首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

定期转种法和低温冷冻法保藏致病真菌活性的能力比较
引用本文:张静,鲁莎,李家豪,蔡文莹,张军民,李希清,席丽艳.定期转种法和低温冷冻法保藏致病真菌活性的能力比较[J].菌物学报,2019,38(8):1379-1384.
作者姓名:张静  鲁莎  李家豪  蔡文莹  张军民  李希清  席丽艳
作者单位:中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120;中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院皮肤性病科 广东广州510120
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81671992)
摘    要:定期转种法和低温冷冻保存法是临床实验室最常用的两种真菌保存方法,为比较两种方法保藏致病真菌活性的能力,本研究使用两种保藏方法对实验室689株致病真菌保藏5年后进行检测。定期转种法是将菌落接种于马铃薯斜面培养基并将其储存在4℃冰箱,每6个月转种1次。低温冷冻法是挑取马铃薯斜面培养基上生长良好的菌落于无菌10%甘油中,放置在-80℃储存。保藏5年后,将两种方法保藏的菌株转种复苏,比较菌株的复活率。对于念珠菌属Candida、新生隐球菌Cryptococcus neoformans、毛癣菌属Trichophyton、曲霉属Aspergillus和孢子丝菌属Sporothirix真菌,两种方法的菌株复活率无统计学差异;对于小孢子菌属Microsporum真菌和马尔尼菲蓝状菌Talaromyces marneffei,使用低温冷冻法保藏的菌株复活率高于定期转种法保藏的菌株复活率;对于着色霉属Fonsecaea真菌,低温冷冻法保藏的菌株复活率低于定期转种法保藏的菌株复活率。因此,我们认为对于常见致病真菌的长期保藏,使用10%甘油作为保护剂的低温冷冻法优于定期转种法,但其不适用于着色霉属Fonsecaea真菌的长期保藏。

关 键 词:真菌保藏  转种法  低温冷冻法
收稿时间:2019-06-27

Comparison of periodic subculture and cryopreservation in preserving viabilities of pathogenic fungi
Authors:Jing ZHANG  Sha LU  Jia-Hao LI  Wen-Ying CAI  Jun-Min ZHANG  Xi-Qing LI  Li-Yan XI
Institution:Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China
Abstract:Periodic subculture and cryopreservation are the most usually used methods for fungal storage. To compare the keeping effectiveness of periodic subculture and cryopreservation in preserving pathogenic fungi, 689 strains of five-year preservation using these two methods were detected. Periodic subculture was that cultures on potato dextrose agar were stored in refrigerator at 4°C and subculture was made every 6 months. As for cryopreservation, fungal cultures on potato dextrose agar were stored in freezer at -80°C in tubes containing 1mL sterile 10% glycerol. After 5-year period preservation, the strains were removed and subcultured on potato dextrose agar to detect the survivability. Comparison between the methods of periodic subculture and cryopreservation indicated that the survival rates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Trichophyton spp., Aspergillus spp. and Sporothirix spp. showed no statistical difference. For Microsporum spp. and Talaromyces marneffei, the survival rate of the cultures cryopreserved was higher than that of the cultures periodically subcultured. For Fonsecaea spp., the survival rate of the cultures cryopreserved was lower than that of the cultures periodically subcultured. Therefore, cryopreservation is a better storage method for most fungi isolated in clinic using 10% glycerol as cryoprotectant as compared with periodic subculture. However, cryopreservation is not suitable for Fonsecaea spp.
Keywords:fungal storage  periodic subculture  cryopreservation  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《菌物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《菌物学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号