首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

基于案例的中国森林生态系统服务功能评价
引用本文:冯继广,丁陆彬,王景升,姚萍萍,姚帅臣,王志凯.基于案例的中国森林生态系统服务功能评价[J].生态学杂志,2016,27(5):1375-1382.
作者姓名:冯继广  丁陆彬  王景升  姚萍萍  姚帅臣  王志凯
作者单位:1.中国人民大学环境学院, 北京 100872; ;2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101
基金项目:本文由中国科学院西部行动计划项目(KZCX2-XB3-08-03)和国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2015CB452705)资助
摘    要:基于《森林生态系统服务功能评估规范》(LY/T 1721—2008),搜集得到全国101个案例点的森林生态系统服务功能价值评估数据,并依据价值系数对森林生态系统服务功能进行综合分析.结果表明:中国森林生态系统服务功能单位面积总价值为6.11万元·hm-2,各项服务功能单位面积价值高低排序为涵养水源(2.44万元·hm-2)>保育土壤(1.15万元·hm-2)>生物多样性保护(1.00万元·hm-2)>固碳释氧(0.98万元·hm-2)>净化大气环境(0.28万元·hm-2)>森林游憩(0.23万元·hm-2)>森林防护(0.19万元·hm-2)>积累营养物质(0.16万元·hm-2),其中,涵养水源、保育土壤、生物多样性保护和固碳释氧是中国森林生态系统的主导服务功能.保护区森林生态系统服务功能单位面积价值高于县域,保护区的建立对于生物多样性保护和服务功能的发挥具有促进作用,但其在森林游憩功能上还存在不足,需要进一步提升.不同自然地区森林生态系统的主导服务功能存在差异,各项服务功能在空间上表现出不同的分异特征,其中,华南地区森林生态系统的单位面积总价值最高,为11.36万元·hm-2.服务功能总价值与森林面积、森林蓄积量之间的幂回归相关系数(R2)分别为0.905(P<0.01)、0.860(P<0.01),说明森林面积和蓄积是影响森林生态系统服务功能及其总价值的两个重要因素;此外,纬度和年均降水量都对服务功能单位面积价值存在显著影响.

关 键 词:森林生态系统  服务功能  价值评估  价值系数  自然地理区划
收稿时间:2015-08-10

Case-based evaluation of forest ecosystem service function in China.
FENG Ji-guang,DING Lu-bin,WANG Jing-sheng,YAO Ping-ping,YAO Shuai-chen,WANG Zhi-kai.Case-based evaluation of forest ecosystem service function in China.[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2016,27(5):1375-1382.
Authors:FENG Ji-guang  DING Lu-bin  WANG Jing-sheng  YAO Ping-ping  YAO Shuai-chen  WANG Zhi-kai
Institution:1.School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China; ;2.Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:The data of valuation of forest ecosystem service function (FESF) in 101 primary case studies of China were collected and obtained based on Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services in China (LY/T 1721—2008). FESF was then analyzed synthetically in terms of value coefficient. The results showed that the average value per unit area (VPUA) of FESF in China was 6.11×104 yuan·hm-2, and the order of VPUA of each service function was: water conservation (2.44×104 yuan·hm-2)> soil conservation (1.15×104 yuan·hm-2)> biodiversity conservation (1.00×104 yuan·hm-2)> carbon fixation and oxygen release (0.98×104 yuan·hm-2)> atmosphere environmental purification (0.28×104 yuan·hm-2)> forest recreation (0.23×104 yuan·hm-2)> action of forest against natural calamities (0.19×104 yuan·hm-2)> nutrient accumulation(0.16×104 yuan·hm-2). Water conservation, soil conservation, biodiversity conservation, carbon fixation and oxygen release were the four dominant service functions of forest ecosystem in China. The VPUA of FESF of the reserve level was higher than that of county level. The establishment of reserves played positive roles in biodiversity conservation and enhancement of service function, but the service function of forest recreation still existed with some insufficiency, and it needed to be further improved. Dominant service functions of forest ecosystem varied in different physicographic regions, and each type of service function presented different differentiation characteristics in space. The VPUA of FESF in South China was the highest up to 11.36×104 yuan·hm-2. The power regression correlation coefficients (R2) of the total value of FESF with forest area and forest stock volume were 0.905 (P<0.01) and 0.860 (P<0.01), respectively, indicating that forest area and forest stock volume were the two key factors affecting FESF and its total value. Moreover, latitude and mean annual precipitation also had significant effect on the VPUA of FESF.
Keywords:forest ecosystem  service function  valuation  value coefficient  physiographic regio-nalization  
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号