应用5.8S rDNA及ITS区序列分析链格孢种级分类 |
| |
引用本文: | 王洪凯,张天宇,张猛.应用5.8S rDNA及ITS区序列分析链格孢种级分类[J].菌物学报,2001,20(2):168-173. |
| |
作者姓名: | 王洪凯 张天宇 张猛 |
| |
作者单位: | 山东农业大学植病系;浙江大学生物技术研究所 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家自然科学基金资助项目!(项目号:39770003)&& |
| |
摘 要: | 对9个链格孢小孢子种和3个大孢子种共20个链格孢菌株的5.8S rDNA及其两侧的ITS1区和ITS2区进行了序列分析。聚类分析结果表明形态差异大的种可以明确加以区分,而供试的9个小孢子种之间差异很小,不能根据对所选区段的序列分析加以区分。传统分类上的滨菊链格孢不属于Alternaria, 其分类地位需进一步研究。
|
关 键 词: | 链格孢 序列分析 ITS区 rDNA5.8s段 |
文章编号: | 1007-3515(2001)02-0168-0173 |
修稿时间: | 2000年4月20日 |
APPLICATION OF SEQUENCING OF 5.8S rDNA, ITS1 AND ITS2 ON IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ALTERNARIA AT SEPECIES LEVEL |
| |
Authors: | Wang Hong-Kai Zhang Tian-Yu Zhang Meng |
| |
Institution: | Wang Hong-Kai Zhang Tian-Yu** Zhang Meng |
| |
Abstract: | The sequences coding for the 5.8S rDNA and the flanking internaltranscribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) were amplified by PCR and sequenced from 9 small-spored species and other 3 large-species in Alternaria. Phylogenetic analysis clearly separated the 2 large-spored species from each other and from 9 small-spored species tested, but small-spore species cannot be clearly separated each other. This indicate that small-spored species tested belong to a natural species group. Traditional taxonomic morphologically distinguished species A.leucanthemi may not belong to Alternaria according to sequence analysis, its taxonomic position require further study. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《菌物学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《菌物学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |