Is there a trade‐off between horn growth and survival in adult female chamois?

Life‐history theory predicts trade‐offs in energy allocation between different life‐history traits when resources are limited, i.e. certain traits should be negatively correlated. However, individuals differ in their ability to acquire resources, which can lead to positive correlations between traits at the population level. Here, we investigated the consequences of the allocation in horn growth and body mass on survival in a bovid (Rupicapra rupicapra) with capture‐mark re‐sighting data on 161 females. In female ungulates, body mass often covaries positively with demographic performance and the few studies on horn size suggest that this trait could be a signal of individual quality. Thus, we expected to measure positive correlations between the allocation in these traits and female survival. However, body mass was not correlated to female survival and there was only a negative, though marginal, effect of horn growth. Hence, it seems that the allocation in growth is not an indicator of female quality. Future studies could investigate the importance of growth on female reproduction to evaluate its effect on lifetime reproductive success. Moreover, it is important to confirm in other populations our result that suggests a cost of the allocation in horn growth to better understand the presence of horns in female bovids. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113 , 516–521.