The plasticity of correspondence: After-effects,illusions and horopter shifts in depth perception

Retinal disparity is the cue for stereoscopic depth perception. Disparity detection begins with cortical single units driven binocularly from the two eyes. A previous paper (Nelson, 1975) has shown that inhibitory and facilitatory interactions are essential to insure successful disparity detection, particularly with repeating stimulus patterns, and that such a system will display all the appropriate properties of sensory fusion. This paper shows that most depth illusions occur as by-products of the same domain interactions. Such illusion effects fall into two classes: those caused by shifts in the distribution of activity along the appropriate sensory domain (here, the disparity domain) and those caused by changes in the average activity level within the domain. Profile shifts cause depth contrast illusions. The most important profile level change is an activity lowering due to disparity domain inhibition. This adversely affects fusional range (Panum's area). It is postulated that all domain interactions persist following cessation of stimulation. Persistent profile shifts cause depth after-effect illusions; persistent profile lowering is responsible for threshold elevation after-effects.Sensory fusion, the coding errors seen in illusions, the induced effect, and widespread failure to perceive depth from disparity input show that retinal correspondence is not stable in the normal individual. Yet horopter research has attempted to specify one set of retinal points as corresponding. Not surprisingly, horopter research shows systematic shifts in retinal correspondence linked to eye position. Small, simple, tonic modulations of the domain interactions responsible for so many other stereopsis system properties provide a satisfactory cortical mechanism for horopter changes.