Nocturnal stomatal conductance responses to rising [CO2], temperature and drought

The response of nocturnal stomatal conductance (g(s,n)) to rising atmospheric CO(2) concentration (CO(2)]) is currently unknown, and may differ from responses of daytime stomatal conductance (g(s,d)). Because night-time water fluxes can have a significant impact on landscape water budgets, an understanding of the effects of CO(2)] and temperature on g(s,n) is crucial for predicting water fluxes under future climates. Here, we examined the effects of CO(2)] (280, 400 and 640 μmol mol(-1)), temperature (ambient and ambient + 4°C) and drought on g(s,n,) and g(s,d) in Eucalyptus sideroxylon saplings. g(s,n) was substantially higher than zero, averaging 34% of g(s,d). Before the onset of drought, g(s,n) increased by 85% when CO(2)] increased from 280 to 640 μmol mol(-1), averaged across both temperature treatments. g(s,n) declined with drought, but an increase in CO(2)] slowed this decline. Consequently, the soil water potential at which g(s,n) was zero (Ψ(0)) was significantly more negative in elevated CO(2)] and temperature treatments. g(s,d) showed inconsistent responses to CO(2)] and temperature. g (s,n) may be higher in future climates, potentially increasing nocturnal water loss and susceptibility to drought, but cannot be predicted easily from g(s,d). Therefore, predictive models using stomatal conductance must account for both g(s,n) and g(s,d) when estimating ecosystem water fluxes.