首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

河流流量对流域下垫面特性的响应
引用本文:田迪,李叙勇.河流流量对流域下垫面特性的响应[J].生态学报,2012,32(1):27-37.
作者姓名:田迪  李叙勇
作者单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心,中国科学院生态环境研究中心
基金项目:国家自然基金面上项目(41071323,40971271);城市与区域生态国家重点实验室自主项目(SKLURE2008-1-05),中国科学院国际合作团队项目“生态系统过程与服务” (KZCX2-YW-T13)
摘    要:以美国切斯比克湾地区为例,对该区域150个小流域的下垫面特性(包括土地利用类型、地面不透水系数和土壤物理属性)进行了提取,根据1984—2004年间逐日流量观测数据计算出了33个水文指标,运用逐步回归方法在不同地理区分析了9种下垫面特性对其中17个重要水文指标的影响。结果表明:随着草地和林地比例的增加,流量趋于减小、流量变化趋于稳定,随着建设用地和不透水层的增加,流量增加、流量变化剧烈,随着土壤水文组等级的升高,流量减少;在整个切斯比克湾流域,对流域下垫面特性响应最为显著的水文指标是高脉冲个数及历时,在阿巴拉契亚高地地区响应最为显著的水文指标是年极值流量、高脉冲个数及历时,在皮德蒙特山地响应最为显著的水文指标是高脉冲个数及历时,在沿海平原地区响应最为显著的水文指标是高脉冲个数及历时、流量变化的速率与频率。

关 键 词:流域下垫面特性  土地利用  地表不透水系数  土壤物理属性  水文指标
收稿时间:2010/11/12 0:00:00
修稿时间:2011/1/24 0:00:00

The responses of hydrological indicators to watershed characteristics
TIAN Di and LI Xuyong.The responses of hydrological indicators to watershed characteristics[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(1):27-37.
Authors:TIAN Di and LI Xuyong
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Urban & Regional Ecology, Research Center of Eco-environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;State Key Laboratory of Urban & Regional Ecology, Research Center of Eco-environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Maryland 21037-0028, USA
Abstract:Watershed characteristics affect the stream flow of the watershed.Those effects vary in different temporal and spatial scales.The long-term stream flow can be statistically described by magnitude,frequency,and duration;those hydrological indicators are important metrics that can be used to reflect the effects on flow by watershed characteristics.However,the responses of hydrological indicators to watershed characteristics are still a controversial topic throughout the world.Our goal is to address the following questions based on data analyses of a large number of hydrological monitoring sites and their corresponding watersheds:(1) what and how watershed characteristics affect stream flow?(2) Which hydrological indicators have significant responses to watershed characteristics and what are the differences of their responses among different physiographic provinces? We randomly selected 150 small watersheds(<282km2) in three physiographic provinces in Chesapeake Bay region(37 in Coastal Plain area,56 in Piedmont area,and 57 in Highland area).Using long-term daily stream flow data from the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS),we calculated 34 hydrological indicators for all watersheds.Seventeen hydrological indicators were selected using principle component analysis for further analyses.For all watersheds,we used ArcGIS to develop proportions of agriculture,developed land,grassland,and forest from the Mid-Atlantic RESAC 2000 land use map.We derived the values of impervious surface coefficients for all watersheds from the Mid-Atlantic RESAC impervious surface map.The proportions of sand,rock depth,hydrologic group and permeability rate were collected from the STATSGO soil database of the United States.We then used stepwise regression to quantify the effects of watershed land use,impervious surface,and soil physical properties on the selected 17 hydrological indicators in three physiographic provinces of the Chesapeake Bay drainage area.Hydrological data during 2005—2009 was used to validate our predictive regression model.We found that the most important factors affected stream flow were the proportions of grassland,developed land,forest,and impervious surface and soil hydrologic group.Land use types had more strongly influence on stream flow than soil physical properties.Flow volume and flow variability decreased where proportion of grassland or forest increased,but increased where proportion of developed land or impervious surface increased.Flow was lower at higher category of soil hydrologic group.Among the 17 hydrological indicators,we found that the number and duration of the flow pulses with high frequency were the best indicators that were correlated to the watershed characteristics at the whole Chesapeake watershed scale;the peak flow,and the number and duration of high flow pulses were the best indicators that were correlated to the watershed characteristics in the Highland area;the number and duration of high flow pulses were the best indicators that were correlated to the watershed characteristics in the Piedmont area;the number and duration of high flow pulses,and the rate and frequency of flow variability were the best indicators that were correlated to the watershed characteristics in the Coastal plain area.Watershed characteristics can be used to predict number of high flow pulses in the whole Chesapeake Bay watershed,Piedmont and Coastal Plain regions.
Keywords:watershed characteristics  land use  impervious surface  soil physical properties  hydrological indicator
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号