoides)、夏菊(Dendranthema morifolium)为研究对象,研究白光LED灯从每天18:00—24:00照光(T1处理)、每天18:00—次日8:00照光(T2处理)以及自然光周期(CK)等3种光环境条件下,3种植物生物量积累与分配、开花特征、色素含量、碳氮含量及其比值(C/N比)、抗氧化酶等方面的响应与适应特征。结果表明,T1和T2处理增加了凤仙花的生物量(分别为CK的1.4和1.9倍),降低了叶片和茎的N含量,增加了叶片的C/N比(分别为CK的1.2和1.9倍),降低了叶片的色素含量;T1处理延迟了凤仙花的花期,T2处理条件下凤仙花不开花。T1和T2处理虽然没有影响小叶栀子的花期,但增加了花的数量,减小了花的平均重量,花的C/N比显著增加(T2处理为CK的1.3倍);T2处理降低了小叶栀子叶片的叶绿素a、b及总叶绿素含量,增加了丙二醛的含量(T2处理为CK的1.7倍)。夏菊的生物量及生理特征受到T1和T2处理的影响最小,但T1和T2处理均抑制了夏菊开花。这些结果表明凤仙花和夏菊开花对光污染引起光周期的变化比较敏感,凤仙花的生长和养分特征也受到夜间光照的显著影响,光污染对小叶栀子的叶片造成了显著伤害。总的来讲,与T2相比,T1处理对3种植物的负面影响较小,在城市照明的管理过程中,可以根据需要缩短夜间光照的时间,既可以节约能源,又可以减小对植物生理生态的负面影响。

关 键 词:光污染  园林植物  白光LED  光周期
收稿时间:2015/8/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/12/2 0:00:00

Responses and adaptive status of three garden plants exposed to night illumination
CHEN Lianghu,CAO Yi,YANG Wanqin,ZHANG Jian and HE Shuhui.Responses and adaptive status of three garden plants exposed to night illumination[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(2):549-556.
Authors:CHEN Lianghu  CAO Yi  YANG Wanqin  ZHANG Jian and HE Shuhui
Institution:Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Security in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China,Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China,Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Security in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China,Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Security in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China and Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
Abstract:Light pollution is one of the most serious pollutants in urban ecosystems. Existing research in this field has mainly focused on the effects of light pollution on human health, life cycles, and behavior and actions of insects or other animals, whereas information regarding its effects on the physiology and ecology of plants is lacking. We used Impatiens balsamina, Gardenia jasminoides, and Dendranthema morifolium to document biomass accumulation and allocation, blossoming, pigmentation, C and N content (and C/N ratio), and activities of antioxidant enzymes in response to night illumination produced by a white LED from 18:00 to 24:00 (T1 treatment), from 18:00 to 08:00 the following day (T2 treatment), and natural photoperiod (control; CK). The main results were as follows:(1) Compared to CK, T1 and T2 increased the biomass of I. balsamina by 1.4 and 1.9 times, respectively, and the C/N ratio in leaves by 1.2 and 1.9 times, respectively, but decreased the N content in leaves and stems, and content of pigments in leaves. The T1 treatment delayed florescence, and the T2 treatment inhibited flowering. (2) Although neither T1 nor T2 affected the florescence of G. jasminoides, night illumination increased the average number of flowers and decreased average weight per flower. Compared to CK, T2 significantly increased the C/N ratio in flowers and content of malondialdehyde (MDA), although it decreased chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll content in leaves. (3) Biomass and physiological traits were not obviously affected in D. morifolium. However, both T1 and T2 inhibited flowering. These results indicated that flowering of both I. balsamina and D. morifolium were sensitive to the altered photoperiodism induced by nighttime illumination. In addition, growth and nutrient status of I. balsamina was negatively affected by nighttime illumination, and there was a detrimental effect on the leaves of G. jasminoides. Generally, when compared to T2, the T1 treatment exerted fewer negative impacts on the three species. Therefore, in urban light management, we should shorten the duration of illumination to the degree it is practical. This will not only save electric energy, but also lessen the negative influence on the physiology and ecology of garden plants.
Keywords:light pollution  night illumination  white LED  photoperiodism
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号