首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


How LCA studies deal with uncertainty
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Stuart?RossEmail author  David?Evans  Michael?Webber
Institution:(1) School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies (SAGES), University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Victoria, Australia;(2) Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:In recent years many workers have examined the implications of various sources of uncertainty for the reliability of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Indeed, the International Standardization Organization (ISO) has recognised the relevance of this work by including several cautionary statements in the ISO 14040 series of standards. However, in practice, there is a risk that the significance of these uncertainties for the results of an LCA could be overlooked as practitioners strive to complete studies on time and within budget. This paper presents the findings of a survey of LCA studies we made to determine the extent to which the problem of uncertainty had been dealt with in practice. This survey revealed that the significance of the limitations on the reliability of LCA results given in the standards has not been fully appreciated by practitioners. We conclude that the standards need to be revised to ensure that LCA studies include at least a qualitative discussion on all relevant aspects of uncertainty.
Keywords:Data aggregation  data quality  impact assessment  incomplete data  ISO 14040  life cycle assessment  methodology  potential impacts  uncertainty
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号