不同施肥处理下水稻根际和非根际土壤中氨基糖积累特征

以水稻长期定位施肥试验土壤为研究对象,选取不施肥(CK)、化肥(NPK)、秸秆还田+化肥(NPKS)、30%有机肥+70%化肥(LOM)和60%有机肥+40%化肥(HOM)5种处理,分析水稻分蘖旺期根际土和非根际土中氨基糖积累特征.结果表明: 与CK和NPK处理相比,长期施用有机物料(NPKS、LOM、HOM)显著增加了水稻根际土和非根际土中有机碳、总氨基糖及其氨基单糖(胞壁酸、氨基葡萄糖和氨基半乳糖)含量.不同施肥处理下3种氨基单糖的积累规律不同,说明不同微生物对施肥处理的响应趋势和强度有所不同.受稻田翻耕等均匀化土壤的农事操作影响,各处理总氨基糖含量在根际土与非根际土间无显著差异.氨基糖碳对土壤有机碳积累的贡献范围为24.0～28.3 mg·g^-1,且以NPKS处理最高,HOM和CK处理最低.真菌氨基葡萄糖/胞壁酸比值范围为24.4～36.6,说明该试验点所有处理的根际土与非根际土中有机质的降解与转化过程以真菌为主导,且与NPK和CK相比,NPKS处理的真菌参与度提高,而施用HOM处理的细菌参与度提高.

Characteristics of amino sugar accumulation in rhizosphere and non rhizosphere soil of rice under different fertilization treatments

Soil samples were collected from paddy ecosystem under five long-term fertilization treatments, including control without fertilizer (CK), chemical fertilization alone (NPK), rice residue combined with NPK (NPKS), 30% manure plus 70% chemical fertilizer (LOM), and 60% manure plus 40% chemical fertilizer (HOM) in Ningxiang City, Hunan Province. The cha-racteristics of amino sugars accumulation in the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils at rice tillering stage were analyzed. Results showed that the contents of soil organic carbon, total amino sugars and three amino monosaccharides (muramic acid, glucosamine and galactosamine) with long-term application of organic materials (rice residue or manure) were significantly higher compared with CK and NPK. The inconsistent accumulation trends of the three amino monosaccharides under different fertilization treatments indicated that different responses of microbial groups to various fertilization treatments. The content of total amino sugars was not significantly different between the rhizosphere soil and the non-rhizosphere soil, probably because the agricultural operations such as plowing could homogenize paddy soils. The contribution of amino sugar derived carbon to soil organic carbon ranged from 24.0 to 28.3 mg·g^-1, which was highest in NPKS, and lowest in HOM and CK. The ratio of fungal to bacterial residues (fungal glucosamine/muramic acid) ranged from 24.4 to 36.6, indicating that fungi dominated the degradation and transformation of organic matter in all the soils. Compared with that under NPK and CK, the participation of organic matter transformation from fungi under NPKS treatment was increased, whereas the bacteria involved in organic matter transformation under HOM treatment was enhanced.