首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Fidelity to foraging sites,consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles
Authors:Gail Schofield  Victoria J Hobson  Sabrina Fossette  Martin K S Lilley  Kostas A Katselidis  Graeme C Hays
Institution:1. School of the Environment and Society, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK;2. National Marine Park of Zakynthos, 1 El. Venizelou Str., GR‐29100 Zakynthos, Greece
Abstract:Aim Resources can shape patterns of habitat utilization. Recently a broad foraging dichotomy between oceanic and coastal sites has been revealed for loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Since oceanic and coastal foraging sites differ in prey availability, we might expect a gross difference in home‐range size across these habitats. We tested this hypothesis by equipping nine adult male loggerhead sea turtles with GPS tracking devices. Location National Marine Park of Zakynthos (NMPZ) Greece, central and eastern Mediterranean (Adriatic, Ionian and Aegean seas). Methods In 2007, 2008 and 2009, Fastloc GPS‐Argos transmitters were attached to nine male loggerheads. In addition, a Sirtrack PTT unit was attached to one male in 2007. Four of the turtles were tracked on successive years. We filtered the GPS data to ensure comparable data volumes. Route consistency between breeding and foraging sites of the four re‐tracked turtles was conducted. Foraging site home range areas and within site movement patterns were investigated by the fixed kernel density method. Results Foraging home range size ranged between circa 10 km2 at neritic habitats (coastal and open‐sea on the continental shelf) to circa 1000 km2 at oceanic sites (using 90% kernel estimates), the latter most probably reflecting sparsely distributed oceanic prey. Across different years individuals did not follow exactly the same migration routes, but did show fidelity to their previous foraging sites, whether oceanic or neritic, with accurate homing in the final stages of migration. Main conclusions The broad distribution and diverse life‐history strategies of this population could complicate the identification of priority marine protected areas beyond the core breeding site.
Keywords:Biodiversity scale  conservation management  endangered  marine vertebrate  phenology  remote technology
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号