首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The scaling of primary flight feather length and mass in relation to wing shape, function and habitat
Authors:ALISTAIR DAWSON
Institution:Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, UK
Abstract:The mass and length of each primary flight feather was measured in 120 species of birds (347 individuals) representing 37 families and 15 orders. The scaling relationship between mass and length was determined using the mass of each primary as a proportion of total primary feather mass for that individual and, similarly, length as a proportion of total length. This eliminated errors due to intra- and interspecific differences in absolute size. In every species there was a highly significant constant scaling relationship (log mass/log length) for all of the primary feathers proximal to the feather that formed the wing tip. This relationship was allometric and varied between 1.80 in Rooks Corvus frugilegus and 4.87 in Winter Wrens Troglodytes troglodytes . The mean scaling relationship for 120 species was 2.41 ± 0.42 sd, which was significantly less ( P  < 0.0001) than isometry (i.e. 3.00). In most species (117 of 120) the primary feather forming the wing tip and all feathers distal to it had a different scaling relationship, and had a greater mass than expected from their length. The greater relative mass of the outer primaries may reflect a protective role against physical abrasion, or an aerodynamic role in that each of these feathers provides a leading edge to the wing. Thus, there were two scaling relationships that pivoted about the feather forming the wing tip, resulting in a characteristic 'signature' for each species. Scaling relationships can be related to flight characteristics and habitat, rather than to phylogeny. Closely related species often had widely varying scaling relationships. In general, species exploiting dense vegetation had greater scaling relationships than more aerial species. However, species with a high scaling relationship did not have a greater mean feather mass, so the increased relative mass of the distal primaries was at the expense of proximal primary feather mass.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号