Checkpoint control in crane-fly spermatocytes: unattached chromosomes induced by cytochalasin D or latrunculin treatment do not prevent or delay the start of anaphase |
| |
Authors: | Arthur Forer Jeremy D Pickett-Heaps |
| |
Institution: | (1) Biology Department, York University, M3J 1P3 Downsview, Ont., Canada;(2) School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria |
| |
Abstract: | Summary Variable numbers of bivalents and sex chromosomes do not attach to the spindle when prophase or early prometaphase cranefly spermatocytes (2n=8) are treated with cytochalasin D or latrunculin. The unattached bivalents lie in the cytoplasm or at the spindle pole, and they do not delay onset of autosomal anaphase; sometimes they disjoin at the same time as the attached bivalents, so they respond to the global signals that initiate anaphase. Unattached sex chromosomes do not delay autosomal anaphase, either. Of various interpretations of these data, we think the best explanation is that the checkpoint system responds to physical rather than chemical cues; we think that the spindle is a tensegral structure, that chromosomes need to interact with the spindle in order to be recognised by the anaphase-onset checkpoint control, and that the physical interaction of chromosomes with spindle acts as a signalling network. Cytochalasin D and latrunculin treatments delay onset of sex chromosome anaphase (which normally occurs about 15 min after autosomal anaphase) and cause altered patterns of sex-chromosome segregation. |
| |
Keywords: | Anaphase-onset checkpoint Cytochalasin Latrunculin Crane-fly spermatocytes Tensegrity |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|