β‐amyloid model core peptides: Effects of hydrophobes and disulfides

The mechanism by which a disordered peptide nucleates and forms amyloid is incompletely understood. A central domain of β‐amyloid (Aβ21–30) has been proposed to have intrinsic structural propensities that guide the limited formation of structure in the process of fibrillization. In order to test this hypothesis, we examine several internal fragments of Aβ, and variants of these either cyclized or with an N‐terminal Cys. While Aβ21–30 and variants were always monomeric and unstructured (circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS)), we found that the addition of flanking hydrophobic residues in Aβ16–34 led to formation of typical amyloid fibrils. NMR showed no long‐range nuclear overhauser effect (nOes) in Aβ21–30, Aβ16–34, or their variants, however. Serial ¹H‐¹⁵N‐heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy, ¹H‐¹H nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy, and ¹H‐¹H total correlational spectroscopy spectra were used to follow aggregation of Aβ16–34 and Cys‐Aβ16–34 at a site‐specific level. The addition of an N‐terminal Cys residue (in Cys‐Aβ16–34) increased the rate of fibrillization which was attributable to disulfide bond formation. We propose a scheme comparing the aggregation pathways for Aβ16–34 and Cys‐Aβ16–34, according to which Cys‐Aβ16–34 dimerizes, which accelerates fibril formation. In this context, cysteine residues form a focal point that guides fibrillization, a role which, in native peptides, can be assumed by heterogeneous nucleators of aggregation.