Effect of osmotic potential on the growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis and Phialophora spp.

The linear growth of 10 isolates each of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis, G. graminis var. tritici and Phialophora graminicola and five isolates each of G. graminis var. avenae and a lobed-hyphopodiate Phialophora sp. was studied on osmotically adjusted agar at 20 °C. While most isolates of G. graminis var. avenae ceased growing at osmotic potentials of -60 bars (1 bar = 10⁵ Pa), six out of 10 isolates of G. graminis var. tritici grew at that potential. The growth of all isolates of G. graminis var. tritici and var. avenae ceased at -70 bars. In contrast, four out of 10 isolates of P. graminicola grew at -70 bars, but all stopped growing at -80 bars. Most of the isolates of G. graminis var. graminis and the lobed-hyphopodiate Phialophora sp. grew at -70 bars while three out of 10 isolates of G. graminis var. graminis and one out of five isolates of the lobed-hyphopodiate Phialophora sp. were capable of growth at -80 bars. None of the fungi grew at -90 bars. Detailed studies of the growth of two or three isolates each of the five fungi at 10, 20, 30 and 35 °C were carried out on osmotic agar controlled by the addition of either sodium chloride or potassium chloride. In general, similar reductions in growth occurred with decreasing osmotic potential regardless of the solute used. At 10 and 20 °C., all three isolates of P. graminicola showed optimal growth at about -5 bars while the other fungi grew fastest at -1²middot; bars. At 30 °C., one isolate of the lobed hyphopodiate Phialophora sp. and two isolates each of P. graminicola, G. graminis var. tritici and G. graminis var. avenae grew optimally at osmotic potentials of -10 to -15 bars. The other isolate of the Phialophora sp. and two isolates of G. graminis var. graminis studied grew optimally at the highest potential (-1·2 bars). However, at 35 °C the last three fungi exhibited optimal growth at osmotic potentials of-10 to -20 bars. The ecological significance of these results is discussed in relation to cross-protection against the take-all fungi by the avirulent fungi.