首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

生态脆弱区贫困与生态环境的博弈分析
引用本文:祁新华,叶士琳,程煜,林荣平.生态脆弱区贫困与生态环境的博弈分析[J].生态学报,2013,33(19):6411-6417.
作者姓名:祁新华  叶士琳  程煜  林荣平
作者单位:福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007
基金项目:国家基础科学人才培养基金项目(J1210067);福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2011J01266);福建省教育厅A类项目(JA10082);福建师范大学优秀青年骨干教师培养基金资助项目(fjsdjk2012071);国家自然科学基金资助项目(31000298)
摘    要:生态脆弱区既是生态环境破坏最典型、最强烈的区域,也是贫困问题最集中的区域。然而,实践中试图摆脱"贫困陷阱"的成功案例并不多见。其中一个重要原因是鲜有协同生态保护与扶贫的研究,尤其是忽视了不同利益主体的相互作用过程与机制。从博弈论的视角,探讨生态脆弱区不同利益主体的两组核心博弈,即政府与民众以及政府与企业的博弈。研究发现,扶贫与生态环境保护相互作用过程事实上就是协调不同利益主体的目标与利益的博弈过程,博弈结果一定程度上决定了扶贫的效果以及生态环境保护的效应。研究为深入理解贫困与生态环境相互作用的过程与机制提供一个理论分析框架,并为中国生态脆弱区可持续发展实践提供有益借鉴。

关 键 词:生态脆弱区  贫困  生态环境恶化  利益主体  博弈
收稿时间:2013/4/30 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/7/15 0:00:00

The game analysis between poverty and environment in ecologically fragile zones
QI Xinhu,YE Shilin,CHENG Yu and LIN Rongping.The game analysis between poverty and environment in ecologically fragile zones[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(19):6411-6417.
Authors:QI Xinhu  YE Shilin  CHENG Yu and LIN Rongping
Institution:School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
Abstract:Ecologically fragile zones are the most typical and serious areas of environmental degradation, and the most poverty-stricken regions. Poverty and environmental degradation are two important challenges in ecologically fragile zones. However, there are few successful attempts that aimed to escape the poverty trap in practice. Many policies dealing with the problems of poverty and environmental degradation were failed or only got limited achievements. One of the reasons is the shortage of the integrated study of poverty alleviation and environmental protection, in particular the ignorance of the intrinsic mechanism of multiple stakeholders. Taking the perspective of game theory, this paper discusses two key game processes, i.e., the game process between the government and the public, and the game process between the government and the business enterprise. It is suggested that the interaction between poverty alleviation and environmental protection is actually the game process to integrate various objectives and benefits of multiple stakeholders. According to the game theory, when there were strong dependences among different stakeholders, the consequences of the decision-making and behaviors are not only determined by the stakeholders themselves, but also the responses of other stakeholders. Therefore, the consequences of game drive and determine largely and directly the results of poverty alleviation and the effects of environmental protection.
The effective policies must aim at protecting the livelihoods and the environment at the same time, and take into account the socio-economic benefit and ecological benefit simultaneously in poverty alleviation. When dealing with the relationship between poverty and environment, two extreme conditions must be avoided, i.e., developing at the expense of the environment or harming the poor in the name of environmental protection. In particular, the poor must be regarded as the stakeholders rather than destroyers or victims during the integration of poverty alleviation and environmental protection in ecologically fragile zones. Most importantly, the livelihoods of the vulnerable groups who heavily depend on the resource and environment must be carefully protected. In addition, green vocations are significant for ecologically fragile zones to escape the poverty trap. In order to realize the objective of sustainable development, the government must promote the business enterprise to develop ecological industries by certain kinds of supervisions and punishments. This study will provide an analytical framework to deepen the understanding of the relationship between poverty and environment, and provide valuable references to sustainable development of ecologically fragile zones in China. However, there are still some important issues needed to be explored, such as the game process between the business enterprise and the public and the game process within the stakeholders (for example, the governments at different hierarchies, and the rich and the poor). Additionally, the overall value of the payoff matrix needs more logical analysis and empirical case.
Keywords:ecologically fragile zones  poverty  environmental degradation  stakeholders  game
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号