Leaf anatomy does not explain apparent short‐term responses of mesophyll conductance to light and CO2 in tobacco

Mesophyll conductance to CO₂ (g_m), a key photosynthetic trait, is strongly constrained by leaf anatomy. Leaf anatomical parameters such as cell wall thickness and chloroplast area exposed to the mesophyll intercellular airspace have been demonstrated to determine g_m in species with diverging phylogeny, leaf structure and ontogeny. However, the potential implication of leaf anatomy, especially chloroplast movement, on the short‐term response of g_m to rapid changes (i.e. seconds to minutes) under different environmental conditions (CO₂, light or temperature) has not been examined. The aim of this study was to determine whether the observed rapid variations of g_m in response to variations of light and CO₂ could be explained by changes in any leaf anatomical arrangements. When compared to high light and ambient CO₂, the values of g_m estimated by chlorophyll fluorescence decreased under high CO₂ and increased at low CO₂, while it decreased with decreasing light. Nevertheless, no changes in anatomical parameters, including chloroplast distribution, were found. Hence, the g_m estimated by analytical models based on anatomical parameters was constant under varying light and CO₂. Considering this discrepancy between anatomy and chlorophyll fluorescence estimates, it is concluded that apparent fast g_m variations should be due to artefacts in its estimation and/or to changes in the biochemical components acting on diffusional properties of the leaf (e.g. aquaporins and carbonic anhydrase).