首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

甘肃兴隆山保护区圈养雄性马麝繁殖性能的行为判别
引用本文:孟秀祥,杨奇森,冯祚建,冯金朝,周宜君,徐宏发.甘肃兴隆山保护区圈养雄性马麝繁殖性能的行为判别[J].动物学研究,2007,28(2):149-154.
作者姓名:孟秀祥  杨奇森  冯祚建  冯金朝  周宜君  徐宏发
作者单位:1. 中央民族大学,生命与环境科学学院,北京,100081;中国科学院动物研究所,北京,100080;华东师范大学,生命科学学院,上海,200062
2. 中国科学院动物研究所,北京,100080
3. 中央民族大学,生命与环境科学学院,北京,100081
4. 华东师范大学,生命科学学院,上海,200062
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(30500060,30540055),中央民族大学“985工程项目”(CUN985-03-03)
摘    要:2000年6月至2001年2月,采用焦点取样连续记录方法,对甘肃兴隆山自然保护区马麝(Moschus sifanicus)繁育中心的雄性马麝进行了行为取样。按马麝爬胯结果,将样本动物区分为爬胯成功雄麝和爬胯失败雄麝,并对两类群雄麝在非交配季节(6—10月)和交配季节(11月—翌年1月)的行为格局分别进行了比较分析。结果表明,在单位取样时间(5min)内,爬胯成功雄麝在非交配季节的摄食行为持续时间显著少于爬胯失败雄麝,而静卧和蹭尾行为的持续时间显著多于爬胯失败雄麝。爬胯成功雄麝在交配季节的静卧时间显著少于爬胯失败雄麝,而攻击行为、蹭尾及粪尿标记的持续时间显著多于爬胯失败雄麝。根据以上结果,在麝类迁地保护和驯养实践中,雄性马麝的静卧和蹭尾行为(尤其是蹭尾)可以作为其爬胯成功度及繁殖性能的行为判别指标。这为马麝驯养实践,尤其是在提高配种雄麝选取的直观性及可操作性方面提供了量化行为参数。

关 键 词:圈养  马麝  雄性  爬胯  行为比较
文章编号:0254-5853(2007)02-0149-06
收稿时间:2006-11-12
修稿时间:2006-11-122007-02-05

The Behaviours Differentiating the Reproductive Capacity of Male Captive Alpine Musk Deer
MENG Xiu-xiang,YANG Qi-sen,FENG Zuo-jian,FENG Jin-chao,ZHOU Yi-jun,XU Hong-fa.The Behaviours Differentiating the Reproductive Capacity of Male Captive Alpine Musk Deer[J].Zoological Research,2007,28(2):149-154.
Authors:MENG Xiu-xiang  YANG Qi-sen  FENG Zuo-jian  FENG Jin-chao  ZHOU Yi-jun  XU Hong-fa
Institution:1. College of Life and Environment Sciences, Central University for Nationalities, Beijing 100081, China; 2. China Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China ; 3. College of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Abstract:From June 2000 to February 2001, focal sampling and occurrence recording were used to quantify the behavioural patterns of captive male alpine musk deer (Moschus sifanicus) at Xinglongshan Musk Deer Farm in Gansu Province, northwest China. The behavioural patterns of unsuccessfully mounting males (UM) and successfully mounting males (SM) were compared to identify behavioural differences. The results showed that, in the non-mating season (Aug. to Oct.), SM foraged significantly less than UM, and bedding and tail rubbing behaviour of the former were significantly more frequent than those of the latter. In the mating season (Nov. to Jan.), the bedding behaviour of SM was less than that of UM. However, conflict behavior, tail rubbing and urinating/defecating of SM were all significantly higher than those of UM. This research showed that bedding behavior and tail rubbing behavior were significantly different between SM and UM during the mating and non-mating seasons. These behaviours, especially tail rubbing, could be used as behavioral indicators to differentiate the reproductive performance of captive male musk deer. Using this method, males with high frequency of tail rubbing could be chosen as the mating males, improving the pregnancy rate of female musk deer, and reducing the cost of the musk deer farming.
Keywords:In captivity  Alpine musk deer (Moschus sifanicus)  Male  Mounting  Behavioral comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《动物学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《动物学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号