Methods in comparative phylogeography, and their application to studying evolution in the north american aridlands

Historical biogeography and comparative phylogeography havemuch in common. Both seek to discover common historical patternsin the elements of biotas, although typically at different tiersof evolutionary history. Comparative phylogeography is basedon phylogeographic analyses of multiple taxa, usually widespreadspecies. By comparing the phylogeographic structures of numerouswidespread sympatric species, one can infer whether the currentfauna has been historically stable, as evidenced by the relativefrequency of geographically congruent reciprocally monophyleticgroups. Alternatively, if species distributions are ephemeralover evolutionary time, a mixture of phylogeographic structuresis expected. Coalescence analyses contribute information abouthistory irrespective of whether haplotype phylogenies are structuredor not. In the aridlands of North America, several isolatingevents are evident in the phylogeographic patterns of birds,mammals and herps. A mid-peninsular seaway in Baja California,dated at ca. one million years before present, had a pervasiveeffect, with 13 of 16 assayed species showing a concordant split.Hence, this community appears to have been a stable assemblageof species over the past one million years. In contrast, theavifauna of the Sonoran-Chihuahuan deserts consists of two specieswith a concordant split and three other species that are undifferentiatedacross both deserts. Hence, the species in this area have haddifferent histories. The Baja biota appears to resemble itsancestral configuration to a greater degree than the Sonoran-Chihuahuanone. A deeper evolutionary event separated taxa in Baja Californiafrom the eastern deserts, showing that the aridlands fauna wasaffected by events at different times resulting in overlaintiers of history.