可持续生计框架下连片特困区发展机理——以宁夏限制开发生态区为例

生计资本与农户收支有着密切关系,决定农户的生计策略,影响区域的发展机理与发展模式.基于参与式农村评估和数理统计方法,分民族、地形、农户类型对宁夏限制开发生态区农户生计资本与农户收支状况进行定量评估,创建农户非农性指数,揭示生计资本与农户收支和非农性指数的关系,结合研究区实际对农户可持续生计进行研究,探讨区域发展机理.结果表明: 研究区农户生计资本量整体偏低,其中,回族略高于汉族、川道农户高于山地农户、兼业户和非农业户显著高于农业户;区域发展与非农性指数和人力、物质等资本显著正相关,与自然资本显著负相关,需着力提升农户的非农性指数和人力、物质等资本量,同时引导农户对农业生产资料进行流转,促进自然资本两极分化.

Development mechanism of concentrated poverty areas under the sustainable livelihood: The example of the development restricted ecological district of Ningxia,Northwest China.

Livelihood capital has a close relationship with the income and expenditure of farmers’ households. For example, the survival strategies of farmers’ households are determined by it and it also influences regional development mechanisms and models. Under the analysis framework of sustainable livelihoods, this study evaluated farmers’ livelihood capital, income, and expenditure, based on a participatory rural appraisal and a statistical method, in the development restricted ecological district of Ningxia, decomposed into the nationality, terrain, and type of farmers’ household. Further, by using an index of non-farm business households, the correlations between the livelihood capital and income with the expenditure of farmers’ households and the index of non-farm business households were quantified to understand the mechanism of regional development. The results showed that livelihood capital was generally low in the study area. In particular, the livelihood capital of Hui nationality households was slightly higher than that of Han nationality households, that of river valley households was higher than that of mountain households, and that of combined occupation households and non-farm business households was significantly higher than that of agricultural households. Moreover, there was a significant positive correlation between the net annual income of farmers’ households and the non agricultural index, human capital, physical capital, and financial capital, while a significant negative correlation existed between net annual income and natural capital. These findings suggested that efforts were required to enhance the capacity of the non agricultural index and the human, material, and other capital in the study area. They also served as a guideline for the circulation of peasants’ means of production in order to accelerate the polarization of natural capital.