首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

我国典型城市化石能源消费CO2排放及其影响因素比较研究
引用本文:郑颖,逯非,刘晶茹,王效科.我国典型城市化石能源消费CO2排放及其影响因素比较研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3315-3327.
作者姓名:郑颖  逯非  刘晶茹  王效科
作者单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
基金项目:国家自然科学基金委员会重点项目(71533005)
摘    要:城市是化石能源消费和CO_2排放的主要区域。分析典型城市化石能源消费CO_2排放特征,明确不同城市CO_2排放动态及主要影响因素的差异,是开展城市减排行动的重要科学依据。采用IPCC推荐方法及中国的排放参数核算11个典型城市2006—2015年间化石能源消费产生的CO_2排放量。根据各城市经济发展和CO_2排放特征将之分为四类:经济高度发达城市(北京、上海、广州)、高碳排放城市(重庆、乌鲁木齐、唐山)、低排放低增长城市(哈尔滨、呼和浩特和大庆)和低排放高增长城市(贵阳、合肥),并运用对数平均迪氏指数法(Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index,即LMDI分解法)对比分析了四类城市CO_2排放量的影响因素。结果表明:(1)研究期内大部分城市CO_2排放总量有所增加,仅北京和广州呈下降趋势,工业部门CO_2排放在城市排放总量及其变化中占据主导地位;四类城市的人均CO_2排放量表现出与排放总量相似的变化趋势;CO_2排放强度整体上表现为经济高度发达城市(均值为0.88 t CO_2/万元)低排放低增长城市(均值为2.82 t CO_2/万元)低排放高增长城市(均值为3.05 t CO_2/万元)高碳排放城市(均值为6.62 t CO_2/万元)。(2)在城市CO_2排放的影响因素中,经济发展和人口规模均是4类城市CO_2排放增长的促进因素,但经济发展效应的累积贡献值大于人口规模效应;能源强度降低是4类城市CO_2排放最主要的抑制因素,且经济高度发达和高碳排放城市的抑制作用强于其他两类城市;对第三产业GDP年平均增速高于第二产业的6个城市来说,产业结构是CO_2排放的抑制因素;能源结构的变化仅对煤炭消费比重较低且降幅较大的北京和广州的CO_2排放是抑制作用,累积贡献值分别为-21.73Mt和-0.03Mt,而对其他城市,特别是高碳排放城市的CO_2排放具有明显的促进作用。

关 键 词:城市  CO2排放  化石能源  对数平均迪氏指数法  影响因素
收稿时间:2019/1/29 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/9/4 0:00:00

Comparative study on CO2 emissions from fossil energy consumption and its influencing factors in typical cities of China
ZHENG Ying,LU Fei,LIU Jingru,WANG Xiaoke.Comparative study on CO2 emissions from fossil energy consumption and its influencing factors in typical cities of China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(10):3315-3327.
Authors:ZHENG Ying  LU Fei  LIU Jingru  WANG Xiaoke
Institution:State key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Cities are the main regions of fossil energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Analysis of characteristics of the CO2 emissions from fossil energy consumption in typical cities, and clarification of the dynamics and critical influencing factors of the CO2 emissions in different cities could provide important scientific basis for CO2 mitigation action in urban areas. With the IPCC recommended methods and China-specific emission parameters, the CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion were estimated in 11 typical cities from 2006 to 2015. Based on the emission characters and economic development, the 11 cities are categorized into four groups, namely, cities with highly developed economy (including Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou), cities with high carbon emission (including Chongqing, Urumqi and Tangshan), cities with low emission and low economic growth (including Harbin, Hohhot and Daqing), and the cities with low emission but high economic growth (including Guiyang and Hefei). Then the urban CO2 emissions were decomposed by Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method to compare the differences of influencing factors among the above four categories of cities. The results indicated that CO2 emissions from most cities increased during the study period, while the CO2 emissions of Beijing and Guangzhou showed a decreasing trend. The emissions from the industrial sector took the dominant position in both of the total emissions from the cities and their dynamics. The per capita CO2 emissions of different cities showed a similar variation pattern to that of the total CO2 emissions. Cities with highly developed economy had the lowest CO2 emissions intensity (avg. 0.088t CO2/k Yuan), and the values went gradually higher for cities with low emission and low economic growth (avg. 0.282t CO2/k Yuan), cities with low emission but high economic growth (avg. 0.305t CO2/k Yuan), and cities with high carbon emission (avg. 0.662t CO2/k Yuan). For all the 4 categories of cities, both economic development and population size enlargement could lead to CO2 emissions increment, but economic development made the major contribution while the effects of population size were relatively small. Meanwhile, the decrease of energy intensity effect acted as the main driving factor of CO2 emissions reduction, and this reduction effect is stronger in cities with highly developed economy or with high carbon emission than those in the rest two categories of cities. The effect of industrial structure promotion restrained CO2 emissions in 6 cities where the average annual growth rate of the tertiary industry GDP was higher than the secondary industry. The energy structure effect only inhibits the CO2 emissions of Beijing and Guangzhou (with the accumulative contribution at -21.73Mt and -0.03Mt, respectively), where coal''s proportion in fossil energy consumption was low and going down fast. While in the cities with high carbon emission, the change of energy structure has the most obvious promoting effect on the CO2 emissions.
Keywords:city  CO2 emissions  fossil energy  Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI)  influencing factors
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号