Getting into Shape: An Empirical Comparison of Traditional Truss-Based Morphometric Methods with a Newer Geometric Method Applied to New World Cichlids

Body shape is a difficult, but important, trait to quantify. Researchers have traditionally used multivariate analysis of several linear measures ('trusses') across the body form to quantify shape. Newer geometric morphometric methods claim to better estimate shape because they analyze the geometry among the locations of all landmarks simultaneously rather than the linear distances between pairs of landmarks. We tested this claim by comparing the results of several traditional morphometric analyses against a newer geometric analysis involving thin-plate splines (TPS), all applied to a common data set of morphologically variable new world cichlids Amphilophus citrinellus and A. zaliosus. The TPS method yielded slightly stronger evidence of morphological differences among forms, although traditional methods also distinguished the two species. Perhaps our most important result was the idiosyncratic interpretation of shape variation among the traditional truss-based methods, whereas the generation of deformation grids using the TPS approach yielded clear and visually interpretable figures. Our results indicate that geometric morphometrics can be a more effective way to analyze and interpret body form, but also that traditional methods can be relied upon to provide statistical evidence of shape differences, although not necessarily accurate information about the nature of variation in shape.