首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

基于双作物系数法估算不同水分条件下温室番茄蒸发蒸腾量
引用本文:龚雪文,刘浩,孙景生,马筱建,王万宁,崔永生.基于双作物系数法估算不同水分条件下温室番茄蒸发蒸腾量[J].生态学杂志,2017,28(4):1255-1264.
作者姓名:龚雪文  刘浩  孙景生  马筱建  王万宁  崔永生
作者单位:1.中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所/农业部作物需水与调控重点开放实验室, 河南新乡 453003 ;2.中国农业科学院研究生院, 北京 100081
基金项目:本文由国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2011AA100502)、国家自然科学基金项目(51009140)和中央级科研院所基本科研业务费专项(中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所)资助
摘    要:2015—2016年在中国农业科学院新乡综合试验基地,以华北地区典型日光温室滴灌番茄为研究对象,分析2种灌溉水平参考20 cm标准蒸发皿的累积蒸发量(Ep),设置2种灌溉水平(高水: 0.9Ep;低水:0.5Ep)]下番茄不同生育期土壤蒸发(E)、作物蒸腾(T)、蒸发蒸腾(ET)和土壤蒸发占蒸发蒸腾比值(E/ET)的变化,探讨水分亏缺对作物系数(Kc)的影响以及水分胁迫系数(Ks)在全生育期的动态变化.采用双作物系数法分别估算ETET,并与实测结果进行对比分析.结果表明: 2015和2016年全生育期高水处理的E分别比低水处理高21.5%和20.4%, 占总蒸发蒸腾量的24.0%和25.0%,E/ET在生育初期最大、中期最小;高水处理的Kc值在生育初期、发育期、生育中期和生育后期分别为0.45、0.89、1.06和0.93,低水处理下分别为0.45、0.89、0.87和0.41;低水处理的Ks值在0.32~1.0,生育初期、发育期、生育中期和生育后期分别为0.98、0.93、0.78和0.39.双作物系数法可较精确地估算不同水分处理的ET,其平均绝对误差(MAE)为0.36~0.48 mm·d-1,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.44~0.65 mm·d-1;该方法也可精确地估算ET,其MAE分别为0.15~0.19和0.26~0.56 mm·d-1,RMSE分别为0.20~0.24和0.33~0.72 mm·d-1.

关 键 词:日光温室  土壤蒸发  作物蒸腾  作物系数  水分胁迫系数
收稿时间:2016-09-23

Modeling evapotranspiration of greenhouse tomato under different water conditions based on the dual crop coefficient method
GONG Xue-wen,LIU Hao,SUN Jing-sheng,MA Xiao-jian,WANG Wan-ning,CUI Yong-sheng.Modeling evapotranspiration of greenhouse tomato under different water conditions based on the dual crop coefficient method[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2017,28(4):1255-1264.
Authors:GONG Xue-wen  LIU Hao  SUN Jing-sheng  MA Xiao-jian  WANG Wan-ning  CUI Yong-sheng
Institution:1.Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory for Crop Water Requirement and Regulation, Institute of Farmland Irrigation Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China ;2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:An experiment was conducted to investigate soil evaporation (E), crop transpiration (T), evapotranspiration (ET) and the ratio of evaporation to evapotranspiration (E/ET) of drip-irrigated tomato, which was planted in a typical solar greenhouse in the North China, under different water conditions irrigation amount was determined based on accumulated pan evaporation (Ep) of 20 cm pan evaporation, and two treatments were designed with full irrigation (0.9Ep) and deficit irrigation (0.5Ep)] at different growth stages in 2015 and 2016 at Xinxiang Comprehensive Experimental Station, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Effects of deficit irrigation on crop coefficient (Kc) and variation of water stress coefficient (Ks) throughout the growing season were also discussed. E, T and ET of tomato were calculated with a dual crop coefficient approach, and compared with the measured data. Results indicated that E in the full irrigation was 21.5% and 20.4% higher than that in the deficit irrigation in 2015 and 2016, respectively, accounting for 24.0% and 25.0% of ET in the whole growing season. The maximum E/ET was measured in the initial stage of tomato, while the minimum obtained in the middle stage. The Kc the full irrigation was 0.45, 0.89, 1.06 and 0.93 in the initial, development, middle, and late stage of tomato, and 0.45, 0.89, 0.87 and 0.41 the deficit irrigation. The Ks the deficit irrigation was 0.98, 0.93, 0.78 and 0.39 in the initial, development, middle, and late stage, respectively. The dual crop coefficient method could accurately estimate ET of greenhouse tomato under different water conditions in 2015 and 2016 seasons with the mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.36-0.48 mm·d-1, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.44-0.65 mm·d-1. The method also estimated E and T accurately with MAE of 0.15-0.19 and 0.26-0.56 mm·d-1, and with RMSE of 0.20-0.24 and 0.33-0.72 mm·d-1, respectively.
Keywords:solar greenhouse  soil evaporation  crop transpiration  crop coefficient  water stress coefficient
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号