首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

中国和日本分离的几株流行性出血热病毒的抗原性比较
引用本文:邢峥,宋干,刘为民,郑晓丽,廖化新,傅建林.中国和日本分离的几株流行性出血热病毒的抗原性比较[J].病毒学报,1987(1).
作者姓名:邢峥  宋干  刘为民  郑晓丽  廖化新  傅建林
作者单位:中国预防医学科学院病毒学研究所 (邢峥,宋干,刘为民,廖化新),卫生部长春生物制品研究所 (郑晓丽),中国预防医学科学院病毒学研究所(傅建林)
摘    要:采用间接免疫荧光法(IFA)和ELISA法比较了几株中国和日本流行性出血热病毒(EHFV)的抗原性,IFA法不能区分大鼠属和姬鼠属来源的病毒,ELISA竞争试验表明,大鼠型病毒(R22、SR-11和TR-352株)与姬鼠型病毒(A 9株)存在弱单向交叉反应,交叉ELISA证实,A 9株与R22株、SR-11株和TR-352株均有较显著的抗原性差异,但R22,SR-11和TR-352株彼此间抗原性相近,本文讨论了有关EHFV抗原性比较中的一些问题。

关 键 词:流行性出血热病毒  抗原性比较  大鼠型病毒  姬鼠型病毒

ANTIGENIC COMPARISON OF VIRUSES OF HEMORRHAGIC FEVER WITH RENAL SYNDROME ISOLATED FROM CHINA AND JAPAN
Xing Zheng Song Gan Liu Weimin Zheng Xiaoli Liao Huaxin Fu Jianlin Hang Changsou.ANTIGENIC COMPARISON OF VIRUSES OF HEMORRHAGIC FEVER WITH RENAL SYNDROME ISOLATED FROM CHINA AND JAPAN[J].Chinese Journal of Virology,1987(1).
Authors:Xing Zheng Song Gan Liu Weimin Zheng Xiaoli Liao Huaxin Fu Jianlin Hang Changsou
Abstract:The antigenicity of several viruses of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome ( HFRS ) , isolated in China and Japan, was compared by IFA ELI-SA,etc. IFA failed to discriminate the viruses isolated from Apodemus and Rattus. The ELISA competing test indicated a weak one-way cross reaction between Rattus-borne viruses(SR-11 and TR-352 strains ) and Apodemus-bor-ne virus ( A9 strain) .The antigenicity of A9 strain was strikingly different from that of R22,SR-11 and TR-352 strains by cross ELISA, but the Rattus-borne viruses were similar to each other. Some problems concerning the antigenic analysis of HFRS virus were discussed.
Keywords:Antigenic comparison Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome Apodemus serotype Rattus serotype
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号